Double integral involving the normal CDFExpected value of minimum order statistic from a normal sampleExpected value of a random variable involving a standard normal random variableExpected number of events from Poisson distribution with Gamma priorequation involving the cumulative normal distributionFormular Derivation - Expected Value Truncated Normal DistributionExpectation of the softmax transform for Gaussian multivariate variablesSearch solution to an integralMoments of the horseshoe prior?Integral from the Adversarial Spheres paper (maximum of the difference between a constant and a normal random variable)How to calculate the integral of Normal CDF and Normal PDF?

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

Why isn't P and P/poly trivially the same?

I can't die. Who am I?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?

Propulsion Systems

Sort array by month and year

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

After Brexit, will the EU recognize British passports that are valid for more than ten years?

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

Generating a list with duplicate entries

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

How would an energy-based "projectile" blow up a spaceship?

Mixed Feelings - What am I

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Exempt portion of equation line from aligning?

Why does a car's steering wheel get lighter with increasing speed

Help! My Character is too much for her story!

Are small insurances worth it?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?



Double integral involving the normal CDF


Expected value of minimum order statistic from a normal sampleExpected value of a random variable involving a standard normal random variableExpected number of events from Poisson distribution with Gamma priorequation involving the cumulative normal distributionFormular Derivation - Expected Value Truncated Normal DistributionExpectation of the softmax transform for Gaussian multivariate variablesSearch solution to an integralMoments of the horseshoe prior?Integral from the Adversarial Spheres paper (maximum of the difference between a constant and a normal random variable)How to calculate the integral of Normal CDF and Normal PDF?













1












$begingroup$


I need to compute (or best approximate?) the following integral



$$int_0^infty int_0^infty (1 + alpha u)^-1(1 + v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) textdu textdv,qquad alpha, gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
where $Phi(cdot)$ is the standard normal cumulative distribution function. What strategy would you advise for this?



I don't know if this is helpful but I can also reformulate my problem (up to multiplicative constants) as computing the following expectation:



$$textEleft Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right)right,qquad gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
where
$$X sim textHalf-Cauchy(0,1), qquad Y sim textHalf-Cauchy(0,alpha^-1/2), quad alpha > 0.$$



EDIT: I made a mistake in the first integral, it should be:



$$int_0^infty int_0^infty (1 + alpha x^2)^-1(1 + y^2)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + x^2y^2right) textdx textdy,qquad alpha, gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
which now corresponds to the above expectation.



EDIT 2: Another way to solve my problem would be to characterise the difference (hopefully small?)
$$textEleft Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right)right - Phileft(fracbetasqrtgammaright),qquad gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
would it be sensible to approximate the difference
$$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right) - Phileft(fracbetasqrtgammaright),$$
with a Taylor series in zero or is this unreasonable given that the half-Cauchy distributions are heavy-tailed?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I would advise studying the asymptotic behavior, because this integral diverges.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your point, I actually made a mistake in the first integral, very sorry about this. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it would help to present the original version of this problem. This integral does not seem straightforward to evaluate using any other approach than brute force numerical quadrature, and I suspect that you have made a reformulation which is not necessarily helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin L
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You are probably right, in fact the original problem corresponds to that of the expectation above, with X and Y having their respective half-Cauchy distribution... I should probably have stated the problem directly in this way. Does this make you think of any other strategy?
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    58 mins ago















1












$begingroup$


I need to compute (or best approximate?) the following integral



$$int_0^infty int_0^infty (1 + alpha u)^-1(1 + v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) textdu textdv,qquad alpha, gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
where $Phi(cdot)$ is the standard normal cumulative distribution function. What strategy would you advise for this?



I don't know if this is helpful but I can also reformulate my problem (up to multiplicative constants) as computing the following expectation:



$$textEleft Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right)right,qquad gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
where
$$X sim textHalf-Cauchy(0,1), qquad Y sim textHalf-Cauchy(0,alpha^-1/2), quad alpha > 0.$$



EDIT: I made a mistake in the first integral, it should be:



$$int_0^infty int_0^infty (1 + alpha x^2)^-1(1 + y^2)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + x^2y^2right) textdx textdy,qquad alpha, gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
which now corresponds to the above expectation.



EDIT 2: Another way to solve my problem would be to characterise the difference (hopefully small?)
$$textEleft Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right)right - Phileft(fracbetasqrtgammaright),qquad gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
would it be sensible to approximate the difference
$$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right) - Phileft(fracbetasqrtgammaright),$$
with a Taylor series in zero or is this unreasonable given that the half-Cauchy distributions are heavy-tailed?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I would advise studying the asymptotic behavior, because this integral diverges.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your point, I actually made a mistake in the first integral, very sorry about this. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it would help to present the original version of this problem. This integral does not seem straightforward to evaluate using any other approach than brute force numerical quadrature, and I suspect that you have made a reformulation which is not necessarily helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin L
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You are probably right, in fact the original problem corresponds to that of the expectation above, with X and Y having their respective half-Cauchy distribution... I should probably have stated the problem directly in this way. Does this make you think of any other strategy?
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    58 mins ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I need to compute (or best approximate?) the following integral



$$int_0^infty int_0^infty (1 + alpha u)^-1(1 + v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) textdu textdv,qquad alpha, gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
where $Phi(cdot)$ is the standard normal cumulative distribution function. What strategy would you advise for this?



I don't know if this is helpful but I can also reformulate my problem (up to multiplicative constants) as computing the following expectation:



$$textEleft Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right)right,qquad gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
where
$$X sim textHalf-Cauchy(0,1), qquad Y sim textHalf-Cauchy(0,alpha^-1/2), quad alpha > 0.$$



EDIT: I made a mistake in the first integral, it should be:



$$int_0^infty int_0^infty (1 + alpha x^2)^-1(1 + y^2)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + x^2y^2right) textdx textdy,qquad alpha, gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
which now corresponds to the above expectation.



EDIT 2: Another way to solve my problem would be to characterise the difference (hopefully small?)
$$textEleft Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right)right - Phileft(fracbetasqrtgammaright),qquad gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
would it be sensible to approximate the difference
$$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right) - Phileft(fracbetasqrtgammaright),$$
with a Taylor series in zero or is this unreasonable given that the half-Cauchy distributions are heavy-tailed?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I need to compute (or best approximate?) the following integral



$$int_0^infty int_0^infty (1 + alpha u)^-1(1 + v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) textdu textdv,qquad alpha, gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
where $Phi(cdot)$ is the standard normal cumulative distribution function. What strategy would you advise for this?



I don't know if this is helpful but I can also reformulate my problem (up to multiplicative constants) as computing the following expectation:



$$textEleft Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right)right,qquad gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
where
$$X sim textHalf-Cauchy(0,1), qquad Y sim textHalf-Cauchy(0,alpha^-1/2), quad alpha > 0.$$



EDIT: I made a mistake in the first integral, it should be:



$$int_0^infty int_0^infty (1 + alpha x^2)^-1(1 + y^2)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + x^2y^2right) textdx textdy,qquad alpha, gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
which now corresponds to the above expectation.



EDIT 2: Another way to solve my problem would be to characterise the difference (hopefully small?)
$$textEleft Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right)right - Phileft(fracbetasqrtgammaright),qquad gamma > 0, quad beta in mathbbR,$$
would it be sensible to approximate the difference
$$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + X^2Y^2right) - Phileft(fracbetasqrtgammaright),$$
with a Taylor series in zero or is this unreasonable given that the half-Cauchy distributions are heavy-tailed?







normal-distribution expected-value approximation integral






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 33 mins ago







user79097

















asked 21 hours ago









user79097user79097

1306




1306











  • $begingroup$
    I would advise studying the asymptotic behavior, because this integral diverges.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your point, I actually made a mistake in the first integral, very sorry about this. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it would help to present the original version of this problem. This integral does not seem straightforward to evaluate using any other approach than brute force numerical quadrature, and I suspect that you have made a reformulation which is not necessarily helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin L
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You are probably right, in fact the original problem corresponds to that of the expectation above, with X and Y having their respective half-Cauchy distribution... I should probably have stated the problem directly in this way. Does this make you think of any other strategy?
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    58 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I would advise studying the asymptotic behavior, because this integral diverges.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your point, I actually made a mistake in the first integral, very sorry about this. I have edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it would help to present the original version of this problem. This integral does not seem straightforward to evaluate using any other approach than brute force numerical quadrature, and I suspect that you have made a reformulation which is not necessarily helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin L
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You are probably right, in fact the original problem corresponds to that of the expectation above, with X and Y having their respective half-Cauchy distribution... I should probably have stated the problem directly in this way. Does this make you think of any other strategy?
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    58 mins ago















$begingroup$
I would advise studying the asymptotic behavior, because this integral diverges.
$endgroup$
– whuber
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
I would advise studying the asymptotic behavior, because this integral diverges.
$endgroup$
– whuber
19 hours ago












$begingroup$
Thanks for your point, I actually made a mistake in the first integral, very sorry about this. I have edited the question.
$endgroup$
– user79097
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks for your point, I actually made a mistake in the first integral, very sorry about this. I have edited the question.
$endgroup$
– user79097
18 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I think it would help to present the original version of this problem. This integral does not seem straightforward to evaluate using any other approach than brute force numerical quadrature, and I suspect that you have made a reformulation which is not necessarily helpful.
$endgroup$
– Martin L
15 hours ago




$begingroup$
I think it would help to present the original version of this problem. This integral does not seem straightforward to evaluate using any other approach than brute force numerical quadrature, and I suspect that you have made a reformulation which is not necessarily helpful.
$endgroup$
– Martin L
15 hours ago












$begingroup$
You are probably right, in fact the original problem corresponds to that of the expectation above, with X and Y having their respective half-Cauchy distribution... I should probably have stated the problem directly in this way. Does this make you think of any other strategy?
$endgroup$
– user79097
58 mins ago




$begingroup$
You are probably right, in fact the original problem corresponds to that of the expectation above, with X and Y having their respective half-Cauchy distribution... I should probably have stated the problem directly in this way. Does this make you think of any other strategy?
$endgroup$
– user79097
58 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Under the conditions that $alpha, gamma, u,$ and $v$ are all positive,



$$beta/sqrtgamma + uv ge min(beta/sqrtgamma, 0) = delta gt -infty.$$



Therefore, because $Phi$ is a CDF for a distribution supported on $(-infty,infty),$ $$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright)ge Phi(delta) = epsilon gt 0.$$



Consequently



$$eqalign
&int_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) mathrmdumathrmdv \
&ge
epsilonint_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 mathrmdumathrmdv \
&= lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinftyepsilonint_0^M (1+alpha u)^-1mathrmduint_0^N (1+v)^-1 mathrmdv \
&=fracepsilonalpha lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinfty log(1 + Malpha)log(1 + N),
$$



which diverges to $+infty.$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, this is a very clear argument. For the "edited" integral, it seems that the argument doesn't apply anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I will let this answer stand because (a) the changes you made to the question translate in an obvious way to comparable changes in this analysis and (b) it sheds useful light on issues of numerical integration, which almost surely is going to be the solution. In particular, the convergence of each integral is only $O(1/M)$ and $O(1/N),$ which suggests preliminary manipulations to concentrate the mass of the integral into a smaller region would be useful if you want efficiency or accuracy.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks @whuber, that's helpful, I will try this. In the meantime, I added a second edit, where I give another formulation of my problem.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    31 mins ago


















1












$begingroup$

If approximation is OK, you could simulate the expected value through an average. A law of large numbers implies that the average converges to the expected value - provided the latter exists, which is however not obvious to me. I did simulate a few runs, though, and got very similar results each time, which is not indicative of an issue with heavy tails.



library(LaplacesDemon)

draws <- 1e6
alpha <- 3
gamma <- 1
beta <- 1
x <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1)
y <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1/sqrt(alpha))

mean(pnorm(beta/sqrt(gamma+x^2*y^2)))





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes I could do this, but in fact I would need an analytic approximation not a numeric one (in particular, alpha, beta and gamma are generic)...
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I hope somebody else could weigh in. Of course, you could run the code for any values of the parameters you are interested in.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph Hanck
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sure, the problem is that I really need something analytical unfortunately. But thanks very much for your help!
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f396326%2fdouble-integral-involving-the-normal-cdf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Under the conditions that $alpha, gamma, u,$ and $v$ are all positive,



$$beta/sqrtgamma + uv ge min(beta/sqrtgamma, 0) = delta gt -infty.$$



Therefore, because $Phi$ is a CDF for a distribution supported on $(-infty,infty),$ $$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright)ge Phi(delta) = epsilon gt 0.$$



Consequently



$$eqalign
&int_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) mathrmdumathrmdv \
&ge
epsilonint_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 mathrmdumathrmdv \
&= lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinftyepsilonint_0^M (1+alpha u)^-1mathrmduint_0^N (1+v)^-1 mathrmdv \
&=fracepsilonalpha lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinfty log(1 + Malpha)log(1 + N),
$$



which diverges to $+infty.$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, this is a very clear argument. For the "edited" integral, it seems that the argument doesn't apply anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I will let this answer stand because (a) the changes you made to the question translate in an obvious way to comparable changes in this analysis and (b) it sheds useful light on issues of numerical integration, which almost surely is going to be the solution. In particular, the convergence of each integral is only $O(1/M)$ and $O(1/N),$ which suggests preliminary manipulations to concentrate the mass of the integral into a smaller region would be useful if you want efficiency or accuracy.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks @whuber, that's helpful, I will try this. In the meantime, I added a second edit, where I give another formulation of my problem.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    31 mins ago















2












$begingroup$

Under the conditions that $alpha, gamma, u,$ and $v$ are all positive,



$$beta/sqrtgamma + uv ge min(beta/sqrtgamma, 0) = delta gt -infty.$$



Therefore, because $Phi$ is a CDF for a distribution supported on $(-infty,infty),$ $$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright)ge Phi(delta) = epsilon gt 0.$$



Consequently



$$eqalign
&int_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) mathrmdumathrmdv \
&ge
epsilonint_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 mathrmdumathrmdv \
&= lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinftyepsilonint_0^M (1+alpha u)^-1mathrmduint_0^N (1+v)^-1 mathrmdv \
&=fracepsilonalpha lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinfty log(1 + Malpha)log(1 + N),
$$



which diverges to $+infty.$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, this is a very clear argument. For the "edited" integral, it seems that the argument doesn't apply anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I will let this answer stand because (a) the changes you made to the question translate in an obvious way to comparable changes in this analysis and (b) it sheds useful light on issues of numerical integration, which almost surely is going to be the solution. In particular, the convergence of each integral is only $O(1/M)$ and $O(1/N),$ which suggests preliminary manipulations to concentrate the mass of the integral into a smaller region would be useful if you want efficiency or accuracy.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks @whuber, that's helpful, I will try this. In the meantime, I added a second edit, where I give another formulation of my problem.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    31 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Under the conditions that $alpha, gamma, u,$ and $v$ are all positive,



$$beta/sqrtgamma + uv ge min(beta/sqrtgamma, 0) = delta gt -infty.$$



Therefore, because $Phi$ is a CDF for a distribution supported on $(-infty,infty),$ $$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright)ge Phi(delta) = epsilon gt 0.$$



Consequently



$$eqalign
&int_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) mathrmdumathrmdv \
&ge
epsilonint_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 mathrmdumathrmdv \
&= lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinftyepsilonint_0^M (1+alpha u)^-1mathrmduint_0^N (1+v)^-1 mathrmdv \
&=fracepsilonalpha lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinfty log(1 + Malpha)log(1 + N),
$$



which diverges to $+infty.$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Under the conditions that $alpha, gamma, u,$ and $v$ are all positive,



$$beta/sqrtgamma + uv ge min(beta/sqrtgamma, 0) = delta gt -infty.$$



Therefore, because $Phi$ is a CDF for a distribution supported on $(-infty,infty),$ $$Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright)ge Phi(delta) = epsilon gt 0.$$



Consequently



$$eqalign
&int_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 Phileft(fracbetasqrtgamma + uvright) mathrmdumathrmdv \
&ge
epsilonint_0^infty int_0^infty (1+alpha u)^-1(1+v)^-1 mathrmdumathrmdv \
&= lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinftyepsilonint_0^M (1+alpha u)^-1mathrmduint_0^N (1+v)^-1 mathrmdv \
&=fracepsilonalpha lim_Mtoinftylim_Ntoinfty log(1 + Malpha)log(1 + N),
$$



which diverges to $+infty.$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 19 hours ago









whuberwhuber

205k33449816




205k33449816











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, this is a very clear argument. For the "edited" integral, it seems that the argument doesn't apply anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I will let this answer stand because (a) the changes you made to the question translate in an obvious way to comparable changes in this analysis and (b) it sheds useful light on issues of numerical integration, which almost surely is going to be the solution. In particular, the convergence of each integral is only $O(1/M)$ and $O(1/N),$ which suggests preliminary manipulations to concentrate the mass of the integral into a smaller region would be useful if you want efficiency or accuracy.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks @whuber, that's helpful, I will try this. In the meantime, I added a second edit, where I give another formulation of my problem.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    31 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, this is a very clear argument. For the "edited" integral, it seems that the argument doesn't apply anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    18 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I will let this answer stand because (a) the changes you made to the question translate in an obvious way to comparable changes in this analysis and (b) it sheds useful light on issues of numerical integration, which almost surely is going to be the solution. In particular, the convergence of each integral is only $O(1/M)$ and $O(1/N),$ which suggests preliminary manipulations to concentrate the mass of the integral into a smaller region would be useful if you want efficiency or accuracy.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks @whuber, that's helpful, I will try this. In the meantime, I added a second edit, where I give another formulation of my problem.
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    31 mins ago















$begingroup$
Thanks, this is a very clear argument. For the "edited" integral, it seems that the argument doesn't apply anymore.
$endgroup$
– user79097
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks, this is a very clear argument. For the "edited" integral, it seems that the argument doesn't apply anymore.
$endgroup$
– user79097
18 hours ago












$begingroup$
I will let this answer stand because (a) the changes you made to the question translate in an obvious way to comparable changes in this analysis and (b) it sheds useful light on issues of numerical integration, which almost surely is going to be the solution. In particular, the convergence of each integral is only $O(1/M)$ and $O(1/N),$ which suggests preliminary manipulations to concentrate the mass of the integral into a smaller region would be useful if you want efficiency or accuracy.
$endgroup$
– whuber
15 hours ago




$begingroup$
I will let this answer stand because (a) the changes you made to the question translate in an obvious way to comparable changes in this analysis and (b) it sheds useful light on issues of numerical integration, which almost surely is going to be the solution. In particular, the convergence of each integral is only $O(1/M)$ and $O(1/N),$ which suggests preliminary manipulations to concentrate the mass of the integral into a smaller region would be useful if you want efficiency or accuracy.
$endgroup$
– whuber
15 hours ago












$begingroup$
Thanks @whuber, that's helpful, I will try this. In the meantime, I added a second edit, where I give another formulation of my problem.
$endgroup$
– user79097
31 mins ago




$begingroup$
Thanks @whuber, that's helpful, I will try this. In the meantime, I added a second edit, where I give another formulation of my problem.
$endgroup$
– user79097
31 mins ago













1












$begingroup$

If approximation is OK, you could simulate the expected value through an average. A law of large numbers implies that the average converges to the expected value - provided the latter exists, which is however not obvious to me. I did simulate a few runs, though, and got very similar results each time, which is not indicative of an issue with heavy tails.



library(LaplacesDemon)

draws <- 1e6
alpha <- 3
gamma <- 1
beta <- 1
x <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1)
y <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1/sqrt(alpha))

mean(pnorm(beta/sqrt(gamma+x^2*y^2)))





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes I could do this, but in fact I would need an analytic approximation not a numeric one (in particular, alpha, beta and gamma are generic)...
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I hope somebody else could weigh in. Of course, you could run the code for any values of the parameters you are interested in.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph Hanck
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sure, the problem is that I really need something analytical unfortunately. But thanks very much for your help!
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago















1












$begingroup$

If approximation is OK, you could simulate the expected value through an average. A law of large numbers implies that the average converges to the expected value - provided the latter exists, which is however not obvious to me. I did simulate a few runs, though, and got very similar results each time, which is not indicative of an issue with heavy tails.



library(LaplacesDemon)

draws <- 1e6
alpha <- 3
gamma <- 1
beta <- 1
x <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1)
y <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1/sqrt(alpha))

mean(pnorm(beta/sqrt(gamma+x^2*y^2)))





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes I could do this, but in fact I would need an analytic approximation not a numeric one (in particular, alpha, beta and gamma are generic)...
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I hope somebody else could weigh in. Of course, you could run the code for any values of the parameters you are interested in.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph Hanck
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sure, the problem is that I really need something analytical unfortunately. But thanks very much for your help!
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

If approximation is OK, you could simulate the expected value through an average. A law of large numbers implies that the average converges to the expected value - provided the latter exists, which is however not obvious to me. I did simulate a few runs, though, and got very similar results each time, which is not indicative of an issue with heavy tails.



library(LaplacesDemon)

draws <- 1e6
alpha <- 3
gamma <- 1
beta <- 1
x <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1)
y <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1/sqrt(alpha))

mean(pnorm(beta/sqrt(gamma+x^2*y^2)))





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



If approximation is OK, you could simulate the expected value through an average. A law of large numbers implies that the average converges to the expected value - provided the latter exists, which is however not obvious to me. I did simulate a few runs, though, and got very similar results each time, which is not indicative of an issue with heavy tails.



library(LaplacesDemon)

draws <- 1e6
alpha <- 3
gamma <- 1
beta <- 1
x <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1)
y <- rhalfcauchy(draws, scale=1/sqrt(alpha))

mean(pnorm(beta/sqrt(gamma+x^2*y^2)))






share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 21 hours ago

























answered 21 hours ago









Christoph HanckChristoph Hanck

17.3k34074




17.3k34074











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes I could do this, but in fact I would need an analytic approximation not a numeric one (in particular, alpha, beta and gamma are generic)...
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I hope somebody else could weigh in. Of course, you could run the code for any values of the parameters you are interested in.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph Hanck
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sure, the problem is that I really need something analytical unfortunately. But thanks very much for your help!
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes I could do this, but in fact I would need an analytic approximation not a numeric one (in particular, alpha, beta and gamma are generic)...
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    OK, I hope somebody else could weigh in. Of course, you could run the code for any values of the parameters you are interested in.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph Hanck
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sure, the problem is that I really need something analytical unfortunately. But thanks very much for your help!
    $endgroup$
    – user79097
    21 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes I could do this, but in fact I would need an analytic approximation not a numeric one (in particular, alpha, beta and gamma are generic)...
$endgroup$
– user79097
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes I could do this, but in fact I would need an analytic approximation not a numeric one (in particular, alpha, beta and gamma are generic)...
$endgroup$
– user79097
21 hours ago












$begingroup$
OK, I hope somebody else could weigh in. Of course, you could run the code for any values of the parameters you are interested in.
$endgroup$
– Christoph Hanck
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
OK, I hope somebody else could weigh in. Of course, you could run the code for any values of the parameters you are interested in.
$endgroup$
– Christoph Hanck
21 hours ago












$begingroup$
Yes, sure, the problem is that I really need something analytical unfortunately. But thanks very much for your help!
$endgroup$
– user79097
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes, sure, the problem is that I really need something analytical unfortunately. But thanks very much for your help!
$endgroup$
– user79097
21 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f396326%2fdouble-integral-involving-the-normal-cdf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye