What is the vector field on this sphere? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowTravel vector fieldFinding total flux of vector field across boundary boxVector field on sphereWhat is an irrotational vector field intuitively?Continuous vector field tangent to even dimensional sphere which only vanish at one pointIs this a vector field?Divergence of Vector Field: Maximizing, Normalizing, Singularities, InterpretationPair of Cartesian Cordinates for a line that is tangent to two surfaces.How can a vector field eat a smooth function?A nowhere vanishing vector field $X$ tangent to the leaves of the foliation?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Which one is the true statement?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

What day is it again?

Aggressive Under-Indexing and no data for missing index

free fall ellipse or parabola?

How do I fit a non linear curve?

TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?

What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO?

From jafe to El-Guest

Can this note be analyzed as a non-chord tone?

Spaces in which all closed sets are regular closed

Could a dragon use its wings to swim?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Getting Stale Gas Out of a Gas Tank w/out Dropping the Tank

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)

Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Yu-Gi-Oh cards in Python 3

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

Is there an equivalent of cd - for cp or mv

Expressing the idea of having a very busy time



What is the vector field on this sphere?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowTravel vector fieldFinding total flux of vector field across boundary boxVector field on sphereWhat is an irrotational vector field intuitively?Continuous vector field tangent to even dimensional sphere which only vanish at one pointIs this a vector field?Divergence of Vector Field: Maximizing, Normalizing, Singularities, InterpretationPair of Cartesian Cordinates for a line that is tangent to two surfaces.How can a vector field eat a smooth function?A nowhere vanishing vector field $X$ tangent to the leaves of the foliation?










1












$begingroup$


What is the vector field shown on this sphere?



The source should be at $P(0,0,0)$ and the sink should be at $P(1,1,1).$



How would I derive this vector field?



It looks like the vectors are all tangent to great circles.



So would the vector field be something like: $$ F= 2x+y^2+z^2,2y+x^2,+z^2,2z+x^2+y^2? $$



I'm sure that is wrong though.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Why two coordinates instead of 3 for the source and the sink ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 20:57










  • $begingroup$
    It should be 3 coordinates
    $endgroup$
    – Ultradark
    Mar 19 at 20:59










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know if this will work, but locally (at the south pole) if you look on the tangent plane this looks just like $fracx$ so perhaps by transferring this by polar projection you can find something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Mar 19 at 21:06















1












$begingroup$


What is the vector field shown on this sphere?



The source should be at $P(0,0,0)$ and the sink should be at $P(1,1,1).$



How would I derive this vector field?



It looks like the vectors are all tangent to great circles.



So would the vector field be something like: $$ F= 2x+y^2+z^2,2y+x^2,+z^2,2z+x^2+y^2? $$



I'm sure that is wrong though.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Why two coordinates instead of 3 for the source and the sink ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 20:57










  • $begingroup$
    It should be 3 coordinates
    $endgroup$
    – Ultradark
    Mar 19 at 20:59










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know if this will work, but locally (at the south pole) if you look on the tangent plane this looks just like $fracx$ so perhaps by transferring this by polar projection you can find something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Mar 19 at 21:06













1












1








1





$begingroup$


What is the vector field shown on this sphere?



The source should be at $P(0,0,0)$ and the sink should be at $P(1,1,1).$



How would I derive this vector field?



It looks like the vectors are all tangent to great circles.



So would the vector field be something like: $$ F= 2x+y^2+z^2,2y+x^2,+z^2,2z+x^2+y^2? $$



I'm sure that is wrong though.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




What is the vector field shown on this sphere?



The source should be at $P(0,0,0)$ and the sink should be at $P(1,1,1).$



How would I derive this vector field?



It looks like the vectors are all tangent to great circles.



So would the vector field be something like: $$ F= 2x+y^2+z^2,2y+x^2,+z^2,2z+x^2+y^2? $$



I'm sure that is wrong though.



enter image description here







multivariable-calculus vector-fields






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 19 at 21:00







Ultradark

















asked Mar 19 at 20:35









UltradarkUltradark

3681518




3681518











  • $begingroup$
    Why two coordinates instead of 3 for the source and the sink ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 20:57










  • $begingroup$
    It should be 3 coordinates
    $endgroup$
    – Ultradark
    Mar 19 at 20:59










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know if this will work, but locally (at the south pole) if you look on the tangent plane this looks just like $fracx$ so perhaps by transferring this by polar projection you can find something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Mar 19 at 21:06
















  • $begingroup$
    Why two coordinates instead of 3 for the source and the sink ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Mar 19 at 20:57










  • $begingroup$
    It should be 3 coordinates
    $endgroup$
    – Ultradark
    Mar 19 at 20:59










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know if this will work, but locally (at the south pole) if you look on the tangent plane this looks just like $fracx$ so perhaps by transferring this by polar projection you can find something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Mar 19 at 21:06















$begingroup$
Why two coordinates instead of 3 for the source and the sink ?
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 20:57




$begingroup$
Why two coordinates instead of 3 for the source and the sink ?
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Mar 19 at 20:57












$begingroup$
It should be 3 coordinates
$endgroup$
– Ultradark
Mar 19 at 20:59




$begingroup$
It should be 3 coordinates
$endgroup$
– Ultradark
Mar 19 at 20:59












$begingroup$
I don't know if this will work, but locally (at the south pole) if you look on the tangent plane this looks just like $fracx$ so perhaps by transferring this by polar projection you can find something ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Mar 19 at 21:06




$begingroup$
I don't know if this will work, but locally (at the south pole) if you look on the tangent plane this looks just like $fracx$ so perhaps by transferring this by polar projection you can find something ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Mar 19 at 21:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The explanation will be simpler if the source is the South Pole and the sink the North pole on the unit sphere centered in $O(0,0,0)$.



We are going to work on spherical coordinates at first : let $theta, phi$ be the longitude and latitude resp.



The depicted vectors have visibly all of the same norm, orthogonal to unit vectors that are their "attach point".



Consider the generic point $P$ of the sphere characterized by $(theta, phi, r=1)$, i.e., with cartesian coordinates



$$P=(cos theta cos phi, sin theta cos phi, sin phi).tag1$$



The great circles passing through the north and south poles being integral lines of the vector fiels, the generic vector belonging to the vector field at point $P$ is proportional to the derivative of (1) with respect to $phi$ ($theta $ being kept constant).



Thus the general formula for this vector field is :



$$vecV=k(-cos theta sin phi, -sin theta sin phi, cos phi).tag2$$



Please note that $|vecV|=k$. Nothing give us information on the real value of $k$.



One can pass from this particular case to the general case by a rotation and an homothety (the sphere you are dealing with has radius $1/(2 sqrt3)$).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154569%2fwhat-is-the-vector-field-on-this-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The explanation will be simpler if the source is the South Pole and the sink the North pole on the unit sphere centered in $O(0,0,0)$.



    We are going to work on spherical coordinates at first : let $theta, phi$ be the longitude and latitude resp.



    The depicted vectors have visibly all of the same norm, orthogonal to unit vectors that are their "attach point".



    Consider the generic point $P$ of the sphere characterized by $(theta, phi, r=1)$, i.e., with cartesian coordinates



    $$P=(cos theta cos phi, sin theta cos phi, sin phi).tag1$$



    The great circles passing through the north and south poles being integral lines of the vector fiels, the generic vector belonging to the vector field at point $P$ is proportional to the derivative of (1) with respect to $phi$ ($theta $ being kept constant).



    Thus the general formula for this vector field is :



    $$vecV=k(-cos theta sin phi, -sin theta sin phi, cos phi).tag2$$



    Please note that $|vecV|=k$. Nothing give us information on the real value of $k$.



    One can pass from this particular case to the general case by a rotation and an homothety (the sphere you are dealing with has radius $1/(2 sqrt3)$).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      The explanation will be simpler if the source is the South Pole and the sink the North pole on the unit sphere centered in $O(0,0,0)$.



      We are going to work on spherical coordinates at first : let $theta, phi$ be the longitude and latitude resp.



      The depicted vectors have visibly all of the same norm, orthogonal to unit vectors that are their "attach point".



      Consider the generic point $P$ of the sphere characterized by $(theta, phi, r=1)$, i.e., with cartesian coordinates



      $$P=(cos theta cos phi, sin theta cos phi, sin phi).tag1$$



      The great circles passing through the north and south poles being integral lines of the vector fiels, the generic vector belonging to the vector field at point $P$ is proportional to the derivative of (1) with respect to $phi$ ($theta $ being kept constant).



      Thus the general formula for this vector field is :



      $$vecV=k(-cos theta sin phi, -sin theta sin phi, cos phi).tag2$$



      Please note that $|vecV|=k$. Nothing give us information on the real value of $k$.



      One can pass from this particular case to the general case by a rotation and an homothety (the sphere you are dealing with has radius $1/(2 sqrt3)$).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The explanation will be simpler if the source is the South Pole and the sink the North pole on the unit sphere centered in $O(0,0,0)$.



        We are going to work on spherical coordinates at first : let $theta, phi$ be the longitude and latitude resp.



        The depicted vectors have visibly all of the same norm, orthogonal to unit vectors that are their "attach point".



        Consider the generic point $P$ of the sphere characterized by $(theta, phi, r=1)$, i.e., with cartesian coordinates



        $$P=(cos theta cos phi, sin theta cos phi, sin phi).tag1$$



        The great circles passing through the north and south poles being integral lines of the vector fiels, the generic vector belonging to the vector field at point $P$ is proportional to the derivative of (1) with respect to $phi$ ($theta $ being kept constant).



        Thus the general formula for this vector field is :



        $$vecV=k(-cos theta sin phi, -sin theta sin phi, cos phi).tag2$$



        Please note that $|vecV|=k$. Nothing give us information on the real value of $k$.



        One can pass from this particular case to the general case by a rotation and an homothety (the sphere you are dealing with has radius $1/(2 sqrt3)$).






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The explanation will be simpler if the source is the South Pole and the sink the North pole on the unit sphere centered in $O(0,0,0)$.



        We are going to work on spherical coordinates at first : let $theta, phi$ be the longitude and latitude resp.



        The depicted vectors have visibly all of the same norm, orthogonal to unit vectors that are their "attach point".



        Consider the generic point $P$ of the sphere characterized by $(theta, phi, r=1)$, i.e., with cartesian coordinates



        $$P=(cos theta cos phi, sin theta cos phi, sin phi).tag1$$



        The great circles passing through the north and south poles being integral lines of the vector fiels, the generic vector belonging to the vector field at point $P$ is proportional to the derivative of (1) with respect to $phi$ ($theta $ being kept constant).



        Thus the general formula for this vector field is :



        $$vecV=k(-cos theta sin phi, -sin theta sin phi, cos phi).tag2$$



        Please note that $|vecV|=k$. Nothing give us information on the real value of $k$.



        One can pass from this particular case to the general case by a rotation and an homothety (the sphere you are dealing with has radius $1/(2 sqrt3)$).







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 19 at 21:25









        Jean MarieJean Marie

        31.1k42155




        31.1k42155



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154569%2fwhat-is-the-vector-field-on-this-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye