Invariant subspaces of the representation of $T(sigma)[x_1,…,x_n] = [x_sigma^-1(1),…,x_sigma^-1(n)]$Finding invariant subspacesIs every linear representation of a group $G$ on $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ a dual representation?Why does the tensor product of an irreducible representation with the sign representation yield another irreducible representation?Lifting representations, kernels and invariant subspacesUnitary representation with non-closed invariant subspaceShow permutation representation is reducible, by finding G-invariant subspaceTensor product with irreducible representation has no $G$-invariant submodulesRepresentations of the symmetric group induced by an embeddingTensor product and invariant subspacesLet $F$ be such that $textchar(F)=3$ and let $rho : S_3 rightarrow GL_3(F)$ be the standard representation. Show this is not completely reducible
Go Pregnant or Go Home
Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?
when is out of tune ok?
How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?
Can a monster with multiattack use this ability if they are missing a limb?
Is it correct to write "is not focus on"?
Valid Badminton Score?
Displaying the order of the columns of a table
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
Lay out the Carpet
Time travel short story where a man arrives in the late 19th century in a time machine and then sends the machine back into the past
What to do with wrong results in talks?
What defines a dissertation?
What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?
Personal Teleportation as a Weapon
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?
What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?
Everything Bob says is false. How does he get people to trust him?
Coordinate position not precise
Is there any easy technique written in Bhagavad GITA to control lust?
Using parameter substitution on a Bash array
Invariant subspaces of the representation of $T(sigma)[x_1,…,x_n] = [x_sigma^-1(1),…,x_sigma^-1(n)]$
Finding invariant subspacesIs every linear representation of a group $G$ on $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ a dual representation?Why does the tensor product of an irreducible representation with the sign representation yield another irreducible representation?Lifting representations, kernels and invariant subspacesUnitary representation with non-closed invariant subspaceShow permutation representation is reducible, by finding G-invariant subspaceTensor product with irreducible representation has no $G$-invariant submodulesRepresentations of the symmetric group induced by an embeddingTensor product and invariant subspacesLet $F$ be such that $textchar(F)=3$ and let $rho : S_3 rightarrow GL_3(F)$ be the standard representation. Show this is not completely reducible
$begingroup$
Where $sigma in S_n$ and the representation is over the vector space $mathbbC^n$
I'm trying to find as many invariant subspaces of this representation as possible. I don't know how to find these invariant subspaces other than the guess and check method - so far I have these two:
$$ sum_i=1^n x_i = 0$$
and
$$ x_1 = x_2 = ... = x_n$$
Are there any others? Is there a way of proving that there are (or aren't) any others? Is there a good method of finding these?
In general the approach seems to be to construct the matrix of the representation and find the eigenspaces, but I don't see how to do that with this particular representation. Is it possible?
representation-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Where $sigma in S_n$ and the representation is over the vector space $mathbbC^n$
I'm trying to find as many invariant subspaces of this representation as possible. I don't know how to find these invariant subspaces other than the guess and check method - so far I have these two:
$$ sum_i=1^n x_i = 0$$
and
$$ x_1 = x_2 = ... = x_n$$
Are there any others? Is there a way of proving that there are (or aren't) any others? Is there a good method of finding these?
In general the approach seems to be to construct the matrix of the representation and find the eigenspaces, but I don't see how to do that with this particular representation. Is it possible?
representation-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Where $sigma in S_n$ and the representation is over the vector space $mathbbC^n$
I'm trying to find as many invariant subspaces of this representation as possible. I don't know how to find these invariant subspaces other than the guess and check method - so far I have these two:
$$ sum_i=1^n x_i = 0$$
and
$$ x_1 = x_2 = ... = x_n$$
Are there any others? Is there a way of proving that there are (or aren't) any others? Is there a good method of finding these?
In general the approach seems to be to construct the matrix of the representation and find the eigenspaces, but I don't see how to do that with this particular representation. Is it possible?
representation-theory
$endgroup$
Where $sigma in S_n$ and the representation is over the vector space $mathbbC^n$
I'm trying to find as many invariant subspaces of this representation as possible. I don't know how to find these invariant subspaces other than the guess and check method - so far I have these two:
$$ sum_i=1^n x_i = 0$$
and
$$ x_1 = x_2 = ... = x_n$$
Are there any others? Is there a way of proving that there are (or aren't) any others? Is there a good method of finding these?
In general the approach seems to be to construct the matrix of the representation and find the eigenspaces, but I don't see how to do that with this particular representation. Is it possible?
representation-theory
representation-theory
asked Mar 17 at 12:41
Pedro BachPedro Bach
31
31
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In general, given a complex finite dimensional representation of a finite group, you can always use character theory to work out which irreducible representations of the group appear as subrepresentations of the given one, and with which multiplicity. You can even find the actual subspaces, using projection idempotents.
In your particular example, the two you have found are the only ones. The general theorem is that if a group $G$ acts doubly transitively on a set $X$, meaning that $G$ acts transitively and for every $xin X$, the stabiliser $rm Stab_G(x)$ acts transitively on $Xsetminus x$, then the permutation representation $mathbbC[X]$ has exactly one copy of the trivial representation, and the complement is irreducible.
You can find this in every introductory text book on representation theory, or in my notes. The business about permutation representations is treated in section 5.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151494%2finvariant-subspaces-of-the-representation-of-t-sigmax-1-x-n-x-sigm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In general, given a complex finite dimensional representation of a finite group, you can always use character theory to work out which irreducible representations of the group appear as subrepresentations of the given one, and with which multiplicity. You can even find the actual subspaces, using projection idempotents.
In your particular example, the two you have found are the only ones. The general theorem is that if a group $G$ acts doubly transitively on a set $X$, meaning that $G$ acts transitively and for every $xin X$, the stabiliser $rm Stab_G(x)$ acts transitively on $Xsetminus x$, then the permutation representation $mathbbC[X]$ has exactly one copy of the trivial representation, and the complement is irreducible.
You can find this in every introductory text book on representation theory, or in my notes. The business about permutation representations is treated in section 5.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, given a complex finite dimensional representation of a finite group, you can always use character theory to work out which irreducible representations of the group appear as subrepresentations of the given one, and with which multiplicity. You can even find the actual subspaces, using projection idempotents.
In your particular example, the two you have found are the only ones. The general theorem is that if a group $G$ acts doubly transitively on a set $X$, meaning that $G$ acts transitively and for every $xin X$, the stabiliser $rm Stab_G(x)$ acts transitively on $Xsetminus x$, then the permutation representation $mathbbC[X]$ has exactly one copy of the trivial representation, and the complement is irreducible.
You can find this in every introductory text book on representation theory, or in my notes. The business about permutation representations is treated in section 5.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, given a complex finite dimensional representation of a finite group, you can always use character theory to work out which irreducible representations of the group appear as subrepresentations of the given one, and with which multiplicity. You can even find the actual subspaces, using projection idempotents.
In your particular example, the two you have found are the only ones. The general theorem is that if a group $G$ acts doubly transitively on a set $X$, meaning that $G$ acts transitively and for every $xin X$, the stabiliser $rm Stab_G(x)$ acts transitively on $Xsetminus x$, then the permutation representation $mathbbC[X]$ has exactly one copy of the trivial representation, and the complement is irreducible.
You can find this in every introductory text book on representation theory, or in my notes. The business about permutation representations is treated in section 5.
$endgroup$
In general, given a complex finite dimensional representation of a finite group, you can always use character theory to work out which irreducible representations of the group appear as subrepresentations of the given one, and with which multiplicity. You can even find the actual subspaces, using projection idempotents.
In your particular example, the two you have found are the only ones. The general theorem is that if a group $G$ acts doubly transitively on a set $X$, meaning that $G$ acts transitively and for every $xin X$, the stabiliser $rm Stab_G(x)$ acts transitively on $Xsetminus x$, then the permutation representation $mathbbC[X]$ has exactly one copy of the trivial representation, and the complement is irreducible.
You can find this in every introductory text book on representation theory, or in my notes. The business about permutation representations is treated in section 5.
edited Mar 17 at 17:25
answered Mar 17 at 16:30
Alex B.Alex B.
16.5k13567
16.5k13567
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151494%2finvariant-subspaces-of-the-representation-of-t-sigmax-1-x-n-x-sigm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown