Proving that the composition of relations are equal to each other Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)When is the composition of partial orders a partial order?About binary relations under certain conditions and their compositionComposite Relations - Give Examples of relations $R_1$ and $R_2$ such that $R_2 circ R_1 = R_1 circ R_2$ and $R_2 circ R_1 neq R_1 circ R_2$Suppose that R and S are reflexive relations on a set A. Prove or disprove each of these statements.Suppose R and S are relations $subseteq Atimes B$Let $Q$ be the symmetric closure of $R$, and let $S$ be the transitive closure of $Q$. Prove that $S$ is the symmetric transitive closure of $R$.Notation for the composition of functions and relations.Symmetricity of composition of equivalence relationsWhy equality of relations is defined like that?Correct definition of composite relations?

What is Wonderstone and are there any references to it pre-1982?

Why light coming from distant stars is not discreet?

Dating a Former Employee

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

Can inflation occur in a positive-sum game currency system such as the Stack Exchange reputation system?

What does this icon in iOS Stardew Valley mean?

When do you get frequent flier miles - when you buy, or when you fly?

Check which numbers satisfy the condition [A*B*C = A! + B! + C!]

Why is my conclusion inconsistent with the van't Hoff equation?

Error "illegal generic type for instanceof" when using local classes

Naming the result of a source block

Can I cast Passwall to drop an enemy into a 20-foot pit?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Single word antonym of "flightless"

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

What's the purpose of writing one's academic biography in the third person?

What exactly is a "Meth" in Altered Carbon?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

51k Euros annually for a family of 4 in Berlin: Is it enough?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Why am I getting the error "non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected" for this request?



Proving that the composition of relations are equal to each other



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)When is the composition of partial orders a partial order?About binary relations under certain conditions and their compositionComposite Relations - Give Examples of relations $R_1$ and $R_2$ such that $R_2 circ R_1 = R_1 circ R_2$ and $R_2 circ R_1 neq R_1 circ R_2$Suppose that R and S are reflexive relations on a set A. Prove or disprove each of these statements.Suppose R and S are relations $subseteq Atimes B$Let $Q$ be the symmetric closure of $R$, and let $S$ be the transitive closure of $Q$. Prove that $S$ is the symmetric transitive closure of $R$.Notation for the composition of functions and relations.Symmetricity of composition of equivalence relationsWhy equality of relations is defined like that?Correct definition of composite relations?










1












$begingroup$


Please excuse my English if it's not understandable, exercises are translated so I don't know all the English terms in math.
So I'm doing exercises regarding relations and compositions, and one of the exercises is:





Suppose $Rsubseteq Atimes B$, $Ssubseteq Btimes C$ and $Tsubseteq Ctimes D$. Which of the following statements are true?



  1. $(Scirc R)^-1=R^-1circ S^-1$

  2. $Scirc R=R^-1circ S^-1$

  3. $Scirc R=(Rcirc S)^-1$

  4. $(Tcirc S)circ R=Tcirc (Scirc R)$




The answer to 1.:




To prove 1., suppose $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$. Then, by definition of the inverse relation, $(a,c)in (Scirc R)$. By the definition of the composite relation, there exists $bin B$ such that $(a,b)in R$ and $(b,c)in S$. This of course means $(c,b)in S^-1$ and $(b,a)in R^-1$. Applying the definition of the composite relation again, we find $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$. Thus, $(Scirc R)subseteq R^-1circ S^-1$. Similar arguments show $R^-1circ S^-1subseteq (Scirc R)$ and the result follows.




Note that this is not my answer. I just don't understand how I can come to this conclusion. Our lecturer hasn't covered how to prove these kind of calcualtions.
Can someone please explain to me the approach to these kind of exercises?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Please excuse my English if it's not understandable, exercises are translated so I don't know all the English terms in math.
    So I'm doing exercises regarding relations and compositions, and one of the exercises is:





    Suppose $Rsubseteq Atimes B$, $Ssubseteq Btimes C$ and $Tsubseteq Ctimes D$. Which of the following statements are true?



    1. $(Scirc R)^-1=R^-1circ S^-1$

    2. $Scirc R=R^-1circ S^-1$

    3. $Scirc R=(Rcirc S)^-1$

    4. $(Tcirc S)circ R=Tcirc (Scirc R)$




    The answer to 1.:




    To prove 1., suppose $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$. Then, by definition of the inverse relation, $(a,c)in (Scirc R)$. By the definition of the composite relation, there exists $bin B$ such that $(a,b)in R$ and $(b,c)in S$. This of course means $(c,b)in S^-1$ and $(b,a)in R^-1$. Applying the definition of the composite relation again, we find $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$. Thus, $(Scirc R)subseteq R^-1circ S^-1$. Similar arguments show $R^-1circ S^-1subseteq (Scirc R)$ and the result follows.




    Note that this is not my answer. I just don't understand how I can come to this conclusion. Our lecturer hasn't covered how to prove these kind of calcualtions.
    Can someone please explain to me the approach to these kind of exercises?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Please excuse my English if it's not understandable, exercises are translated so I don't know all the English terms in math.
      So I'm doing exercises regarding relations and compositions, and one of the exercises is:





      Suppose $Rsubseteq Atimes B$, $Ssubseteq Btimes C$ and $Tsubseteq Ctimes D$. Which of the following statements are true?



      1. $(Scirc R)^-1=R^-1circ S^-1$

      2. $Scirc R=R^-1circ S^-1$

      3. $Scirc R=(Rcirc S)^-1$

      4. $(Tcirc S)circ R=Tcirc (Scirc R)$




      The answer to 1.:




      To prove 1., suppose $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$. Then, by definition of the inverse relation, $(a,c)in (Scirc R)$. By the definition of the composite relation, there exists $bin B$ such that $(a,b)in R$ and $(b,c)in S$. This of course means $(c,b)in S^-1$ and $(b,a)in R^-1$. Applying the definition of the composite relation again, we find $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$. Thus, $(Scirc R)subseteq R^-1circ S^-1$. Similar arguments show $R^-1circ S^-1subseteq (Scirc R)$ and the result follows.




      Note that this is not my answer. I just don't understand how I can come to this conclusion. Our lecturer hasn't covered how to prove these kind of calcualtions.
      Can someone please explain to me the approach to these kind of exercises?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Please excuse my English if it's not understandable, exercises are translated so I don't know all the English terms in math.
      So I'm doing exercises regarding relations and compositions, and one of the exercises is:





      Suppose $Rsubseteq Atimes B$, $Ssubseteq Btimes C$ and $Tsubseteq Ctimes D$. Which of the following statements are true?



      1. $(Scirc R)^-1=R^-1circ S^-1$

      2. $Scirc R=R^-1circ S^-1$

      3. $Scirc R=(Rcirc S)^-1$

      4. $(Tcirc S)circ R=Tcirc (Scirc R)$




      The answer to 1.:




      To prove 1., suppose $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$. Then, by definition of the inverse relation, $(a,c)in (Scirc R)$. By the definition of the composite relation, there exists $bin B$ such that $(a,b)in R$ and $(b,c)in S$. This of course means $(c,b)in S^-1$ and $(b,a)in R^-1$. Applying the definition of the composite relation again, we find $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$. Thus, $(Scirc R)subseteq R^-1circ S^-1$. Similar arguments show $R^-1circ S^-1subseteq (Scirc R)$ and the result follows.




      Note that this is not my answer. I just don't understand how I can come to this conclusion. Our lecturer hasn't covered how to prove these kind of calcualtions.
      Can someone please explain to me the approach to these kind of exercises?







      discrete-mathematics relations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 26 at 18:44









      st.math

      1,268115




      1,268115










      asked Mar 26 at 17:53









      bendikbpbendikbp

      62




      62




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Note that to show that two sets are equal (relations are sets), e.g. $A=B$, then it has to be true that $Asubseteq B$ and $Bsubseteq A$. Now, if you want to show that $Asubseteq B$, you have to prove that the implication $$xin Aimplies xin B$$ is true (similar for $Bsubseteq A$).



          This is what the solution of the first question does. It takes an arbitrary element $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$ and then concludes by properties of (inverse) relations and by using the definition of relations, that $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$ is also true.



          The basic properties to use here are:



          • $(a,b)in Siff(b,a)in S^-1$

          • $(a,c)in Scirc Riffexists_bin B,(a,b)in Rland (b,c)in S$





          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163526%2fproving-that-the-composition-of-relations-are-equal-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Note that to show that two sets are equal (relations are sets), e.g. $A=B$, then it has to be true that $Asubseteq B$ and $Bsubseteq A$. Now, if you want to show that $Asubseteq B$, you have to prove that the implication $$xin Aimplies xin B$$ is true (similar for $Bsubseteq A$).



            This is what the solution of the first question does. It takes an arbitrary element $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$ and then concludes by properties of (inverse) relations and by using the definition of relations, that $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$ is also true.



            The basic properties to use here are:



            • $(a,b)in Siff(b,a)in S^-1$

            • $(a,c)in Scirc Riffexists_bin B,(a,b)in Rland (b,c)in S$





            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              Note that to show that two sets are equal (relations are sets), e.g. $A=B$, then it has to be true that $Asubseteq B$ and $Bsubseteq A$. Now, if you want to show that $Asubseteq B$, you have to prove that the implication $$xin Aimplies xin B$$ is true (similar for $Bsubseteq A$).



              This is what the solution of the first question does. It takes an arbitrary element $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$ and then concludes by properties of (inverse) relations and by using the definition of relations, that $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$ is also true.



              The basic properties to use here are:



              • $(a,b)in Siff(b,a)in S^-1$

              • $(a,c)in Scirc Riffexists_bin B,(a,b)in Rland (b,c)in S$





              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Note that to show that two sets are equal (relations are sets), e.g. $A=B$, then it has to be true that $Asubseteq B$ and $Bsubseteq A$. Now, if you want to show that $Asubseteq B$, you have to prove that the implication $$xin Aimplies xin B$$ is true (similar for $Bsubseteq A$).



                This is what the solution of the first question does. It takes an arbitrary element $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$ and then concludes by properties of (inverse) relations and by using the definition of relations, that $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$ is also true.



                The basic properties to use here are:



                • $(a,b)in Siff(b,a)in S^-1$

                • $(a,c)in Scirc Riffexists_bin B,(a,b)in Rland (b,c)in S$





                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Note that to show that two sets are equal (relations are sets), e.g. $A=B$, then it has to be true that $Asubseteq B$ and $Bsubseteq A$. Now, if you want to show that $Asubseteq B$, you have to prove that the implication $$xin Aimplies xin B$$ is true (similar for $Bsubseteq A$).



                This is what the solution of the first question does. It takes an arbitrary element $(c,a)in(Scirc R)^-1$ and then concludes by properties of (inverse) relations and by using the definition of relations, that $(c,a)in R^-1circ S^-1$ is also true.



                The basic properties to use here are:



                • $(a,b)in Siff(b,a)in S^-1$

                • $(a,c)in Scirc Riffexists_bin B,(a,b)in Rland (b,c)in S$






                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 26 at 18:05

























                answered Mar 26 at 17:58









                st.mathst.math

                1,268115




                1,268115



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163526%2fproving-that-the-composition-of-relations-are-equal-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                    John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

                    Sum infinite sum for a complex variable not in the integers The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Convergence of the infinite product $prod_n = 1^infty fracz - alpha_nz - beta_n$Suppose $sum_k=-infty^inftya_kz^k$ and $sum_-infty^inftyb_kz^k$ converge to $1/sin(pi z)$. Find $b_k-a_k$.Laurent series of $ 1over (z - i) $Laurent series for $z^2 e^1/z$ at $z = infty$Write $sumlimits_n=0^infty e^-xn^3$ in the form $sumlimits_n=-infty^infty a_nx^n$Help needed on laurent series for a complex functionShow that $sum_-infty^infty (-1)^nexp(nz-frac12(n+frac12)^2omega)$ converges and is entireΑn entire function as an infinite sum of entire functionsClassify singularities in the extended complex planeFinding the laurent series around z = 0