Defining a kind of “projection of a measure” in a precise wayIs there a change of variables formula for a measure theoretic integral that does not use the Lebesgue measureLebesgue measure on $mathbbR/mathbbZ$General questions on measure spacesProof that the class of measurable functions is closed under taking limits.What axioms must a Borel measure satisfy?Defining weak* convergence of measures using compactly supported continuous functionsNormalized partial sums of normal random variables are dense in $mathbbR$Change of measure to make things “easier”?Synthesis of discrete and continous probability definitionsMeasure over intersection of set with another measureNotation for defining a measure in terms of its density?

Using parameter substitution on a Bash array

when is out of tune ok?

How was Earth single-handedly capable of creating 3 of the 4 gods of chaos?

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Mapping a list into a phase plot

Time travel short story where a man arrives in the late 19th century in a time machine and then sends the machine back into the past

Products and sum of cubes in Fibonacci

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

What is difference between behavior and behaviour

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

Student evaluations of teaching assistants

The plural of 'stomach"

Will it be accepted, if there is no ''Main Character" stereotype?

Displaying the order of the columns of a table

Is there any reason not to eat food that's been dropped on the surface of the moon?

How does a character multiclassing into warlock get a focus?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

Trouble understanding overseas colleagues

Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?

Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?

Confused about a passage in Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal



Defining a kind of “projection of a measure” in a precise way


Is there a change of variables formula for a measure theoretic integral that does not use the Lebesgue measureLebesgue measure on $mathbbR/mathbbZ$General questions on measure spacesProof that the class of measurable functions is closed under taking limits.What axioms must a Borel measure satisfy?Defining weak* convergence of measures using compactly supported continuous functionsNormalized partial sums of normal random variables are dense in $mathbbR$Change of measure to make things “easier”?Synthesis of discrete and continous probability definitionsMeasure over intersection of set with another measureNotation for defining a measure in terms of its density?













2












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a probability measure $$mu: mathcalS times mathbbRrightarrow [0,1],$$where $mathcalS$ is some countable set. In some personal, handwritten lecture notes I'm reading it is then stated that we "take $(A,B)$ such that $(A,B) sim mu $ and consider $mathbbE[B]$".



I can't parse this sentence. So far, I've come across the "$sim$" notation only where one side was a random variable and the other a density function. But in this case that does not seem to apply.



So I'm not sure what $B$ is; it seems to be some kind of projection of $mu$ onto $mathbbR$. How can I define $B$ precisely/rigorously?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The keyword to search for might be "marginal distribution". (I am absolutely not sure about this)
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Mar 17 at 12:34










  • $begingroup$
    Note that in my answer, i disregard that your $mu$ has domain $mathcalStimes mathbbR$ and not the product sigma algebra on that space.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin
    Mar 18 at 15:20















2












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a probability measure $$mu: mathcalS times mathbbRrightarrow [0,1],$$where $mathcalS$ is some countable set. In some personal, handwritten lecture notes I'm reading it is then stated that we "take $(A,B)$ such that $(A,B) sim mu $ and consider $mathbbE[B]$".



I can't parse this sentence. So far, I've come across the "$sim$" notation only where one side was a random variable and the other a density function. But in this case that does not seem to apply.



So I'm not sure what $B$ is; it seems to be some kind of projection of $mu$ onto $mathbbR$. How can I define $B$ precisely/rigorously?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The keyword to search for might be "marginal distribution". (I am absolutely not sure about this)
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Mar 17 at 12:34










  • $begingroup$
    Note that in my answer, i disregard that your $mu$ has domain $mathcalStimes mathbbR$ and not the product sigma algebra on that space.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin
    Mar 18 at 15:20













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Suppose we have a probability measure $$mu: mathcalS times mathbbRrightarrow [0,1],$$where $mathcalS$ is some countable set. In some personal, handwritten lecture notes I'm reading it is then stated that we "take $(A,B)$ such that $(A,B) sim mu $ and consider $mathbbE[B]$".



I can't parse this sentence. So far, I've come across the "$sim$" notation only where one side was a random variable and the other a density function. But in this case that does not seem to apply.



So I'm not sure what $B$ is; it seems to be some kind of projection of $mu$ onto $mathbbR$. How can I define $B$ precisely/rigorously?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose we have a probability measure $$mu: mathcalS times mathbbRrightarrow [0,1],$$where $mathcalS$ is some countable set. In some personal, handwritten lecture notes I'm reading it is then stated that we "take $(A,B)$ such that $(A,B) sim mu $ and consider $mathbbE[B]$".



I can't parse this sentence. So far, I've come across the "$sim$" notation only where one side was a random variable and the other a density function. But in this case that does not seem to apply.



So I'm not sure what $B$ is; it seems to be some kind of projection of $mu$ onto $mathbbR$. How can I define $B$ precisely/rigorously?







probability-theory measure-theory products projection






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 17 at 12:29









temotemo

1,8231648




1,8231648











  • $begingroup$
    The keyword to search for might be "marginal distribution". (I am absolutely not sure about this)
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Mar 17 at 12:34










  • $begingroup$
    Note that in my answer, i disregard that your $mu$ has domain $mathcalStimes mathbbR$ and not the product sigma algebra on that space.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin
    Mar 18 at 15:20
















  • $begingroup$
    The keyword to search for might be "marginal distribution". (I am absolutely not sure about this)
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Mar 17 at 12:34










  • $begingroup$
    Note that in my answer, i disregard that your $mu$ has domain $mathcalStimes mathbbR$ and not the product sigma algebra on that space.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin
    Mar 18 at 15:20















$begingroup$
The keyword to search for might be "marginal distribution". (I am absolutely not sure about this)
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 17 at 12:34




$begingroup$
The keyword to search for might be "marginal distribution". (I am absolutely not sure about this)
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 17 at 12:34












$begingroup$
Note that in my answer, i disregard that your $mu$ has domain $mathcalStimes mathbbR$ and not the product sigma algebra on that space.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 18 at 15:20




$begingroup$
Note that in my answer, i disregard that your $mu$ has domain $mathcalStimes mathbbR$ and not the product sigma algebra on that space.
$endgroup$
– Martin
Mar 18 at 15:20










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Normally when you have a probability measure $nu$ on some measure space $(mathcalS,mathcalF,nu)$ and you write "let $X$ be a random variable with $Xsim nu$", then it just means that $X$ is a measurable mapping from some probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that $X(P)=nu$. In other words $nu$ is the distribution of $X$.



In your case you are given a probability measure $mu$ on the product space $mathcalStimes mathbbR$. When we now say that $(A,B) sim mu$, we simply mean that $A,B$ are random variables/elements defined on some common probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that the pushforward measure $(A,B)(P)=mu$, that is $mu$ is the simultaneous distribution of $A$ and $B$. Here $(A,B)(P)$ is the pushforward measure of $P$ with the bundle map $omegamapsto(A(omega),B(omega))inmathcalStimesmathbbR$. Constructing the bundle $(A,B)$ like this, will yield that the marginal distributions are given by $Asim pi_1(mu)$ and $B sim pi_2(mu)$



Similarly we can arrive at the following representation of the expectation of $B$:
beginalign*
E(B) &= int_Omega B(omega) , dP(omega) \
&= int_Omega pi_2(A(omega),B(omega)) , dP(omega)\
&=int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , d(A,B)(P)(a,b)\
&= int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , dmu(a,b) \
&= int_ mathbbR b , d pi_2(mu)(b)
endalign*

where we used the abstract change of variable theorem, and that $pi_2$ is the coordinate projection onto the second coordinate, that is $pi_2 :mathcalStimes mathbbRto mathbbR$ given by $pi_2(s,x) =x$ for any $(s,x)inmathcalStimes mathbbR$.



One way to construct $A$ and $B$ rigorously is to let the common probability space be given by $(mathcalStimes mathbbR, mathcalB(mathcal(S))otimes mathcalB(mathbbR),mu)$ and now define the random variables/elements as $A=pi_1$ and $B=pi_2$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    My guess is that $ mu $ is a form of probability mass-distribution function, and "$ (A,B) sim mu $" means that $ A $ and $ B $ are random variables jointly distributed according to $ mu $:
    $$ mathrmProbleft( leftA = sright & lefty<Ble xrightright) = muleft(s,xright) - muleft(s,yright) .$$
    The distribution function $ F_B $ of $ B $ would then be given by $ F_Bleft(xright) = displaystylesum_sinmathcalSmuleft(s,xright) $, and $ mathbbEleft[Bright] $ by the Lebesgue-Stieljes integral
    $$mathbbEleft[Bright] = int_-infty^infty x dF_Bleft(xright) .$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151483%2fdefining-a-kind-of-projection-of-a-measure-in-a-precise-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      Normally when you have a probability measure $nu$ on some measure space $(mathcalS,mathcalF,nu)$ and you write "let $X$ be a random variable with $Xsim nu$", then it just means that $X$ is a measurable mapping from some probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that $X(P)=nu$. In other words $nu$ is the distribution of $X$.



      In your case you are given a probability measure $mu$ on the product space $mathcalStimes mathbbR$. When we now say that $(A,B) sim mu$, we simply mean that $A,B$ are random variables/elements defined on some common probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that the pushforward measure $(A,B)(P)=mu$, that is $mu$ is the simultaneous distribution of $A$ and $B$. Here $(A,B)(P)$ is the pushforward measure of $P$ with the bundle map $omegamapsto(A(omega),B(omega))inmathcalStimesmathbbR$. Constructing the bundle $(A,B)$ like this, will yield that the marginal distributions are given by $Asim pi_1(mu)$ and $B sim pi_2(mu)$



      Similarly we can arrive at the following representation of the expectation of $B$:
      beginalign*
      E(B) &= int_Omega B(omega) , dP(omega) \
      &= int_Omega pi_2(A(omega),B(omega)) , dP(omega)\
      &=int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , d(A,B)(P)(a,b)\
      &= int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , dmu(a,b) \
      &= int_ mathbbR b , d pi_2(mu)(b)
      endalign*

      where we used the abstract change of variable theorem, and that $pi_2$ is the coordinate projection onto the second coordinate, that is $pi_2 :mathcalStimes mathbbRto mathbbR$ given by $pi_2(s,x) =x$ for any $(s,x)inmathcalStimes mathbbR$.



      One way to construct $A$ and $B$ rigorously is to let the common probability space be given by $(mathcalStimes mathbbR, mathcalB(mathcal(S))otimes mathcalB(mathbbR),mu)$ and now define the random variables/elements as $A=pi_1$ and $B=pi_2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        Normally when you have a probability measure $nu$ on some measure space $(mathcalS,mathcalF,nu)$ and you write "let $X$ be a random variable with $Xsim nu$", then it just means that $X$ is a measurable mapping from some probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that $X(P)=nu$. In other words $nu$ is the distribution of $X$.



        In your case you are given a probability measure $mu$ on the product space $mathcalStimes mathbbR$. When we now say that $(A,B) sim mu$, we simply mean that $A,B$ are random variables/elements defined on some common probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that the pushforward measure $(A,B)(P)=mu$, that is $mu$ is the simultaneous distribution of $A$ and $B$. Here $(A,B)(P)$ is the pushforward measure of $P$ with the bundle map $omegamapsto(A(omega),B(omega))inmathcalStimesmathbbR$. Constructing the bundle $(A,B)$ like this, will yield that the marginal distributions are given by $Asim pi_1(mu)$ and $B sim pi_2(mu)$



        Similarly we can arrive at the following representation of the expectation of $B$:
        beginalign*
        E(B) &= int_Omega B(omega) , dP(omega) \
        &= int_Omega pi_2(A(omega),B(omega)) , dP(omega)\
        &=int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , d(A,B)(P)(a,b)\
        &= int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , dmu(a,b) \
        &= int_ mathbbR b , d pi_2(mu)(b)
        endalign*

        where we used the abstract change of variable theorem, and that $pi_2$ is the coordinate projection onto the second coordinate, that is $pi_2 :mathcalStimes mathbbRto mathbbR$ given by $pi_2(s,x) =x$ for any $(s,x)inmathcalStimes mathbbR$.



        One way to construct $A$ and $B$ rigorously is to let the common probability space be given by $(mathcalStimes mathbbR, mathcalB(mathcal(S))otimes mathcalB(mathbbR),mu)$ and now define the random variables/elements as $A=pi_1$ and $B=pi_2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Normally when you have a probability measure $nu$ on some measure space $(mathcalS,mathcalF,nu)$ and you write "let $X$ be a random variable with $Xsim nu$", then it just means that $X$ is a measurable mapping from some probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that $X(P)=nu$. In other words $nu$ is the distribution of $X$.



          In your case you are given a probability measure $mu$ on the product space $mathcalStimes mathbbR$. When we now say that $(A,B) sim mu$, we simply mean that $A,B$ are random variables/elements defined on some common probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that the pushforward measure $(A,B)(P)=mu$, that is $mu$ is the simultaneous distribution of $A$ and $B$. Here $(A,B)(P)$ is the pushforward measure of $P$ with the bundle map $omegamapsto(A(omega),B(omega))inmathcalStimesmathbbR$. Constructing the bundle $(A,B)$ like this, will yield that the marginal distributions are given by $Asim pi_1(mu)$ and $B sim pi_2(mu)$



          Similarly we can arrive at the following representation of the expectation of $B$:
          beginalign*
          E(B) &= int_Omega B(omega) , dP(omega) \
          &= int_Omega pi_2(A(omega),B(omega)) , dP(omega)\
          &=int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , d(A,B)(P)(a,b)\
          &= int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , dmu(a,b) \
          &= int_ mathbbR b , d pi_2(mu)(b)
          endalign*

          where we used the abstract change of variable theorem, and that $pi_2$ is the coordinate projection onto the second coordinate, that is $pi_2 :mathcalStimes mathbbRto mathbbR$ given by $pi_2(s,x) =x$ for any $(s,x)inmathcalStimes mathbbR$.



          One way to construct $A$ and $B$ rigorously is to let the common probability space be given by $(mathcalStimes mathbbR, mathcalB(mathcal(S))otimes mathcalB(mathbbR),mu)$ and now define the random variables/elements as $A=pi_1$ and $B=pi_2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Normally when you have a probability measure $nu$ on some measure space $(mathcalS,mathcalF,nu)$ and you write "let $X$ be a random variable with $Xsim nu$", then it just means that $X$ is a measurable mapping from some probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that $X(P)=nu$. In other words $nu$ is the distribution of $X$.



          In your case you are given a probability measure $mu$ on the product space $mathcalStimes mathbbR$. When we now say that $(A,B) sim mu$, we simply mean that $A,B$ are random variables/elements defined on some common probability space $(Omega,mathcalH,P)$ such that the pushforward measure $(A,B)(P)=mu$, that is $mu$ is the simultaneous distribution of $A$ and $B$. Here $(A,B)(P)$ is the pushforward measure of $P$ with the bundle map $omegamapsto(A(omega),B(omega))inmathcalStimesmathbbR$. Constructing the bundle $(A,B)$ like this, will yield that the marginal distributions are given by $Asim pi_1(mu)$ and $B sim pi_2(mu)$



          Similarly we can arrive at the following representation of the expectation of $B$:
          beginalign*
          E(B) &= int_Omega B(omega) , dP(omega) \
          &= int_Omega pi_2(A(omega),B(omega)) , dP(omega)\
          &=int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , d(A,B)(P)(a,b)\
          &= int_mathcalStimes mathbbR pi_2(a,b) , dmu(a,b) \
          &= int_ mathbbR b , d pi_2(mu)(b)
          endalign*

          where we used the abstract change of variable theorem, and that $pi_2$ is the coordinate projection onto the second coordinate, that is $pi_2 :mathcalStimes mathbbRto mathbbR$ given by $pi_2(s,x) =x$ for any $(s,x)inmathcalStimes mathbbR$.



          One way to construct $A$ and $B$ rigorously is to let the common probability space be given by $(mathcalStimes mathbbR, mathcalB(mathcal(S))otimes mathcalB(mathbbR),mu)$ and now define the random variables/elements as $A=pi_1$ and $B=pi_2$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 17 at 13:22

























          answered Mar 17 at 13:15









          MartinMartin

          1,1811019




          1,1811019





















              1












              $begingroup$

              My guess is that $ mu $ is a form of probability mass-distribution function, and "$ (A,B) sim mu $" means that $ A $ and $ B $ are random variables jointly distributed according to $ mu $:
              $$ mathrmProbleft( leftA = sright & lefty<Ble xrightright) = muleft(s,xright) - muleft(s,yright) .$$
              The distribution function $ F_B $ of $ B $ would then be given by $ F_Bleft(xright) = displaystylesum_sinmathcalSmuleft(s,xright) $, and $ mathbbEleft[Bright] $ by the Lebesgue-Stieljes integral
              $$mathbbEleft[Bright] = int_-infty^infty x dF_Bleft(xright) .$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                My guess is that $ mu $ is a form of probability mass-distribution function, and "$ (A,B) sim mu $" means that $ A $ and $ B $ are random variables jointly distributed according to $ mu $:
                $$ mathrmProbleft( leftA = sright & lefty<Ble xrightright) = muleft(s,xright) - muleft(s,yright) .$$
                The distribution function $ F_B $ of $ B $ would then be given by $ F_Bleft(xright) = displaystylesum_sinmathcalSmuleft(s,xright) $, and $ mathbbEleft[Bright] $ by the Lebesgue-Stieljes integral
                $$mathbbEleft[Bright] = int_-infty^infty x dF_Bleft(xright) .$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  My guess is that $ mu $ is a form of probability mass-distribution function, and "$ (A,B) sim mu $" means that $ A $ and $ B $ are random variables jointly distributed according to $ mu $:
                  $$ mathrmProbleft( leftA = sright & lefty<Ble xrightright) = muleft(s,xright) - muleft(s,yright) .$$
                  The distribution function $ F_B $ of $ B $ would then be given by $ F_Bleft(xright) = displaystylesum_sinmathcalSmuleft(s,xright) $, and $ mathbbEleft[Bright] $ by the Lebesgue-Stieljes integral
                  $$mathbbEleft[Bright] = int_-infty^infty x dF_Bleft(xright) .$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  My guess is that $ mu $ is a form of probability mass-distribution function, and "$ (A,B) sim mu $" means that $ A $ and $ B $ are random variables jointly distributed according to $ mu $:
                  $$ mathrmProbleft( leftA = sright & lefty<Ble xrightright) = muleft(s,xright) - muleft(s,yright) .$$
                  The distribution function $ F_B $ of $ B $ would then be given by $ F_Bleft(xright) = displaystylesum_sinmathcalSmuleft(s,xright) $, and $ mathbbEleft[Bright] $ by the Lebesgue-Stieljes integral
                  $$mathbbEleft[Bright] = int_-infty^infty x dF_Bleft(xright) .$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 17 at 13:34

























                  answered Mar 17 at 13:20









                  lonza leggieralonza leggiera

                  1,20828




                  1,20828



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151483%2fdefining-a-kind-of-projection-of-a-measure-in-a-precise-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                      Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                      Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers