How to prove that $p! (mod p^2) = p(p-1) $question about congruencesHow can I find $x$ such that $ax equiv 1 pmodbx+c$, given $a,b,c$?prove a=b (mod n) then ra=rb(mod n)Demostrating that a number x is the smallest such that 24x mod (59) = 2 mod (59)Intuition behind modular arithmetic $21z equiv 3 mod 16 iff 5z equiv 3 mod 16$If $a^p-1 equiv 1 pmod p$ and then $a^fracp-12 equiv 1$ or $p-1 pmod p$?Is this possible to solve through algebra?How does modular arithmetic work - Fermat's last theorem near misses?Prove that $(t$ mod $N) $ mod $ p = (t$ mod $p)$About Congruences of $fracabmod n$

How to add theme from github with composer

I am the person who abides by rules but breaks the rules . Who am I

Why does this boat have a landing pad? (SpaceX's GO Searcher) Any plans for propulsive capsule landings?

Why does a car's steering wheel get lighter with increasing speed

Paper published similar to PhD thesis

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Is "cogitate" used appropriately in "I cogitate that success relies on hard work"?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

Why is my explanation wrong?

How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

EXM headers adding bounce@spe.sitecoremail.com as the sender

An Undercover Army

How do you make a gun that shoots melee weapons and/or swords?

Can I challenge the interviewer to give me a proper technical feedback?

Why would /etc/passwd be used every time someone executes `ls -l` command?

How to recover against Snake as a heavyweight character?

Too soon for a plot twist?

Generating a list with duplicate entries

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

Geological Explanation for an Unusually Temperate Northern Mountain Valley

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Are small insurances worth it?



How to prove that $p! (mod p^2) = p(p-1) $


question about congruencesHow can I find $x$ such that $ax equiv 1 pmodbx+c$, given $a,b,c$?prove a=b (mod n) then ra=rb(mod n)Demostrating that a number x is the smallest such that 24x mod (59) = 2 mod (59)Intuition behind modular arithmetic $21z equiv 3 mod 16 iff 5z equiv 3 mod 16$If $a^p-1 equiv 1 pmod p$ and then $a^fracp-12 equiv 1$ or $p-1 pmod p$?Is this possible to solve through algebra?How does modular arithmetic work - Fermat's last theorem near misses?Prove that $(t$ mod $N) $ mod $ p = (t$ mod $p)$About Congruences of $fracabmod n$













0












$begingroup$


While doing my Math homework about Modular arithmetic. I accidentally found this



$p!equiv p(p-1)pmodp^2$



It's help me save time to find $ 21! (mod 361) $ a lot.



The question is how can I prove an equation above . Thank you in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Wilson's theorem will get you most of the way
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also note that your formula can be simplified: $p(p-1)=p^2-pequiv -p pmodp^2$. But pay attention: the equation holds if and only if $p$ is a prime number!
    $endgroup$
    – AlessioDV
    13 hours ago















0












$begingroup$


While doing my Math homework about Modular arithmetic. I accidentally found this



$p!equiv p(p-1)pmodp^2$



It's help me save time to find $ 21! (mod 361) $ a lot.



The question is how can I prove an equation above . Thank you in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Wilson's theorem will get you most of the way
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also note that your formula can be simplified: $p(p-1)=p^2-pequiv -p pmodp^2$. But pay attention: the equation holds if and only if $p$ is a prime number!
    $endgroup$
    – AlessioDV
    13 hours ago













0












0








0





$begingroup$


While doing my Math homework about Modular arithmetic. I accidentally found this



$p!equiv p(p-1)pmodp^2$



It's help me save time to find $ 21! (mod 361) $ a lot.



The question is how can I prove an equation above . Thank you in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




While doing my Math homework about Modular arithmetic. I accidentally found this



$p!equiv p(p-1)pmodp^2$



It's help me save time to find $ 21! (mod 361) $ a lot.



The question is how can I prove an equation above . Thank you in advance.







number-theory prime-numbers modular-arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 13 hours ago









Fabio Lucchini

8,66311426




8,66311426










asked 13 hours ago









ABCDEFG user157844ABCDEFG user157844

454310




454310







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Wilson's theorem will get you most of the way
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also note that your formula can be simplified: $p(p-1)=p^2-pequiv -p pmodp^2$. But pay attention: the equation holds if and only if $p$ is a prime number!
    $endgroup$
    – AlessioDV
    13 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Wilson's theorem will get you most of the way
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also note that your formula can be simplified: $p(p-1)=p^2-pequiv -p pmodp^2$. But pay attention: the equation holds if and only if $p$ is a prime number!
    $endgroup$
    – AlessioDV
    13 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Wilson's theorem will get you most of the way
$endgroup$
– Henry
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Wilson's theorem will get you most of the way
$endgroup$
– Henry
13 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Also note that your formula can be simplified: $p(p-1)=p^2-pequiv -p pmodp^2$. But pay attention: the equation holds if and only if $p$ is a prime number!
$endgroup$
– AlessioDV
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Also note that your formula can be simplified: $p(p-1)=p^2-pequiv -p pmodp^2$. But pay attention: the equation holds if and only if $p$ is a prime number!
$endgroup$
– AlessioDV
13 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Warning ! You statement is true only when $n$ is prime. For example for $n=4$, you don't have $n! = n(n-1) quad (mathrmmod text n^2)$. So I guess you can't use it with $21$ ("by hand", you can see that $21!=323 neq 21times 20 quad (mathrmmod text 361)$).



Proof when $n$ is prime :



By Wilson's theorem,
$$(p-1)! = -1 quad (mathrmmod text p)$$



Multiplying by $p$, this implies
$$p! = -p quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$



i.e.
$$p! = p^2-p = p(p-1) quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I never knew that we can multiply p throughout the whole equation including (mod p) , that's my truly open-eyed indeed. Wonderful! Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – ABCDEFG user157844
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Well, $a=b quad (mathrmmod text p)$ means that there exists $n$ such that $a-b = pn$. So multiplying by any number $q$, you get $aq-bq=pqn$, so $aq=bq quad (mathrmmod text pq)$.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSilverDoe
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Can we avoid to using Chinese remainder theorem by this principle?
    $endgroup$
    – ABCDEFG user157844
    12 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, I don't think so, Chinese remainder theorem helps to solve a system of congruence equations. It does not consist in just algebraic modifications of one equality.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSilverDoe
    12 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

Wilson's Theorem states that:



$(p-1)! = -1 (mod p^2)$ ......(a)



and



$p!=p(p-1)!$, $-1=p-1(mod p^2)$ .......(b)



applying (b) to (a), we have



$p!=p(p-1)!=p*-1 (mod p^2)$



which implies that



$p!=p(p-1) (mod p^2)$



Note that the $p$ above stands for prime numbers and $21$ is not a prime number since $21=3*7$. Therefore the above statements will not apply, but take for example, 5 is a prime number and



$5!=5*4*3*2*1=120=5(5-1)=20 (mod 25)$






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    $$p! equiv p(p-1) pmodp^2 Leftrightarrow p^2 mid p!-p(p-1) Leftrightarrow p mid (p-1)!-(p-1) Leftrightarrow (p-1)! equiv -1 pmodp$$
    If $p$ is a prime, then except for the two solutions of $x^2 equiv 1 pmodp$ (which are equal $pmodp$ for $p=2$), we can pair the numbers in $2, ... (p-2)$ in pairs $(x,y)$ with $x notequiv y pmodp$ such that $xy equiv 1 pmodp$, so $(p-2)! equiv 1 pmodp$ and so $(p-1)! equiv (p-1)(p-2)! equiv (p-1) equiv -1 pmodp$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139955%2fhow-to-prove-that-p-mod-p2-pp-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      Warning ! You statement is true only when $n$ is prime. For example for $n=4$, you don't have $n! = n(n-1) quad (mathrmmod text n^2)$. So I guess you can't use it with $21$ ("by hand", you can see that $21!=323 neq 21times 20 quad (mathrmmod text 361)$).



      Proof when $n$ is prime :



      By Wilson's theorem,
      $$(p-1)! = -1 quad (mathrmmod text p)$$



      Multiplying by $p$, this implies
      $$p! = -p quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$



      i.e.
      $$p! = p^2-p = p(p-1) quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        I never knew that we can multiply p throughout the whole equation including (mod p) , that's my truly open-eyed indeed. Wonderful! Thank you.
        $endgroup$
        – ABCDEFG user157844
        13 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Well, $a=b quad (mathrmmod text p)$ means that there exists $n$ such that $a-b = pn$. So multiplying by any number $q$, you get $aq-bq=pqn$, so $aq=bq quad (mathrmmod text pq)$.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSilverDoe
        13 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Can we avoid to using Chinese remainder theorem by this principle?
        $endgroup$
        – ABCDEFG user157844
        12 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        No, I don't think so, Chinese remainder theorem helps to solve a system of congruence equations. It does not consist in just algebraic modifications of one equality.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSilverDoe
        12 hours ago















      3












      $begingroup$

      Warning ! You statement is true only when $n$ is prime. For example for $n=4$, you don't have $n! = n(n-1) quad (mathrmmod text n^2)$. So I guess you can't use it with $21$ ("by hand", you can see that $21!=323 neq 21times 20 quad (mathrmmod text 361)$).



      Proof when $n$ is prime :



      By Wilson's theorem,
      $$(p-1)! = -1 quad (mathrmmod text p)$$



      Multiplying by $p$, this implies
      $$p! = -p quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$



      i.e.
      $$p! = p^2-p = p(p-1) quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        I never knew that we can multiply p throughout the whole equation including (mod p) , that's my truly open-eyed indeed. Wonderful! Thank you.
        $endgroup$
        – ABCDEFG user157844
        13 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Well, $a=b quad (mathrmmod text p)$ means that there exists $n$ such that $a-b = pn$. So multiplying by any number $q$, you get $aq-bq=pqn$, so $aq=bq quad (mathrmmod text pq)$.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSilverDoe
        13 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Can we avoid to using Chinese remainder theorem by this principle?
        $endgroup$
        – ABCDEFG user157844
        12 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        No, I don't think so, Chinese remainder theorem helps to solve a system of congruence equations. It does not consist in just algebraic modifications of one equality.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSilverDoe
        12 hours ago













      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$

      Warning ! You statement is true only when $n$ is prime. For example for $n=4$, you don't have $n! = n(n-1) quad (mathrmmod text n^2)$. So I guess you can't use it with $21$ ("by hand", you can see that $21!=323 neq 21times 20 quad (mathrmmod text 361)$).



      Proof when $n$ is prime :



      By Wilson's theorem,
      $$(p-1)! = -1 quad (mathrmmod text p)$$



      Multiplying by $p$, this implies
      $$p! = -p quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$



      i.e.
      $$p! = p^2-p = p(p-1) quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Warning ! You statement is true only when $n$ is prime. For example for $n=4$, you don't have $n! = n(n-1) quad (mathrmmod text n^2)$. So I guess you can't use it with $21$ ("by hand", you can see that $21!=323 neq 21times 20 quad (mathrmmod text 361)$).



      Proof when $n$ is prime :



      By Wilson's theorem,
      $$(p-1)! = -1 quad (mathrmmod text p)$$



      Multiplying by $p$, this implies
      $$p! = -p quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$



      i.e.
      $$p! = p^2-p = p(p-1) quad (mathrmmod text p^2)$$







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 13 hours ago

























      answered 13 hours ago









      TheSilverDoeTheSilverDoe

      3,220112




      3,220112











      • $begingroup$
        I never knew that we can multiply p throughout the whole equation including (mod p) , that's my truly open-eyed indeed. Wonderful! Thank you.
        $endgroup$
        – ABCDEFG user157844
        13 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Well, $a=b quad (mathrmmod text p)$ means that there exists $n$ such that $a-b = pn$. So multiplying by any number $q$, you get $aq-bq=pqn$, so $aq=bq quad (mathrmmod text pq)$.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSilverDoe
        13 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Can we avoid to using Chinese remainder theorem by this principle?
        $endgroup$
        – ABCDEFG user157844
        12 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        No, I don't think so, Chinese remainder theorem helps to solve a system of congruence equations. It does not consist in just algebraic modifications of one equality.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSilverDoe
        12 hours ago
















      • $begingroup$
        I never knew that we can multiply p throughout the whole equation including (mod p) , that's my truly open-eyed indeed. Wonderful! Thank you.
        $endgroup$
        – ABCDEFG user157844
        13 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Well, $a=b quad (mathrmmod text p)$ means that there exists $n$ such that $a-b = pn$. So multiplying by any number $q$, you get $aq-bq=pqn$, so $aq=bq quad (mathrmmod text pq)$.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSilverDoe
        13 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Can we avoid to using Chinese remainder theorem by this principle?
        $endgroup$
        – ABCDEFG user157844
        12 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        No, I don't think so, Chinese remainder theorem helps to solve a system of congruence equations. It does not consist in just algebraic modifications of one equality.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSilverDoe
        12 hours ago















      $begingroup$
      I never knew that we can multiply p throughout the whole equation including (mod p) , that's my truly open-eyed indeed. Wonderful! Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – ABCDEFG user157844
      13 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      I never knew that we can multiply p throughout the whole equation including (mod p) , that's my truly open-eyed indeed. Wonderful! Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – ABCDEFG user157844
      13 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Well, $a=b quad (mathrmmod text p)$ means that there exists $n$ such that $a-b = pn$. So multiplying by any number $q$, you get $aq-bq=pqn$, so $aq=bq quad (mathrmmod text pq)$.
      $endgroup$
      – TheSilverDoe
      13 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Well, $a=b quad (mathrmmod text p)$ means that there exists $n$ such that $a-b = pn$. So multiplying by any number $q$, you get $aq-bq=pqn$, so $aq=bq quad (mathrmmod text pq)$.
      $endgroup$
      – TheSilverDoe
      13 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Can we avoid to using Chinese remainder theorem by this principle?
      $endgroup$
      – ABCDEFG user157844
      12 hours ago





      $begingroup$
      Can we avoid to using Chinese remainder theorem by this principle?
      $endgroup$
      – ABCDEFG user157844
      12 hours ago





      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      No, I don't think so, Chinese remainder theorem helps to solve a system of congruence equations. It does not consist in just algebraic modifications of one equality.
      $endgroup$
      – TheSilverDoe
      12 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      No, I don't think so, Chinese remainder theorem helps to solve a system of congruence equations. It does not consist in just algebraic modifications of one equality.
      $endgroup$
      – TheSilverDoe
      12 hours ago











      0












      $begingroup$

      Wilson's Theorem states that:



      $(p-1)! = -1 (mod p^2)$ ......(a)



      and



      $p!=p(p-1)!$, $-1=p-1(mod p^2)$ .......(b)



      applying (b) to (a), we have



      $p!=p(p-1)!=p*-1 (mod p^2)$



      which implies that



      $p!=p(p-1) (mod p^2)$



      Note that the $p$ above stands for prime numbers and $21$ is not a prime number since $21=3*7$. Therefore the above statements will not apply, but take for example, 5 is a prime number and



      $5!=5*4*3*2*1=120=5(5-1)=20 (mod 25)$






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$

















        0












        $begingroup$

        Wilson's Theorem states that:



        $(p-1)! = -1 (mod p^2)$ ......(a)



        and



        $p!=p(p-1)!$, $-1=p-1(mod p^2)$ .......(b)



        applying (b) to (a), we have



        $p!=p(p-1)!=p*-1 (mod p^2)$



        which implies that



        $p!=p(p-1) (mod p^2)$



        Note that the $p$ above stands for prime numbers and $21$ is not a prime number since $21=3*7$. Therefore the above statements will not apply, but take for example, 5 is a prime number and



        $5!=5*4*3*2*1=120=5(5-1)=20 (mod 25)$






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Wilson's Theorem states that:



          $(p-1)! = -1 (mod p^2)$ ......(a)



          and



          $p!=p(p-1)!$, $-1=p-1(mod p^2)$ .......(b)



          applying (b) to (a), we have



          $p!=p(p-1)!=p*-1 (mod p^2)$



          which implies that



          $p!=p(p-1) (mod p^2)$



          Note that the $p$ above stands for prime numbers and $21$ is not a prime number since $21=3*7$. Therefore the above statements will not apply, but take for example, 5 is a prime number and



          $5!=5*4*3*2*1=120=5(5-1)=20 (mod 25)$






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          Wilson's Theorem states that:



          $(p-1)! = -1 (mod p^2)$ ......(a)



          and



          $p!=p(p-1)!$, $-1=p-1(mod p^2)$ .......(b)



          applying (b) to (a), we have



          $p!=p(p-1)!=p*-1 (mod p^2)$



          which implies that



          $p!=p(p-1) (mod p^2)$



          Note that the $p$ above stands for prime numbers and $21$ is not a prime number since $21=3*7$. Therefore the above statements will not apply, but take for example, 5 is a prime number and



          $5!=5*4*3*2*1=120=5(5-1)=20 (mod 25)$







          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 13 hours ago









          Goodness ThankyouGoodness Thankyou

          11




          11




          New contributor




          Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Goodness Thankyou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              0












              $begingroup$

              $$p! equiv p(p-1) pmodp^2 Leftrightarrow p^2 mid p!-p(p-1) Leftrightarrow p mid (p-1)!-(p-1) Leftrightarrow (p-1)! equiv -1 pmodp$$
              If $p$ is a prime, then except for the two solutions of $x^2 equiv 1 pmodp$ (which are equal $pmodp$ for $p=2$), we can pair the numbers in $2, ... (p-2)$ in pairs $(x,y)$ with $x notequiv y pmodp$ such that $xy equiv 1 pmodp$, so $(p-2)! equiv 1 pmodp$ and so $(p-1)! equiv (p-1)(p-2)! equiv (p-1) equiv -1 pmodp$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                $$p! equiv p(p-1) pmodp^2 Leftrightarrow p^2 mid p!-p(p-1) Leftrightarrow p mid (p-1)!-(p-1) Leftrightarrow (p-1)! equiv -1 pmodp$$
                If $p$ is a prime, then except for the two solutions of $x^2 equiv 1 pmodp$ (which are equal $pmodp$ for $p=2$), we can pair the numbers in $2, ... (p-2)$ in pairs $(x,y)$ with $x notequiv y pmodp$ such that $xy equiv 1 pmodp$, so $(p-2)! equiv 1 pmodp$ and so $(p-1)! equiv (p-1)(p-2)! equiv (p-1) equiv -1 pmodp$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  $$p! equiv p(p-1) pmodp^2 Leftrightarrow p^2 mid p!-p(p-1) Leftrightarrow p mid (p-1)!-(p-1) Leftrightarrow (p-1)! equiv -1 pmodp$$
                  If $p$ is a prime, then except for the two solutions of $x^2 equiv 1 pmodp$ (which are equal $pmodp$ for $p=2$), we can pair the numbers in $2, ... (p-2)$ in pairs $(x,y)$ with $x notequiv y pmodp$ such that $xy equiv 1 pmodp$, so $(p-2)! equiv 1 pmodp$ and so $(p-1)! equiv (p-1)(p-2)! equiv (p-1) equiv -1 pmodp$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $$p! equiv p(p-1) pmodp^2 Leftrightarrow p^2 mid p!-p(p-1) Leftrightarrow p mid (p-1)!-(p-1) Leftrightarrow (p-1)! equiv -1 pmodp$$
                  If $p$ is a prime, then except for the two solutions of $x^2 equiv 1 pmodp$ (which are equal $pmodp$ for $p=2$), we can pair the numbers in $2, ... (p-2)$ in pairs $(x,y)$ with $x notequiv y pmodp$ such that $xy equiv 1 pmodp$, so $(p-2)! equiv 1 pmodp$ and so $(p-1)! equiv (p-1)(p-2)! equiv (p-1) equiv -1 pmodp$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 12 hours ago









                  Wolfgang KaisWolfgang Kais

                  6715




                  6715



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139955%2fhow-to-prove-that-p-mod-p2-pp-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                      Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

                      Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576