Use of paid as adjectiveWhat tenses should I use in clauses joined by “so”?for the comparison - basic or comparative adjective?What's wrong with this separation between a relative clause and the adjective?How can 'important', an adjective, modify an entire clause? Why not an adverb?adjective with from…toCan relative pronouns and clauses follow demonstrative determiners?Which is the correct one between these sentences?Poorly explained usage of grammar constructionIs “presently present” grammatically correct?The way of using ''with honey color '' in sentence below
How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?
What's the purpose of "true" in bash "if sudo true; then"
Is this Spell Mimic feat balanced?
Ways to speed up user implemented RK4
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
Have I saved too much for retirement so far?
Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?
If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?
Is there any easy technique written in Bhagavad GITA to control lust?
is this a spam?
Personal Teleportation as a Weapon
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?
Everything Bob says is false. How does he get people to trust him?
Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?
Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing
Hide Select Output from T-SQL
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
Go Pregnant or Go Home
Why is `const int& k = i; ++i; ` possible?
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Understanding "audieritis" in Psalm 94
Use of paid as adjective
What tenses should I use in clauses joined by “so”?for the comparison - basic or comparative adjective?What's wrong with this separation between a relative clause and the adjective?How can 'important', an adjective, modify an entire clause? Why not an adverb?adjective with from…toCan relative pronouns and clauses follow demonstrative determiners?Which is the correct one between these sentences?Poorly explained usage of grammar constructionIs “presently present” grammatically correct?The way of using ''with honey color '' in sentence below
Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?
Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .
Or would it be better to say:
Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.
grammaticality
add a comment |
Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?
Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .
Or would it be better to say:
Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.
grammaticality
add a comment |
Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?
Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .
Or would it be better to say:
Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.
grammaticality
Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?
Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .
Or would it be better to say:
Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.
grammaticality
grammaticality
edited Mar 17 at 12:43
language learner
asked Mar 17 at 12:23
language learnerlanguage learner
1165
1165
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
add a comment |
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
Mar 17 at 12:59
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 13:39
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
Mar 17 at 14:53
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
Mar 17 at 16:14
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 16:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200941%2fuse-of-paid-as-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
add a comment |
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
add a comment |
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
answered Mar 17 at 12:44
MixolydianMixolydian
4,283714
4,283714
add a comment |
add a comment |
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
Mar 17 at 12:59
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 13:39
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
Mar 17 at 14:53
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
Mar 17 at 16:14
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 16:27
add a comment |
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
Mar 17 at 12:59
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 13:39
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
Mar 17 at 14:53
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
Mar 17 at 16:14
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 16:27
add a comment |
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
answered Mar 17 at 12:50
SamBCSamBC
14.8k1958
14.8k1958
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
Mar 17 at 12:59
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 13:39
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
Mar 17 at 14:53
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
Mar 17 at 16:14
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 16:27
add a comment |
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
Mar 17 at 12:59
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 13:39
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
Mar 17 at 14:53
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
Mar 17 at 16:14
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 16:27
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
Mar 17 at 12:59
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
Mar 17 at 12:59
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 13:39
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 13:39
1
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
Mar 17 at 14:53
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
Mar 17 at 14:53
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
Mar 17 at 16:14
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
Mar 17 at 16:14
1
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 16:27
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
Mar 17 at 16:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200941%2fuse-of-paid-as-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown