Definition of surjectivity on topological spaces.Can continuity be proven in terms of closed sets?Continuous mapping between topological spacesGeneral Topology: Quotient MapHomeomorphisms of topological spaces, are the topologies isomorphic?What does continuity of a function mapping a topological space to a real line interval mean?A topological space is trivial iff every function to it is continuousopen map from a topological space whose connected components aren't open to a connected spaceMaps between topological spaces; any rules?Question about the difference between topological spaces and topologiesf nonsurjective map between two topological spaces; continuity

Theorems that impeded progress

How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

strToHex ( string to its hex representation as string)

can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

How to find program name(s) of an installed package?

Is this a crack on the carbon frame?

Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing

To string or not to string

TGV timetables / schedules?

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Has the BBC provided arguments for saying Brexit being cancelled is unlikely?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?



Definition of surjectivity on topological spaces.


Can continuity be proven in terms of closed sets?Continuous mapping between topological spacesGeneral Topology: Quotient MapHomeomorphisms of topological spaces, are the topologies isomorphic?What does continuity of a function mapping a topological space to a real line interval mean?A topological space is trivial iff every function to it is continuousopen map from a topological space whose connected components aren't open to a connected spaceMaps between topological spaces; any rules?Question about the difference between topological spaces and topologiesf nonsurjective map between two topological spaces; continuity













0












$begingroup$


If a map $f$ between topological spaces, $X$ and $Y$, is surjective, does that mean that every open set in the topological space $Y$ has an open preimage, or merely that the set $Y$ has an open preimage? I guess my question is: is surjectivity mean hitting all the the elements of the set $Y$, or all the open sets on the topological space $Y$? Does it depend on the context?
Thanks 😃










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Technically both are true- surjectivity means that each element in $Y$ is hit at least once so all open sets are also 'hit' (by subsets of $X$) but the preimage of each open set in $Y$ will always be open in $X$ iff $f$ is continuous
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Mar 22 at 0:43











  • $begingroup$
    @Cardioid_Ass_22 that clears everything up. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick
    Mar 22 at 0:50















0












$begingroup$


If a map $f$ between topological spaces, $X$ and $Y$, is surjective, does that mean that every open set in the topological space $Y$ has an open preimage, or merely that the set $Y$ has an open preimage? I guess my question is: is surjectivity mean hitting all the the elements of the set $Y$, or all the open sets on the topological space $Y$? Does it depend on the context?
Thanks 😃










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Technically both are true- surjectivity means that each element in $Y$ is hit at least once so all open sets are also 'hit' (by subsets of $X$) but the preimage of each open set in $Y$ will always be open in $X$ iff $f$ is continuous
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Mar 22 at 0:43











  • $begingroup$
    @Cardioid_Ass_22 that clears everything up. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick
    Mar 22 at 0:50













0












0








0





$begingroup$


If a map $f$ between topological spaces, $X$ and $Y$, is surjective, does that mean that every open set in the topological space $Y$ has an open preimage, or merely that the set $Y$ has an open preimage? I guess my question is: is surjectivity mean hitting all the the elements of the set $Y$, or all the open sets on the topological space $Y$? Does it depend on the context?
Thanks 😃










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




If a map $f$ between topological spaces, $X$ and $Y$, is surjective, does that mean that every open set in the topological space $Y$ has an open preimage, or merely that the set $Y$ has an open preimage? I guess my question is: is surjectivity mean hitting all the the elements of the set $Y$, or all the open sets on the topological space $Y$? Does it depend on the context?
Thanks 😃







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 22 at 0:40









PatrickPatrick

1038




1038







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Technically both are true- surjectivity means that each element in $Y$ is hit at least once so all open sets are also 'hit' (by subsets of $X$) but the preimage of each open set in $Y$ will always be open in $X$ iff $f$ is continuous
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Mar 22 at 0:43











  • $begingroup$
    @Cardioid_Ass_22 that clears everything up. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick
    Mar 22 at 0:50












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Technically both are true- surjectivity means that each element in $Y$ is hit at least once so all open sets are also 'hit' (by subsets of $X$) but the preimage of each open set in $Y$ will always be open in $X$ iff $f$ is continuous
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Mar 22 at 0:43











  • $begingroup$
    @Cardioid_Ass_22 that clears everything up. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick
    Mar 22 at 0:50







1




1




$begingroup$
Technically both are true- surjectivity means that each element in $Y$ is hit at least once so all open sets are also 'hit' (by subsets of $X$) but the preimage of each open set in $Y$ will always be open in $X$ iff $f$ is continuous
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 22 at 0:43





$begingroup$
Technically both are true- surjectivity means that each element in $Y$ is hit at least once so all open sets are also 'hit' (by subsets of $X$) but the preimage of each open set in $Y$ will always be open in $X$ iff $f$ is continuous
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 22 at 0:43













$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 that clears everything up. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Patrick
Mar 22 at 0:50




$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 that clears everything up. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Patrick
Mar 22 at 0:50










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Unless I'm missing some non-standard definition, surjectivity is not a topological property. Whether a map between two topological spaces $X$ and $Y$ is surjective does not depend one jot on the topology of $X$ or the topology of $Y$.



To say $f : X to Y$ is surjective is to say that, for every $y in Y$, there exists an $x in X$ such that $f(x) = y$. It may not be the case that open subsets of $Y$ have open preimages (i.e. $f$ need not be continuous). It will, however, always be the case that $f^-1(Y) = X$, which is open, as every element of $X$ maps into $Y$, by definition of a function. This is true even when $f$ is not surjective!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157592%2fdefinition-of-surjectivity-on-topological-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Unless I'm missing some non-standard definition, surjectivity is not a topological property. Whether a map between two topological spaces $X$ and $Y$ is surjective does not depend one jot on the topology of $X$ or the topology of $Y$.



    To say $f : X to Y$ is surjective is to say that, for every $y in Y$, there exists an $x in X$ such that $f(x) = y$. It may not be the case that open subsets of $Y$ have open preimages (i.e. $f$ need not be continuous). It will, however, always be the case that $f^-1(Y) = X$, which is open, as every element of $X$ maps into $Y$, by definition of a function. This is true even when $f$ is not surjective!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      Unless I'm missing some non-standard definition, surjectivity is not a topological property. Whether a map between two topological spaces $X$ and $Y$ is surjective does not depend one jot on the topology of $X$ or the topology of $Y$.



      To say $f : X to Y$ is surjective is to say that, for every $y in Y$, there exists an $x in X$ such that $f(x) = y$. It may not be the case that open subsets of $Y$ have open preimages (i.e. $f$ need not be continuous). It will, however, always be the case that $f^-1(Y) = X$, which is open, as every element of $X$ maps into $Y$, by definition of a function. This is true even when $f$ is not surjective!






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Unless I'm missing some non-standard definition, surjectivity is not a topological property. Whether a map between two topological spaces $X$ and $Y$ is surjective does not depend one jot on the topology of $X$ or the topology of $Y$.



        To say $f : X to Y$ is surjective is to say that, for every $y in Y$, there exists an $x in X$ such that $f(x) = y$. It may not be the case that open subsets of $Y$ have open preimages (i.e. $f$ need not be continuous). It will, however, always be the case that $f^-1(Y) = X$, which is open, as every element of $X$ maps into $Y$, by definition of a function. This is true even when $f$ is not surjective!






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Unless I'm missing some non-standard definition, surjectivity is not a topological property. Whether a map between two topological spaces $X$ and $Y$ is surjective does not depend one jot on the topology of $X$ or the topology of $Y$.



        To say $f : X to Y$ is surjective is to say that, for every $y in Y$, there exists an $x in X$ such that $f(x) = y$. It may not be the case that open subsets of $Y$ have open preimages (i.e. $f$ need not be continuous). It will, however, always be the case that $f^-1(Y) = X$, which is open, as every element of $X$ maps into $Y$, by definition of a function. This is true even when $f$ is not surjective!







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 22 at 1:19

























        answered Mar 22 at 1:03









        Theo BenditTheo Bendit

        20.3k12353




        20.3k12353



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157592%2fdefinition-of-surjectivity-on-topological-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers