Increase the space between numerator and denominatorReformat frac depending on numerator/denominator size differenceAligned numerator and denominator in frac or any other variantequal size numerator and denominatorfrac command: height of the numerator vs height of denominatorthe numerator and denominator is not aligned well?Numbers are very small in numerator and denominator using fracAlign numerator and denominator of a fractionWhy is the space below the numerator different to the space above the denominator?Horizontal alignment of numerator and denominator in a frac expressionEqual space between numerator and denominator in fraction
The (Easy) Road to Code
Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!
Vector-transposing function
How do you use environments that have the same name within a single latex document?
Paper published similar to PhD thesis
direct sum of representation of product groups
Does an unused member variable take up memory?
How can I have x-axis ticks that show ticks scaled in powers of ten?
Short SF story. Females use stingers to implant eggs in yearfathers
What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?
Is there a math expression equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?
What exactly is the meaning of "fine wine"?
Why does a car's steering wheel get lighter with increasing speed
Why does this boat have a landing pad? (SpaceX's GO Searcher) Any plans for propulsive capsule landings?
Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?
What does it take to become a wilderness skills guide as a business?
How to distinguish easily different soldier of ww2?
Will the concrete slab in a partially heated shed conduct a lot of heat to the unconditioned area?
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
What is the oldest European royal house?
How to install "rounded" brake pads
PTIJ: Sport in the Torah
Is it appropriate to ask a former professor to order a library book for me through ILL?
Is the differential, dp, exact or not?
Increase the space between numerator and denominator
Reformat frac depending on numerator/denominator size differenceAligned numerator and denominator in frac or any other variantequal size numerator and denominatorfrac command: height of the numerator vs height of denominatorthe numerator and denominator is not aligned well?Numbers are very small in numerator and denominator using fracAlign numerator and denominator of a fractionWhy is the space below the numerator different to the space above the denominator?Horizontal alignment of numerator and denominator in a frac expressionEqual space between numerator and denominator in fraction
I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
fractions
add a comment |
I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
fractions
3
Usedfrac
instead offrac
.
– JouleV
19 hours ago
You could add avphantom
command (for examlevphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
add a comment |
I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
fractions
I have created two fractions (see example below), but the denominator is a little too close to the division bar. Can I change this somehow?
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
fractions
fractions
asked 19 hours ago
user503842user503842
1136
1136
3
Usedfrac
instead offrac
.
– JouleV
19 hours ago
You could add avphantom
command (for examlevphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
add a comment |
3
Usedfrac
instead offrac
.
– JouleV
19 hours ago
You could add avphantom
command (for examlevphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
3
3
Use
dfrac
instead of frac
.– JouleV
19 hours ago
Use
dfrac
instead of frac
.– JouleV
19 hours ago
You could add a
vphantom
command (for examle vphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.– koleygr
19 hours ago
You could add a
vphantom
command (for examle vphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.– koleygr
19 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
18 hours ago
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
18 hours ago
add a comment |
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac[]
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
19 hours ago
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
18 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478396%2fincrease-the-space-between-numerator-and-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
18 hours ago
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
18 hours ago
add a comment |
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
18 hours ago
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
18 hours ago
add a comment |
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
You have two main options:
Switch from
frac......
-notation to inline-fraction notationSwitch to display math to typeset the formulas for
mu
andsigma^2
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath % for "text" macro
begindocument
noindent
1. OP's original version:
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 = frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
2. Partial switch to inline-math notation
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance
$sigma_1^2, sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean
$mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$
and variance $sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2$.
medskipnoindent
3. Full switch to inline math notation
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu = (sigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2)/(sigma_1^2 +
sigma_2^2)$ and variance $sigma^2 = 1/(1/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2)$.
medskipnoindent
4. Switch to display math
Combining two Gaussians with means $mu_1$ and $mu_2$ and
variances $sigma_1^2$ and $sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian
with mean $mu$ and variance $sigma^2$ given by
[
mu=fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 + sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2
quadtextandquad
sigma^2 = frac11/sigma_1^2 + 1/sigma_2^2,.
]
enddocument
edited 7 hours ago
answered 19 hours ago
MicoMico
282k31385774
282k31385774
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
18 hours ago
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
18 hours ago
add a comment |
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting adfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...
– Mico
18 hours ago
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
18 hours ago
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)– koleygr
18 hours ago
everymathdisplaystyle
would be an additional option (Just in case that the document can afford such thing.) Of course I would not use it often, but have used in special cases that looked ok. (+1)– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
1
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a
dfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...– Mico
18 hours ago
@koleygr - Unless the paragraph in question is double-spaced (and hence already damaged beyond repair, typographically speaking), typesetting a
dfrac
expression in running text must surely be a high crime against all known forms of decent typography. :-) If you doubt this claim, just look at the outputs of Sebastiano's and Steven's solutions...– Mico
18 hours ago
1
1
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
18 hours ago
Thanks for the info, I also didn't like these kind of solutions but just added the comment in order to propose a more general answer for every case. But of course you are right!
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
1
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
18 hours ago
went for the last option. Thx, Mico!
– user503842
18 hours ago
add a comment |
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac[]
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
19 hours ago
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
18 hours ago
add a comment |
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac[]
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
19 hours ago
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
18 hours ago
add a comment |
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac[]
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
Here, I preserve the fraction in its native textstyle
, but add a (default) 1pt buffer above and below the numerator and denominator of each fraction, which can be changed with an optional argument. I call it qfrac[]
. The MWE shows before and after.
documentclassarticle
usepackagestackengine,scalerel
stackMath
newcommandqfrac[3][1pt]frac%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#2%
ThisStyleaddstackgap[#1]SavedStyle#3%
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = fracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
frac1frac1sigma_1^2 + frac1sigma_2^2$
Combining two Gaussians with mean $mu_1, mu_2$ and variance $sigma_1^2,
sigma_2^2$ yields a new Gaussian with mean $mu = qfracsigma_2^2 mu_1 +
sigma_1^2 mu_2sigma_1^2 + sigma_2^2$ and variance $sigma^2 =
qfrac[.5pt]1qfrac1sigma_1^2 + qfrac1sigma_2^2$
enddocument
edited 18 hours ago
answered 19 hours ago
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
157k9204411
157k9204411
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
19 hours ago
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
18 hours ago
add a comment |
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
19 hours ago
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
18 hours ago
1
1
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
(+1)... I would add your "1pt" inside an extra optional argument of the command.
– koleygr
19 hours ago
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
19 hours ago
@koleygr Excellent idea. Thanks
– Steven B. Segletes
19 hours ago
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
18 hours ago
Nice answer... Straightforward to the OP's problem. Welcome.
– koleygr
18 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478396%2fincrease-the-space-between-numerator-and-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Use
dfrac
instead offrac
.– JouleV
19 hours ago
You could add a
vphantom
command (for examlevphantomA^A^A
) in the beginning of each problematic dominator, and keep the style as inline math.– koleygr
19 hours ago