How to find the smallest side of a triangle when the interior angles are unknown?Given two adjacent sides of a rectangle are equivalent, prove that the quadrilateral is a square.Angles and relations of in triangles and quadilateralsHow to find the sum of the sides of a polygon whose one vertex goes from the north of a circle and the other comes from the east in its perimeter?Is this a recommended approach to find the square of the sides of a triangle whose been divided by a median?Does it exist an approximation using sums and a way to do the computation with more accuracy both by hand to find the length of a spiral?How to find the least number of containers required to fill up a certain quantity?How to do the computation to find the number of coins in a chest if there are different denominations?How to find the length of an iron bar when it is given as a function of its size but some constants are unknown?How to find the work made by a soccer player in a parabolic trajectory when the unknowns are the launch angle and the initial speed?How to find the angle in a protein which is inside of a triangle which appears inscribed in a circle?

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

Why not use SQL instead of GraphQL?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Dragon forelimb placement

What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

LaTeX closing $ signs makes cursor jump

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

How to say job offer in Mandarin/Cantonese?

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

How do I create uniquely male characters?

Today is the Center

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Test if tikzmark exists on same page

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation



How to find the smallest side of a triangle when the interior angles are unknown?


Given two adjacent sides of a rectangle are equivalent, prove that the quadrilateral is a square.Angles and relations of in triangles and quadilateralsHow to find the sum of the sides of a polygon whose one vertex goes from the north of a circle and the other comes from the east in its perimeter?Is this a recommended approach to find the square of the sides of a triangle whose been divided by a median?Does it exist an approximation using sums and a way to do the computation with more accuracy both by hand to find the length of a spiral?How to find the least number of containers required to fill up a certain quantity?How to do the computation to find the number of coins in a chest if there are different denominations?How to find the length of an iron bar when it is given as a function of its size but some constants are unknown?How to find the work made by a soccer player in a parabolic trajectory when the unknowns are the launch angle and the initial speed?How to find the angle in a protein which is inside of a triangle which appears inscribed in a circle?













1












$begingroup$


I am confused on how to find the answer for this problem. So far what I believe would apply is the triangle inequality but I'm not sure on how to use it.




The figure $ABC$ is a triangle so as $BDC$. It is known that the
length of $AB = 8$ inches and $angle BAD = 2,angle BCD$ and
$angle,DBC = 3 angle BCD$. Find the smallest whole number that $BD$
can attain.




Sketch of the problem



The alternatives given in my book are:



$beginarrayll
1.&7,textrminches\
2.&4,textrminches\
3.&8,textrminches\
4.&5,textrminches\
5.&6,textrminches\
endarray$



So far the only thing I could come up with was to "guess" it might be $4$ since, $angle BDA = 4omega$ could it be that since $BD$ is opposing $2omega$ hence that side might be $4$ inches. But that's how far I went. Needless to say that I'm unsure if that's a right way to go. Can somebody help me with this question?. Please try to include some drawing or sketch of the situation as I'd like to know what can I do to solve this problem relying mostly in geometry?.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    BD=4 creates a degenerate triangle.
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Mar 22 at 4:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Doug M Sorry but why would it cause it to be a degenerate triangle?. What do you mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    @DougM I forgot some theoretical aspects of the triangular inequality but I think you were referring that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two will produce a straight line, hence no area and no triangle. Did you meant this?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    Consider the law of Sines. $frac 8sin 4omega = frac 4sin 2omega implies frac sin 4omegasin 2omega = 2$ which is only true at the limit as $omega$ approaches $0.$
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Mar 23 at 6:49















1












$begingroup$


I am confused on how to find the answer for this problem. So far what I believe would apply is the triangle inequality but I'm not sure on how to use it.




The figure $ABC$ is a triangle so as $BDC$. It is known that the
length of $AB = 8$ inches and $angle BAD = 2,angle BCD$ and
$angle,DBC = 3 angle BCD$. Find the smallest whole number that $BD$
can attain.




Sketch of the problem



The alternatives given in my book are:



$beginarrayll
1.&7,textrminches\
2.&4,textrminches\
3.&8,textrminches\
4.&5,textrminches\
5.&6,textrminches\
endarray$



So far the only thing I could come up with was to "guess" it might be $4$ since, $angle BDA = 4omega$ could it be that since $BD$ is opposing $2omega$ hence that side might be $4$ inches. But that's how far I went. Needless to say that I'm unsure if that's a right way to go. Can somebody help me with this question?. Please try to include some drawing or sketch of the situation as I'd like to know what can I do to solve this problem relying mostly in geometry?.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    BD=4 creates a degenerate triangle.
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Mar 22 at 4:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Doug M Sorry but why would it cause it to be a degenerate triangle?. What do you mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    @DougM I forgot some theoretical aspects of the triangular inequality but I think you were referring that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two will produce a straight line, hence no area and no triangle. Did you meant this?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    Consider the law of Sines. $frac 8sin 4omega = frac 4sin 2omega implies frac sin 4omegasin 2omega = 2$ which is only true at the limit as $omega$ approaches $0.$
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Mar 23 at 6:49













1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


I am confused on how to find the answer for this problem. So far what I believe would apply is the triangle inequality but I'm not sure on how to use it.




The figure $ABC$ is a triangle so as $BDC$. It is known that the
length of $AB = 8$ inches and $angle BAD = 2,angle BCD$ and
$angle,DBC = 3 angle BCD$. Find the smallest whole number that $BD$
can attain.




Sketch of the problem



The alternatives given in my book are:



$beginarrayll
1.&7,textrminches\
2.&4,textrminches\
3.&8,textrminches\
4.&5,textrminches\
5.&6,textrminches\
endarray$



So far the only thing I could come up with was to "guess" it might be $4$ since, $angle BDA = 4omega$ could it be that since $BD$ is opposing $2omega$ hence that side might be $4$ inches. But that's how far I went. Needless to say that I'm unsure if that's a right way to go. Can somebody help me with this question?. Please try to include some drawing or sketch of the situation as I'd like to know what can I do to solve this problem relying mostly in geometry?.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am confused on how to find the answer for this problem. So far what I believe would apply is the triangle inequality but I'm not sure on how to use it.




The figure $ABC$ is a triangle so as $BDC$. It is known that the
length of $AB = 8$ inches and $angle BAD = 2,angle BCD$ and
$angle,DBC = 3 angle BCD$. Find the smallest whole number that $BD$
can attain.




Sketch of the problem



The alternatives given in my book are:



$beginarrayll
1.&7,textrminches\
2.&4,textrminches\
3.&8,textrminches\
4.&5,textrminches\
5.&6,textrminches\
endarray$



So far the only thing I could come up with was to "guess" it might be $4$ since, $angle BDA = 4omega$ could it be that since $BD$ is opposing $2omega$ hence that side might be $4$ inches. But that's how far I went. Needless to say that I'm unsure if that's a right way to go. Can somebody help me with this question?. Please try to include some drawing or sketch of the situation as I'd like to know what can I do to solve this problem relying mostly in geometry?.







algebra-precalculus euclidean-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 22 at 3:44









Chris Steinbeck BellChris Steinbeck Bell

855315




855315







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    BD=4 creates a degenerate triangle.
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Mar 22 at 4:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Doug M Sorry but why would it cause it to be a degenerate triangle?. What do you mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    @DougM I forgot some theoretical aspects of the triangular inequality but I think you were referring that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two will produce a straight line, hence no area and no triangle. Did you meant this?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    Consider the law of Sines. $frac 8sin 4omega = frac 4sin 2omega implies frac sin 4omegasin 2omega = 2$ which is only true at the limit as $omega$ approaches $0.$
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Mar 23 at 6:49












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    BD=4 creates a degenerate triangle.
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Mar 22 at 4:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Doug M Sorry but why would it cause it to be a degenerate triangle?. What do you mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    @DougM I forgot some theoretical aspects of the triangular inequality but I think you were referring that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two will produce a straight line, hence no area and no triangle. Did you meant this?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:21










  • $begingroup$
    Consider the law of Sines. $frac 8sin 4omega = frac 4sin 2omega implies frac sin 4omegasin 2omega = 2$ which is only true at the limit as $omega$ approaches $0.$
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    Mar 23 at 6:49







1




1




$begingroup$
BD=4 creates a degenerate triangle.
$endgroup$
– Doug M
Mar 22 at 4:34




$begingroup$
BD=4 creates a degenerate triangle.
$endgroup$
– Doug M
Mar 22 at 4:34












$begingroup$
@Doug M Sorry but why would it cause it to be a degenerate triangle?. What do you mean?
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 2:40




$begingroup$
@Doug M Sorry but why would it cause it to be a degenerate triangle?. What do you mean?
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 2:40












$begingroup$
@DougM I forgot some theoretical aspects of the triangular inequality but I think you were referring that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two will produce a straight line, hence no area and no triangle. Did you meant this?.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 3:21




$begingroup$
@DougM I forgot some theoretical aspects of the triangular inequality but I think you were referring that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two will produce a straight line, hence no area and no triangle. Did you meant this?.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 3:21












$begingroup$
Consider the law of Sines. $frac 8sin 4omega = frac 4sin 2omega implies frac sin 4omegasin 2omega = 2$ which is only true at the limit as $omega$ approaches $0.$
$endgroup$
– Doug M
Mar 23 at 6:49




$begingroup$
Consider the law of Sines. $frac 8sin 4omega = frac 4sin 2omega implies frac sin 4omegasin 2omega = 2$ which is only true at the limit as $omega$ approaches $0.$
$endgroup$
– Doug M
Mar 23 at 6:49










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

A possible path without trigonometry.



enter image description here



EDIT Added explicitely the angles in the diagram, as required in comments.



  1. Draw line $BE$ so that $angle EBC = angle ACB $.


  2. $triangle EBC$ is isoceles (why?); $triangle BDE$ is isosceles (why?); $triangle ABE$ is isosceles (why?)

Now use triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$, to get $2BD > 8$.



EDIT Since $triangle ABE$ is isosceles, $angle AEB cong angle EAB < 90°$, whereas one of the two between $angle BDA$ and $angle BDE$ is greater than or equal to $90°$. Since in any triangle the side opposite to the greater angle is greater, we can state either that $BD < BE$ or that $BD < AB$. So $BD< 8$.



EDIT (Thanks to Lubin for pointing this out in comment)



Once the fact that $4<BD<8$ has been proven, one should also check whether an integer solution between $4$ and $8$ does exist for $BD$. I will try to show, then, that in fact $BD = 5$ is a valid solution. Consider the Figure below.



enter image description here



Start at point $D$ and draw a circle $gamma_1$ centered in $D$ and with radius $5$; draw then a diameter of $gamma_1$, and let $E$ be one of its endpoints. Draw a circle $gamma_2$ centered in $E$ having radius $8$, which intersects $gamma_1$ in $B$, and the line $DE$ (at the opposite side of $D$) in $C$. Finally draw circle $gamma_3$ of radius $8$, centered in $B$. This intersects line $DE$ in two points. One is $E$; call the other one $A$. The triangle $triangle ABC$ satisfies the requirements, with $BD = 5$, as desired.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay I found two of the isosceles triangles you mentioned, however I'm still stuck at how to use the triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$. Because although $BE=8$ what's the value of $DE$?. Upon looking again I figured that $DE=BE$ since it is isoceles. But the thing is triangular inequality would be established as $BD+BDleq 8$ then I searched in other sources and found that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two would yield a degenerate triangle, hence that would be $BD<4$ but stated this way I can't find a way to find the minimum other than zero or one?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    I might be lacking in understanding of triangle inequality or perhaps you did something I forgot to account for?. Can you help me with some theory or explain more what's happening?. Maybe you can include angles in the drawing because I struggled a bit to identify where were the isosceles you mentined.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I like this better than my answer, but do you know that there is a case where $BD$ has length $5$? I think you ought to check that there even is an integral value for $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also like your construction of a case where $BD=5$ ! Really nice.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 22:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisSteinbeckBell for $BD< 8$ consider using triangle inequality on $triangle ABD$, for example (as a matter of fact I did not show this explicitly, being a direct consequence of the hypothesis; but I probably should have). I use Geogebra for the figures :)
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 23:12



















1












$begingroup$

Since $angle ADB=4omega$, Law of Sines tells you that the length of $BD$ is $frac8sin(2omega)sin(4omega)$. Then, since $sin(2alpha)<2sinalpha$ for all acute angles $alpha$, the fraction is always greater than $4$, whereas for $omega=29^circ$, $angle ADB=116^circ$, and Law of Sines gives the length of $BD$ to be about $7.54$in. This length clearly varies continuously with $omega$ in the range $0<omega<30^circ$, so there are integer values for the length of $5,6,7$in. Your choice then is #4, $5$ inches.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I reached the part where you established $BD= frac8sin 2omegasin 4 omega$ But the rest is where I got stuck. I want to understand your answer but I don't know where the inequality $sin 2alpha < 2 sin alpha$ comes from?. If I use trigonometry simplification the only thing I could come up with was $frac4cos 2omega=BD$. The angles omega = 29^circ and angle ADB=116^circ where do you got them? How can I get them too?. The range you given between $0<omega<30^circ$ where did you obtained?. I'd really hope you can explain to me these questions because I'm lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:19










  • $begingroup$
    I’m sure you see, @ChrisSteinbeckBell, that $angle ABD$ is $180^circ-6omega$. Since this has to be positive, $6omega<180^circ$. The inequality $sin2alpha<2sinalpha$ comes from the double-angle formula $sin2alpha=2sinalphacosalpha$. I merely chose $29^circ$ as an angle close to the “forbidden” angle $30^circ$, because when $omega=30^circ$, you get a collapsed picture, where $BD$ coincides with $BA$, in other words, has length $8$in. I just wanted to get a good idea of the range of the function $omegamapsto$ length of $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:38











  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin, Since you defenitely are much more expert than me, I would really appreciate if you could have a look at my edit and see if what I added could be considered a valid demonstration of the existence of a solution $overlineBD = 5$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin. Thanks I understood how you obtained $180^circ > omega$. But the other part where you get the inequality is where I'm still confused. I know the double angle formula, the point where I don't understand is why $sin 2 alpha$ has to be lesser than $2 sinalpha$?. I mean double angle is an equality how is it transformed into an inequality?. I want to understand this part. Is there anything in the picture that leads me to this statement?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lubin I believe that the result of $textrm7.54 in$ comes from inserting $omega=29^circ$ in the law of sines. To which it does in WolframAlpha I'd like to compliment your answer as you did to Matteo's because its a more analytic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157718%2fhow-to-find-the-smallest-side-of-a-triangle-when-the-interior-angles-are-unknown%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

A possible path without trigonometry.



enter image description here



EDIT Added explicitely the angles in the diagram, as required in comments.



  1. Draw line $BE$ so that $angle EBC = angle ACB $.


  2. $triangle EBC$ is isoceles (why?); $triangle BDE$ is isosceles (why?); $triangle ABE$ is isosceles (why?)

Now use triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$, to get $2BD > 8$.



EDIT Since $triangle ABE$ is isosceles, $angle AEB cong angle EAB < 90°$, whereas one of the two between $angle BDA$ and $angle BDE$ is greater than or equal to $90°$. Since in any triangle the side opposite to the greater angle is greater, we can state either that $BD < BE$ or that $BD < AB$. So $BD< 8$.



EDIT (Thanks to Lubin for pointing this out in comment)



Once the fact that $4<BD<8$ has been proven, one should also check whether an integer solution between $4$ and $8$ does exist for $BD$. I will try to show, then, that in fact $BD = 5$ is a valid solution. Consider the Figure below.



enter image description here



Start at point $D$ and draw a circle $gamma_1$ centered in $D$ and with radius $5$; draw then a diameter of $gamma_1$, and let $E$ be one of its endpoints. Draw a circle $gamma_2$ centered in $E$ having radius $8$, which intersects $gamma_1$ in $B$, and the line $DE$ (at the opposite side of $D$) in $C$. Finally draw circle $gamma_3$ of radius $8$, centered in $B$. This intersects line $DE$ in two points. One is $E$; call the other one $A$. The triangle $triangle ABC$ satisfies the requirements, with $BD = 5$, as desired.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay I found two of the isosceles triangles you mentioned, however I'm still stuck at how to use the triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$. Because although $BE=8$ what's the value of $DE$?. Upon looking again I figured that $DE=BE$ since it is isoceles. But the thing is triangular inequality would be established as $BD+BDleq 8$ then I searched in other sources and found that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two would yield a degenerate triangle, hence that would be $BD<4$ but stated this way I can't find a way to find the minimum other than zero or one?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    I might be lacking in understanding of triangle inequality or perhaps you did something I forgot to account for?. Can you help me with some theory or explain more what's happening?. Maybe you can include angles in the drawing because I struggled a bit to identify where were the isosceles you mentined.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I like this better than my answer, but do you know that there is a case where $BD$ has length $5$? I think you ought to check that there even is an integral value for $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also like your construction of a case where $BD=5$ ! Really nice.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 22:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisSteinbeckBell for $BD< 8$ consider using triangle inequality on $triangle ABD$, for example (as a matter of fact I did not show this explicitly, being a direct consequence of the hypothesis; but I probably should have). I use Geogebra for the figures :)
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 23:12
















2












$begingroup$

A possible path without trigonometry.



enter image description here



EDIT Added explicitely the angles in the diagram, as required in comments.



  1. Draw line $BE$ so that $angle EBC = angle ACB $.


  2. $triangle EBC$ is isoceles (why?); $triangle BDE$ is isosceles (why?); $triangle ABE$ is isosceles (why?)

Now use triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$, to get $2BD > 8$.



EDIT Since $triangle ABE$ is isosceles, $angle AEB cong angle EAB < 90°$, whereas one of the two between $angle BDA$ and $angle BDE$ is greater than or equal to $90°$. Since in any triangle the side opposite to the greater angle is greater, we can state either that $BD < BE$ or that $BD < AB$. So $BD< 8$.



EDIT (Thanks to Lubin for pointing this out in comment)



Once the fact that $4<BD<8$ has been proven, one should also check whether an integer solution between $4$ and $8$ does exist for $BD$. I will try to show, then, that in fact $BD = 5$ is a valid solution. Consider the Figure below.



enter image description here



Start at point $D$ and draw a circle $gamma_1$ centered in $D$ and with radius $5$; draw then a diameter of $gamma_1$, and let $E$ be one of its endpoints. Draw a circle $gamma_2$ centered in $E$ having radius $8$, which intersects $gamma_1$ in $B$, and the line $DE$ (at the opposite side of $D$) in $C$. Finally draw circle $gamma_3$ of radius $8$, centered in $B$. This intersects line $DE$ in two points. One is $E$; call the other one $A$. The triangle $triangle ABC$ satisfies the requirements, with $BD = 5$, as desired.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay I found two of the isosceles triangles you mentioned, however I'm still stuck at how to use the triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$. Because although $BE=8$ what's the value of $DE$?. Upon looking again I figured that $DE=BE$ since it is isoceles. But the thing is triangular inequality would be established as $BD+BDleq 8$ then I searched in other sources and found that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two would yield a degenerate triangle, hence that would be $BD<4$ but stated this way I can't find a way to find the minimum other than zero or one?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    I might be lacking in understanding of triangle inequality or perhaps you did something I forgot to account for?. Can you help me with some theory or explain more what's happening?. Maybe you can include angles in the drawing because I struggled a bit to identify where were the isosceles you mentined.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I like this better than my answer, but do you know that there is a case where $BD$ has length $5$? I think you ought to check that there even is an integral value for $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also like your construction of a case where $BD=5$ ! Really nice.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 22:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisSteinbeckBell for $BD< 8$ consider using triangle inequality on $triangle ABD$, for example (as a matter of fact I did not show this explicitly, being a direct consequence of the hypothesis; but I probably should have). I use Geogebra for the figures :)
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 23:12














2












2








2





$begingroup$

A possible path without trigonometry.



enter image description here



EDIT Added explicitely the angles in the diagram, as required in comments.



  1. Draw line $BE$ so that $angle EBC = angle ACB $.


  2. $triangle EBC$ is isoceles (why?); $triangle BDE$ is isosceles (why?); $triangle ABE$ is isosceles (why?)

Now use triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$, to get $2BD > 8$.



EDIT Since $triangle ABE$ is isosceles, $angle AEB cong angle EAB < 90°$, whereas one of the two between $angle BDA$ and $angle BDE$ is greater than or equal to $90°$. Since in any triangle the side opposite to the greater angle is greater, we can state either that $BD < BE$ or that $BD < AB$. So $BD< 8$.



EDIT (Thanks to Lubin for pointing this out in comment)



Once the fact that $4<BD<8$ has been proven, one should also check whether an integer solution between $4$ and $8$ does exist for $BD$. I will try to show, then, that in fact $BD = 5$ is a valid solution. Consider the Figure below.



enter image description here



Start at point $D$ and draw a circle $gamma_1$ centered in $D$ and with radius $5$; draw then a diameter of $gamma_1$, and let $E$ be one of its endpoints. Draw a circle $gamma_2$ centered in $E$ having radius $8$, which intersects $gamma_1$ in $B$, and the line $DE$ (at the opposite side of $D$) in $C$. Finally draw circle $gamma_3$ of radius $8$, centered in $B$. This intersects line $DE$ in two points. One is $E$; call the other one $A$. The triangle $triangle ABC$ satisfies the requirements, with $BD = 5$, as desired.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



A possible path without trigonometry.



enter image description here



EDIT Added explicitely the angles in the diagram, as required in comments.



  1. Draw line $BE$ so that $angle EBC = angle ACB $.


  2. $triangle EBC$ is isoceles (why?); $triangle BDE$ is isosceles (why?); $triangle ABE$ is isosceles (why?)

Now use triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$, to get $2BD > 8$.



EDIT Since $triangle ABE$ is isosceles, $angle AEB cong angle EAB < 90°$, whereas one of the two between $angle BDA$ and $angle BDE$ is greater than or equal to $90°$. Since in any triangle the side opposite to the greater angle is greater, we can state either that $BD < BE$ or that $BD < AB$. So $BD< 8$.



EDIT (Thanks to Lubin for pointing this out in comment)



Once the fact that $4<BD<8$ has been proven, one should also check whether an integer solution between $4$ and $8$ does exist for $BD$. I will try to show, then, that in fact $BD = 5$ is a valid solution. Consider the Figure below.



enter image description here



Start at point $D$ and draw a circle $gamma_1$ centered in $D$ and with radius $5$; draw then a diameter of $gamma_1$, and let $E$ be one of its endpoints. Draw a circle $gamma_2$ centered in $E$ having radius $8$, which intersects $gamma_1$ in $B$, and the line $DE$ (at the opposite side of $D$) in $C$. Finally draw circle $gamma_3$ of radius $8$, centered in $B$. This intersects line $DE$ in two points. One is $E$; call the other one $A$. The triangle $triangle ABC$ satisfies the requirements, with $BD = 5$, as desired.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 24 at 0:37

























answered Mar 22 at 12:19









MatteoMatteo

1,302313




1,302313







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay I found two of the isosceles triangles you mentioned, however I'm still stuck at how to use the triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$. Because although $BE=8$ what's the value of $DE$?. Upon looking again I figured that $DE=BE$ since it is isoceles. But the thing is triangular inequality would be established as $BD+BDleq 8$ then I searched in other sources and found that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two would yield a degenerate triangle, hence that would be $BD<4$ but stated this way I can't find a way to find the minimum other than zero or one?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    I might be lacking in understanding of triangle inequality or perhaps you did something I forgot to account for?. Can you help me with some theory or explain more what's happening?. Maybe you can include angles in the drawing because I struggled a bit to identify where were the isosceles you mentined.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I like this better than my answer, but do you know that there is a case where $BD$ has length $5$? I think you ought to check that there even is an integral value for $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also like your construction of a case where $BD=5$ ! Really nice.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 22:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisSteinbeckBell for $BD< 8$ consider using triangle inequality on $triangle ABD$, for example (as a matter of fact I did not show this explicitly, being a direct consequence of the hypothesis; but I probably should have). I use Geogebra for the figures :)
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 23:12













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay I found two of the isosceles triangles you mentioned, however I'm still stuck at how to use the triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$. Because although $BE=8$ what's the value of $DE$?. Upon looking again I figured that $DE=BE$ since it is isoceles. But the thing is triangular inequality would be established as $BD+BDleq 8$ then I searched in other sources and found that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two would yield a degenerate triangle, hence that would be $BD<4$ but stated this way I can't find a way to find the minimum other than zero or one?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:09










  • $begingroup$
    I might be lacking in understanding of triangle inequality or perhaps you did something I forgot to account for?. Can you help me with some theory or explain more what's happening?. Maybe you can include angles in the drawing because I struggled a bit to identify where were the isosceles you mentined.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I like this better than my answer, but do you know that there is a case where $BD$ has length $5$? I think you ought to check that there even is an integral value for $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also like your construction of a case where $BD=5$ ! Really nice.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 22:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ChrisSteinbeckBell for $BD< 8$ consider using triangle inequality on $triangle ABD$, for example (as a matter of fact I did not show this explicitly, being a direct consequence of the hypothesis; but I probably should have). I use Geogebra for the figures :)
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 23:12








1




1




$begingroup$
Okay I found two of the isosceles triangles you mentioned, however I'm still stuck at how to use the triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$. Because although $BE=8$ what's the value of $DE$?. Upon looking again I figured that $DE=BE$ since it is isoceles. But the thing is triangular inequality would be established as $BD+BDleq 8$ then I searched in other sources and found that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two would yield a degenerate triangle, hence that would be $BD<4$ but stated this way I can't find a way to find the minimum other than zero or one?.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 3:09




$begingroup$
Okay I found two of the isosceles triangles you mentioned, however I'm still stuck at how to use the triangular inequality on $triangle BDE$. Because although $BE=8$ what's the value of $DE$?. Upon looking again I figured that $DE=BE$ since it is isoceles. But the thing is triangular inequality would be established as $BD+BDleq 8$ then I searched in other sources and found that when one side is equal to the sum of the other two would yield a degenerate triangle, hence that would be $BD<4$ but stated this way I can't find a way to find the minimum other than zero or one?.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 3:09












$begingroup$
I might be lacking in understanding of triangle inequality or perhaps you did something I forgot to account for?. Can you help me with some theory or explain more what's happening?. Maybe you can include angles in the drawing because I struggled a bit to identify where were the isosceles you mentined.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 3:11




$begingroup$
I might be lacking in understanding of triangle inequality or perhaps you did something I forgot to account for?. Can you help me with some theory or explain more what's happening?. Maybe you can include angles in the drawing because I struggled a bit to identify where were the isosceles you mentined.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 3:11




1




1




$begingroup$
I like this better than my answer, but do you know that there is a case where $BD$ has length $5$? I think you ought to check that there even is an integral value for $BD$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Mar 23 at 17:44




$begingroup$
I like this better than my answer, but do you know that there is a case where $BD$ has length $5$? I think you ought to check that there even is an integral value for $BD$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Mar 23 at 17:44




1




1




$begingroup$
I also like your construction of a case where $BD=5$ ! Really nice.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Mar 23 at 22:22




$begingroup$
I also like your construction of a case where $BD=5$ ! Really nice.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Mar 23 at 22:22




1




1




$begingroup$
@ChrisSteinbeckBell for $BD< 8$ consider using triangle inequality on $triangle ABD$, for example (as a matter of fact I did not show this explicitly, being a direct consequence of the hypothesis; but I probably should have). I use Geogebra for the figures :)
$endgroup$
– Matteo
Mar 23 at 23:12





$begingroup$
@ChrisSteinbeckBell for $BD< 8$ consider using triangle inequality on $triangle ABD$, for example (as a matter of fact I did not show this explicitly, being a direct consequence of the hypothesis; but I probably should have). I use Geogebra for the figures :)
$endgroup$
– Matteo
Mar 23 at 23:12












1












$begingroup$

Since $angle ADB=4omega$, Law of Sines tells you that the length of $BD$ is $frac8sin(2omega)sin(4omega)$. Then, since $sin(2alpha)<2sinalpha$ for all acute angles $alpha$, the fraction is always greater than $4$, whereas for $omega=29^circ$, $angle ADB=116^circ$, and Law of Sines gives the length of $BD$ to be about $7.54$in. This length clearly varies continuously with $omega$ in the range $0<omega<30^circ$, so there are integer values for the length of $5,6,7$in. Your choice then is #4, $5$ inches.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I reached the part where you established $BD= frac8sin 2omegasin 4 omega$ But the rest is where I got stuck. I want to understand your answer but I don't know where the inequality $sin 2alpha < 2 sin alpha$ comes from?. If I use trigonometry simplification the only thing I could come up with was $frac4cos 2omega=BD$. The angles omega = 29^circ and angle ADB=116^circ where do you got them? How can I get them too?. The range you given between $0<omega<30^circ$ where did you obtained?. I'd really hope you can explain to me these questions because I'm lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:19










  • $begingroup$
    I’m sure you see, @ChrisSteinbeckBell, that $angle ABD$ is $180^circ-6omega$. Since this has to be positive, $6omega<180^circ$. The inequality $sin2alpha<2sinalpha$ comes from the double-angle formula $sin2alpha=2sinalphacosalpha$. I merely chose $29^circ$ as an angle close to the “forbidden” angle $30^circ$, because when $omega=30^circ$, you get a collapsed picture, where $BD$ coincides with $BA$, in other words, has length $8$in. I just wanted to get a good idea of the range of the function $omegamapsto$ length of $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:38











  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin, Since you defenitely are much more expert than me, I would really appreciate if you could have a look at my edit and see if what I added could be considered a valid demonstration of the existence of a solution $overlineBD = 5$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin. Thanks I understood how you obtained $180^circ > omega$. But the other part where you get the inequality is where I'm still confused. I know the double angle formula, the point where I don't understand is why $sin 2 alpha$ has to be lesser than $2 sinalpha$?. I mean double angle is an equality how is it transformed into an inequality?. I want to understand this part. Is there anything in the picture that leads me to this statement?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lubin I believe that the result of $textrm7.54 in$ comes from inserting $omega=29^circ$ in the law of sines. To which it does in WolframAlpha I'd like to compliment your answer as you did to Matteo's because its a more analytic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17















1












$begingroup$

Since $angle ADB=4omega$, Law of Sines tells you that the length of $BD$ is $frac8sin(2omega)sin(4omega)$. Then, since $sin(2alpha)<2sinalpha$ for all acute angles $alpha$, the fraction is always greater than $4$, whereas for $omega=29^circ$, $angle ADB=116^circ$, and Law of Sines gives the length of $BD$ to be about $7.54$in. This length clearly varies continuously with $omega$ in the range $0<omega<30^circ$, so there are integer values for the length of $5,6,7$in. Your choice then is #4, $5$ inches.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I reached the part where you established $BD= frac8sin 2omegasin 4 omega$ But the rest is where I got stuck. I want to understand your answer but I don't know where the inequality $sin 2alpha < 2 sin alpha$ comes from?. If I use trigonometry simplification the only thing I could come up with was $frac4cos 2omega=BD$. The angles omega = 29^circ and angle ADB=116^circ where do you got them? How can I get them too?. The range you given between $0<omega<30^circ$ where did you obtained?. I'd really hope you can explain to me these questions because I'm lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:19










  • $begingroup$
    I’m sure you see, @ChrisSteinbeckBell, that $angle ABD$ is $180^circ-6omega$. Since this has to be positive, $6omega<180^circ$. The inequality $sin2alpha<2sinalpha$ comes from the double-angle formula $sin2alpha=2sinalphacosalpha$. I merely chose $29^circ$ as an angle close to the “forbidden” angle $30^circ$, because when $omega=30^circ$, you get a collapsed picture, where $BD$ coincides with $BA$, in other words, has length $8$in. I just wanted to get a good idea of the range of the function $omegamapsto$ length of $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:38











  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin, Since you defenitely are much more expert than me, I would really appreciate if you could have a look at my edit and see if what I added could be considered a valid demonstration of the existence of a solution $overlineBD = 5$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin. Thanks I understood how you obtained $180^circ > omega$. But the other part where you get the inequality is where I'm still confused. I know the double angle formula, the point where I don't understand is why $sin 2 alpha$ has to be lesser than $2 sinalpha$?. I mean double angle is an equality how is it transformed into an inequality?. I want to understand this part. Is there anything in the picture that leads me to this statement?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lubin I believe that the result of $textrm7.54 in$ comes from inserting $omega=29^circ$ in the law of sines. To which it does in WolframAlpha I'd like to compliment your answer as you did to Matteo's because its a more analytic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Since $angle ADB=4omega$, Law of Sines tells you that the length of $BD$ is $frac8sin(2omega)sin(4omega)$. Then, since $sin(2alpha)<2sinalpha$ for all acute angles $alpha$, the fraction is always greater than $4$, whereas for $omega=29^circ$, $angle ADB=116^circ$, and Law of Sines gives the length of $BD$ to be about $7.54$in. This length clearly varies continuously with $omega$ in the range $0<omega<30^circ$, so there are integer values for the length of $5,6,7$in. Your choice then is #4, $5$ inches.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Since $angle ADB=4omega$, Law of Sines tells you that the length of $BD$ is $frac8sin(2omega)sin(4omega)$. Then, since $sin(2alpha)<2sinalpha$ for all acute angles $alpha$, the fraction is always greater than $4$, whereas for $omega=29^circ$, $angle ADB=116^circ$, and Law of Sines gives the length of $BD$ to be about $7.54$in. This length clearly varies continuously with $omega$ in the range $0<omega<30^circ$, so there are integer values for the length of $5,6,7$in. Your choice then is #4, $5$ inches.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 22 at 4:57









LubinLubin

45.5k44688




45.5k44688











  • $begingroup$
    I reached the part where you established $BD= frac8sin 2omegasin 4 omega$ But the rest is where I got stuck. I want to understand your answer but I don't know where the inequality $sin 2alpha < 2 sin alpha$ comes from?. If I use trigonometry simplification the only thing I could come up with was $frac4cos 2omega=BD$. The angles omega = 29^circ and angle ADB=116^circ where do you got them? How can I get them too?. The range you given between $0<omega<30^circ$ where did you obtained?. I'd really hope you can explain to me these questions because I'm lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:19










  • $begingroup$
    I’m sure you see, @ChrisSteinbeckBell, that $angle ABD$ is $180^circ-6omega$. Since this has to be positive, $6omega<180^circ$. The inequality $sin2alpha<2sinalpha$ comes from the double-angle formula $sin2alpha=2sinalphacosalpha$. I merely chose $29^circ$ as an angle close to the “forbidden” angle $30^circ$, because when $omega=30^circ$, you get a collapsed picture, where $BD$ coincides with $BA$, in other words, has length $8$in. I just wanted to get a good idea of the range of the function $omegamapsto$ length of $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:38











  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin, Since you defenitely are much more expert than me, I would really appreciate if you could have a look at my edit and see if what I added could be considered a valid demonstration of the existence of a solution $overlineBD = 5$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin. Thanks I understood how you obtained $180^circ > omega$. But the other part where you get the inequality is where I'm still confused. I know the double angle formula, the point where I don't understand is why $sin 2 alpha$ has to be lesser than $2 sinalpha$?. I mean double angle is an equality how is it transformed into an inequality?. I want to understand this part. Is there anything in the picture that leads me to this statement?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lubin I believe that the result of $textrm7.54 in$ comes from inserting $omega=29^circ$ in the law of sines. To which it does in WolframAlpha I'd like to compliment your answer as you did to Matteo's because its a more analytic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17
















  • $begingroup$
    I reached the part where you established $BD= frac8sin 2omegasin 4 omega$ But the rest is where I got stuck. I want to understand your answer but I don't know where the inequality $sin 2alpha < 2 sin alpha$ comes from?. If I use trigonometry simplification the only thing I could come up with was $frac4cos 2omega=BD$. The angles omega = 29^circ and angle ADB=116^circ where do you got them? How can I get them too?. The range you given between $0<omega<30^circ$ where did you obtained?. I'd really hope you can explain to me these questions because I'm lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 3:19










  • $begingroup$
    I’m sure you see, @ChrisSteinbeckBell, that $angle ABD$ is $180^circ-6omega$. Since this has to be positive, $6omega<180^circ$. The inequality $sin2alpha<2sinalpha$ comes from the double-angle formula $sin2alpha=2sinalphacosalpha$. I merely chose $29^circ$ as an angle close to the “forbidden” angle $30^circ$, because when $omega=30^circ$, you get a collapsed picture, where $BD$ coincides with $BA$, in other words, has length $8$in. I just wanted to get a good idea of the range of the function $omegamapsto$ length of $BD$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Mar 23 at 17:38











  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin, Since you defenitely are much more expert than me, I would really appreciate if you could have a look at my edit and see if what I added could be considered a valid demonstration of the existence of a solution $overlineBD = 5$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Mar 23 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    @Lubin. Thanks I understood how you obtained $180^circ > omega$. But the other part where you get the inequality is where I'm still confused. I know the double angle formula, the point where I don't understand is why $sin 2 alpha$ has to be lesser than $2 sinalpha$?. I mean double angle is an equality how is it transformed into an inequality?. I want to understand this part. Is there anything in the picture that leads me to this statement?.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lubin I believe that the result of $textrm7.54 in$ comes from inserting $omega=29^circ$ in the law of sines. To which it does in WolframAlpha I'd like to compliment your answer as you did to Matteo's because its a more analytic one.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Steinbeck Bell
    Mar 23 at 23:17















$begingroup$
I reached the part where you established $BD= frac8sin 2omegasin 4 omega$ But the rest is where I got stuck. I want to understand your answer but I don't know where the inequality $sin 2alpha < 2 sin alpha$ comes from?. If I use trigonometry simplification the only thing I could come up with was $frac4cos 2omega=BD$. The angles omega = 29^circ and angle ADB=116^circ where do you got them? How can I get them too?. The range you given between $0<omega<30^circ$ where did you obtained?. I'd really hope you can explain to me these questions because I'm lost.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 3:19




$begingroup$
I reached the part where you established $BD= frac8sin 2omegasin 4 omega$ But the rest is where I got stuck. I want to understand your answer but I don't know where the inequality $sin 2alpha < 2 sin alpha$ comes from?. If I use trigonometry simplification the only thing I could come up with was $frac4cos 2omega=BD$. The angles omega = 29^circ and angle ADB=116^circ where do you got them? How can I get them too?. The range you given between $0<omega<30^circ$ where did you obtained?. I'd really hope you can explain to me these questions because I'm lost.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 3:19












$begingroup$
I’m sure you see, @ChrisSteinbeckBell, that $angle ABD$ is $180^circ-6omega$. Since this has to be positive, $6omega<180^circ$. The inequality $sin2alpha<2sinalpha$ comes from the double-angle formula $sin2alpha=2sinalphacosalpha$. I merely chose $29^circ$ as an angle close to the “forbidden” angle $30^circ$, because when $omega=30^circ$, you get a collapsed picture, where $BD$ coincides with $BA$, in other words, has length $8$in. I just wanted to get a good idea of the range of the function $omegamapsto$ length of $BD$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Mar 23 at 17:38





$begingroup$
I’m sure you see, @ChrisSteinbeckBell, that $angle ABD$ is $180^circ-6omega$. Since this has to be positive, $6omega<180^circ$. The inequality $sin2alpha<2sinalpha$ comes from the double-angle formula $sin2alpha=2sinalphacosalpha$. I merely chose $29^circ$ as an angle close to the “forbidden” angle $30^circ$, because when $omega=30^circ$, you get a collapsed picture, where $BD$ coincides with $BA$, in other words, has length $8$in. I just wanted to get a good idea of the range of the function $omegamapsto$ length of $BD$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Mar 23 at 17:38













$begingroup$
@Lubin, Since you defenitely are much more expert than me, I would really appreciate if you could have a look at my edit and see if what I added could be considered a valid demonstration of the existence of a solution $overlineBD = 5$.
$endgroup$
– Matteo
Mar 23 at 18:28




$begingroup$
@Lubin, Since you defenitely are much more expert than me, I would really appreciate if you could have a look at my edit and see if what I added could be considered a valid demonstration of the existence of a solution $overlineBD = 5$.
$endgroup$
– Matteo
Mar 23 at 18:28












$begingroup$
@Lubin. Thanks I understood how you obtained $180^circ > omega$. But the other part where you get the inequality is where I'm still confused. I know the double angle formula, the point where I don't understand is why $sin 2 alpha$ has to be lesser than $2 sinalpha$?. I mean double angle is an equality how is it transformed into an inequality?. I want to understand this part. Is there anything in the picture that leads me to this statement?.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 23:17




$begingroup$
@Lubin. Thanks I understood how you obtained $180^circ > omega$. But the other part where you get the inequality is where I'm still confused. I know the double angle formula, the point where I don't understand is why $sin 2 alpha$ has to be lesser than $2 sinalpha$?. I mean double angle is an equality how is it transformed into an inequality?. I want to understand this part. Is there anything in the picture that leads me to this statement?.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 23:17




1




1




$begingroup$
@Lubin I believe that the result of $textrm7.54 in$ comes from inserting $omega=29^circ$ in the law of sines. To which it does in WolframAlpha I'd like to compliment your answer as you did to Matteo's because its a more analytic one.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 23:17




$begingroup$
@Lubin I believe that the result of $textrm7.54 in$ comes from inserting $omega=29^circ$ in the law of sines. To which it does in WolframAlpha I'd like to compliment your answer as you did to Matteo's because its a more analytic one.
$endgroup$
– Chris Steinbeck Bell
Mar 23 at 23:17

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157718%2fhow-to-find-the-smallest-side-of-a-triangle-when-the-interior-angles-are-unknown%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye