Prove that n squared is less than or equal to 2 to the n by induction. [duplicate] Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.Proof that $n^2 < 2^n$Prove that $n^k < 2^n$ for all large enough $n$Induction proof $n^2 < 2^n$ for $n > 4$Prove by induction that $2^n > n^2$Proof by induction: $ 2^n ge n^2$ for $nge4$Please prove that $nchoose r < (n+1)^r$. My induction-based proof is ugly!Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.Prove that $n^2 > n+1 quadforall n geq 2$ using mathematical inductionprove inequality by induction — Discrete mathProve: $ 1times3 +2times4 + cdots + n(n+2) = frac16 times n(n+1)(2n+7)$ using InductionProve by induction that $a_n+1 = a_n + a_n$Induction proof that a square of a sum is less than a halfProve Big-Oh using InductionInduction Proof: Prove that if $|N(w)| = 3^k$ for $kgeq 0$, then $N(w) = (-3)^k$.Given $x_1 := sqrt2$ and $x_n+1 :=sqrt2x_n $, prove $sqrt2 ≤ x_n ≤ 2$
Why am I getting the error "non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected" for this request?
2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?
Extract all GPU name, model and GPU ram
When were vectors invented?
Error "illegal generic type for instanceof" when using local classes
Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics
porting install scripts : can rpm replace apt?
Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?
How does the particle を relate to the verb 行く in the structure「A を + B に行く」?
Apollo command module space walk?
How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?
If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?
Why did the Falcon Heavy center core fall off the ASDS OCISLY barge?
What does the "x" in "x86" represent?
What exactly is a "Meth" in Altered Carbon?
Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
What is Arya's weapon design?
How to tell that you are a giant?
How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?
Coloring maths inside a tcolorbox
Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?
What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?
ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order
Prove that n squared is less than or equal to 2 to the n by induction. [duplicate]
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.Proof that $n^2 < 2^n$Prove that $n^k < 2^n$ for all large enough $n$Induction proof $n^2 < 2^n$ for $n > 4$Prove by induction that $2^n > n^2$Proof by induction: $ 2^n ge n^2$ for $nge4$Please prove that $nchoose r < (n+1)^r$. My induction-based proof is ugly!Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.Prove that $n^2 > n+1 quadforall n geq 2$ using mathematical inductionprove inequality by induction — Discrete mathProve: $ 1times3 +2times4 + cdots + n(n+2) = frac16 times n(n+1)(2n+7)$ using InductionProve by induction that $a_n+1 = a_n + a_n$Induction proof that a square of a sum is less than a halfProve Big-Oh using InductionInduction Proof: Prove that if $|N(w)| = 3^k$ for $kgeq 0$, then $N(w) = (-3)^k$.Given $x_1 := sqrt2$ and $x_n+1 :=sqrt2x_n $, prove $sqrt2 ≤ x_n ≤ 2$
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.
4 answers
I've been asked to prove by induction that $n^2leq 2^n$, and told it is true $ forall nin mathbbN,n>3$
I think I have found the right way to the proof, but I'm not sure since I get stuck half-way there. What I did was taking a base case of $n=4$ and tested it, and it resulted to be true. Then I assumed it would be true for some number $k$, such that $n=k$ and $k^2leq 2^k$, and attempted to prove
$(k+1)^2 leq 2^k+1$
And this is how I attempted to prove this. First of all, I started with my assumption.
$=k^2leq 2^k$
$=2k^2leq2^k+1$
Then I tried to prove that $(k+1)^2 leq 2k^2$, for this would imply my thesis, i.e. $(k+1)^2leq2^k+1$. So I went forth on my effort:
$(k+1)^2≤2k^2$
$=k^2+2k+1leq2k^2$
$=2k+1leq k^2$
(By assumption)
$=2k+1leq 2^k$
Now that I simplified it, I need to prove this is true; this is, prove that $(k+1)^2 leq 2k^2$. So I take a base case of $n=4$ and in deed it satisfies the inequality. So I assume it is true for some number $j, k=j$ and try to prove it. Nevertheless I have failed in trying to prove this, I don't really know if my steps so far are right or wrong. Is my reasoning okay? And if its, how can I prove $2k+1leq 2^k$? Thank you in advance.
discrete-mathematics proof-verification inequality proof-writing induction
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by dantopa, Cesareo, Lee David Chung Lin, Eevee Trainer, Leucippus Mar 27 at 4:57
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.
4 answers
I've been asked to prove by induction that $n^2leq 2^n$, and told it is true $ forall nin mathbbN,n>3$
I think I have found the right way to the proof, but I'm not sure since I get stuck half-way there. What I did was taking a base case of $n=4$ and tested it, and it resulted to be true. Then I assumed it would be true for some number $k$, such that $n=k$ and $k^2leq 2^k$, and attempted to prove
$(k+1)^2 leq 2^k+1$
And this is how I attempted to prove this. First of all, I started with my assumption.
$=k^2leq 2^k$
$=2k^2leq2^k+1$
Then I tried to prove that $(k+1)^2 leq 2k^2$, for this would imply my thesis, i.e. $(k+1)^2leq2^k+1$. So I went forth on my effort:
$(k+1)^2≤2k^2$
$=k^2+2k+1leq2k^2$
$=2k+1leq k^2$
(By assumption)
$=2k+1leq 2^k$
Now that I simplified it, I need to prove this is true; this is, prove that $(k+1)^2 leq 2k^2$. So I take a base case of $n=4$ and in deed it satisfies the inequality. So I assume it is true for some number $j, k=j$ and try to prove it. Nevertheless I have failed in trying to prove this, I don't really know if my steps so far are right or wrong. Is my reasoning okay? And if its, how can I prove $2k+1leq 2^k$? Thank you in advance.
discrete-mathematics proof-verification inequality proof-writing induction
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by dantopa, Cesareo, Lee David Chung Lin, Eevee Trainer, Leucippus Mar 27 at 4:57
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
$begingroup$
This question has been asked so many times already. Please make an attempt to search for the problem. math.stackexchange.com/questions/319913/proof-that-n2-2n/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/876127/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1489889/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/439026/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
When you realize that you must prove $2k + 1<k^2$ !!!! DONT !!! go back to your assumption to prove $2k+1 < 2^k$. For one thing proving $2k + 1< 2^k$ won't prove $k^2 < 2k + 1 < 2^k$ is impossible, but more importantly, you got here via the assumption. Going back will be circular. You have gotten to the "practical world" where proving $2k+1< k^2$ is your direct way of proving your proposition. So prove it directly. Prove $2k + 1 < k^2$. That should be easy.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:37
$begingroup$
... for one thing $k^2 -2k - 1= k^2 - 2k + 1 - 2=(k-1)^2 - 2ge 3^2 -2 = 7 > 0$ so $k^2 > 2k + 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.
4 answers
I've been asked to prove by induction that $n^2leq 2^n$, and told it is true $ forall nin mathbbN,n>3$
I think I have found the right way to the proof, but I'm not sure since I get stuck half-way there. What I did was taking a base case of $n=4$ and tested it, and it resulted to be true. Then I assumed it would be true for some number $k$, such that $n=k$ and $k^2leq 2^k$, and attempted to prove
$(k+1)^2 leq 2^k+1$
And this is how I attempted to prove this. First of all, I started with my assumption.
$=k^2leq 2^k$
$=2k^2leq2^k+1$
Then I tried to prove that $(k+1)^2 leq 2k^2$, for this would imply my thesis, i.e. $(k+1)^2leq2^k+1$. So I went forth on my effort:
$(k+1)^2≤2k^2$
$=k^2+2k+1leq2k^2$
$=2k+1leq k^2$
(By assumption)
$=2k+1leq 2^k$
Now that I simplified it, I need to prove this is true; this is, prove that $(k+1)^2 leq 2k^2$. So I take a base case of $n=4$ and in deed it satisfies the inequality. So I assume it is true for some number $j, k=j$ and try to prove it. Nevertheless I have failed in trying to prove this, I don't really know if my steps so far are right or wrong. Is my reasoning okay? And if its, how can I prove $2k+1leq 2^k$? Thank you in advance.
discrete-mathematics proof-verification inequality proof-writing induction
$endgroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.
4 answers
I've been asked to prove by induction that $n^2leq 2^n$, and told it is true $ forall nin mathbbN,n>3$
I think I have found the right way to the proof, but I'm not sure since I get stuck half-way there. What I did was taking a base case of $n=4$ and tested it, and it resulted to be true. Then I assumed it would be true for some number $k$, such that $n=k$ and $k^2leq 2^k$, and attempted to prove
$(k+1)^2 leq 2^k+1$
And this is how I attempted to prove this. First of all, I started with my assumption.
$=k^2leq 2^k$
$=2k^2leq2^k+1$
Then I tried to prove that $(k+1)^2 leq 2k^2$, for this would imply my thesis, i.e. $(k+1)^2leq2^k+1$. So I went forth on my effort:
$(k+1)^2≤2k^2$
$=k^2+2k+1leq2k^2$
$=2k+1leq k^2$
(By assumption)
$=2k+1leq 2^k$
Now that I simplified it, I need to prove this is true; this is, prove that $(k+1)^2 leq 2k^2$. So I take a base case of $n=4$ and in deed it satisfies the inequality. So I assume it is true for some number $j, k=j$ and try to prove it. Nevertheless I have failed in trying to prove this, I don't really know if my steps so far are right or wrong. Is my reasoning okay? And if its, how can I prove $2k+1leq 2^k$? Thank you in advance.
This question already has an answer here:
Proof of $n^2 leq 2^n$.
4 answers
discrete-mathematics proof-verification inequality proof-writing induction
discrete-mathematics proof-verification inequality proof-writing induction
edited Mar 26 at 17:27
Martin Hansen
975115
975115
asked Mar 26 at 17:12
AngelusSilesiusAngelusSilesius
495
495
marked as duplicate by dantopa, Cesareo, Lee David Chung Lin, Eevee Trainer, Leucippus Mar 27 at 4:57
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by dantopa, Cesareo, Lee David Chung Lin, Eevee Trainer, Leucippus Mar 27 at 4:57
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
$begingroup$
This question has been asked so many times already. Please make an attempt to search for the problem. math.stackexchange.com/questions/319913/proof-that-n2-2n/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/876127/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1489889/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/439026/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
When you realize that you must prove $2k + 1<k^2$ !!!! DONT !!! go back to your assumption to prove $2k+1 < 2^k$. For one thing proving $2k + 1< 2^k$ won't prove $k^2 < 2k + 1 < 2^k$ is impossible, but more importantly, you got here via the assumption. Going back will be circular. You have gotten to the "practical world" where proving $2k+1< k^2$ is your direct way of proving your proposition. So prove it directly. Prove $2k + 1 < k^2$. That should be easy.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:37
$begingroup$
... for one thing $k^2 -2k - 1= k^2 - 2k + 1 - 2=(k-1)^2 - 2ge 3^2 -2 = 7 > 0$ so $k^2 > 2k + 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question has been asked so many times already. Please make an attempt to search for the problem. math.stackexchange.com/questions/319913/proof-that-n2-2n/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/876127/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1489889/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/439026/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
When you realize that you must prove $2k + 1<k^2$ !!!! DONT !!! go back to your assumption to prove $2k+1 < 2^k$. For one thing proving $2k + 1< 2^k$ won't prove $k^2 < 2k + 1 < 2^k$ is impossible, but more importantly, you got here via the assumption. Going back will be circular. You have gotten to the "practical world" where proving $2k+1< k^2$ is your direct way of proving your proposition. So prove it directly. Prove $2k + 1 < k^2$. That should be easy.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:37
$begingroup$
... for one thing $k^2 -2k - 1= k^2 - 2k + 1 - 2=(k-1)^2 - 2ge 3^2 -2 = 7 > 0$ so $k^2 > 2k + 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:43
$begingroup$
This question has been asked so many times already. Please make an attempt to search for the problem. math.stackexchange.com/questions/319913/proof-that-n2-2n/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
This question has been asked so many times already. Please make an attempt to search for the problem. math.stackexchange.com/questions/319913/proof-that-n2-2n/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/876127/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1489889/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/439026/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/876127/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1489889/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/439026/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
When you realize that you must prove $2k + 1<k^2$ !!!! DONT !!! go back to your assumption to prove $2k+1 < 2^k$. For one thing proving $2k + 1< 2^k$ won't prove $k^2 < 2k + 1 < 2^k$ is impossible, but more importantly, you got here via the assumption. Going back will be circular. You have gotten to the "practical world" where proving $2k+1< k^2$ is your direct way of proving your proposition. So prove it directly. Prove $2k + 1 < k^2$. That should be easy.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:37
$begingroup$
When you realize that you must prove $2k + 1<k^2$ !!!! DONT !!! go back to your assumption to prove $2k+1 < 2^k$. For one thing proving $2k + 1< 2^k$ won't prove $k^2 < 2k + 1 < 2^k$ is impossible, but more importantly, you got here via the assumption. Going back will be circular. You have gotten to the "practical world" where proving $2k+1< k^2$ is your direct way of proving your proposition. So prove it directly. Prove $2k + 1 < k^2$. That should be easy.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:37
$begingroup$
... for one thing $k^2 -2k - 1= k^2 - 2k + 1 - 2=(k-1)^2 - 2ge 3^2 -2 = 7 > 0$ so $k^2 > 2k + 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:43
$begingroup$
... for one thing $k^2 -2k - 1= k^2 - 2k + 1 - 2=(k-1)^2 - 2ge 3^2 -2 = 7 > 0$ so $k^2 > 2k + 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You need to prove $2k + 1 le k^2$.
Do it this way: $1 < k$ so $2k + 1 < 2k + k = 3k$. And $3 < k$ so $3k < k^2$.
So to put it together:
Induction step:
If $k^2 < 2^k; k > 3$ then
$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 < $
$k^2 + 2k + k = k^2 + 3k < $
$k^2 + k*k = 2k^2 < $
$2*2^k = 2^k+1$.
.....
.... or simply note...
$2k + 1 < k^2 iff$
$1 < k^2 - 2k iff$
$2 < k^2 - 2k + 1 = (k-1)^2$.
And $k-1 ge 3$ the $(k-1)^2 ge 9 > 2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Such a neat reasoning, I feel silly I couldn't do this myself, haha. Excelent, @fleablood, I appreciate the fact that you took the trouble to answer my question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
Mar 26 at 19:30
$begingroup$
The last line in the first part should probably read $2*2^k colorred= 2^k+1.$
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
Mar 26 at 20:36
$begingroup$
ooppps.........
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 21:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You need to prove $2k + 1 le k^2$.
Do it this way: $1 < k$ so $2k + 1 < 2k + k = 3k$. And $3 < k$ so $3k < k^2$.
So to put it together:
Induction step:
If $k^2 < 2^k; k > 3$ then
$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 < $
$k^2 + 2k + k = k^2 + 3k < $
$k^2 + k*k = 2k^2 < $
$2*2^k = 2^k+1$.
.....
.... or simply note...
$2k + 1 < k^2 iff$
$1 < k^2 - 2k iff$
$2 < k^2 - 2k + 1 = (k-1)^2$.
And $k-1 ge 3$ the $(k-1)^2 ge 9 > 2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Such a neat reasoning, I feel silly I couldn't do this myself, haha. Excelent, @fleablood, I appreciate the fact that you took the trouble to answer my question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
Mar 26 at 19:30
$begingroup$
The last line in the first part should probably read $2*2^k colorred= 2^k+1.$
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
Mar 26 at 20:36
$begingroup$
ooppps.........
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 21:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to prove $2k + 1 le k^2$.
Do it this way: $1 < k$ so $2k + 1 < 2k + k = 3k$. And $3 < k$ so $3k < k^2$.
So to put it together:
Induction step:
If $k^2 < 2^k; k > 3$ then
$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 < $
$k^2 + 2k + k = k^2 + 3k < $
$k^2 + k*k = 2k^2 < $
$2*2^k = 2^k+1$.
.....
.... or simply note...
$2k + 1 < k^2 iff$
$1 < k^2 - 2k iff$
$2 < k^2 - 2k + 1 = (k-1)^2$.
And $k-1 ge 3$ the $(k-1)^2 ge 9 > 2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Such a neat reasoning, I feel silly I couldn't do this myself, haha. Excelent, @fleablood, I appreciate the fact that you took the trouble to answer my question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
Mar 26 at 19:30
$begingroup$
The last line in the first part should probably read $2*2^k colorred= 2^k+1.$
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
Mar 26 at 20:36
$begingroup$
ooppps.........
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 21:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to prove $2k + 1 le k^2$.
Do it this way: $1 < k$ so $2k + 1 < 2k + k = 3k$. And $3 < k$ so $3k < k^2$.
So to put it together:
Induction step:
If $k^2 < 2^k; k > 3$ then
$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 < $
$k^2 + 2k + k = k^2 + 3k < $
$k^2 + k*k = 2k^2 < $
$2*2^k = 2^k+1$.
.....
.... or simply note...
$2k + 1 < k^2 iff$
$1 < k^2 - 2k iff$
$2 < k^2 - 2k + 1 = (k-1)^2$.
And $k-1 ge 3$ the $(k-1)^2 ge 9 > 2$.
$endgroup$
You need to prove $2k + 1 le k^2$.
Do it this way: $1 < k$ so $2k + 1 < 2k + k = 3k$. And $3 < k$ so $3k < k^2$.
So to put it together:
Induction step:
If $k^2 < 2^k; k > 3$ then
$(k+1)^2 = k^2 + 2k + 1 < $
$k^2 + 2k + k = k^2 + 3k < $
$k^2 + k*k = 2k^2 < $
$2*2^k = 2^k+1$.
.....
.... or simply note...
$2k + 1 < k^2 iff$
$1 < k^2 - 2k iff$
$2 < k^2 - 2k + 1 = (k-1)^2$.
And $k-1 ge 3$ the $(k-1)^2 ge 9 > 2$.
edited Mar 26 at 21:09
answered Mar 26 at 17:29
fleabloodfleablood
1
1
$begingroup$
Such a neat reasoning, I feel silly I couldn't do this myself, haha. Excelent, @fleablood, I appreciate the fact that you took the trouble to answer my question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
Mar 26 at 19:30
$begingroup$
The last line in the first part should probably read $2*2^k colorred= 2^k+1.$
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
Mar 26 at 20:36
$begingroup$
ooppps.........
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 21:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Such a neat reasoning, I feel silly I couldn't do this myself, haha. Excelent, @fleablood, I appreciate the fact that you took the trouble to answer my question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
Mar 26 at 19:30
$begingroup$
The last line in the first part should probably read $2*2^k colorred= 2^k+1.$
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
Mar 26 at 20:36
$begingroup$
ooppps.........
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 21:08
$begingroup$
Such a neat reasoning, I feel silly I couldn't do this myself, haha. Excelent, @fleablood, I appreciate the fact that you took the trouble to answer my question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
Mar 26 at 19:30
$begingroup$
Such a neat reasoning, I feel silly I couldn't do this myself, haha. Excelent, @fleablood, I appreciate the fact that you took the trouble to answer my question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
Mar 26 at 19:30
$begingroup$
The last line in the first part should probably read $2*2^k colorred= 2^k+1.$
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
Mar 26 at 20:36
$begingroup$
The last line in the first part should probably read $2*2^k colorred= 2^k+1.$
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
Mar 26 at 20:36
$begingroup$
ooppps.........
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 21:08
$begingroup$
ooppps.........
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 21:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question has been asked so many times already. Please make an attempt to search for the problem. math.stackexchange.com/questions/319913/proof-that-n2-2n/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/263825/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/876127/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/1489889/…, math.stackexchange.com/questions/439026/…
$endgroup$
– JavaMan
Mar 26 at 17:30
$begingroup$
When you realize that you must prove $2k + 1<k^2$ !!!! DONT !!! go back to your assumption to prove $2k+1 < 2^k$. For one thing proving $2k + 1< 2^k$ won't prove $k^2 < 2k + 1 < 2^k$ is impossible, but more importantly, you got here via the assumption. Going back will be circular. You have gotten to the "practical world" where proving $2k+1< k^2$ is your direct way of proving your proposition. So prove it directly. Prove $2k + 1 < k^2$. That should be easy.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:37
$begingroup$
... for one thing $k^2 -2k - 1= k^2 - 2k + 1 - 2=(k-1)^2 - 2ge 3^2 -2 = 7 > 0$ so $k^2 > 2k + 1$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 26 at 17:43