Does the following mean value theorem type statement hold in $mathbbR^n$counterexample for direct generalization of the one-dimensional Mean Value TheoremMean Value Theorem for a Multivariate Function $mathbbR^2 to mathbbR$Mean Value Theorem in $mathbb R^n$ for discontinuityMean Value Theorem for Several VariablesMean value theorem on a triangle in 2DMean value theorem for line integralHow to prove that a function is above a its tangent line using the mean value theorem?Inversion of mean value theoremProblem regarding mean value theoremUnderstanding Mean Value Theorem through graphsGraphical interpretation of mean value theorem

Issue with units for a rocket nozzle throat area problem

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?

Is it appropriate to ask a former professor to order a library book for me through ILL?

Should I apply for my boss's promotion?

How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?

3.5% Interest Student Loan or use all of my savings on Tuition?

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Will the concrete slab in a partially heated shed conduct a lot of heat to the unconditioned area?

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

Draw this image in the TIKZ package

Limpar string com Regex

Can Witch Sight see through Mirror Image?

Why do we call complex numbers “numbers” but we don’t consider 2-vectors numbers?

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Short story about cities being connected by a conveyor belt

How does a sound wave propagate?

Was this cameo in Captain Marvel computer generated?

How to recover against Snake as a heavyweight character?

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?



Does the following mean value theorem type statement hold in $mathbbR^n$


counterexample for direct generalization of the one-dimensional Mean Value TheoremMean Value Theorem for a Multivariate Function $mathbbR^2 to mathbbR$Mean Value Theorem in $mathbb R^n$ for discontinuityMean Value Theorem for Several VariablesMean value theorem on a triangle in 2DMean value theorem for line integralHow to prove that a function is above a its tangent line using the mean value theorem?Inversion of mean value theoremProblem regarding mean value theoremUnderstanding Mean Value Theorem through graphsGraphical interpretation of mean value theorem













2












$begingroup$


Let $c: [0,1] rightarrow mathbbR^n$ be a $C^1$ curve. Suppose $c$ passes through two points $c(x_1), c(x_2) in mathbbR^n$ with $0 < x_1 < x_1 < 1$. Does there exist a point $x_0 in (x_1, x_2)$ such that $Dc(x_0)$ lies on the line $c(x_2)-c(x_1)$? I'm not sure if my question makes sense as written, let me know if it doesn't! I will provide some intuition/example for what I want below.



This requirement seems much less strict than let's say the false, directly generalized MVT in this question: counterexample for direct generalization of the one-dimensional Mean Value Theorem.
In the case of the circle, as in the example in the answer to the above question, one could just slide the secant line determined by $c(x_1)$ and $c(x_2)$ until it became a tangent line, which would correspond to the point $x_0$ we are looking for. In $mathbbR^3$ this becomes a bit more confusing. For instance, the curve $c$ can move away from being "above" the segment $c(x_1)c(x_2)$. However, in that case what I'd like to say is something along the lines of: suppose the origin, $c(x_1)$, and $c(x_2)$ are not collinear. Then the origin and $c(x_1)$, the origin and $c(x_2)$ determine a plane. Does there exist a time point $x_0$ such that $Dc(t_0)$ lies in that plane? In general, the idea is similar to the mean value theorem, but most generalizations deal with the magnitude of the derivative, whereas here we just want the tangent to be parallel to the secant.



This is probably very simple but given the discussion above, I have trouble formulating exactly what I want.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    "two points "$c(x_1),c(x_1)$" -- typo? Second subscript $2$ instead?
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    16 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @coffeemath thanks I fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – forgotcalc
    8 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


Let $c: [0,1] rightarrow mathbbR^n$ be a $C^1$ curve. Suppose $c$ passes through two points $c(x_1), c(x_2) in mathbbR^n$ with $0 < x_1 < x_1 < 1$. Does there exist a point $x_0 in (x_1, x_2)$ such that $Dc(x_0)$ lies on the line $c(x_2)-c(x_1)$? I'm not sure if my question makes sense as written, let me know if it doesn't! I will provide some intuition/example for what I want below.



This requirement seems much less strict than let's say the false, directly generalized MVT in this question: counterexample for direct generalization of the one-dimensional Mean Value Theorem.
In the case of the circle, as in the example in the answer to the above question, one could just slide the secant line determined by $c(x_1)$ and $c(x_2)$ until it became a tangent line, which would correspond to the point $x_0$ we are looking for. In $mathbbR^3$ this becomes a bit more confusing. For instance, the curve $c$ can move away from being "above" the segment $c(x_1)c(x_2)$. However, in that case what I'd like to say is something along the lines of: suppose the origin, $c(x_1)$, and $c(x_2)$ are not collinear. Then the origin and $c(x_1)$, the origin and $c(x_2)$ determine a plane. Does there exist a time point $x_0$ such that $Dc(t_0)$ lies in that plane? In general, the idea is similar to the mean value theorem, but most generalizations deal with the magnitude of the derivative, whereas here we just want the tangent to be parallel to the secant.



This is probably very simple but given the discussion above, I have trouble formulating exactly what I want.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    "two points "$c(x_1),c(x_1)$" -- typo? Second subscript $2$ instead?
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    16 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @coffeemath thanks I fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – forgotcalc
    8 hours ago













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Let $c: [0,1] rightarrow mathbbR^n$ be a $C^1$ curve. Suppose $c$ passes through two points $c(x_1), c(x_2) in mathbbR^n$ with $0 < x_1 < x_1 < 1$. Does there exist a point $x_0 in (x_1, x_2)$ such that $Dc(x_0)$ lies on the line $c(x_2)-c(x_1)$? I'm not sure if my question makes sense as written, let me know if it doesn't! I will provide some intuition/example for what I want below.



This requirement seems much less strict than let's say the false, directly generalized MVT in this question: counterexample for direct generalization of the one-dimensional Mean Value Theorem.
In the case of the circle, as in the example in the answer to the above question, one could just slide the secant line determined by $c(x_1)$ and $c(x_2)$ until it became a tangent line, which would correspond to the point $x_0$ we are looking for. In $mathbbR^3$ this becomes a bit more confusing. For instance, the curve $c$ can move away from being "above" the segment $c(x_1)c(x_2)$. However, in that case what I'd like to say is something along the lines of: suppose the origin, $c(x_1)$, and $c(x_2)$ are not collinear. Then the origin and $c(x_1)$, the origin and $c(x_2)$ determine a plane. Does there exist a time point $x_0$ such that $Dc(t_0)$ lies in that plane? In general, the idea is similar to the mean value theorem, but most generalizations deal with the magnitude of the derivative, whereas here we just want the tangent to be parallel to the secant.



This is probably very simple but given the discussion above, I have trouble formulating exactly what I want.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Let $c: [0,1] rightarrow mathbbR^n$ be a $C^1$ curve. Suppose $c$ passes through two points $c(x_1), c(x_2) in mathbbR^n$ with $0 < x_1 < x_1 < 1$. Does there exist a point $x_0 in (x_1, x_2)$ such that $Dc(x_0)$ lies on the line $c(x_2)-c(x_1)$? I'm not sure if my question makes sense as written, let me know if it doesn't! I will provide some intuition/example for what I want below.



This requirement seems much less strict than let's say the false, directly generalized MVT in this question: counterexample for direct generalization of the one-dimensional Mean Value Theorem.
In the case of the circle, as in the example in the answer to the above question, one could just slide the secant line determined by $c(x_1)$ and $c(x_2)$ until it became a tangent line, which would correspond to the point $x_0$ we are looking for. In $mathbbR^3$ this becomes a bit more confusing. For instance, the curve $c$ can move away from being "above" the segment $c(x_1)c(x_2)$. However, in that case what I'd like to say is something along the lines of: suppose the origin, $c(x_1)$, and $c(x_2)$ are not collinear. Then the origin and $c(x_1)$, the origin and $c(x_2)$ determine a plane. Does there exist a time point $x_0$ such that $Dc(t_0)$ lies in that plane? In general, the idea is similar to the mean value theorem, but most generalizations deal with the magnitude of the derivative, whereas here we just want the tangent to be parallel to the secant.



This is probably very simple but given the discussion above, I have trouble formulating exactly what I want.







real-analysis calculus multivariable-calculus vector-analysis






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago







forgotcalc













New contributor




forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 16 hours ago









forgotcalcforgotcalc

112




112




New contributor




forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






forgotcalc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    "two points "$c(x_1),c(x_1)$" -- typo? Second subscript $2$ instead?
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    16 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @coffeemath thanks I fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – forgotcalc
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    "two points "$c(x_1),c(x_1)$" -- typo? Second subscript $2$ instead?
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    16 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @coffeemath thanks I fixed it
    $endgroup$
    – forgotcalc
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
"two points "$c(x_1),c(x_1)$" -- typo? Second subscript $2$ instead?
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
16 hours ago




$begingroup$
"two points "$c(x_1),c(x_1)$" -- typo? Second subscript $2$ instead?
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
16 hours ago












$begingroup$
@coffeemath thanks I fixed it
$endgroup$
– forgotcalc
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@coffeemath thanks I fixed it
$endgroup$
– forgotcalc
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

For $mathbb R^3$ this is true. Pick wlog basis in which endpoints of your $C^1$ curve lie in $z=0$ plane. In this case the 'tangent parallel to the plane' condition is equivalent to just having last component zero which is true by e.g. Rolle's theorem.



For $mathbb R^n$ for $n>3$ it is not true which is easy to see from the previous example. Take curve with endpoints $(1,0,0,0)$, $(0,1,0,0)$ and in the first two coordinates you take this curve to follow rectlinear motion between the endpoints. In the last two coordinates pick two functions with different locations of stationary points and zeros at endpoints giving you the counterexample.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Consider the helix
    $$gamma:quad tmapsto c(t):=(cos t,sin t, t)qquad(0leq tleq 2pi) .$$
    Then $c(2pi)-c(0)=(0,0,2pi)$, but there is no point on the curve $gamma$ with $c'(t)=(-sin tcos t, 1)$ parallel to the $z$-axis.



    A remark: One sentence in your question says: "Does $c'(t)$ lie in that plane for some $t,$?" Note that $c'(t)$ lying in some plane is asking much less than asking for $c'(t)$ being parallel to some vector.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the counterexample! Yes, what if I want containment in a plane? In the case of this example, I'm not sure which plane I would like exactly (since the two points $c(2pi)$ and $c(0)$ are collinear with $0$. But suppose they weren't, could we get containment in the plane?
      $endgroup$
      – forgotcalc
      8 hours ago










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    forgotcalc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140020%2fdoes-the-following-mean-value-theorem-type-statement-hold-in-mathbbrn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    For $mathbb R^3$ this is true. Pick wlog basis in which endpoints of your $C^1$ curve lie in $z=0$ plane. In this case the 'tangent parallel to the plane' condition is equivalent to just having last component zero which is true by e.g. Rolle's theorem.



    For $mathbb R^n$ for $n>3$ it is not true which is easy to see from the previous example. Take curve with endpoints $(1,0,0,0)$, $(0,1,0,0)$ and in the first two coordinates you take this curve to follow rectlinear motion between the endpoints. In the last two coordinates pick two functions with different locations of stationary points and zeros at endpoints giving you the counterexample.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      For $mathbb R^3$ this is true. Pick wlog basis in which endpoints of your $C^1$ curve lie in $z=0$ plane. In this case the 'tangent parallel to the plane' condition is equivalent to just having last component zero which is true by e.g. Rolle's theorem.



      For $mathbb R^n$ for $n>3$ it is not true which is easy to see from the previous example. Take curve with endpoints $(1,0,0,0)$, $(0,1,0,0)$ and in the first two coordinates you take this curve to follow rectlinear motion between the endpoints. In the last two coordinates pick two functions with different locations of stationary points and zeros at endpoints giving you the counterexample.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        For $mathbb R^3$ this is true. Pick wlog basis in which endpoints of your $C^1$ curve lie in $z=0$ plane. In this case the 'tangent parallel to the plane' condition is equivalent to just having last component zero which is true by e.g. Rolle's theorem.



        For $mathbb R^n$ for $n>3$ it is not true which is easy to see from the previous example. Take curve with endpoints $(1,0,0,0)$, $(0,1,0,0)$ and in the first two coordinates you take this curve to follow rectlinear motion between the endpoints. In the last two coordinates pick two functions with different locations of stationary points and zeros at endpoints giving you the counterexample.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        For $mathbb R^3$ this is true. Pick wlog basis in which endpoints of your $C^1$ curve lie in $z=0$ plane. In this case the 'tangent parallel to the plane' condition is equivalent to just having last component zero which is true by e.g. Rolle's theorem.



        For $mathbb R^n$ for $n>3$ it is not true which is easy to see from the previous example. Take curve with endpoints $(1,0,0,0)$, $(0,1,0,0)$ and in the first two coordinates you take this curve to follow rectlinear motion between the endpoints. In the last two coordinates pick two functions with different locations of stationary points and zeros at endpoints giving you the counterexample.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 13 hours ago









        RadostRadost

        6119




        6119





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Consider the helix
            $$gamma:quad tmapsto c(t):=(cos t,sin t, t)qquad(0leq tleq 2pi) .$$
            Then $c(2pi)-c(0)=(0,0,2pi)$, but there is no point on the curve $gamma$ with $c'(t)=(-sin tcos t, 1)$ parallel to the $z$-axis.



            A remark: One sentence in your question says: "Does $c'(t)$ lie in that plane for some $t,$?" Note that $c'(t)$ lying in some plane is asking much less than asking for $c'(t)$ being parallel to some vector.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the counterexample! Yes, what if I want containment in a plane? In the case of this example, I'm not sure which plane I would like exactly (since the two points $c(2pi)$ and $c(0)$ are collinear with $0$. But suppose they weren't, could we get containment in the plane?
              $endgroup$
              – forgotcalc
              8 hours ago















            1












            $begingroup$

            Consider the helix
            $$gamma:quad tmapsto c(t):=(cos t,sin t, t)qquad(0leq tleq 2pi) .$$
            Then $c(2pi)-c(0)=(0,0,2pi)$, but there is no point on the curve $gamma$ with $c'(t)=(-sin tcos t, 1)$ parallel to the $z$-axis.



            A remark: One sentence in your question says: "Does $c'(t)$ lie in that plane for some $t,$?" Note that $c'(t)$ lying in some plane is asking much less than asking for $c'(t)$ being parallel to some vector.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the counterexample! Yes, what if I want containment in a plane? In the case of this example, I'm not sure which plane I would like exactly (since the two points $c(2pi)$ and $c(0)$ are collinear with $0$. But suppose they weren't, could we get containment in the plane?
              $endgroup$
              – forgotcalc
              8 hours ago













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Consider the helix
            $$gamma:quad tmapsto c(t):=(cos t,sin t, t)qquad(0leq tleq 2pi) .$$
            Then $c(2pi)-c(0)=(0,0,2pi)$, but there is no point on the curve $gamma$ with $c'(t)=(-sin tcos t, 1)$ parallel to the $z$-axis.



            A remark: One sentence in your question says: "Does $c'(t)$ lie in that plane for some $t,$?" Note that $c'(t)$ lying in some plane is asking much less than asking for $c'(t)$ being parallel to some vector.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Consider the helix
            $$gamma:quad tmapsto c(t):=(cos t,sin t, t)qquad(0leq tleq 2pi) .$$
            Then $c(2pi)-c(0)=(0,0,2pi)$, but there is no point on the curve $gamma$ with $c'(t)=(-sin tcos t, 1)$ parallel to the $z$-axis.



            A remark: One sentence in your question says: "Does $c'(t)$ lie in that plane for some $t,$?" Note that $c'(t)$ lying in some plane is asking much less than asking for $c'(t)$ being parallel to some vector.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 11 hours ago









            Christian BlatterChristian Blatter

            175k8115327




            175k8115327











            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the counterexample! Yes, what if I want containment in a plane? In the case of this example, I'm not sure which plane I would like exactly (since the two points $c(2pi)$ and $c(0)$ are collinear with $0$. But suppose they weren't, could we get containment in the plane?
              $endgroup$
              – forgotcalc
              8 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the counterexample! Yes, what if I want containment in a plane? In the case of this example, I'm not sure which plane I would like exactly (since the two points $c(2pi)$ and $c(0)$ are collinear with $0$. But suppose they weren't, could we get containment in the plane?
              $endgroup$
              – forgotcalc
              8 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the counterexample! Yes, what if I want containment in a plane? In the case of this example, I'm not sure which plane I would like exactly (since the two points $c(2pi)$ and $c(0)$ are collinear with $0$. But suppose they weren't, could we get containment in the plane?
            $endgroup$
            – forgotcalc
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the counterexample! Yes, what if I want containment in a plane? In the case of this example, I'm not sure which plane I would like exactly (since the two points $c(2pi)$ and $c(0)$ are collinear with $0$. But suppose they weren't, could we get containment in the plane?
            $endgroup$
            – forgotcalc
            8 hours ago










            forgotcalc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            forgotcalc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            forgotcalc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            forgotcalc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140020%2fdoes-the-following-mean-value-theorem-type-statement-hold-in-mathbbrn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers