$limlimits_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0$ implies $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergentProof of $lim limits_ntoinftyleft(fraca_n+b_n2right)^n=sqrtab$If $lim limits_n to infty nb_n = 0 $, construct a convergent series such that $lim limits_n to infty fracb_na_n =0$.limit laws:$lim_ntoinftymax(a_n,b_n)=max(lim_ntoinftya_n,lim_ntoinftyb_n)$prove that $lim limits_n to inftya_n= lim limits_n to inftyb_n$Let $a_n,b_n>0 ,lim limits_n to infty [a_n+b_n]=0 $ then$ lim limits_n to inftya_n=0 $ and$ lim limits_n to infty b_n = 0$Prove formally that if $lim_nto+infty a_n = +infty$ then $lim_nto+inftyb_n = +infty.$Prove that: $limlimits_n to infty b_n = limlimits_n to infty a_n$.Suppose $lim_ntoinfty a_n = a$ and $lim _ntoinfty b_n = b$. Prove $a leq b$.Prove that if $lim_ntoinftyfraca_nb_n=+infty$ and $lim_ntoinftya_n=+infty$, then $lim_ntoinfty(a_n-b_n)=+infty$.If $lim_nrightarrowinfty fraca_nb_n = 0$ and $sum_n=0^infty b_n$ is convergent. Proving that $sum_n=0^infty a_n$ is also convergent
Insult for someone who "doesn't know anything"
What exactly is the meaning of "fine wine"?
Tool for measuring readability of English text
Do I need a return ticket to Canada if I'm a Japanese National?
If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?
A running toilet that stops itself
Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?
Is "cogitate" used appropriately in "I cogitate that success relies on hard work"?
What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?
How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?
Can multiple states demand income tax from an LLC?
Book where society has been split into 2 with a wall down the middle where one side embraced high tech whereas other side were totally against tech
Short story about cities being connected by a conveyor belt
Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding
Too soon for a plot twist?
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
A vote on the Brexit backstop
The (Easy) Road to Code
After Brexit, will the EU recognize British passports that are valid for more than ten years?
How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?
3.5% Interest Student Loan or use all of my savings on Tuition?
Why does this boat have a landing pad? (SpaceX's GO Searcher) Any plans for propulsive capsule landings?
Averaging over columns while ignoring zero entries
Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?
$limlimits_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0$ implies $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent
Proof of $lim limits_ntoinftyleft(fraca_n+b_n2right)^n=sqrtab$If $lim limits_n to infty nb_n = 0 $, construct a convergent series such that $lim limits_n to infty fracb_na_n =0$.limit laws:$lim_ntoinftymax(a_n,b_n)=max(lim_ntoinftya_n,lim_ntoinftyb_n)$prove that $lim limits_n to inftya_n= lim limits_n to inftyb_n$Let $a_n,b_n>0 ,lim limits_n to infty [a_n+b_n]=0 $ then$ lim limits_n to inftya_n=0 $ and$ lim limits_n to infty b_n = 0$Prove formally that if $lim_nto+infty a_n = +infty$ then $lim_nto+inftyb_n = +infty.$Prove that: $limlimits_n to infty b_n = limlimits_n to infty a_n$.Suppose $lim_ntoinfty a_n = a$ and $lim _ntoinfty b_n = b$. Prove $a leq b$.Prove that if $lim_ntoinftyfraca_nb_n=+infty$ and $lim_ntoinftya_n=+infty$, then $lim_ntoinfty(a_n-b_n)=+infty$.If $lim_nrightarrowinfty fraca_nb_n = 0$ and $sum_n=0^infty b_n$ is convergent. Proving that $sum_n=0^infty a_n$ is also convergent
$begingroup$
Let $f:[0,1] to mathbb R$ be a continuous function and the sequences $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ s.t. $$lim_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0.$$ Prove that $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent.
I know that $$left|int_0^1f(x)dxright| le int_0^1|f(x)|dx.$$ Can somebody help me, please?
calculus integration sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:[0,1] to mathbb R$ be a continuous function and the sequences $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ s.t. $$lim_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0.$$ Prove that $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent.
I know that $$left|int_0^1f(x)dxright| le int_0^1|f(x)|dx.$$ Can somebody help me, please?
calculus integration sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:[0,1] to mathbb R$ be a continuous function and the sequences $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ s.t. $$lim_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0.$$ Prove that $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent.
I know that $$left|int_0^1f(x)dxright| le int_0^1|f(x)|dx.$$ Can somebody help me, please?
calculus integration sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
Let $f:[0,1] to mathbb R$ be a continuous function and the sequences $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ s.t. $$lim_nto infty int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx=0.$$ Prove that $(a_n)_n,(b_n)_n$ are convergent.
I know that $$left|int_0^1f(x)dxright| le int_0^1|f(x)|dx.$$ Can somebody help me, please?
calculus integration sequences-and-series convergence
calculus integration sequences-and-series convergence
edited 6 hours ago
rtybase
11.3k21533
11.3k21533
asked 15 hours ago
GaboruGaboru
3477
3477
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
$$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$
Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.
Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
$$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$
Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.
This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.
So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
$$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$
It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very ingenious argument. +1
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is an elementary proof:
Lemma
If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.
Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.
Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.
Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
$endgroup$
– Fred
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$
Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.
Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:
$frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.
Can you proceed ?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140000%2flim-limits-n-to-infty-int-01-fx-a-nx-b-n-dx-0-implies-a-n-n-b-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
$$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$
Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.
Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
$$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$
Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.
This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.
So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
$$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$
It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very ingenious argument. +1
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
$$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$
Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.
Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
$$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$
Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.
This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.
So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
$$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$
It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very ingenious argument. +1
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
$$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$
Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.
Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
$$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$
Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.
This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.
So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
$$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$
It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.
$endgroup$
Consider the metric space $E$ of the continuous functions on $[0,1]$, with the distance $d : E times E rightarrow mathbbR_+$ defined by
$$d(f,g)=int_0^1 |f(t)-g(t)| mathrmdt$$
Consider the subspace $A$ of affine functions.
Consider the application $varphi : [0,1]^2 rightarrow E$ defined for all $(a,b) in [0,1]^2$ by
$$varphi(a,b) = lbrace f : t rightarrow (b-a)t+a rbrace$$
Then it is easy to see that $varphi$ is continuous. Moreover, its image is precisely $A$. You deduce that $A$ is a compact subset of $E$ (as a continuous image of the compact $[0,1]^2$), and therefore $A$ is closed.
This proves, in the case of your question, that such a function $f$ has to be affine, as a limit of the closed set of affine functions.
So there exists $a,b$ such that $f(x)=ax+b$. You can rewrite the hypothesis
$$int_0^1 |(a-a_n)x +(b-b_n)| mathrmdx rightarrow 0$$
It is easy now to prove that the only possibility is that $a_n rightarrow a$ and $b_n rightarrow b$.
answered 11 hours ago
TheSilverDoeTheSilverDoe
3,220112
3,220112
$begingroup$
Very ingenious argument. +1
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Very ingenious argument. +1
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very ingenious argument. +1
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very ingenious argument. +1
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Don't you know a simpler proof?I do not know metric spaces.
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is an elementary proof:
Lemma
If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.
Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.
Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.
Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
$endgroup$
– Fred
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is an elementary proof:
Lemma
If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.
Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.
Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.
Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
$endgroup$
– Fred
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is an elementary proof:
Lemma
If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.
Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.
Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.
Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.
$endgroup$
Here is an elementary proof:
Lemma
If $int_0^1 |f(x)-f_n(x)|dx to 0$ (with $f,f_1,f_2,...$ continuous) and $F(x)=int_0^x f(y)dy,F_n(x)=int_0^x f_n(y)dy$ then $int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx to 0$.
Proof of lemma: $$int_0^1 |F(x)-F_n(x)|dx leq int_0^1int_0^x |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy dx$$ $$ =int_0^1int_y^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dxdy =int_0^1 (1-y)|f(y)-f_n(y)|dy leq int_0^1 |f(y)-f_n(y)|dy$$. This proves the lemma.
Now the hypothesis implies $int_0^1 (a_nx+b_n) dx$ converges and the lemma shows that $int_0^1 (a_nx^2/2+b_nx) dx$ also converges. From these two it is quite easy to show that $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ both converge.
Another proof using basic measure theory. It is given that $a_nx+b_n to f$ in $L^1$. This implies there is a subsequence which converges almost everywhere, say $a_n_kx+b_n_k to f(x)$ almost everywhere. Form this (using two values of $x$ for which convergence holds) we see that $a_n_k$ and $b_n_k$ both converge, say to $a$ and $b$ so $f(x)=ax+b$ for some $a$ and $b$. Note that this last equation uniquely determines $a$ and $b$. In fact $b=f(0)$ and $a =f(1)-f(0)$ We can now argue that every subsequence of $a_n_k$ has a subsequence converging to the same limit, so $a_n$ is convergent. Similarly $b_n$ is convegent.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 15 hours ago
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
65.6k42766
65.6k42766
$begingroup$
Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
$endgroup$
– Fred
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
$endgroup$
– Fred
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
$endgroup$
– Fred
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Why are the sequences $(a_n) $ and $(b_n) $ convergent?
$endgroup$
– Fred
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
A sequence $(x_n)$ in a metric space converges to $x$ iff every subsequence of $(x_n)$ has a further subseqeunce which converges to $x$. @Fred
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gaboru I have added another elementary proof.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$
Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.
Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:
$frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.
Can you proceed ?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$
Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.
Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:
$frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.
Can you proceed ?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$
Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.
Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:
$frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.
Can you proceed ?
$endgroup$
We have $|int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx| le int_0^1 |f(x)-a_nx-b_n| dx.$
Hence $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx to 0$.
Since $int_0^1 (f(x)-a_nx-b_n) dx = int_0^1 f(x) dx-frac12a_n-b_n$, we see:
$frac12a_n+b_n to int_0^1 f(x) dx$.
Can you proceed ?
answered 15 hours ago
FredFred
47.8k1849
47.8k1849
1
$begingroup$
But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
15 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
15 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
But that doesn't imply that both of them are convergent. Because we can be in a infinity-infinity case
$endgroup$
– Gaboru
15 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...
$endgroup$
Let be $L_n(x) = a_n x + b_n$. The hypothesis says that $L_nto f$ in $L^1$. Consider the vector subspace generated by the polynomials of degree $le 1$ and $f$. Obviously, is finite-dimensional. But in finite dimension all the norms are equivalent, so the convergence $L_nto f$ is uniform...
answered 6 hours ago
Martín-Blas Pérez PinillaMartín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
34.5k42971
34.5k42971
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140000%2flim-limits-n-to-infty-int-01-fx-a-nx-b-n-dx-0-implies-a-n-n-b-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown