The correct way to do CAGR calculations? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAre these derivatives correct??Is my working correct? Exponenial decayMore than one way to solve a exponential equation?Is this proof that $e$ is irrational correct?Other Way to Express an Exponential FunctionIs this a correct way of expressing number in natural logarithmA mathmatical way to solve for $x$ in $(a + b)^2 = a^x + b^x$On the way finding limit.What is the significance of the number 2.87682 popping up in my calculations?Simple way of explaining the empty product

Is fine stranded wire ok for main supply line?

What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?

It is correct to match light sources with the same color temperature?

Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?

Getting Stale Gas Out of a Gas Tank w/out Dropping the Tank

In the "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" video game, what potion is used to sabotage Umbridge's speakers?

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?

What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

How to get the last not-null value in an ordered column of a huge table?

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Point distance program written without a framework

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

What are the unusually-enlarged wing sections on this P-38 Lightning?

How do I fit a non linear curve?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Help/tips for a first time writer?

What difference does it make using sed with/without whitespaces?

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

The Ultimate Number Sequence Puzzle

How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

What day is it again?



The correct way to do CAGR calculations?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAre these derivatives correct??Is my working correct? Exponenial decayMore than one way to solve a exponential equation?Is this proof that $e$ is irrational correct?Other Way to Express an Exponential FunctionIs this a correct way of expressing number in natural logarithmA mathmatical way to solve for $x$ in $(a + b)^2 = a^x + b^x$On the way finding limit.What is the significance of the number 2.87682 popping up in my calculations?Simple way of explaining the empty product










0












$begingroup$


I was recently familiarizing myself with CAGR formulae and spotted that several sources interpret the formula in different ways.



METHOD ONE: from Wikipedia



$V_0$=9000 (2004),
$V_n$=13000 (2007)



$ mathrm CAGR (t_0,t_n)=left(frac V(t_n)V(t_0)right)^frac 1t_n-t_0-1$



Which gives us the CAGR value to be 13%.



$rm CAGR(0,3) = left( frac130009000 right)^frac13 - 1 = 0.13 = 13%$



METHOD TWO: Extend Office



However, other sources appear to count the number of years differently, namely using the (N-1) notation, such as here:(https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/2596-excel-average-compound-growth-rate.html):



Where instead of $t_n -t_0$ the author is counting all the periods and subtracting one. In this particular example, the date range of 2011-2020 is counted as 9 years (the distance between $t_n$ and $t_0$).



For now, both methods of calculating years line up, which doesn't affect the answers.



METHOD THREE: CAGRCALCULATOR



What get's confusing is when some sources appear to count the total number of years including the original year, such as here (https://cagrcalculator.net/formula-for-cagr-calculation/), where between 2008 and 2016 is counted as 9 years, where the prior formulae would return 8.



Putting aside the gotchas of calculating CAGR and treating it as the definitive growth metric, which one of these is correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 21:54










  • $begingroup$
    If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas E
    Mar 19 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 22:00















0












$begingroup$


I was recently familiarizing myself with CAGR formulae and spotted that several sources interpret the formula in different ways.



METHOD ONE: from Wikipedia



$V_0$=9000 (2004),
$V_n$=13000 (2007)



$ mathrm CAGR (t_0,t_n)=left(frac V(t_n)V(t_0)right)^frac 1t_n-t_0-1$



Which gives us the CAGR value to be 13%.



$rm CAGR(0,3) = left( frac130009000 right)^frac13 - 1 = 0.13 = 13%$



METHOD TWO: Extend Office



However, other sources appear to count the number of years differently, namely using the (N-1) notation, such as here:(https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/2596-excel-average-compound-growth-rate.html):



Where instead of $t_n -t_0$ the author is counting all the periods and subtracting one. In this particular example, the date range of 2011-2020 is counted as 9 years (the distance between $t_n$ and $t_0$).



For now, both methods of calculating years line up, which doesn't affect the answers.



METHOD THREE: CAGRCALCULATOR



What get's confusing is when some sources appear to count the total number of years including the original year, such as here (https://cagrcalculator.net/formula-for-cagr-calculation/), where between 2008 and 2016 is counted as 9 years, where the prior formulae would return 8.



Putting aside the gotchas of calculating CAGR and treating it as the definitive growth metric, which one of these is correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 21:54










  • $begingroup$
    If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas E
    Mar 19 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 22:00













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I was recently familiarizing myself with CAGR formulae and spotted that several sources interpret the formula in different ways.



METHOD ONE: from Wikipedia



$V_0$=9000 (2004),
$V_n$=13000 (2007)



$ mathrm CAGR (t_0,t_n)=left(frac V(t_n)V(t_0)right)^frac 1t_n-t_0-1$



Which gives us the CAGR value to be 13%.



$rm CAGR(0,3) = left( frac130009000 right)^frac13 - 1 = 0.13 = 13%$



METHOD TWO: Extend Office



However, other sources appear to count the number of years differently, namely using the (N-1) notation, such as here:(https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/2596-excel-average-compound-growth-rate.html):



Where instead of $t_n -t_0$ the author is counting all the periods and subtracting one. In this particular example, the date range of 2011-2020 is counted as 9 years (the distance between $t_n$ and $t_0$).



For now, both methods of calculating years line up, which doesn't affect the answers.



METHOD THREE: CAGRCALCULATOR



What get's confusing is when some sources appear to count the total number of years including the original year, such as here (https://cagrcalculator.net/formula-for-cagr-calculation/), where between 2008 and 2016 is counted as 9 years, where the prior formulae would return 8.



Putting aside the gotchas of calculating CAGR and treating it as the definitive growth metric, which one of these is correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I was recently familiarizing myself with CAGR formulae and spotted that several sources interpret the formula in different ways.



METHOD ONE: from Wikipedia



$V_0$=9000 (2004),
$V_n$=13000 (2007)



$ mathrm CAGR (t_0,t_n)=left(frac V(t_n)V(t_0)right)^frac 1t_n-t_0-1$



Which gives us the CAGR value to be 13%.



$rm CAGR(0,3) = left( frac130009000 right)^frac13 - 1 = 0.13 = 13%$



METHOD TWO: Extend Office



However, other sources appear to count the number of years differently, namely using the (N-1) notation, such as here:(https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/2596-excel-average-compound-growth-rate.html):



Where instead of $t_n -t_0$ the author is counting all the periods and subtracting one. In this particular example, the date range of 2011-2020 is counted as 9 years (the distance between $t_n$ and $t_0$).



For now, both methods of calculating years line up, which doesn't affect the answers.



METHOD THREE: CAGRCALCULATOR



What get's confusing is when some sources appear to count the total number of years including the original year, such as here (https://cagrcalculator.net/formula-for-cagr-calculation/), where between 2008 and 2016 is counted as 9 years, where the prior formulae would return 8.



Putting aside the gotchas of calculating CAGR and treating it as the definitive growth metric, which one of these is correct?







exponential-function






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 19 at 20:49









Thomas EThomas E

11




11







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 21:54










  • $begingroup$
    If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas E
    Mar 19 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 22:00












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 21:54










  • $begingroup$
    If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas E
    Mar 19 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 22:00







1




1




$begingroup$
What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 21:54




$begingroup$
What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 21:54












$begingroup$
If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
$endgroup$
– Thomas E
Mar 19 at 21:57




$begingroup$
If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
$endgroup$
– Thomas E
Mar 19 at 21:57












$begingroup$
Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 22:00




$begingroup$
Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 22:00










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154589%2fthe-correct-way-to-do-cagr-calculations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154589%2fthe-correct-way-to-do-cagr-calculations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers