Difference between 'dont avoir besoin' and 'en avoir besoin'Règles pour la structure des phrases — Phrase Structure RulesWhy is “de” used instead of “des” in this statement that begins with “Il y a…”When to use “ce qui” and “ce que” instead of “qui”Difference between The Past Definite, Imperfect, and Past Indefinite tensesWhy is “une culture” frequently followed by plural verbs?Using pronoun phrases with “de” for personThe use of “dont” in “… dont je m'étonne que…”Vous savez qui on attend? Why “qui” and not “que”?Why does “que ça” mean “at it” in this instance?What is the difference between “Ça, c'est ~” and “C'est ~”?

Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?

is this a spam?

What is the oldest known work of fiction?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

Your magic is very sketchy

Time travel short story where a man arrives in the late 19th century in a time machine and then sends the machine back into the past

How was Earth single-handedly capable of creating 3 of the 4 gods of chaos?

Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?

Print name if parameter passed to function

Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Mapping a list into a phase plot

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars

Understanding "audieritis" in Psalm 94

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

apt-get update is failing in debian



Difference between 'dont avoir besoin' and 'en avoir besoin'


Règles pour la structure des phrases — Phrase Structure RulesWhy is “de” used instead of “des” in this statement that begins with “Il y a…”When to use “ce qui” and “ce que” instead of “qui”Difference between The Past Definite, Imperfect, and Past Indefinite tensesWhy is “une culture” frequently followed by plural verbs?Using pronoun phrases with “de” for personThe use of “dont” in “… dont je m'étonne que…”Vous savez qui on attend? Why “qui” and not “que”?Why does “que ça” mean “at it” in this instance?What is the difference between “Ça, c'est ~” and “C'est ~”?













2















French politician says




C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




In my textbook I have found this phrase




Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




Why in the second example we use en instead of dont? Merci










share|improve this question


























    2















    French politician says




    C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




    In my textbook I have found this phrase




    Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




    Why in the second example we use en instead of dont? Merci










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      French politician says




      C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




      In my textbook I have found this phrase




      Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




      Why in the second example we use en instead of dont? Merci










      share|improve this question














      French politician says




      C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




      In my textbook I have found this phrase




      Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




      Why in the second example we use en instead of dont? Merci







      grammaire






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 17 at 9:00









      Vitaliy GrabovetsVitaliy Grabovets

      1134




      1134




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Réponse principalement en français accompagnée par la traduction des essentiels en anglais entre parenthèses.




          Notre économie a besoin de liberté. (rappel : avoir besoin de)




          Dont est un pronom relatif qui remplace de + antécédent dans la subordonnée relative. Ici, dont remplace donc de liberté. (It is a relative pronoun which replaces de + antecedent in the relative subordinate.)




          C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




          Autre exemple :




          J'ai besoin de ces stylos.



          Ce sont ces stylos dont j'ai besoin.




          Ici, dont remplace de ce stylos.



          La construction avec c'est/ce sont comme ci-dessus s'appelle mise en relief, une tournure grammaticale très importante en français. (The framing device c’est . . . qui/que/dont is very frequently used in spoken and written French to
          highlight a particular element. French Grammar in Context, p. 211.)




          Concernant la seconde phrase de la question. (Regarding the second question.)




          Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'argent/de support financier/etc. (hypothétiquement) toucheront une bourse.




          En est ici un pronom personnel complément qui remplace d'argent/de suppport/etc.. (En is here a personal pronoun complement replacing...)




          Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




          Pour aller plus loin :



          https://www.lingoda.com/en/french/learning-material/cefr/B1.2/les-doubles-pronoms-1/download



          https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2guides/guides/chroniq/index-fra.html?lang=fra&lettr=indx_autr84vWAiHFbX6w&page=9OU4XXgOiRWE.html



          http://www.aidenet.eu/grammaire12a.htm






          share|improve this answer
































            2














            When dont has a possessive meaning, it can be translated by whose, of which:




            La Ville dont le prince est un enfant



            The City Whose Prince is a Child




            When it has no possessive meaning, it can be translated by that, whom, which or just skipped in English:




            C'est le livre dont je t'ai parlé



            It's the book (that) I talk you about.




            In the first sentence, there is no possessive meaning:




            C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




            It is equivalent to the following sentences:




            La liberté, c'est ce dont notre économie a besoin.



            La liberté, c'est de cela dont notre économie a besoin.



            La liberté, c'est de quoi notre économie a besoin.




            They can be translated to:




            Liberty, this is what our economy is in need of.




            or maybe:




            Liberty, this is that our economy is in need of.




            Literally :




            It is (of) liberty that our economy is in need of.





            In the second sentence, en is close to the English "it":




            Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




            means:




            Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'une bourse toucheront une bourse




            Literally :




            All of those who need it will get a scholarship.




            While it and that can sometimes be used interchangeably, en and dont do not span the same range of meanings.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 2





              You just can't explain grammar though translation to a language that uses a different grammar.

              – Stéphane Gimenez
              Mar 17 at 12:43











            • @StéphaneGimenez Yes, my initial wording was definitely lacking explanations.

              – jlliagre
              Mar 17 at 14:13











            • I don't understand your answer, what doesn't fit at all to translate dont here. (that is much closer in almost every case)

              – Teleporting Goat
              Mar 18 at 10:36











            • @TeleportingGoat You are right. What was more there to translate ce than dont in my examples. Answer reworked.

              – jlliagre
              Mar 18 at 11:23











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "299"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ffrench.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34312%2fdifference-between-dont-avoir-besoin-and-en-avoir-besoin%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            Réponse principalement en français accompagnée par la traduction des essentiels en anglais entre parenthèses.




            Notre économie a besoin de liberté. (rappel : avoir besoin de)




            Dont est un pronom relatif qui remplace de + antécédent dans la subordonnée relative. Ici, dont remplace donc de liberté. (It is a relative pronoun which replaces de + antecedent in the relative subordinate.)




            C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




            Autre exemple :




            J'ai besoin de ces stylos.



            Ce sont ces stylos dont j'ai besoin.




            Ici, dont remplace de ce stylos.



            La construction avec c'est/ce sont comme ci-dessus s'appelle mise en relief, une tournure grammaticale très importante en français. (The framing device c’est . . . qui/que/dont is very frequently used in spoken and written French to
            highlight a particular element. French Grammar in Context, p. 211.)




            Concernant la seconde phrase de la question. (Regarding the second question.)




            Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'argent/de support financier/etc. (hypothétiquement) toucheront une bourse.




            En est ici un pronom personnel complément qui remplace d'argent/de suppport/etc.. (En is here a personal pronoun complement replacing...)




            Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




            Pour aller plus loin :



            https://www.lingoda.com/en/french/learning-material/cefr/B1.2/les-doubles-pronoms-1/download



            https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2guides/guides/chroniq/index-fra.html?lang=fra&lettr=indx_autr84vWAiHFbX6w&page=9OU4XXgOiRWE.html



            http://www.aidenet.eu/grammaire12a.htm






            share|improve this answer





























              3














              Réponse principalement en français accompagnée par la traduction des essentiels en anglais entre parenthèses.




              Notre économie a besoin de liberté. (rappel : avoir besoin de)




              Dont est un pronom relatif qui remplace de + antécédent dans la subordonnée relative. Ici, dont remplace donc de liberté. (It is a relative pronoun which replaces de + antecedent in the relative subordinate.)




              C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




              Autre exemple :




              J'ai besoin de ces stylos.



              Ce sont ces stylos dont j'ai besoin.




              Ici, dont remplace de ce stylos.



              La construction avec c'est/ce sont comme ci-dessus s'appelle mise en relief, une tournure grammaticale très importante en français. (The framing device c’est . . . qui/que/dont is very frequently used in spoken and written French to
              highlight a particular element. French Grammar in Context, p. 211.)




              Concernant la seconde phrase de la question. (Regarding the second question.)




              Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'argent/de support financier/etc. (hypothétiquement) toucheront une bourse.




              En est ici un pronom personnel complément qui remplace d'argent/de suppport/etc.. (En is here a personal pronoun complement replacing...)




              Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




              Pour aller plus loin :



              https://www.lingoda.com/en/french/learning-material/cefr/B1.2/les-doubles-pronoms-1/download



              https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2guides/guides/chroniq/index-fra.html?lang=fra&lettr=indx_autr84vWAiHFbX6w&page=9OU4XXgOiRWE.html



              http://www.aidenet.eu/grammaire12a.htm






              share|improve this answer



























                3












                3








                3







                Réponse principalement en français accompagnée par la traduction des essentiels en anglais entre parenthèses.




                Notre économie a besoin de liberté. (rappel : avoir besoin de)




                Dont est un pronom relatif qui remplace de + antécédent dans la subordonnée relative. Ici, dont remplace donc de liberté. (It is a relative pronoun which replaces de + antecedent in the relative subordinate.)




                C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




                Autre exemple :




                J'ai besoin de ces stylos.



                Ce sont ces stylos dont j'ai besoin.




                Ici, dont remplace de ce stylos.



                La construction avec c'est/ce sont comme ci-dessus s'appelle mise en relief, une tournure grammaticale très importante en français. (The framing device c’est . . . qui/que/dont is very frequently used in spoken and written French to
                highlight a particular element. French Grammar in Context, p. 211.)




                Concernant la seconde phrase de la question. (Regarding the second question.)




                Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'argent/de support financier/etc. (hypothétiquement) toucheront une bourse.




                En est ici un pronom personnel complément qui remplace d'argent/de suppport/etc.. (En is here a personal pronoun complement replacing...)




                Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




                Pour aller plus loin :



                https://www.lingoda.com/en/french/learning-material/cefr/B1.2/les-doubles-pronoms-1/download



                https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2guides/guides/chroniq/index-fra.html?lang=fra&lettr=indx_autr84vWAiHFbX6w&page=9OU4XXgOiRWE.html



                http://www.aidenet.eu/grammaire12a.htm






                share|improve this answer















                Réponse principalement en français accompagnée par la traduction des essentiels en anglais entre parenthèses.




                Notre économie a besoin de liberté. (rappel : avoir besoin de)




                Dont est un pronom relatif qui remplace de + antécédent dans la subordonnée relative. Ici, dont remplace donc de liberté. (It is a relative pronoun which replaces de + antecedent in the relative subordinate.)




                C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




                Autre exemple :




                J'ai besoin de ces stylos.



                Ce sont ces stylos dont j'ai besoin.




                Ici, dont remplace de ce stylos.



                La construction avec c'est/ce sont comme ci-dessus s'appelle mise en relief, une tournure grammaticale très importante en français. (The framing device c’est . . . qui/que/dont is very frequently used in spoken and written French to
                highlight a particular element. French Grammar in Context, p. 211.)




                Concernant la seconde phrase de la question. (Regarding the second question.)




                Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'argent/de support financier/etc. (hypothétiquement) toucheront une bourse.




                En est ici un pronom personnel complément qui remplace d'argent/de suppport/etc.. (En is here a personal pronoun complement replacing...)




                Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




                Pour aller plus loin :



                https://www.lingoda.com/en/french/learning-material/cefr/B1.2/les-doubles-pronoms-1/download



                https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2guides/guides/chroniq/index-fra.html?lang=fra&lettr=indx_autr84vWAiHFbX6w&page=9OU4XXgOiRWE.html



                http://www.aidenet.eu/grammaire12a.htm







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 17 at 19:05

























                answered Mar 17 at 9:36









                DimitrisDimitris

                7,9842629




                7,9842629





















                    2














                    When dont has a possessive meaning, it can be translated by whose, of which:




                    La Ville dont le prince est un enfant



                    The City Whose Prince is a Child




                    When it has no possessive meaning, it can be translated by that, whom, which or just skipped in English:




                    C'est le livre dont je t'ai parlé



                    It's the book (that) I talk you about.




                    In the first sentence, there is no possessive meaning:




                    C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




                    It is equivalent to the following sentences:




                    La liberté, c'est ce dont notre économie a besoin.



                    La liberté, c'est de cela dont notre économie a besoin.



                    La liberté, c'est de quoi notre économie a besoin.




                    They can be translated to:




                    Liberty, this is what our economy is in need of.




                    or maybe:




                    Liberty, this is that our economy is in need of.




                    Literally :




                    It is (of) liberty that our economy is in need of.





                    In the second sentence, en is close to the English "it":




                    Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




                    means:




                    Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'une bourse toucheront une bourse




                    Literally :




                    All of those who need it will get a scholarship.




                    While it and that can sometimes be used interchangeably, en and dont do not span the same range of meanings.






                    share|improve this answer




















                    • 2





                      You just can't explain grammar though translation to a language that uses a different grammar.

                      – Stéphane Gimenez
                      Mar 17 at 12:43











                    • @StéphaneGimenez Yes, my initial wording was definitely lacking explanations.

                      – jlliagre
                      Mar 17 at 14:13











                    • I don't understand your answer, what doesn't fit at all to translate dont here. (that is much closer in almost every case)

                      – Teleporting Goat
                      Mar 18 at 10:36











                    • @TeleportingGoat You are right. What was more there to translate ce than dont in my examples. Answer reworked.

                      – jlliagre
                      Mar 18 at 11:23
















                    2














                    When dont has a possessive meaning, it can be translated by whose, of which:




                    La Ville dont le prince est un enfant



                    The City Whose Prince is a Child




                    When it has no possessive meaning, it can be translated by that, whom, which or just skipped in English:




                    C'est le livre dont je t'ai parlé



                    It's the book (that) I talk you about.




                    In the first sentence, there is no possessive meaning:




                    C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




                    It is equivalent to the following sentences:




                    La liberté, c'est ce dont notre économie a besoin.



                    La liberté, c'est de cela dont notre économie a besoin.



                    La liberté, c'est de quoi notre économie a besoin.




                    They can be translated to:




                    Liberty, this is what our economy is in need of.




                    or maybe:




                    Liberty, this is that our economy is in need of.




                    Literally :




                    It is (of) liberty that our economy is in need of.





                    In the second sentence, en is close to the English "it":




                    Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




                    means:




                    Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'une bourse toucheront une bourse




                    Literally :




                    All of those who need it will get a scholarship.




                    While it and that can sometimes be used interchangeably, en and dont do not span the same range of meanings.






                    share|improve this answer




















                    • 2





                      You just can't explain grammar though translation to a language that uses a different grammar.

                      – Stéphane Gimenez
                      Mar 17 at 12:43











                    • @StéphaneGimenez Yes, my initial wording was definitely lacking explanations.

                      – jlliagre
                      Mar 17 at 14:13











                    • I don't understand your answer, what doesn't fit at all to translate dont here. (that is much closer in almost every case)

                      – Teleporting Goat
                      Mar 18 at 10:36











                    • @TeleportingGoat You are right. What was more there to translate ce than dont in my examples. Answer reworked.

                      – jlliagre
                      Mar 18 at 11:23














                    2












                    2








                    2







                    When dont has a possessive meaning, it can be translated by whose, of which:




                    La Ville dont le prince est un enfant



                    The City Whose Prince is a Child




                    When it has no possessive meaning, it can be translated by that, whom, which or just skipped in English:




                    C'est le livre dont je t'ai parlé



                    It's the book (that) I talk you about.




                    In the first sentence, there is no possessive meaning:




                    C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




                    It is equivalent to the following sentences:




                    La liberté, c'est ce dont notre économie a besoin.



                    La liberté, c'est de cela dont notre économie a besoin.



                    La liberté, c'est de quoi notre économie a besoin.




                    They can be translated to:




                    Liberty, this is what our economy is in need of.




                    or maybe:




                    Liberty, this is that our economy is in need of.




                    Literally :




                    It is (of) liberty that our economy is in need of.





                    In the second sentence, en is close to the English "it":




                    Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




                    means:




                    Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'une bourse toucheront une bourse




                    Literally :




                    All of those who need it will get a scholarship.




                    While it and that can sometimes be used interchangeably, en and dont do not span the same range of meanings.






                    share|improve this answer















                    When dont has a possessive meaning, it can be translated by whose, of which:




                    La Ville dont le prince est un enfant



                    The City Whose Prince is a Child




                    When it has no possessive meaning, it can be translated by that, whom, which or just skipped in English:




                    C'est le livre dont je t'ai parlé



                    It's the book (that) I talk you about.




                    In the first sentence, there is no possessive meaning:




                    C'est de liberté dont notre économie a besoin.




                    It is equivalent to the following sentences:




                    La liberté, c'est ce dont notre économie a besoin.



                    La liberté, c'est de cela dont notre économie a besoin.



                    La liberté, c'est de quoi notre économie a besoin.




                    They can be translated to:




                    Liberty, this is what our economy is in need of.




                    or maybe:




                    Liberty, this is that our economy is in need of.




                    Literally :




                    It is (of) liberty that our economy is in need of.





                    In the second sentence, en is close to the English "it":




                    Tous ceux qui en ont besoin toucheront une bourse.




                    means:




                    Tous ceux qui ont besoin d'une bourse toucheront une bourse




                    Literally :




                    All of those who need it will get a scholarship.




                    While it and that can sometimes be used interchangeably, en and dont do not span the same range of meanings.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Mar 18 at 18:48

























                    answered Mar 17 at 9:36









                    jlliagrejlliagre

                    65.8k244102




                    65.8k244102







                    • 2





                      You just can't explain grammar though translation to a language that uses a different grammar.

                      – Stéphane Gimenez
                      Mar 17 at 12:43











                    • @StéphaneGimenez Yes, my initial wording was definitely lacking explanations.

                      – jlliagre
                      Mar 17 at 14:13











                    • I don't understand your answer, what doesn't fit at all to translate dont here. (that is much closer in almost every case)

                      – Teleporting Goat
                      Mar 18 at 10:36











                    • @TeleportingGoat You are right. What was more there to translate ce than dont in my examples. Answer reworked.

                      – jlliagre
                      Mar 18 at 11:23













                    • 2





                      You just can't explain grammar though translation to a language that uses a different grammar.

                      – Stéphane Gimenez
                      Mar 17 at 12:43











                    • @StéphaneGimenez Yes, my initial wording was definitely lacking explanations.

                      – jlliagre
                      Mar 17 at 14:13











                    • I don't understand your answer, what doesn't fit at all to translate dont here. (that is much closer in almost every case)

                      – Teleporting Goat
                      Mar 18 at 10:36











                    • @TeleportingGoat You are right. What was more there to translate ce than dont in my examples. Answer reworked.

                      – jlliagre
                      Mar 18 at 11:23








                    2




                    2





                    You just can't explain grammar though translation to a language that uses a different grammar.

                    – Stéphane Gimenez
                    Mar 17 at 12:43





                    You just can't explain grammar though translation to a language that uses a different grammar.

                    – Stéphane Gimenez
                    Mar 17 at 12:43













                    @StéphaneGimenez Yes, my initial wording was definitely lacking explanations.

                    – jlliagre
                    Mar 17 at 14:13





                    @StéphaneGimenez Yes, my initial wording was definitely lacking explanations.

                    – jlliagre
                    Mar 17 at 14:13













                    I don't understand your answer, what doesn't fit at all to translate dont here. (that is much closer in almost every case)

                    – Teleporting Goat
                    Mar 18 at 10:36





                    I don't understand your answer, what doesn't fit at all to translate dont here. (that is much closer in almost every case)

                    – Teleporting Goat
                    Mar 18 at 10:36













                    @TeleportingGoat You are right. What was more there to translate ce than dont in my examples. Answer reworked.

                    – jlliagre
                    Mar 18 at 11:23






                    @TeleportingGoat You are right. What was more there to translate ce than dont in my examples. Answer reworked.

                    – jlliagre
                    Mar 18 at 11:23


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to French Language Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ffrench.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34312%2fdifference-between-dont-avoir-besoin-and-en-avoir-besoin%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                    Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                    Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers