The correct way to do CAGR calculations? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAre these derivatives correct??Is my working correct? Exponenial decayMore than one way to solve a exponential equation?Is this proof that $e$ is irrational correct?Other Way to Express an Exponential FunctionIs this a correct way of expressing number in natural logarithmA mathmatical way to solve for $x$ in $(a + b)^2 = a^x + b^x$On the way finding limit.What is the significance of the number 2.87682 popping up in my calculations?Simple way of explaining the empty product

Is fine stranded wire ok for main supply line?

What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?

It is correct to match light sources with the same color temperature?

Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?

Getting Stale Gas Out of a Gas Tank w/out Dropping the Tank

In the "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" video game, what potion is used to sabotage Umbridge's speakers?

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?

What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

How to get the last not-null value in an ordered column of a huge table?

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Point distance program written without a framework

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

What are the unusually-enlarged wing sections on this P-38 Lightning?

How do I fit a non linear curve?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Help/tips for a first time writer?

What difference does it make using sed with/without whitespaces?

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

The Ultimate Number Sequence Puzzle

How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

What day is it again?



The correct way to do CAGR calculations?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAre these derivatives correct??Is my working correct? Exponenial decayMore than one way to solve a exponential equation?Is this proof that $e$ is irrational correct?Other Way to Express an Exponential FunctionIs this a correct way of expressing number in natural logarithmA mathmatical way to solve for $x$ in $(a + b)^2 = a^x + b^x$On the way finding limit.What is the significance of the number 2.87682 popping up in my calculations?Simple way of explaining the empty product










0












$begingroup$


I was recently familiarizing myself with CAGR formulae and spotted that several sources interpret the formula in different ways.



METHOD ONE: from Wikipedia



$V_0$=9000 (2004),
$V_n$=13000 (2007)



$ mathrm CAGR (t_0,t_n)=left(frac V(t_n)V(t_0)right)^frac 1t_n-t_0-1$



Which gives us the CAGR value to be 13%.



$rm CAGR(0,3) = left( frac130009000 right)^frac13 - 1 = 0.13 = 13%$



METHOD TWO: Extend Office



However, other sources appear to count the number of years differently, namely using the (N-1) notation, such as here:(https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/2596-excel-average-compound-growth-rate.html):



Where instead of $t_n -t_0$ the author is counting all the periods and subtracting one. In this particular example, the date range of 2011-2020 is counted as 9 years (the distance between $t_n$ and $t_0$).



For now, both methods of calculating years line up, which doesn't affect the answers.



METHOD THREE: CAGRCALCULATOR



What get's confusing is when some sources appear to count the total number of years including the original year, such as here (https://cagrcalculator.net/formula-for-cagr-calculation/), where between 2008 and 2016 is counted as 9 years, where the prior formulae would return 8.



Putting aside the gotchas of calculating CAGR and treating it as the definitive growth metric, which one of these is correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 21:54










  • $begingroup$
    If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas E
    Mar 19 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 22:00















0












$begingroup$


I was recently familiarizing myself with CAGR formulae and spotted that several sources interpret the formula in different ways.



METHOD ONE: from Wikipedia



$V_0$=9000 (2004),
$V_n$=13000 (2007)



$ mathrm CAGR (t_0,t_n)=left(frac V(t_n)V(t_0)right)^frac 1t_n-t_0-1$



Which gives us the CAGR value to be 13%.



$rm CAGR(0,3) = left( frac130009000 right)^frac13 - 1 = 0.13 = 13%$



METHOD TWO: Extend Office



However, other sources appear to count the number of years differently, namely using the (N-1) notation, such as here:(https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/2596-excel-average-compound-growth-rate.html):



Where instead of $t_n -t_0$ the author is counting all the periods and subtracting one. In this particular example, the date range of 2011-2020 is counted as 9 years (the distance between $t_n$ and $t_0$).



For now, both methods of calculating years line up, which doesn't affect the answers.



METHOD THREE: CAGRCALCULATOR



What get's confusing is when some sources appear to count the total number of years including the original year, such as here (https://cagrcalculator.net/formula-for-cagr-calculation/), where between 2008 and 2016 is counted as 9 years, where the prior formulae would return 8.



Putting aside the gotchas of calculating CAGR and treating it as the definitive growth metric, which one of these is correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 21:54










  • $begingroup$
    If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas E
    Mar 19 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 22:00













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I was recently familiarizing myself with CAGR formulae and spotted that several sources interpret the formula in different ways.



METHOD ONE: from Wikipedia



$V_0$=9000 (2004),
$V_n$=13000 (2007)



$ mathrm CAGR (t_0,t_n)=left(frac V(t_n)V(t_0)right)^frac 1t_n-t_0-1$



Which gives us the CAGR value to be 13%.



$rm CAGR(0,3) = left( frac130009000 right)^frac13 - 1 = 0.13 = 13%$



METHOD TWO: Extend Office



However, other sources appear to count the number of years differently, namely using the (N-1) notation, such as here:(https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/2596-excel-average-compound-growth-rate.html):



Where instead of $t_n -t_0$ the author is counting all the periods and subtracting one. In this particular example, the date range of 2011-2020 is counted as 9 years (the distance between $t_n$ and $t_0$).



For now, both methods of calculating years line up, which doesn't affect the answers.



METHOD THREE: CAGRCALCULATOR



What get's confusing is when some sources appear to count the total number of years including the original year, such as here (https://cagrcalculator.net/formula-for-cagr-calculation/), where between 2008 and 2016 is counted as 9 years, where the prior formulae would return 8.



Putting aside the gotchas of calculating CAGR and treating it as the definitive growth metric, which one of these is correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I was recently familiarizing myself with CAGR formulae and spotted that several sources interpret the formula in different ways.



METHOD ONE: from Wikipedia



$V_0$=9000 (2004),
$V_n$=13000 (2007)



$ mathrm CAGR (t_0,t_n)=left(frac V(t_n)V(t_0)right)^frac 1t_n-t_0-1$



Which gives us the CAGR value to be 13%.



$rm CAGR(0,3) = left( frac130009000 right)^frac13 - 1 = 0.13 = 13%$



METHOD TWO: Extend Office



However, other sources appear to count the number of years differently, namely using the (N-1) notation, such as here:(https://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/2596-excel-average-compound-growth-rate.html):



Where instead of $t_n -t_0$ the author is counting all the periods and subtracting one. In this particular example, the date range of 2011-2020 is counted as 9 years (the distance between $t_n$ and $t_0$).



For now, both methods of calculating years line up, which doesn't affect the answers.



METHOD THREE: CAGRCALCULATOR



What get's confusing is when some sources appear to count the total number of years including the original year, such as here (https://cagrcalculator.net/formula-for-cagr-calculation/), where between 2008 and 2016 is counted as 9 years, where the prior formulae would return 8.



Putting aside the gotchas of calculating CAGR and treating it as the definitive growth metric, which one of these is correct?







exponential-function






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 19 at 20:49









Thomas EThomas E

11




11







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 21:54










  • $begingroup$
    If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas E
    Mar 19 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 22:00












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 21:54










  • $begingroup$
    If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas E
    Mar 19 at 21:57










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 22:00







1




1




$begingroup$
What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 21:54




$begingroup$
What is CAGR for the dumbs ?
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 21:54












$begingroup$
If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
$endgroup$
– Thomas E
Mar 19 at 21:57




$begingroup$
If you mean as an expansion of abbreviation - compound annual growth rate
$endgroup$
– Thomas E
Mar 19 at 21:57












$begingroup$
Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 22:00




$begingroup$
Thanks for your prompt answer to a non native english speaker.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 22:00










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154589%2fthe-correct-way-to-do-cagr-calculations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154589%2fthe-correct-way-to-do-cagr-calculations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye