Use of paid as adjectiveWhat tenses should I use in clauses joined by “so”?for the comparison - basic or comparative adjective?What's wrong with this separation between a relative clause and the adjective?How can 'important', an adjective, modify an entire clause? Why not an adverb?adjective with from…toCan relative pronouns and clauses follow demonstrative determiners?Which is the correct one between these sentences?Poorly explained usage of grammar constructionIs “presently present” grammatically correct?The way of using ''with honey color '' in sentence below

How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?

What's the purpose of "true" in bash "if sudo true; then"

Is this Spell Mimic feat balanced?

Ways to speed up user implemented RK4

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?

Is there any easy technique written in Bhagavad GITA to control lust?

is this a spam?

Personal Teleportation as a Weapon

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

Everything Bob says is false. How does he get people to trust him?

Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

Hide Select Output from T-SQL

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Why is `const int& k = i; ++i; ` possible?

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Understanding "audieritis" in Psalm 94



Use of paid as adjective


What tenses should I use in clauses joined by “so”?for the comparison - basic or comparative adjective?What's wrong with this separation between a relative clause and the adjective?How can 'important', an adjective, modify an entire clause? Why not an adverb?adjective with from…toCan relative pronouns and clauses follow demonstrative determiners?Which is the correct one between these sentences?Poorly explained usage of grammar constructionIs “presently present” grammatically correct?The way of using ''with honey color '' in sentence below













2















Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?




Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .




Or would it be better to say:




Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.











share|improve this question




























    2















    Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?




    Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .




    Or would it be better to say:




    Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.











    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2


      1






      Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?




      Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .




      Or would it be better to say:




      Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.











      share|improve this question
















      Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?




      Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .




      Or would it be better to say:




      Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.








      grammaticality






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 17 at 12:43







      language learner

















      asked Mar 17 at 12:23









      language learnerlanguage learner

      1165




      1165




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:




          In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.



          In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.



          In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.



          In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.







          share|improve this answer






























            2














            Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.



            However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.



            The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.




            Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.




            That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.



            Try:




            There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.

            You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.




            There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.






            share|improve this answer























            • Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.

              – language learner
              Mar 17 at 12:59











            • Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".

              – SamBC
              Mar 17 at 13:39






            • 1





              @languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".

              – alephzero
              Mar 17 at 14:53












            • It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.

              – Mixolydian
              Mar 17 at 16:14






            • 1





              I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.

              – SamBC
              Mar 17 at 16:27










            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200941%2fuse-of-paid-as-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:




            In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.



            In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.



            In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.



            In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.







            share|improve this answer



























              2














              Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:




              In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.



              In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.



              In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.



              In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.







              share|improve this answer

























                2












                2








                2







                Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:




                In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.



                In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.



                In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.



                In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.







                share|improve this answer













                Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:




                In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.



                In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.



                In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.



                In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 17 at 12:44









                MixolydianMixolydian

                4,283714




                4,283714























                    2














                    Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.



                    However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.



                    The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.




                    Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.




                    That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.



                    Try:




                    There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.

                    You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.




                    There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.

                      – language learner
                      Mar 17 at 12:59











                    • Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".

                      – SamBC
                      Mar 17 at 13:39






                    • 1





                      @languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".

                      – alephzero
                      Mar 17 at 14:53












                    • It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.

                      – Mixolydian
                      Mar 17 at 16:14






                    • 1





                      I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.

                      – SamBC
                      Mar 17 at 16:27















                    2














                    Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.



                    However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.



                    The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.




                    Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.




                    That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.



                    Try:




                    There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.

                    You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.




                    There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.

                      – language learner
                      Mar 17 at 12:59











                    • Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".

                      – SamBC
                      Mar 17 at 13:39






                    • 1





                      @languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".

                      – alephzero
                      Mar 17 at 14:53












                    • It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.

                      – Mixolydian
                      Mar 17 at 16:14






                    • 1





                      I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.

                      – SamBC
                      Mar 17 at 16:27













                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.



                    However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.



                    The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.




                    Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.




                    That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.



                    Try:




                    There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.

                    You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.




                    There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.






                    share|improve this answer













                    Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.



                    However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.



                    The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.




                    Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.




                    That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.



                    Try:




                    There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.

                    You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.




                    There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 17 at 12:50









                    SamBCSamBC

                    14.8k1958




                    14.8k1958












                    • Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.

                      – language learner
                      Mar 17 at 12:59











                    • Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".

                      – SamBC
                      Mar 17 at 13:39






                    • 1





                      @languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".

                      – alephzero
                      Mar 17 at 14:53












                    • It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.

                      – Mixolydian
                      Mar 17 at 16:14






                    • 1





                      I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.

                      – SamBC
                      Mar 17 at 16:27

















                    • Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.

                      – language learner
                      Mar 17 at 12:59











                    • Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".

                      – SamBC
                      Mar 17 at 13:39






                    • 1





                      @languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".

                      – alephzero
                      Mar 17 at 14:53












                    • It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.

                      – Mixolydian
                      Mar 17 at 16:14






                    • 1





                      I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.

                      – SamBC
                      Mar 17 at 16:27
















                    Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.

                    – language learner
                    Mar 17 at 12:59





                    Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.

                    – language learner
                    Mar 17 at 12:59













                    Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".

                    – SamBC
                    Mar 17 at 13:39





                    Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".

                    – SamBC
                    Mar 17 at 13:39




                    1




                    1





                    @languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".

                    – alephzero
                    Mar 17 at 14:53






                    @languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".

                    – alephzero
                    Mar 17 at 14:53














                    It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.

                    – Mixolydian
                    Mar 17 at 16:14





                    It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.

                    – Mixolydian
                    Mar 17 at 16:14




                    1




                    1





                    I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.

                    – SamBC
                    Mar 17 at 16:27





                    I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.

                    – SamBC
                    Mar 17 at 16:27

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200941%2fuse-of-paid-as-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                    Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                    Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers