Solving linear system using the invariance of the trace and determinantThe relation between Schimidt and Cross ProductState Space Difference Linear Dynamic SystemHow to determine the eigenvectors for this matrixWhy this system is not linear and how that influences the number of solutions?sequence of positive definite matricesSolving system of differential equations using matrix exponentiationSolving a system of linear equations that depends on parameters $alpha, beta in Bbb R$How to solve a matrix system using Gauss eliminationlinear system of equations and the intersection of two spansChange the trace of a Matrix
How does learning spells work when leveling a multiclass character?
EXM headers adding bounce@spe.sitecoremail.com as the sender
Boss Telling direct supervisor I snitched
Is the differential, dp, exact or not?
Averaging over columns while ignoring zero entries
Inorganic chemistry handbook with reaction lists
Create chunks from an array
How do you make a gun that shoots melee weapons and/or swords?
What exactly is the meaning of "fine wine"?
Does an unused member variable take up memory?
Can inspiration allow the Rogue to make a Sneak Attack?
How do I get an FAA okay for a private runway?
Why do we call complex numbers “numbers” but we don’t consider 2-vectors numbers?
The (Easy) Road to Code
Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?
Is there a math expression equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?
Can Witch Sight see through Mirror Image?
Is "cogitate" used appropriately in "I cogitate that success relies on hard work"?
Do I need a return ticket to Canada if I'm a Japanese National?
Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?
Was this cameo in Captain Marvel computer generated?
Are small insurances worth it?
How to add theme from github with composer
How spaceships determine each other's mass in space?
Solving linear system using the invariance of the trace and determinant
The relation between Schimidt and Cross ProductState Space Difference Linear Dynamic SystemHow to determine the eigenvectors for this matrixWhy this system is not linear and how that influences the number of solutions?sequence of positive definite matricesSolving system of differential equations using matrix exponentiationSolving a system of linear equations that depends on parameters $alpha, beta in Bbb R$How to solve a matrix system using Gauss eliminationlinear system of equations and the intersection of two spansChange the trace of a Matrix
$begingroup$
We have the system of equations
$$
v_k+1 = A v_k, quad forall k geq 1,
$$
where $mu leq 1$, $v_k = left( beginarrayc u_k-1 \ u_k endarray right)$, and $ A = left[ beginarraycc
0 & 1 \ 1 & i2mu endarray right]$.
Let $lambda_+$ and $lambda_-$ the eigenvalues of $A$. We want to prove that if $lambda_+ neq lambda_-$, then
$$ u_n = left( fraclambda_- lambda_+^n - lambda_+ lambda_-^nlambda_- - lambda_+ right) u_0 + left(fraclambda_-^n - lambda_+^nlambda_- - lambda_+ right) u_1.
$$
The given instructions say to do it making use of (*)"the invariance of the trace and determinant of $A$", but I don't see how to use these properties in this case.
I can nonetheless solve this problem by:
- Find the associatied eigenvectors $w_+$ and $w_-$ of $lambda_+$ and $lambda_-$ respectively, note that they are not orthogonal.
- Find $alpha, beta in mathbbC$ such that $v_1 = alpha w_+ + beta w_-$.
- By linearity, and eigenvectoricity, apply the matrix enough times since
$$ A(alpha w_+ + beta w_- ) = alpha lambda_+ w_+ + beta lambda_- w_-. $$ - Rearrange terms.
My question is about an alternative (and possibly easier/faster way to solve this problem). How to use the instruction * ?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have the system of equations
$$
v_k+1 = A v_k, quad forall k geq 1,
$$
where $mu leq 1$, $v_k = left( beginarrayc u_k-1 \ u_k endarray right)$, and $ A = left[ beginarraycc
0 & 1 \ 1 & i2mu endarray right]$.
Let $lambda_+$ and $lambda_-$ the eigenvalues of $A$. We want to prove that if $lambda_+ neq lambda_-$, then
$$ u_n = left( fraclambda_- lambda_+^n - lambda_+ lambda_-^nlambda_- - lambda_+ right) u_0 + left(fraclambda_-^n - lambda_+^nlambda_- - lambda_+ right) u_1.
$$
The given instructions say to do it making use of (*)"the invariance of the trace and determinant of $A$", but I don't see how to use these properties in this case.
I can nonetheless solve this problem by:
- Find the associatied eigenvectors $w_+$ and $w_-$ of $lambda_+$ and $lambda_-$ respectively, note that they are not orthogonal.
- Find $alpha, beta in mathbbC$ such that $v_1 = alpha w_+ + beta w_-$.
- By linearity, and eigenvectoricity, apply the matrix enough times since
$$ A(alpha w_+ + beta w_- ) = alpha lambda_+ w_+ + beta lambda_- w_-. $$ - Rearrange terms.
My question is about an alternative (and possibly easier/faster way to solve this problem). How to use the instruction * ?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Mixing superscripts and exponents is not a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you, I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the $i$ in font of $2mu$ intended ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, else the matrix is diagonalizable.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have the system of equations
$$
v_k+1 = A v_k, quad forall k geq 1,
$$
where $mu leq 1$, $v_k = left( beginarrayc u_k-1 \ u_k endarray right)$, and $ A = left[ beginarraycc
0 & 1 \ 1 & i2mu endarray right]$.
Let $lambda_+$ and $lambda_-$ the eigenvalues of $A$. We want to prove that if $lambda_+ neq lambda_-$, then
$$ u_n = left( fraclambda_- lambda_+^n - lambda_+ lambda_-^nlambda_- - lambda_+ right) u_0 + left(fraclambda_-^n - lambda_+^nlambda_- - lambda_+ right) u_1.
$$
The given instructions say to do it making use of (*)"the invariance of the trace and determinant of $A$", but I don't see how to use these properties in this case.
I can nonetheless solve this problem by:
- Find the associatied eigenvectors $w_+$ and $w_-$ of $lambda_+$ and $lambda_-$ respectively, note that they are not orthogonal.
- Find $alpha, beta in mathbbC$ such that $v_1 = alpha w_+ + beta w_-$.
- By linearity, and eigenvectoricity, apply the matrix enough times since
$$ A(alpha w_+ + beta w_- ) = alpha lambda_+ w_+ + beta lambda_- w_-. $$ - Rearrange terms.
My question is about an alternative (and possibly easier/faster way to solve this problem). How to use the instruction * ?
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
We have the system of equations
$$
v_k+1 = A v_k, quad forall k geq 1,
$$
where $mu leq 1$, $v_k = left( beginarrayc u_k-1 \ u_k endarray right)$, and $ A = left[ beginarraycc
0 & 1 \ 1 & i2mu endarray right]$.
Let $lambda_+$ and $lambda_-$ the eigenvalues of $A$. We want to prove that if $lambda_+ neq lambda_-$, then
$$ u_n = left( fraclambda_- lambda_+^n - lambda_+ lambda_-^nlambda_- - lambda_+ right) u_0 + left(fraclambda_-^n - lambda_+^nlambda_- - lambda_+ right) u_1.
$$
The given instructions say to do it making use of (*)"the invariance of the trace and determinant of $A$", but I don't see how to use these properties in this case.
I can nonetheless solve this problem by:
- Find the associatied eigenvectors $w_+$ and $w_-$ of $lambda_+$ and $lambda_-$ respectively, note that they are not orthogonal.
- Find $alpha, beta in mathbbC$ such that $v_1 = alpha w_+ + beta w_-$.
- By linearity, and eigenvectoricity, apply the matrix enough times since
$$ A(alpha w_+ + beta w_- ) = alpha lambda_+ w_+ + beta lambda_- w_-. $$ - Rearrange terms.
My question is about an alternative (and possibly easier/faster way to solve this problem). How to use the instruction * ?
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited 13 hours ago
pancho
asked 13 hours ago
panchopancho
531210
531210
$begingroup$
Mixing superscripts and exponents is not a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you, I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the $i$ in font of $2mu$ intended ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, else the matrix is diagonalizable.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mixing superscripts and exponents is not a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you, I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the $i$ in font of $2mu$ intended ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, else the matrix is diagonalizable.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Mixing superscripts and exponents is not a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Mixing superscripts and exponents is not a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you, I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you, I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the $i$ in font of $2mu$ intended ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the $i$ in font of $2mu$ intended ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, else the matrix is diagonalizable.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, else the matrix is diagonalizable.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The matrix equation boils down to
$$u_k+1=2imu,u_k+u_k-1,$$ which is a simple second order recurrence. The solution is a linear combination of the powers of the characteristic roots found from
$$u^2-2imu,u-1=0$$ and the coefficients are solution of
$$begincasesc_++c_-=u_0,\c_+u_++c_uu_-=u_1.endcases$$
Hint for using trace and determinant:
By induction,
$$v_n=A^nv_0.$$
The characteristic equation of $A$ is
$$lambda^2-textTr(A)lambda+textDet(A)=lambda^2-2imu,lambda-1=0,$$
so that the characteristic equation of $A^n$ is
$$lambda^2-(2imu)^n,lambda+(-1)^n=0.$$
Then the Eigenvectors of $A^n$ are the same as those of $A$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, thank you. Somehow it catches me out of guard, as recurrence solutions is not part of the course. But it does indeed answers the question.
$endgroup$
– pancho
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: still missing a way to find the Eigenvectors of $A^n$.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't them be the same ones as those of $A$ with eigenvalues $lambda_pm^n$?
$endgroup$
– pancho
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: stupid me, that's right.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139950%2fsolving-linear-system-using-the-invariance-of-the-trace-and-determinant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The matrix equation boils down to
$$u_k+1=2imu,u_k+u_k-1,$$ which is a simple second order recurrence. The solution is a linear combination of the powers of the characteristic roots found from
$$u^2-2imu,u-1=0$$ and the coefficients are solution of
$$begincasesc_++c_-=u_0,\c_+u_++c_uu_-=u_1.endcases$$
Hint for using trace and determinant:
By induction,
$$v_n=A^nv_0.$$
The characteristic equation of $A$ is
$$lambda^2-textTr(A)lambda+textDet(A)=lambda^2-2imu,lambda-1=0,$$
so that the characteristic equation of $A^n$ is
$$lambda^2-(2imu)^n,lambda+(-1)^n=0.$$
Then the Eigenvectors of $A^n$ are the same as those of $A$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, thank you. Somehow it catches me out of guard, as recurrence solutions is not part of the course. But it does indeed answers the question.
$endgroup$
– pancho
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: still missing a way to find the Eigenvectors of $A^n$.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't them be the same ones as those of $A$ with eigenvalues $lambda_pm^n$?
$endgroup$
– pancho
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: stupid me, that's right.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The matrix equation boils down to
$$u_k+1=2imu,u_k+u_k-1,$$ which is a simple second order recurrence. The solution is a linear combination of the powers of the characteristic roots found from
$$u^2-2imu,u-1=0$$ and the coefficients are solution of
$$begincasesc_++c_-=u_0,\c_+u_++c_uu_-=u_1.endcases$$
Hint for using trace and determinant:
By induction,
$$v_n=A^nv_0.$$
The characteristic equation of $A$ is
$$lambda^2-textTr(A)lambda+textDet(A)=lambda^2-2imu,lambda-1=0,$$
so that the characteristic equation of $A^n$ is
$$lambda^2-(2imu)^n,lambda+(-1)^n=0.$$
Then the Eigenvectors of $A^n$ are the same as those of $A$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, thank you. Somehow it catches me out of guard, as recurrence solutions is not part of the course. But it does indeed answers the question.
$endgroup$
– pancho
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: still missing a way to find the Eigenvectors of $A^n$.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't them be the same ones as those of $A$ with eigenvalues $lambda_pm^n$?
$endgroup$
– pancho
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: stupid me, that's right.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The matrix equation boils down to
$$u_k+1=2imu,u_k+u_k-1,$$ which is a simple second order recurrence. The solution is a linear combination of the powers of the characteristic roots found from
$$u^2-2imu,u-1=0$$ and the coefficients are solution of
$$begincasesc_++c_-=u_0,\c_+u_++c_uu_-=u_1.endcases$$
Hint for using trace and determinant:
By induction,
$$v_n=A^nv_0.$$
The characteristic equation of $A$ is
$$lambda^2-textTr(A)lambda+textDet(A)=lambda^2-2imu,lambda-1=0,$$
so that the characteristic equation of $A^n$ is
$$lambda^2-(2imu)^n,lambda+(-1)^n=0.$$
Then the Eigenvectors of $A^n$ are the same as those of $A$.
$endgroup$
The matrix equation boils down to
$$u_k+1=2imu,u_k+u_k-1,$$ which is a simple second order recurrence. The solution is a linear combination of the powers of the characteristic roots found from
$$u^2-2imu,u-1=0$$ and the coefficients are solution of
$$begincasesc_++c_-=u_0,\c_+u_++c_uu_-=u_1.endcases$$
Hint for using trace and determinant:
By induction,
$$v_n=A^nv_0.$$
The characteristic equation of $A$ is
$$lambda^2-textTr(A)lambda+textDet(A)=lambda^2-2imu,lambda-1=0,$$
so that the characteristic equation of $A^n$ is
$$lambda^2-(2imu)^n,lambda+(-1)^n=0.$$
Then the Eigenvectors of $A^n$ are the same as those of $A$.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
129k676227
129k676227
$begingroup$
Oh, thank you. Somehow it catches me out of guard, as recurrence solutions is not part of the course. But it does indeed answers the question.
$endgroup$
– pancho
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: still missing a way to find the Eigenvectors of $A^n$.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't them be the same ones as those of $A$ with eigenvalues $lambda_pm^n$?
$endgroup$
– pancho
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: stupid me, that's right.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oh, thank you. Somehow it catches me out of guard, as recurrence solutions is not part of the course. But it does indeed answers the question.
$endgroup$
– pancho
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: still missing a way to find the Eigenvectors of $A^n$.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't them be the same ones as those of $A$ with eigenvalues $lambda_pm^n$?
$endgroup$
– pancho
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: stupid me, that's right.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh, thank you. Somehow it catches me out of guard, as recurrence solutions is not part of the course. But it does indeed answers the question.
$endgroup$
– pancho
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh, thank you. Somehow it catches me out of guard, as recurrence solutions is not part of the course. But it does indeed answers the question.
$endgroup$
– pancho
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: still missing a way to find the Eigenvectors of $A^n$.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: still missing a way to find the Eigenvectors of $A^n$.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't them be the same ones as those of $A$ with eigenvalues $lambda_pm^n$?
$endgroup$
– pancho
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't them be the same ones as those of $A$ with eigenvalues $lambda_pm^n$?
$endgroup$
– pancho
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: stupid me, that's right.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@pancho: stupid me, that's right.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139950%2fsolving-linear-system-using-the-invariance-of-the-trace-and-determinant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Mixing superscripts and exponents is not a good idea.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you, I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the $i$ in font of $2mu$ intended ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes, else the matrix is diagonalizable.
$endgroup$
– pancho
13 hours ago