$limlimits_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0$ implies $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergentProof of $lim limits_ntoinftyleft(fraca_n+b_n2right)^n=sqrtab$If $lim limits_n to infty nb_n = 0 $, construct a convergent series such that $lim limits_n to infty fracb_na_n =0$.limit laws:$lim_ntoinftymax(a_n,b_n)=max(lim_ntoinftya_n,lim_ntoinftyb_n)$prove that $lim limits_n to inftya_n= lim limits_n to inftyb_n$Let $a_n,b_n>0 ,lim limits_n to infty [a_n+b_n]=0 $ then$ lim limits_n to inftya_n=0 $ and$ lim limits_n to infty b_n = 0$Prove formally that if $lim_nto+infty a_n = +infty$ then $lim_nto+inftyb_n = +infty.$Prove that: $limlimits_n to infty b_n = limlimits_n to infty a_n$.Suppose $lim_ntoinfty a_n = a$ and $lim _ntoinfty b_n = b$. Prove $a leq b$.Prove that if $lim_ntoinftyfraca_nb_n=+infty$ and $lim_ntoinftya_n=+infty$, then $lim_ntoinfty(a_n-b_n)=+infty$.If $lim_nrightarrowinfty fraca_nb_n = 0$ and $sum_n=0^infty b_n$ is convergent. Proving that $sum_n=0^infty a_n$ is also convergent

Insult for someone who "doesn't know anything"

What exactly is the meaning of "fine wine"?

Tool for measuring readability of English text

Do I need a return ticket to Canada if I'm a Japanese National?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

A running toilet that stops itself

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Is "cogitate" used appropriately in "I cogitate that success relies on hard work"?

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

Can multiple states demand income tax from an LLC?

Book where society has been split into 2 with a wall down the middle where one side embraced high tech whereas other side were totally against tech

Short story about cities being connected by a conveyor belt

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

Too soon for a plot twist?

Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?

A vote on the Brexit backstop

The (Easy) Road to Code

After Brexit, will the EU recognize British passports that are valid for more than ten years?

How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?

3.5% Interest Student Loan or use all of my savings on Tuition?

Why does this boat have a landing pad? (SpaceX's GO Searcher) Any plans for propulsive capsule landings?

Averaging over columns while ignoring zero entries

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?



$limlimits_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0$ implies $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent


Proof of $lim limits_ntoinftyleft(fraca_n+b_n2right)^n=sqrtab$If $lim limits_n to infty nb_n = 0 $, construct a convergent series such that $lim limits_n to infty fracb_na_n =0$.limit laws:$lim_ntoinftymax(a_n,b_n)=max(lim_ntoinftya_n,lim_ntoinftyb_n)$prove that $lim limits_n to inftya_n= lim limits_n to inftyb_n$Let $a_n,b_n>0 ,lim limits_n to infty [a_n+b_n]=0 $ then$ lim limits_n to inftya_n=0 $ and$ lim limits_n to infty b_n = 0$Prove formally that if $lim_nto+infty a_n = +infty$ then $lim_nto+inftyb_n = +infty.$Prove that: $limlimits_n to infty b_n = limlimits_n to infty a_n$.Suppose $lim_ntoinfty a_n = a$ and $lim _ntoinfty b_n = b$. Prove $a leq b$.Prove that if $lim_ntoinftyfraca_nb_n=+infty$ and $lim_ntoinftya_n=+infty$, then $lim_ntoinfty(a_n-b_n)=+infty$.If $lim_nrightarrowinfty fraca_nb_n = 0$ and $sum_n=0^infty b_n$ is convergent. Proving that $sum_n=0^infty a_n$ is also convergent













6












$begingroup$



Let $f:[0,1] to mathbb R$ be a continuous function and the sequences $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ s.t. $$lim_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0.$$ Prove that $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent.




I know that $$left|int_0^1f(x)dxright| le int_0^1|f(x)|dx.$$ Can somebody help me, please?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$



    Let $f:[0,1] to mathbb R$ be a continuous function and the sequences $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ s.t. $$lim_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0.$$ Prove that $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent.




    I know that $$left|int_0^1f(x)dxright| le int_0^1|f(x)|dx.$$ Can somebody help me, please?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6


      3



      $begingroup$



      Let $f:[0,1] to mathbb R$ be a continuous function and the sequences $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ s.t. $$lim_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0.$$ Prove that $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent.




      I know that $$left|int_0^1f(x)dxright| le int_0^1|f(x)|dx.$$ Can somebody help me, please?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Let $f:[0,1] to mathbb R$ be a continuous function and the sequences $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ s.t. $$lim_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0.$$ Prove that $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent.




      I know that $$left|int_0^1f(x)dxright| le int_0^1|f(x)|dx.$$ Can somebody help me, please?







      calculus integration sequences-and-series convergence






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago









      rtybase

      11.3k21533




      11.3k21533










      asked 15 hours ago









      GaboruGaboru

      3477




      3477




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
          $$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$



          Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.



          Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
          $$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$



          Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.



          This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.



          So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
          $$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$



          It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Very ingenious argument. +1
            $endgroup$
            – Paramanand Singh
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
            $endgroup$
            – Gaboru
            6 hours ago


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Here is an elementary proof:



          Lemma



          If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.



          Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.



          Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.



          Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            3 hours ago


















          0












          $begingroup$

          We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$



          Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.



          Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:



          $frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.



          Can you proceed ?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
            $endgroup$
            – Gaboru
            15 hours ago


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140000%2flim-limits-n-to-infty-int-01-fx-a-nx-b-n-dx-0-implies-a-n-n-b-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes








            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
            $$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$



            Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.



            Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
            $$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$



            Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.



            This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.



            So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
            $$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$



            It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Very ingenious argument. +1
              $endgroup$
              – Paramanand Singh
              9 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
              $endgroup$
              – Gaboru
              6 hours ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
            $$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$



            Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.



            Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
            $$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$



            Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.



            This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.



            So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
            $$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$



            It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Very ingenious argument. +1
              $endgroup$
              – Paramanand Singh
              9 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
              $endgroup$
              – Gaboru
              6 hours ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
            $$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$



            Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.



            Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
            $$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$



            Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.



            This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.



            So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
            $$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$



            It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
            $$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$



            Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.



            Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
            $$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$



            Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.



            This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.



            So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
            $$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$



            It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 11 hours ago









            TheSilverDoeTheSilverDoe

            3,220112




            3,220112











            • $begingroup$
              Very ingenious argument. +1
              $endgroup$
              – Paramanand Singh
              9 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
              $endgroup$
              – Gaboru
              6 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Very ingenious argument. +1
              $endgroup$
              – Paramanand Singh
              9 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
              $endgroup$
              – Gaboru
              6 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Very ingenious argument. +1
            $endgroup$
            – Paramanand Singh
            9 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Very ingenious argument. +1
            $endgroup$
            – Paramanand Singh
            9 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
            $endgroup$
            – Gaboru
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
            $endgroup$
            – Gaboru
            6 hours ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            Here is an elementary proof:



            Lemma



            If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.



            Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.



            Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.



            Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
              $endgroup$
              – Fred
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              3 hours ago















            1












            $begingroup$

            Here is an elementary proof:



            Lemma



            If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.



            Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.



            Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.



            Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
              $endgroup$
              – Fred
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              3 hours ago













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Here is an elementary proof:



            Lemma



            If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.



            Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.



            Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.



            Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Here is an elementary proof:



            Lemma



            If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.



            Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.



            Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.



            Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 15 hours ago









            Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

            65.6k42766




            65.6k42766











            • $begingroup$
              Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
              $endgroup$
              – Fred
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              3 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
              $endgroup$
              – Fred
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              3 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            5 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            4 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            3 hours ago











            0












            $begingroup$

            We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$



            Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.



            Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:



            $frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.



            Can you proceed ?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
              $endgroup$
              – Gaboru
              15 hours ago















            0












            $begingroup$

            We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$



            Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.



            Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:



            $frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.



            Can you proceed ?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
              $endgroup$
              – Gaboru
              15 hours ago













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$



            Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.



            Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:



            $frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.



            Can you proceed ?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$



            Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.



            Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:



            $frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.



            Can you proceed ?







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 15 hours ago









            FredFred

            47.8k1849




            47.8k1849







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
              $endgroup$
              – Gaboru
              15 hours ago












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
              $endgroup$
              – Gaboru
              15 hours ago







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
            $endgroup$
            – Gaboru
            15 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
            $endgroup$
            – Gaboru
            15 hours ago











            0












            $begingroup$

            Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 6 hours ago









                Martín-Blas Pérez PinillaMartín-Blas Pérez Pinilla

                34.5k42971




                34.5k42971



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140000%2flim-limits-n-to-infty-int-01-fx-a-nx-b-n-dx-0-implies-a-n-n-b-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye