Show that $limlimits_ntoinftyleftlangle N,fracp_n-prightrangle =0$ on a regular surface Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Every subsequence of $x_n$ has a further subsequence which converges to $x$. Then the sequence $x_n$ converges to $x$.Why study “curves” instead of 1-manifolds?Techniques to check if a surface is regularA condition on parametrisations of regular surfacesParametrised vs Regular SurfacesIntuition behind transverse planes and regular curvesRegular surfaces in Differential GeometryDifferential Geometry Regular Surface problemShow that a surface of revolution can always be parametrized so that $E = E(v), F = 0$ and $G = 1$.Why does this property of reparametrizations of surfaces matter?If a regular surface lie on side of a plane, then the plane is tagent plane
Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages
String `!23` is replaced with `docker` in command line
What does an IRS interview request entail when called in to verify expenses for a sole proprietor small business?
Why are Kinder Surprise Eggs illegal in the USA?
Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?
ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order
What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?
prime numbers and expressing non-prime numbers
Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems
Why didn't this character "real die" when they blew their stack out in Altered Carbon?
How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?
Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters
How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?
What to do with chalk when deepwater soloing?
What does the word "veer" mean here?
Why did the rest of the Eastern Bloc not invade Yugoslavia?
Overriding an object in memory with placement new
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
Bete Noir -- no dairy
Generate an RGB colour grid
Using audio cues to encourage good posture
Resolving to minmaj7
Show that $limlimits_ntoinftyleftlangle N,fracp_n-prightrangle =0$ on a regular surface
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Every subsequence of $x_n$ has a further subsequence which converges to $x$. Then the sequence $x_n$ converges to $x$.Why study “curves” instead of 1-manifolds?Techniques to check if a surface is regularA condition on parametrisations of regular surfacesParametrised vs Regular SurfacesIntuition behind transverse planes and regular curvesRegular surfaces in Differential GeometryDifferential Geometry Regular Surface problemShow that a surface of revolution can always be parametrized so that $E = E(v), F = 0$ and $G = 1$.Why does this property of reparametrizations of surfaces matter?If a regular surface lie on side of a plane, then the plane is tagent plane
$begingroup$
I am trying to do the following question, because I think it is very interesting as it formalises the idea that the tangent space is practically indistinguishable from the surface if one looks in a very small neighbourhood of a point. The question is from "differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces" by Tapp.
My first idea was to show that $limlimits_ntoinftyfracp_n-p=:vin T_pS$ but I don't see why/if this limit exists.
I would be very greatful for some hints or even a solution.
Thanks a lot in advance!:)
Definition of regular surface:
I tried to use $p_n-p=sigma(x_n)-sigma(x))=d_psigma(x_n-x)+o(|x_n-x|)$ to rewrite $langle N,fracp_n-prangle$
differential-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to do the following question, because I think it is very interesting as it formalises the idea that the tangent space is practically indistinguishable from the surface if one looks in a very small neighbourhood of a point. The question is from "differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces" by Tapp.
My first idea was to show that $limlimits_ntoinftyfracp_n-p=:vin T_pS$ but I don't see why/if this limit exists.
I would be very greatful for some hints or even a solution.
Thanks a lot in advance!:)
Definition of regular surface:
I tried to use $p_n-p=sigma(x_n)-sigma(x))=d_psigma(x_n-x)+o(|x_n-x|)$ to rewrite $langle N,fracp_n-prangle$
differential-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to do the following question, because I think it is very interesting as it formalises the idea that the tangent space is practically indistinguishable from the surface if one looks in a very small neighbourhood of a point. The question is from "differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces" by Tapp.
My first idea was to show that $limlimits_ntoinftyfracp_n-p=:vin T_pS$ but I don't see why/if this limit exists.
I would be very greatful for some hints or even a solution.
Thanks a lot in advance!:)
Definition of regular surface:
I tried to use $p_n-p=sigma(x_n)-sigma(x))=d_psigma(x_n-x)+o(|x_n-x|)$ to rewrite $langle N,fracp_n-prangle$
differential-geometry
$endgroup$
I am trying to do the following question, because I think it is very interesting as it formalises the idea that the tangent space is practically indistinguishable from the surface if one looks in a very small neighbourhood of a point. The question is from "differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces" by Tapp.
My first idea was to show that $limlimits_ntoinftyfracp_n-p=:vin T_pS$ but I don't see why/if this limit exists.
I would be very greatful for some hints or even a solution.
Thanks a lot in advance!:)
Definition of regular surface:
I tried to use $p_n-p=sigma(x_n)-sigma(x))=d_psigma(x_n-x)+o(|x_n-x|)$ to rewrite $langle N,fracp_n-prangle$
differential-geometry
differential-geometry
edited Mar 26 at 17:01
Hans
asked Mar 26 at 15:48
HansHans
122110
122110
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It may very well be that $lim_n to infty fracp_n-p$ does not exist. (To see this, consider an oscillation near a point.)
But by taking subsequences, we can prove the result, even if the limit above does not exist by itself. Fix a subsequence $p_n_i$ of $p_n$.
First, taking a parametrization $varphi$ near $p$, we have that $p_n_i$ is in that chart for $i$ sufficiently big. Letting $q_n_i=varphi^-1(p_n_i)$, we know that
beginalign
fracp_n_i-p&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)+dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-qcdot fracq_n_i-q \
&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-q +dvarphileft(fracq_n_i-qq_n_i-qright)cdot fracq_n_i-q.
endalign
By passing to subsequences yet again (twice), this converges to
$Kcdot dvarphi(h)$ for some $h in mathbbR^2$, $K in mathbbR$. Therefore, the limit of this subsequence $fracp_n_i_j-p$ of $p_n_i$ belongs to $T_pS$ and it follows that
$$lim_j to infty leftlangle N, fracp_n_i_j-prightrangle=0.$$
Letting $a_n=leftlangle N, fracp_n-prightrangle$, we have thus proved that every subsequence of $a_n$ has a further subsequence converging to $0$. This proves that $a_n$ converges to zero. (This is a general fact about sequences - see here, for example.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163363%2fshow-that-lim-limits-n-to-infty-left-langle-n-fracp-n-pp-n-p-righ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It may very well be that $lim_n to infty fracp_n-p$ does not exist. (To see this, consider an oscillation near a point.)
But by taking subsequences, we can prove the result, even if the limit above does not exist by itself. Fix a subsequence $p_n_i$ of $p_n$.
First, taking a parametrization $varphi$ near $p$, we have that $p_n_i$ is in that chart for $i$ sufficiently big. Letting $q_n_i=varphi^-1(p_n_i)$, we know that
beginalign
fracp_n_i-p&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)+dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-qcdot fracq_n_i-q \
&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-q +dvarphileft(fracq_n_i-qq_n_i-qright)cdot fracq_n_i-q.
endalign
By passing to subsequences yet again (twice), this converges to
$Kcdot dvarphi(h)$ for some $h in mathbbR^2$, $K in mathbbR$. Therefore, the limit of this subsequence $fracp_n_i_j-p$ of $p_n_i$ belongs to $T_pS$ and it follows that
$$lim_j to infty leftlangle N, fracp_n_i_j-prightrangle=0.$$
Letting $a_n=leftlangle N, fracp_n-prightrangle$, we have thus proved that every subsequence of $a_n$ has a further subsequence converging to $0$. This proves that $a_n$ converges to zero. (This is a general fact about sequences - see here, for example.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It may very well be that $lim_n to infty fracp_n-p$ does not exist. (To see this, consider an oscillation near a point.)
But by taking subsequences, we can prove the result, even if the limit above does not exist by itself. Fix a subsequence $p_n_i$ of $p_n$.
First, taking a parametrization $varphi$ near $p$, we have that $p_n_i$ is in that chart for $i$ sufficiently big. Letting $q_n_i=varphi^-1(p_n_i)$, we know that
beginalign
fracp_n_i-p&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)+dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-qcdot fracq_n_i-q \
&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-q +dvarphileft(fracq_n_i-qq_n_i-qright)cdot fracq_n_i-q.
endalign
By passing to subsequences yet again (twice), this converges to
$Kcdot dvarphi(h)$ for some $h in mathbbR^2$, $K in mathbbR$. Therefore, the limit of this subsequence $fracp_n_i_j-p$ of $p_n_i$ belongs to $T_pS$ and it follows that
$$lim_j to infty leftlangle N, fracp_n_i_j-prightrangle=0.$$
Letting $a_n=leftlangle N, fracp_n-prightrangle$, we have thus proved that every subsequence of $a_n$ has a further subsequence converging to $0$. This proves that $a_n$ converges to zero. (This is a general fact about sequences - see here, for example.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It may very well be that $lim_n to infty fracp_n-p$ does not exist. (To see this, consider an oscillation near a point.)
But by taking subsequences, we can prove the result, even if the limit above does not exist by itself. Fix a subsequence $p_n_i$ of $p_n$.
First, taking a parametrization $varphi$ near $p$, we have that $p_n_i$ is in that chart for $i$ sufficiently big. Letting $q_n_i=varphi^-1(p_n_i)$, we know that
beginalign
fracp_n_i-p&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)+dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-qcdot fracq_n_i-q \
&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-q +dvarphileft(fracq_n_i-qq_n_i-qright)cdot fracq_n_i-q.
endalign
By passing to subsequences yet again (twice), this converges to
$Kcdot dvarphi(h)$ for some $h in mathbbR^2$, $K in mathbbR$. Therefore, the limit of this subsequence $fracp_n_i_j-p$ of $p_n_i$ belongs to $T_pS$ and it follows that
$$lim_j to infty leftlangle N, fracp_n_i_j-prightrangle=0.$$
Letting $a_n=leftlangle N, fracp_n-prightrangle$, we have thus proved that every subsequence of $a_n$ has a further subsequence converging to $0$. This proves that $a_n$ converges to zero. (This is a general fact about sequences - see here, for example.)
$endgroup$
It may very well be that $lim_n to infty fracp_n-p$ does not exist. (To see this, consider an oscillation near a point.)
But by taking subsequences, we can prove the result, even if the limit above does not exist by itself. Fix a subsequence $p_n_i$ of $p_n$.
First, taking a parametrization $varphi$ near $p$, we have that $p_n_i$ is in that chart for $i$ sufficiently big. Letting $q_n_i=varphi^-1(p_n_i)$, we know that
beginalign
fracp_n_i-p&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)+dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-qcdot fracq_n_i-q \
&=fracvarphi(q_n_i)-varphi(q)-dvarphi(q_n_i-q)q_n_i-q +dvarphileft(fracq_n_i-qq_n_i-qright)cdot fracq_n_i-q.
endalign
By passing to subsequences yet again (twice), this converges to
$Kcdot dvarphi(h)$ for some $h in mathbbR^2$, $K in mathbbR$. Therefore, the limit of this subsequence $fracp_n_i_j-p$ of $p_n_i$ belongs to $T_pS$ and it follows that
$$lim_j to infty leftlangle N, fracp_n_i_j-prightrangle=0.$$
Letting $a_n=leftlangle N, fracp_n-prightrangle$, we have thus proved that every subsequence of $a_n$ has a further subsequence converging to $0$. This proves that $a_n$ converges to zero. (This is a general fact about sequences - see here, for example.)
edited Mar 26 at 17:01
answered Mar 26 at 16:56
Aloizio Macedo♦Aloizio Macedo
23.8k24088
23.8k24088
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163363%2fshow-that-lim-limits-n-to-infty-left-langle-n-fracp-n-pp-n-p-righ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown