Were Persian-Median kings illiterate?Parashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverWhy do we honor Charvona, specifically?Charvona? How many Charvona's were there?Were the converts mentioned in the Megillah actually Jews?Who were the “girls” that fasted with Esther?Why were Haman's sons killed?Who were the Jewish Governors during the Persian Era?What language is called by the Gemara עברית / Ivrit and who were the עברים / Ivrim?
Why dont electromagnetic waves interact with each other?
Theorems that impeded progress
Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments...
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
strToHex ( string to its hex representation as string)
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
Dragon forelimb placement
Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance
What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
Today is the Center
If I cast Expeditious Retreat, can I Dash as a bonus action on the same turn?
can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
Animated Series: Alien black spider robot crashes on Earth
TGV timetables / schedules?
To string or not to string
Were Persian-Median kings illiterate?
Parashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverWhy do we honor Charvona, specifically?Charvona? How many Charvona's were there?Were the converts mentioned in the Megillah actually Jews?Who were the “girls” that fasted with Esther?Why were Haman's sons killed?Who were the Jewish Governors during the Persian Era?What language is called by the Gemara עברית / Ivrit and who were the עברים / Ivrim?
In the Megillah, we read (6:1):
בַּלַּיְלָה הַהוּא נָדְדָה שְׁנַת הַמֶּלֶךְ וַיֹּאמֶר לְהָבִיא אֶת־סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת דִּבְרֵי הַיָּמִים וַיִּהְיוּ נִקְרָאִים לִפְנֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ
On that night, the king's sleep was disturbed. He said to bring the book of chronicles, and they read it before the king.
Likewise, in Ezra 4:18, Artachshasta (who was either Koreish/Daryavesh, according to Rashi, or Achashveirosh, according to Ralbag) says that he had a letter read to him:
נִשְׁתְּוָנָא דִּי שְׁלַחְתּוּן עֲלֶינָא מְפָרַשׁ קֱרִי קָדָמָי
The letter which you have sent to me has been explained and read before me.
Why didn't these kings read the text themselves? At first, I thought maybe it was just the way of kings to have others read things to them, but we find that Jewish kings did read (Yehoram in Melachim 2:5:7, Yoshiah in ibid. 22:16 and 23:2), as well as Babylonian ones (Sanhedrin 22a explains that the handwriting on the wall was written in code, implying Belshatzar could read it otherwise).
According to the Ralbag, perhaps since Achashveirosh's father was a stable boy (Megillah 12b), he simply didn't have the education to know how to read. But Rashi learns that Artachshasta was a different king; what was his excuse?
I see three possibilities here:
- Specifically Persian-Median kings had the custom to be read to, rather than reading themselves.
- Persian-Median kings were incapable of reading.
- Persian-Median kings could read, but Achashveirosh was ill-educated, and Koreish...?
Which of these is correct?
megillat-esther ezra-nechemya
asked Mar 22 at 1:16
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
add a comment |
In the Megillah, we read (6:1):
בַּלַּיְלָה הַהוּא נָדְדָה שְׁנַת הַמֶּלֶךְ וַיֹּאמֶר לְהָבִיא אֶת־סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת דִּבְרֵי הַיָּמִים וַיִּהְיוּ נִקְרָאִים לִפְנֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ
On that night, the king's sleep was disturbed. He said to bring the book of chronicles, and they read it before the king.
Likewise, in Ezra 4:18, Artachshasta (who was either Koreish/Daryavesh, according to Rashi, or Achashveirosh, according to Ralbag) says that he had a letter read to him:
נִשְׁתְּוָנָא דִּי שְׁלַחְתּוּן עֲלֶינָא מְפָרַשׁ קֱרִי קָדָמָי
The letter which you have sent to me has been explained and read before me.
Why didn't these kings read the text themselves? At first, I thought maybe it was just the way of kings to have others read things to them, but we find that Jewish kings did read (Yehoram in Melachim 2:5:7, Yoshiah in ibid. 22:16 and 23:2), as well as Babylonian ones (Sanhedrin 22a explains that the handwriting on the wall was written in code, implying Belshatzar could read it otherwise).
According to the Ralbag, perhaps since Achashveirosh's father was a stable boy (Megillah 12b), he simply didn't have the education to know how to read. But Rashi learns that Artachshasta was a different king; what was his excuse?
I see three possibilities here:
- Specifically Persian-Median kings had the custom to be read to, rather than reading themselves.
- Persian-Median kings were incapable of reading.
- Persian-Median kings could read, but Achashveirosh was ill-educated, and Koreish...?
Which of these is correct?
megillat-esther ezra-nechemya
asked Mar 22 at 1:16
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
Maybe it is easier to fall asleep when someone reads to you than when you read yourself? Might have to do with being able to stay in the dark when someone else reads
– mbloch
Mar 22 at 4:26
Why generalize - "were they all..."? Even if some of them were what's the Nafka Mina? How vital is this for running a country? While the question is legit, I'd like you to specify your intention - what could be learned from it.
– Al Berko
Mar 22 at 10:47
@AlBerko Why does it matter? Maybe it’s just a curiosity in the Pesukim.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:48
A guess: cuneiform writing was still in use at that time, which far fewer people could read than the simpler Alphabetic scripts. Perhaps the archives' "books" were cuneiform on clay or more perishable tablets, and only scribes could easily read them? Or your possibility #1 was in effect--It's good to be The King(thanks, Mel!)and he didn't have to read anything if he didn't want to.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:11
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behistun_Inscription for info on a cuneiform monumental inscription of that era.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:25
add a comment |
In the Megillah, we read (6:1):
בַּלַּיְלָה הַהוּא נָדְדָה שְׁנַת הַמֶּלֶךְ וַיֹּאמֶר לְהָבִיא אֶת־סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת דִּבְרֵי הַיָּמִים וַיִּהְיוּ נִקְרָאִים לִפְנֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ
On that night, the king's sleep was disturbed. He said to bring the book of chronicles, and they read it before the king.
Likewise, in Ezra 4:18, Artachshasta (who was either Koreish/Daryavesh, according to Rashi, or Achashveirosh, according to Ralbag) says that he had a letter read to him:
נִשְׁתְּוָנָא דִּי שְׁלַחְתּוּן עֲלֶינָא מְפָרַשׁ קֱרִי קָדָמָי
The letter which you have sent to me has been explained and read before me.
Why didn't these kings read the text themselves? At first, I thought maybe it was just the way of kings to have others read things to them, but we find that Jewish kings did read (Yehoram in Melachim 2:5:7, Yoshiah in ibid. 22:16 and 23:2), as well as Babylonian ones (Sanhedrin 22a explains that the handwriting on the wall was written in code, implying Belshatzar could read it otherwise).
According to the Ralbag, perhaps since Achashveirosh's father was a stable boy (Megillah 12b), he simply didn't have the education to know how to read. But Rashi learns that Artachshasta was a different king; what was his excuse?
I see three possibilities here:
- Specifically Persian-Median kings had the custom to be read to, rather than reading themselves.
- Persian-Median kings were incapable of reading.
- Persian-Median kings could read, but Achashveirosh was ill-educated, and Koreish...?
Which of these is correct?
megillat-esther ezra-nechemya
asked Mar 22 at 1:16
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
In the Megillah, we read (6:1):
בַּלַּיְלָה הַהוּא נָדְדָה שְׁנַת הַמֶּלֶךְ וַיֹּאמֶר לְהָבִיא אֶת־סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת דִּבְרֵי הַיָּמִים וַיִּהְיוּ נִקְרָאִים לִפְנֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ
On that night, the king's sleep was disturbed. He said to bring the book of chronicles, and they read it before the king.
Likewise, in Ezra 4:18, Artachshasta (who was either Koreish/Daryavesh, according to Rashi, or Achashveirosh, according to Ralbag) says that he had a letter read to him:
נִשְׁתְּוָנָא דִּי שְׁלַחְתּוּן עֲלֶינָא מְפָרַשׁ קֱרִי קָדָמָי
The letter which you have sent to me has been explained and read before me.
Why didn't these kings read the text themselves? At first, I thought maybe it was just the way of kings to have others read things to them, but we find that Jewish kings did read (Yehoram in Melachim 2:5:7, Yoshiah in ibid. 22:16 and 23:2), as well as Babylonian ones (Sanhedrin 22a explains that the handwriting on the wall was written in code, implying Belshatzar could read it otherwise).
According to the Ralbag, perhaps since Achashveirosh's father was a stable boy (Megillah 12b), he simply didn't have the education to know how to read. But Rashi learns that Artachshasta was a different king; what was his excuse?
I see three possibilities here:
- Specifically Persian-Median kings had the custom to be read to, rather than reading themselves.
- Persian-Median kings were incapable of reading.
- Persian-Median kings could read, but Achashveirosh was ill-educated, and Koreish...?
Which of these is correct?
megillat-esther ezra-nechemya
megillat-esther ezra-nechemya
asked Mar 22 at 1:16
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked Mar 22 at 1:16
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked Mar 22 at 1:16
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked Mar 22 at 1:16
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked Mar 22 at 1:16
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
17k12689
Maybe it is easier to fall asleep when someone reads to you than when you read yourself? Might have to do with being able to stay in the dark when someone else reads
– mbloch
Mar 22 at 4:26
Why generalize - "were they all..."? Even if some of them were what's the Nafka Mina? How vital is this for running a country? While the question is legit, I'd like you to specify your intention - what could be learned from it.
– Al Berko
Mar 22 at 10:47
@AlBerko Why does it matter? Maybe it’s just a curiosity in the Pesukim.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:48
A guess: cuneiform writing was still in use at that time, which far fewer people could read than the simpler Alphabetic scripts. Perhaps the archives' "books" were cuneiform on clay or more perishable tablets, and only scribes could easily read them? Or your possibility #1 was in effect--It's good to be The King(thanks, Mel!)and he didn't have to read anything if he didn't want to.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:11
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behistun_Inscription for info on a cuneiform monumental inscription of that era.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:25
add a comment |
Maybe it is easier to fall asleep when someone reads to you than when you read yourself? Might have to do with being able to stay in the dark when someone else reads
– mbloch
Mar 22 at 4:26
Why generalize - "were they all..."? Even if some of them were what's the Nafka Mina? How vital is this for running a country? While the question is legit, I'd like you to specify your intention - what could be learned from it.
– Al Berko
Mar 22 at 10:47
@AlBerko Why does it matter? Maybe it’s just a curiosity in the Pesukim.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:48
A guess: cuneiform writing was still in use at that time, which far fewer people could read than the simpler Alphabetic scripts. Perhaps the archives' "books" were cuneiform on clay or more perishable tablets, and only scribes could easily read them? Or your possibility #1 was in effect--It's good to be The King(thanks, Mel!)and he didn't have to read anything if he didn't want to.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:11
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behistun_Inscription for info on a cuneiform monumental inscription of that era.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:25
Maybe it is easier to fall asleep when someone reads to you than when you read yourself? Might have to do with being able to stay in the dark when someone else reads
– mbloch
Mar 22 at 4:26
Maybe it is easier to fall asleep when someone reads to you than when you read yourself? Might have to do with being able to stay in the dark when someone else reads
– mbloch
Mar 22 at 4:26
Why generalize - "were they all..."? Even if some of them were what's the Nafka Mina? How vital is this for running a country? While the question is legit, I'd like you to specify your intention - what could be learned from it.
– Al Berko
Mar 22 at 10:47
Why generalize - "were they all..."? Even if some of them were what's the Nafka Mina? How vital is this for running a country? While the question is legit, I'd like you to specify your intention - what could be learned from it.
– Al Berko
Mar 22 at 10:47
@AlBerko Why does it matter? Maybe it’s just a curiosity in the Pesukim.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:48
@AlBerko Why does it matter? Maybe it’s just a curiosity in the Pesukim.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:48
A guess: cuneiform writing was still in use at that time, which far fewer people could read than the simpler Alphabetic scripts. Perhaps the archives' "books" were cuneiform on clay or more perishable tablets, and only scribes could easily read them? Or your possibility #1 was in effect--It's good to be The King(thanks, Mel!)and he didn't have to read anything if he didn't want to.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:11
A guess: cuneiform writing was still in use at that time, which far fewer people could read than the simpler Alphabetic scripts. Perhaps the archives' "books" were cuneiform on clay or more perishable tablets, and only scribes could easily read them? Or your possibility #1 was in effect--It's good to be The King(thanks, Mel!)and he didn't have to read anything if he didn't want to.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:11
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behistun_Inscription for info on a cuneiform monumental inscription of that era.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:25
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behistun_Inscription for info on a cuneiform monumental inscription of that era.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In the case of Achashveirosh, Rashi writes:
(from sefaria)
לְהָבִיא אֶת סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת. דֶּרֶךְ הַמְּלָכִים, כְּשֶׁשְּׁנָתָן נוֹדֶדֶת, אוֹמְרִים לִפְנֵיהֶם מְשָׁלִים וְשִׂיחוֹת עַד שֶׁשְּׁנָתָם חוֹזֶרֶת עֲלֵיהֶם.
To bring the book of archives. It is the custom of kings that when their sleep is disturbed, parables and tales are recounted before them until their sleep is restored.
Thus, regardless of whether he was literate or not, it would have been read to him.
In the case of Artachshasta, R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod quotes someone (I'm not sure who it is)1 who suggests that it was translated for him from Aramaic to Persian - again, not an indication that he was illiterate.
1 R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod agrues with this explanation, but JPS also explains it like this.
answered Mar 22 at 1:44
PloniPloni
4,6871460
add a comment |
Books were cumbersome and heavy at the time, not the Capitalist small paperbacks the companies make today for profit!
Do you expect a king to take a 5kg book to bed at night to read or a 5m long scroll papyrus?
answered Mar 22 at 6:32
dimachaerusdimachaerus
191
2
It's not about "capitalist paperbacks". My soviet-printed books are just as small. It's about paper, and the printing press. Parchment is thicker and heavier than paper, and a human using ink and the pens of that time wouldn't be able to write as small as modern print without the ink smearing and the letters becoming unreadable.
– Galastel
Mar 22 at 14:39
I also asked about a letter sent to Artachshasta. Certainly that was smaller.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:49
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In the case of Achashveirosh, Rashi writes:
(from sefaria)
לְהָבִיא אֶת סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת. דֶּרֶךְ הַמְּלָכִים, כְּשֶׁשְּׁנָתָן נוֹדֶדֶת, אוֹמְרִים לִפְנֵיהֶם מְשָׁלִים וְשִׂיחוֹת עַד שֶׁשְּׁנָתָם חוֹזֶרֶת עֲלֵיהֶם.
To bring the book of archives. It is the custom of kings that when their sleep is disturbed, parables and tales are recounted before them until their sleep is restored.
Thus, regardless of whether he was literate or not, it would have been read to him.
In the case of Artachshasta, R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod quotes someone (I'm not sure who it is)1 who suggests that it was translated for him from Aramaic to Persian - again, not an indication that he was illiterate.
1 R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod agrues with this explanation, but JPS also explains it like this.
answered Mar 22 at 1:44
PloniPloni
4,6871460
add a comment |
In the case of Achashveirosh, Rashi writes:
(from sefaria)
לְהָבִיא אֶת סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת. דֶּרֶךְ הַמְּלָכִים, כְּשֶׁשְּׁנָתָן נוֹדֶדֶת, אוֹמְרִים לִפְנֵיהֶם מְשָׁלִים וְשִׂיחוֹת עַד שֶׁשְּׁנָתָם חוֹזֶרֶת עֲלֵיהֶם.
To bring the book of archives. It is the custom of kings that when their sleep is disturbed, parables and tales are recounted before them until their sleep is restored.
Thus, regardless of whether he was literate or not, it would have been read to him.
In the case of Artachshasta, R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod quotes someone (I'm not sure who it is)1 who suggests that it was translated for him from Aramaic to Persian - again, not an indication that he was illiterate.
1 R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod agrues with this explanation, but JPS also explains it like this.
answered Mar 22 at 1:44
PloniPloni
4,6871460
add a comment |
In the case of Achashveirosh, Rashi writes:
(from sefaria)
לְהָבִיא אֶת סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת. דֶּרֶךְ הַמְּלָכִים, כְּשֶׁשְּׁנָתָן נוֹדֶדֶת, אוֹמְרִים לִפְנֵיהֶם מְשָׁלִים וְשִׂיחוֹת עַד שֶׁשְּׁנָתָם חוֹזֶרֶת עֲלֵיהֶם.
To bring the book of archives. It is the custom of kings that when their sleep is disturbed, parables and tales are recounted before them until their sleep is restored.
Thus, regardless of whether he was literate or not, it would have been read to him.
In the case of Artachshasta, R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod quotes someone (I'm not sure who it is)1 who suggests that it was translated for him from Aramaic to Persian - again, not an indication that he was illiterate.
1 R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod agrues with this explanation, but JPS also explains it like this.
answered Mar 22 at 1:44
PloniPloni
4,6871460
In the case of Achashveirosh, Rashi writes:
(from sefaria)
לְהָבִיא אֶת סֵפֶר הַזִּכְרֹנוֹת. דֶּרֶךְ הַמְּלָכִים, כְּשֶׁשְּׁנָתָן נוֹדֶדֶת, אוֹמְרִים לִפְנֵיהֶם מְשָׁלִים וְשִׂיחוֹת עַד שֶׁשְּׁנָתָם חוֹזֶרֶת עֲלֵיהֶם.
To bring the book of archives. It is the custom of kings that when their sleep is disturbed, parables and tales are recounted before them until their sleep is restored.
Thus, regardless of whether he was literate or not, it would have been read to him.
In the case of Artachshasta, R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod quotes someone (I'm not sure who it is)1 who suggests that it was translated for him from Aramaic to Persian - again, not an indication that he was illiterate.
1 R. Mordechai Zer-Kavod agrues with this explanation, but JPS also explains it like this.
answered Mar 22 at 1:44
PloniPloni
4,6871460
edited Mar 22 at 2:20
answered Mar 22 at 1:44
PloniPloni
4,6871460
answered Mar 22 at 1:44
PloniPloni
4,6871460
answered Mar 22 at 1:44
PloniPloni
4,6871460
4,6871460
add a comment |
add a comment |
Books were cumbersome and heavy at the time, not the Capitalist small paperbacks the companies make today for profit!
Do you expect a king to take a 5kg book to bed at night to read or a 5m long scroll papyrus?
answered Mar 22 at 6:32
dimachaerusdimachaerus
191
2
It's not about "capitalist paperbacks". My soviet-printed books are just as small. It's about paper, and the printing press. Parchment is thicker and heavier than paper, and a human using ink and the pens of that time wouldn't be able to write as small as modern print without the ink smearing and the letters becoming unreadable.
– Galastel
Mar 22 at 14:39
I also asked about a letter sent to Artachshasta. Certainly that was smaller.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:49
add a comment |
Books were cumbersome and heavy at the time, not the Capitalist small paperbacks the companies make today for profit!
Do you expect a king to take a 5kg book to bed at night to read or a 5m long scroll papyrus?
answered Mar 22 at 6:32
dimachaerusdimachaerus
191
2
It's not about "capitalist paperbacks". My soviet-printed books are just as small. It's about paper, and the printing press. Parchment is thicker and heavier than paper, and a human using ink and the pens of that time wouldn't be able to write as small as modern print without the ink smearing and the letters becoming unreadable.
– Galastel
Mar 22 at 14:39
I also asked about a letter sent to Artachshasta. Certainly that was smaller.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:49
add a comment |
Books were cumbersome and heavy at the time, not the Capitalist small paperbacks the companies make today for profit!
Do you expect a king to take a 5kg book to bed at night to read or a 5m long scroll papyrus?
answered Mar 22 at 6:32
dimachaerusdimachaerus
191
Books were cumbersome and heavy at the time, not the Capitalist small paperbacks the companies make today for profit!
Do you expect a king to take a 5kg book to bed at night to read or a 5m long scroll papyrus?
answered Mar 22 at 6:32
dimachaerusdimachaerus
191
answered Mar 22 at 6:32
dimachaerusdimachaerus
191
answered Mar 22 at 6:32
dimachaerusdimachaerus
191
answered Mar 22 at 6:32
dimachaerusdimachaerus
191
191
2
It's not about "capitalist paperbacks". My soviet-printed books are just as small. It's about paper, and the printing press. Parchment is thicker and heavier than paper, and a human using ink and the pens of that time wouldn't be able to write as small as modern print without the ink smearing and the letters becoming unreadable.
– Galastel
Mar 22 at 14:39
I also asked about a letter sent to Artachshasta. Certainly that was smaller.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:49
add a comment |
2
It's not about "capitalist paperbacks". My soviet-printed books are just as small. It's about paper, and the printing press. Parchment is thicker and heavier than paper, and a human using ink and the pens of that time wouldn't be able to write as small as modern print without the ink smearing and the letters becoming unreadable.
– Galastel
Mar 22 at 14:39
I also asked about a letter sent to Artachshasta. Certainly that was smaller.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:49
2
2
It's not about "capitalist paperbacks". My soviet-printed books are just as small. It's about paper, and the printing press. Parchment is thicker and heavier than paper, and a human using ink and the pens of that time wouldn't be able to write as small as modern print without the ink smearing and the letters becoming unreadable.
– Galastel
Mar 22 at 14:39
It's not about "capitalist paperbacks". My soviet-printed books are just as small. It's about paper, and the printing press. Parchment is thicker and heavier than paper, and a human using ink and the pens of that time wouldn't be able to write as small as modern print without the ink smearing and the letters becoming unreadable.
– Galastel
Mar 22 at 14:39
I also asked about a letter sent to Artachshasta. Certainly that was smaller.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:49
I also asked about a letter sent to Artachshasta. Certainly that was smaller.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:49
add a comment |
Maybe it is easier to fall asleep when someone reads to you than when you read yourself? Might have to do with being able to stay in the dark when someone else reads
– mbloch
Mar 22 at 4:26
Why generalize - "were they all..."? Even if some of them were what's the Nafka Mina? How vital is this for running a country? While the question is legit, I'd like you to specify your intention - what could be learned from it.
– Al Berko
Mar 22 at 10:47
@AlBerko Why does it matter? Maybe it’s just a curiosity in the Pesukim.
– DonielF
Mar 22 at 14:48
A guess: cuneiform writing was still in use at that time, which far fewer people could read than the simpler Alphabetic scripts. Perhaps the archives' "books" were cuneiform on clay or more perishable tablets, and only scribes could easily read them? Or your possibility #1 was in effect--It's good to be The King(thanks, Mel!)and he didn't have to read anything if he didn't want to.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:11
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behistun_Inscription for info on a cuneiform monumental inscription of that era.
– Gary
Mar 28 at 5:25