$f : BbbC to BbbC$ is an entire function s.t. $|f(z)| to infty$ as $|z| to infty$. Prove $f$ is a polynomial.If $F$ is entire with removable singularity at $infty$, then $F$ is constant?bounded real part then removable singularityAt $z=0$ the function $f(z)=exp(zover 1-cos z)$ hasMust an entire function be bounded in any open disk around the origin?Extending an analytic function to an entire functionNot understanding how to use the following information: $f$ is entire, and $lim _ fracf(z)z^2=2i$Prove that $fequiv 0$ where $f$ is entireFind all entire function $f$ such that $lim_zto inftyleft|fracf(z)zright|=0$problem on existence of entire functionShouldn't a entire function be strictly a polynomial?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Which models of the Boeing 737 are still in production?

Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

What are the differences between the usage of 'it' and 'they'?

Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?

Why do falling prices hurt debtors?

What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Minkowski space

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Python: next in for loop

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

How to format long polynomial?

How could an uplifted falcon's brain work?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?



$f : BbbC to BbbC$ is an entire function s.t. $|f(z)| to infty$ as $|z| to infty$. Prove $f$ is a polynomial.


If $F$ is entire with removable singularity at $infty$, then $F$ is constant?bounded real part then removable singularityAt $z=0$ the function $f(z)=exp(zover 1-cos z)$ hasMust an entire function be bounded in any open disk around the origin?Extending an analytic function to an entire functionNot understanding how to use the following information: $f$ is entire, and $lim _z fracf(z)z^2=2i$Prove that $fequiv 0$ where $f$ is entireFind all entire function $f$ such that $lim_zto inftyleft|fracf(z)zright|=0$problem on existence of entire functionShouldn't a entire function be strictly a polynomial?













4












$begingroup$


Let $f : mathbbC rightarrow mathbbC$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.



(a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus0$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.



(b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.



(c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.




I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.



For point (a) I wrote



In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac1z)| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_n=-infty^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac1z)$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_n=0^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.



Hence,
$ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac1z)$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.



For (b) I wrote



Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.



And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    Let $f : mathbbC rightarrow mathbbC$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.



    (a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus0$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
    singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
    finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.



    (b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.



    (c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.




    I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.



    For point (a) I wrote



    In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac1z)| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_n=-infty^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac1z)$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_n=0^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.



    Hence,
    $ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac1z)$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
    finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.



    For (b) I wrote



    Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
    with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.



    And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $f : mathbbC rightarrow mathbbC$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.



      (a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus0$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
      singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
      finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.



      (b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.



      (c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.




      I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.



      For point (a) I wrote



      In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac1z)| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_n=-infty^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac1z)$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_n=0^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.



      Hence,
      $ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac1z)$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
      finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.



      For (b) I wrote



      Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
      with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.



      And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $f : mathbbC rightarrow mathbbC$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.



      (a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus0$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
      singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
      finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.



      (b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.



      (c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.




      I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.



      For point (a) I wrote



      In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac1z)| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_n=-infty^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac1z)$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_n=0^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.



      Hence,
      $ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac1z)$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
      finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.



      For (b) I wrote



      Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
      with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.



      And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 22 at 2:45









      Andrews

      1,2812422




      1,2812422










      asked Mar 22 at 0:37









      ChengCheng

      233




      233




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_nfrac 1z^n +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



          For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



          For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157589%2ff-bbbc-to-bbbc-is-an-entire-function-s-t-fz-to-infty-as-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_nfrac 1z^n +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



            For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



            For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_nfrac 1z^n +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



              For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



              For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_nfrac 1z^n +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



                For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



                For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_nfrac 1z^n +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



                For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_n=0^infty a_n frac 1z^n$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



                For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 22 at 3:53









                lEmlEm

                3,3871921




                3,3871921



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157589%2ff-bbbc-to-bbbc-is-an-entire-function-s-t-fz-to-infty-as-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer