Fragmentation Level for HeapsIndex fragmentation increase as more row being deletedWhat happen when changing column type for a table with clustered index?Why index REBUILD does not reduce index fragmentatation with a page count > 1000?Different results rebuilding an index online and offlineDoes index rebuild time depend on the fragmentation level?Index rebuild - Not reducing fragmentationOnline & Offline Index RebuildMSSQL: High number of logical reads when inserting into fragmented heapNon-Unique Clustered Indexes AdministrationSQL Server hangs on index rebuild, works well after SQL service restart

Centering an <li> element without taking bullet point into account

Is there any reason not to eat food that's been dropped on the surface of the moon?

How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

Opposite of a diet

Products and sum of cubes in Fibonacci

Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle

is this a spam?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

Why does John Bercow say “unlock” after reading out the results of a vote?

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Student evaluations of teaching assistants

The baby cries all morning

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

Greatest common substring

There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

Can criminal fraud exist without damages?

Is there any easy technique written in Bhagavad GITA to control lust?

Will it be accepted, if there is no ''Main Character" stereotype?

What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections?

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

Do there exist finite commutative rings with identity that are not Bézout rings?



Fragmentation Level for Heaps


Index fragmentation increase as more row being deletedWhat happen when changing column type for a table with clustered index?Why index REBUILD does not reduce index fragmentatation with a page count > 1000?Different results rebuilding an index online and offlineDoes index rebuild time depend on the fragmentation level?Index rebuild - Not reducing fragmentationOnline & Offline Index RebuildMSSQL: High number of logical reads when inserting into fragmented heapNon-Unique Clustered Indexes AdministrationSQL Server hangs on index rebuild, works well after SQL service restart













2















I am currently using scripts provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for executing maintenance job and of-late I have been noticing that there are many tables (heaps) fragmentation level is alarmingly high and needs to be looked and taken action upon. I checked FAQ at the site and seems his script doesn't support rebuilding heaps. I used below query to find the fragmentation level:



SELECT dbschemas.[name] as 'Schema', 
dbtables.[name] as 'Table',
dbindexes.[name] as 'Index',
indexstats.alloc_unit_type_desc,
indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent,
indexstats.page_count
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) AS indexstats
INNER JOIN sys.tables dbtables on dbtables.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
INNER JOIN sys.schemas dbschemas on dbtables.[schema_id] = dbschemas.[schema_id]
INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS dbindexes ON dbindexes.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
AND indexstats.index_id = dbindexes.index_id
WHERE indexstats.database_id = DB_ID() and dbindexes.name is null
ORDER BY page_count desc, indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc


My application is supported by vendor and I have been communicating with them to change these heaps to tables and create clustered index however it hasn't yielded any meaningful result yet since they have defined primary key as unique non-clustered index and it is also part of foreign key, so needs to change at many level before doing any change. First of all, it took many days for me to explain the difference between clustered index and primary key with unique index.



I also went through the tweaks suggested by Mr. Brent Ozar for changing the defaults at script provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for index optimize in order to make it more efficient however I didn't find any details of heap rebuilding.



As per my understanding heap's fragmentation can be handled in two ways as described here:



  1. To create clustered index on table and drop it - This would clear all the fragmentation and also rebuild all non-clustered index however it would be time and I/O consuming.

  2. Rebuilding the heap - This would also clear the fragmentation and rebuild all non-clustered index part of table rebuild.

I can't go for option 1 because I am not aware of columns where clustered index can be created and also this could take longer than option 2.



I am looking for possibility of implementing option 1 in the scripts by Ola Hallengren or alternative method for handling this. Also to add, I would like to rebuild my heaps only when the size of heap is more than 10,000 pages and fragmentation level is more than 80.



I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP3 Enterprise Edition.



As a DBA - I don't prefer to have heaps in my database however since it is vendor supported application and since they have already defined primary key as unique index and these keys are foreign keys, its very difficult to change them to clustered due to references as well as likeliness of down time.



EDIT: I went through the link provided by Mr. Erik Darling and I can confirm that I have number of heaps with forwarded records or deletes across the databases. Now, I am back to point from where I had started i.e. with those two options. As I mentioned earlier, creating clustered index is very very difficult in my scenario and will require at least months(being optimistic) with likeliness of downtime considering complex foreign key structure. Need advise on rebuilding the heaps and possible side effect.










share|improve this question




























    2















    I am currently using scripts provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for executing maintenance job and of-late I have been noticing that there are many tables (heaps) fragmentation level is alarmingly high and needs to be looked and taken action upon. I checked FAQ at the site and seems his script doesn't support rebuilding heaps. I used below query to find the fragmentation level:



    SELECT dbschemas.[name] as 'Schema', 
    dbtables.[name] as 'Table',
    dbindexes.[name] as 'Index',
    indexstats.alloc_unit_type_desc,
    indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent,
    indexstats.page_count
    FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) AS indexstats
    INNER JOIN sys.tables dbtables on dbtables.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
    INNER JOIN sys.schemas dbschemas on dbtables.[schema_id] = dbschemas.[schema_id]
    INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS dbindexes ON dbindexes.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
    AND indexstats.index_id = dbindexes.index_id
    WHERE indexstats.database_id = DB_ID() and dbindexes.name is null
    ORDER BY page_count desc, indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc


    My application is supported by vendor and I have been communicating with them to change these heaps to tables and create clustered index however it hasn't yielded any meaningful result yet since they have defined primary key as unique non-clustered index and it is also part of foreign key, so needs to change at many level before doing any change. First of all, it took many days for me to explain the difference between clustered index and primary key with unique index.



    I also went through the tweaks suggested by Mr. Brent Ozar for changing the defaults at script provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for index optimize in order to make it more efficient however I didn't find any details of heap rebuilding.



    As per my understanding heap's fragmentation can be handled in two ways as described here:



    1. To create clustered index on table and drop it - This would clear all the fragmentation and also rebuild all non-clustered index however it would be time and I/O consuming.

    2. Rebuilding the heap - This would also clear the fragmentation and rebuild all non-clustered index part of table rebuild.

    I can't go for option 1 because I am not aware of columns where clustered index can be created and also this could take longer than option 2.



    I am looking for possibility of implementing option 1 in the scripts by Ola Hallengren or alternative method for handling this. Also to add, I would like to rebuild my heaps only when the size of heap is more than 10,000 pages and fragmentation level is more than 80.



    I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP3 Enterprise Edition.



    As a DBA - I don't prefer to have heaps in my database however since it is vendor supported application and since they have already defined primary key as unique index and these keys are foreign keys, its very difficult to change them to clustered due to references as well as likeliness of down time.



    EDIT: I went through the link provided by Mr. Erik Darling and I can confirm that I have number of heaps with forwarded records or deletes across the databases. Now, I am back to point from where I had started i.e. with those two options. As I mentioned earlier, creating clustered index is very very difficult in my scenario and will require at least months(being optimistic) with likeliness of downtime considering complex foreign key structure. Need advise on rebuilding the heaps and possible side effect.










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      I am currently using scripts provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for executing maintenance job and of-late I have been noticing that there are many tables (heaps) fragmentation level is alarmingly high and needs to be looked and taken action upon. I checked FAQ at the site and seems his script doesn't support rebuilding heaps. I used below query to find the fragmentation level:



      SELECT dbschemas.[name] as 'Schema', 
      dbtables.[name] as 'Table',
      dbindexes.[name] as 'Index',
      indexstats.alloc_unit_type_desc,
      indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent,
      indexstats.page_count
      FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) AS indexstats
      INNER JOIN sys.tables dbtables on dbtables.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
      INNER JOIN sys.schemas dbschemas on dbtables.[schema_id] = dbschemas.[schema_id]
      INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS dbindexes ON dbindexes.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
      AND indexstats.index_id = dbindexes.index_id
      WHERE indexstats.database_id = DB_ID() and dbindexes.name is null
      ORDER BY page_count desc, indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc


      My application is supported by vendor and I have been communicating with them to change these heaps to tables and create clustered index however it hasn't yielded any meaningful result yet since they have defined primary key as unique non-clustered index and it is also part of foreign key, so needs to change at many level before doing any change. First of all, it took many days for me to explain the difference between clustered index and primary key with unique index.



      I also went through the tweaks suggested by Mr. Brent Ozar for changing the defaults at script provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for index optimize in order to make it more efficient however I didn't find any details of heap rebuilding.



      As per my understanding heap's fragmentation can be handled in two ways as described here:



      1. To create clustered index on table and drop it - This would clear all the fragmentation and also rebuild all non-clustered index however it would be time and I/O consuming.

      2. Rebuilding the heap - This would also clear the fragmentation and rebuild all non-clustered index part of table rebuild.

      I can't go for option 1 because I am not aware of columns where clustered index can be created and also this could take longer than option 2.



      I am looking for possibility of implementing option 1 in the scripts by Ola Hallengren or alternative method for handling this. Also to add, I would like to rebuild my heaps only when the size of heap is more than 10,000 pages and fragmentation level is more than 80.



      I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP3 Enterprise Edition.



      As a DBA - I don't prefer to have heaps in my database however since it is vendor supported application and since they have already defined primary key as unique index and these keys are foreign keys, its very difficult to change them to clustered due to references as well as likeliness of down time.



      EDIT: I went through the link provided by Mr. Erik Darling and I can confirm that I have number of heaps with forwarded records or deletes across the databases. Now, I am back to point from where I had started i.e. with those two options. As I mentioned earlier, creating clustered index is very very difficult in my scenario and will require at least months(being optimistic) with likeliness of downtime considering complex foreign key structure. Need advise on rebuilding the heaps and possible side effect.










      share|improve this question
















      I am currently using scripts provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for executing maintenance job and of-late I have been noticing that there are many tables (heaps) fragmentation level is alarmingly high and needs to be looked and taken action upon. I checked FAQ at the site and seems his script doesn't support rebuilding heaps. I used below query to find the fragmentation level:



      SELECT dbschemas.[name] as 'Schema', 
      dbtables.[name] as 'Table',
      dbindexes.[name] as 'Index',
      indexstats.alloc_unit_type_desc,
      indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent,
      indexstats.page_count
      FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) AS indexstats
      INNER JOIN sys.tables dbtables on dbtables.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
      INNER JOIN sys.schemas dbschemas on dbtables.[schema_id] = dbschemas.[schema_id]
      INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS dbindexes ON dbindexes.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
      AND indexstats.index_id = dbindexes.index_id
      WHERE indexstats.database_id = DB_ID() and dbindexes.name is null
      ORDER BY page_count desc, indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc


      My application is supported by vendor and I have been communicating with them to change these heaps to tables and create clustered index however it hasn't yielded any meaningful result yet since they have defined primary key as unique non-clustered index and it is also part of foreign key, so needs to change at many level before doing any change. First of all, it took many days for me to explain the difference between clustered index and primary key with unique index.



      I also went through the tweaks suggested by Mr. Brent Ozar for changing the defaults at script provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for index optimize in order to make it more efficient however I didn't find any details of heap rebuilding.



      As per my understanding heap's fragmentation can be handled in two ways as described here:



      1. To create clustered index on table and drop it - This would clear all the fragmentation and also rebuild all non-clustered index however it would be time and I/O consuming.

      2. Rebuilding the heap - This would also clear the fragmentation and rebuild all non-clustered index part of table rebuild.

      I can't go for option 1 because I am not aware of columns where clustered index can be created and also this could take longer than option 2.



      I am looking for possibility of implementing option 1 in the scripts by Ola Hallengren or alternative method for handling this. Also to add, I would like to rebuild my heaps only when the size of heap is more than 10,000 pages and fragmentation level is more than 80.



      I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP3 Enterprise Edition.



      As a DBA - I don't prefer to have heaps in my database however since it is vendor supported application and since they have already defined primary key as unique index and these keys are foreign keys, its very difficult to change them to clustered due to references as well as likeliness of down time.



      EDIT: I went through the link provided by Mr. Erik Darling and I can confirm that I have number of heaps with forwarded records or deletes across the databases. Now, I am back to point from where I had started i.e. with those two options. As I mentioned earlier, creating clustered index is very very difficult in my scenario and will require at least months(being optimistic) with likeliness of downtime considering complex foreign key structure. Need advise on rebuilding the heaps and possible side effect.







      sql-server sql-server-2014 ola-hallengren fragmentation heap






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 18 at 8:49







      Learning_DBAdmin

















      asked Mar 17 at 9:17









      Learning_DBAdminLearning_DBAdmin

      380114




      380114




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:



          • Forwarded Records

          • Captive Pages

          I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.



          At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.



          You can read more about this stuff here:



          • sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes

          • How To Fix Forwarded Records

          • Mysterious Forwarded Records

          • Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups





          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "182"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232357%2ffragmentation-level-for-heaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            9














            Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:



            • Forwarded Records

            • Captive Pages

            I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.



            At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.



            You can read more about this stuff here:



            • sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes

            • How To Fix Forwarded Records

            • Mysterious Forwarded Records

            • Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups





            share|improve this answer





























              9














              Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:



              • Forwarded Records

              • Captive Pages

              I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.



              At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.



              You can read more about this stuff here:



              • sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes

              • How To Fix Forwarded Records

              • Mysterious Forwarded Records

              • Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups





              share|improve this answer



























                9












                9








                9







                Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:



                • Forwarded Records

                • Captive Pages

                I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.



                At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.



                You can read more about this stuff here:



                • sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes

                • How To Fix Forwarded Records

                • Mysterious Forwarded Records

                • Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups





                share|improve this answer















                Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:



                • Forwarded Records

                • Captive Pages

                I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.



                At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.



                You can read more about this stuff here:



                • sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes

                • How To Fix Forwarded Records

                • Mysterious Forwarded Records

                • Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 17 at 22:25









                Joe Obbish

                21.5k43189




                21.5k43189










                answered Mar 17 at 13:21









                Erik DarlingErik Darling

                22.1k1268110




                22.1k1268110



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232357%2ffragmentation-level-for-heaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye