Let $d_1$ and $d_2$ be two equivalent metrics. If $A$ is an open subset of $(X,d_1)$ is $A$ an open subset of $(X,d_2)$? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowLocally Lipschitz implies Lipschitz under equivalent metrics?Uniformly equivalent metrics and the metric on a countable product spaceTopologies of equivalent metricsProve that a sequence converges to an element $x_0$ in $(X, d_1)$ if and only if the sequence converges to $x_0$ in $(X, d_2)$Are strongly equivalent metrics mutually complete?Showing $d_1(x,y)=|x-y|$ and $d_2=sqrt$ for $x,yinmathbbR$ define equivalent metricsTopologically-equivalent/metrically-equivalent metrics and the same topologyIf $d_1(x,y) leq d_2(x,y)$ and all $d_2$-closed balls in $M$ are also $d_1$-closed, then $(M,d_2)$ is complete.Proving the metrics $d_1(x,y) $ and $d_2(x,y) $ are equivalentAn alternative proof for $D_2 D_1 f(x) = D_1 D_2 f(x)$ when $f in C^2$

How to Implement Deterministic Encryption Safely in .NET

What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?

It is correct to match light sources with the same color temperature?

Could a dragon use its wings to swim?

What are the unusually-enlarged wing sections on this P-38 Lightning?

Inductor and Capacitor in Parallel

Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)

How to use ReplaceAll on an expression that contains a rule

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?

What CSS properties can the br tag have?

Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

Is there a reasonable and studied concept of reduction between regular languages?

(How) Could a medieval fantasy world survive a magic-induced "nuclear winter"?

Free fall ellipse or parabola?

Are the names of these months realistic?

Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?

What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

Why do we say 'Un seul M' and not 'Une seule M' even though M is a "consonne"

TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?



Let $d_1$ and $d_2$ be two equivalent metrics. If $A$ is an open subset of $(X,d_1)$ is $A$ an open subset of $(X,d_2)$?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowLocally Lipschitz implies Lipschitz under equivalent metrics?Uniformly equivalent metrics and the metric on a countable product spaceTopologies of equivalent metricsProve that a sequence converges to an element $x_0$ in $(X, d_1)$ if and only if the sequence converges to $x_0$ in $(X, d_2)$Are strongly equivalent metrics mutually complete?Showing $d_1(x,y)=|x-y|$ and $d_2=sqrtx-y$ for $x,yinmathbbR$ define equivalent metricsTopologically-equivalent/metrically-equivalent metrics and the same topologyIf $d_1(x,y) leq d_2(x,y)$ and all $d_2$-closed balls in $M$ are also $d_1$-closed, then $(M,d_2)$ is complete.Proving the metrics $d_1(x,y) $ and $d_2(x,y) $ are equivalentAn alternative proof for $D_2 D_1 f(x) = D_1 D_2 f(x)$ when $f in C^2$










0












$begingroup$



Let $d_1$ and $d_2$ be two equivalent metrics. If $A$ is an open subset of $(X,d_1)$, is $A$ an open subset of $(X,d_2)$?





Well, I have that if two metrics are equivalent then every sequence in $(X,d_1)$ is convergent in $(X,d_2)$. Now, let $a_n$ be an arbitrary sequence that converges to $x_0in A^c subset X$ under $d_1$, with $x_0$ a limit point (or accumulation point). Then, the sequence converges by definition of equivalent metrics in $(X,d_2)$. Now, we know that $a_n$ converges to some point $x_1$ in $(X,d_2)$ but not necessarily $x_0$ = $x_1$ (I can prove that). So then, it can be that in $A^c subset X$ under $d_2$ does not contain every accumulation point (I’m saying that it can be $x_1 notin A^c$). Then $A^c$ isn’t a closed set and we cannot prove anything. Or until now I can’t find a way to prove that $x_1in A^c$.



Any suggestions? Am I right?




A time ago I proved in some homework that if some metrics $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent then we can bound each other, something like:



$$exists C : d_1 leq C d_2 land exists K : d_2 leq K d_1$$



But I can’t prove it to the other side, it may help










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Your "definition" of metric equivalence is not standard, see wikipedia Equivalence of metrics.
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Mar 19 at 22:14















0












$begingroup$



Let $d_1$ and $d_2$ be two equivalent metrics. If $A$ is an open subset of $(X,d_1)$, is $A$ an open subset of $(X,d_2)$?





Well, I have that if two metrics are equivalent then every sequence in $(X,d_1)$ is convergent in $(X,d_2)$. Now, let $a_n$ be an arbitrary sequence that converges to $x_0in A^c subset X$ under $d_1$, with $x_0$ a limit point (or accumulation point). Then, the sequence converges by definition of equivalent metrics in $(X,d_2)$. Now, we know that $a_n$ converges to some point $x_1$ in $(X,d_2)$ but not necessarily $x_0$ = $x_1$ (I can prove that). So then, it can be that in $A^c subset X$ under $d_2$ does not contain every accumulation point (I’m saying that it can be $x_1 notin A^c$). Then $A^c$ isn’t a closed set and we cannot prove anything. Or until now I can’t find a way to prove that $x_1in A^c$.



Any suggestions? Am I right?




A time ago I proved in some homework that if some metrics $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent then we can bound each other, something like:



$$exists C : d_1 leq C d_2 land exists K : d_2 leq K d_1$$



But I can’t prove it to the other side, it may help










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Your "definition" of metric equivalence is not standard, see wikipedia Equivalence of metrics.
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Mar 19 at 22:14













0












0








0


2



$begingroup$



Let $d_1$ and $d_2$ be two equivalent metrics. If $A$ is an open subset of $(X,d_1)$, is $A$ an open subset of $(X,d_2)$?





Well, I have that if two metrics are equivalent then every sequence in $(X,d_1)$ is convergent in $(X,d_2)$. Now, let $a_n$ be an arbitrary sequence that converges to $x_0in A^c subset X$ under $d_1$, with $x_0$ a limit point (or accumulation point). Then, the sequence converges by definition of equivalent metrics in $(X,d_2)$. Now, we know that $a_n$ converges to some point $x_1$ in $(X,d_2)$ but not necessarily $x_0$ = $x_1$ (I can prove that). So then, it can be that in $A^c subset X$ under $d_2$ does not contain every accumulation point (I’m saying that it can be $x_1 notin A^c$). Then $A^c$ isn’t a closed set and we cannot prove anything. Or until now I can’t find a way to prove that $x_1in A^c$.



Any suggestions? Am I right?




A time ago I proved in some homework that if some metrics $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent then we can bound each other, something like:



$$exists C : d_1 leq C d_2 land exists K : d_2 leq K d_1$$



But I can’t prove it to the other side, it may help










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Let $d_1$ and $d_2$ be two equivalent metrics. If $A$ is an open subset of $(X,d_1)$, is $A$ an open subset of $(X,d_2)$?





Well, I have that if two metrics are equivalent then every sequence in $(X,d_1)$ is convergent in $(X,d_2)$. Now, let $a_n$ be an arbitrary sequence that converges to $x_0in A^c subset X$ under $d_1$, with $x_0$ a limit point (or accumulation point). Then, the sequence converges by definition of equivalent metrics in $(X,d_2)$. Now, we know that $a_n$ converges to some point $x_1$ in $(X,d_2)$ but not necessarily $x_0$ = $x_1$ (I can prove that). So then, it can be that in $A^c subset X$ under $d_2$ does not contain every accumulation point (I’m saying that it can be $x_1 notin A^c$). Then $A^c$ isn’t a closed set and we cannot prove anything. Or until now I can’t find a way to prove that $x_1in A^c$.



Any suggestions? Am I right?




A time ago I proved in some homework that if some metrics $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent then we can bound each other, something like:



$$exists C : d_1 leq C d_2 land exists K : d_2 leq K d_1$$



But I can’t prove it to the other side, it may help







real-analysis analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 19 at 22:05









user251257

7,64721128




7,64721128










asked Mar 19 at 21:37









Pablo Valentin Cortes CastilloPablo Valentin Cortes Castillo

427




427











  • $begingroup$
    Your "definition" of metric equivalence is not standard, see wikipedia Equivalence of metrics.
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Mar 19 at 22:14
















  • $begingroup$
    Your "definition" of metric equivalence is not standard, see wikipedia Equivalence of metrics.
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Mar 19 at 22:14















$begingroup$
Your "definition" of metric equivalence is not standard, see wikipedia Equivalence of metrics.
$endgroup$
– user251257
Mar 19 at 22:14




$begingroup$
Your "definition" of metric equivalence is not standard, see wikipedia Equivalence of metrics.
$endgroup$
– user251257
Mar 19 at 22:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $A subseteq X$ be open with respect to $d_1$. Because $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent, there exists $C_1,C_2 > 0$ such that
$$
C_1 d_1(x,y) leq d_2(x,y) leq C_2d_1(x,y)
$$

for all $x,y in X$. Let now $x in A$ be given. Since $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, there exists $epsilon > 0$ such that
$$
B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A.
$$

Here, $B(x,epsilon; d_1)$ denotes the open ball (with respect to $d_1$)
$$
left y in X : d_1(x,y) < epsilon right.
$$

Now, consider the open ball (with respect to $d_2$):
$$
B := Bleft( x, C_1epsilon; d_2right).
$$

We claim that $B subseteq B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A$ which would complete the proof. Indeed, if $y in B$ then
beginalign*
d_1(x,y)leq fracd_2(x,y)C_1 < fracC_1epsilonC_1 = epsilon.
endalign*

Hence, $y in B(x,epsilon;d_1) subseteq A$. By symmetry, you can then conclude that open subsets of $(X,d_2)$ are open in $(X,d_1)$ as well. This means that equivalent metrics induce the same topology on $X$.




Edit: Let's instead only assume that $d_1$ and $d_2$ satisfy the following property:




A sequence $(x_n)$ converges to $x in X$ with respect to $d_1$ if and only if it converges to $x$ with respect to $d_2$.




If $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, then it will still be open with respect to $d_2$. To verify this, it would be enough to check that $A^complement$ is closed with respect to $d_2$. To this end, let $(x_n)$ be a sequence in $A^complement$ converging to $x in X$ with respect to $d_2$. Then, we have $x_n to x$ in $(X,d_1)$ by assumption. Since $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_1)$, we get that $x in A^complement$. This ensures that $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_2)$, and so $A$ is open in this same space.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Any hint to prove that because d1 and d2 are equivalent there exists C1 and C2 such that...? I thaugh in that but I can only prove it to the other side, I mean if there exists some C1 and C2 such that... then d1 and d2 are equivalent. Sorry for the inconveniences, I edited the question adding that part but it didn’t save it or something
    $endgroup$
    – Pablo Valentin Cortes Castillo
    Mar 19 at 22:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of equivalence does not necessarily imply this criterion. In fact, I think you have the wrong definition of equivalence. Typically, one would either assume that such $C_1, C_2 > 0$ exist. Or, more generally, that a sequence converges to $x$ in $(X,d_1)$ if and only if it also converges to $x$ with respect to $(X,d_2)$. See my edit for a proof using this more general definition.
    $endgroup$
    – rolandcyp
    Mar 19 at 22:20












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154648%2flet-d-1-and-d-2-be-two-equivalent-metrics-if-a-is-an-open-subset-of-x-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Let $A subseteq X$ be open with respect to $d_1$. Because $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent, there exists $C_1,C_2 > 0$ such that
$$
C_1 d_1(x,y) leq d_2(x,y) leq C_2d_1(x,y)
$$

for all $x,y in X$. Let now $x in A$ be given. Since $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, there exists $epsilon > 0$ such that
$$
B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A.
$$

Here, $B(x,epsilon; d_1)$ denotes the open ball (with respect to $d_1$)
$$
left y in X : d_1(x,y) < epsilon right.
$$

Now, consider the open ball (with respect to $d_2$):
$$
B := Bleft( x, C_1epsilon; d_2right).
$$

We claim that $B subseteq B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A$ which would complete the proof. Indeed, if $y in B$ then
beginalign*
d_1(x,y)leq fracd_2(x,y)C_1 < fracC_1epsilonC_1 = epsilon.
endalign*

Hence, $y in B(x,epsilon;d_1) subseteq A$. By symmetry, you can then conclude that open subsets of $(X,d_2)$ are open in $(X,d_1)$ as well. This means that equivalent metrics induce the same topology on $X$.




Edit: Let's instead only assume that $d_1$ and $d_2$ satisfy the following property:




A sequence $(x_n)$ converges to $x in X$ with respect to $d_1$ if and only if it converges to $x$ with respect to $d_2$.




If $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, then it will still be open with respect to $d_2$. To verify this, it would be enough to check that $A^complement$ is closed with respect to $d_2$. To this end, let $(x_n)$ be a sequence in $A^complement$ converging to $x in X$ with respect to $d_2$. Then, we have $x_n to x$ in $(X,d_1)$ by assumption. Since $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_1)$, we get that $x in A^complement$. This ensures that $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_2)$, and so $A$ is open in this same space.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Any hint to prove that because d1 and d2 are equivalent there exists C1 and C2 such that...? I thaugh in that but I can only prove it to the other side, I mean if there exists some C1 and C2 such that... then d1 and d2 are equivalent. Sorry for the inconveniences, I edited the question adding that part but it didn’t save it or something
    $endgroup$
    – Pablo Valentin Cortes Castillo
    Mar 19 at 22:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of equivalence does not necessarily imply this criterion. In fact, I think you have the wrong definition of equivalence. Typically, one would either assume that such $C_1, C_2 > 0$ exist. Or, more generally, that a sequence converges to $x$ in $(X,d_1)$ if and only if it also converges to $x$ with respect to $(X,d_2)$. See my edit for a proof using this more general definition.
    $endgroup$
    – rolandcyp
    Mar 19 at 22:20
















1












$begingroup$

Let $A subseteq X$ be open with respect to $d_1$. Because $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent, there exists $C_1,C_2 > 0$ such that
$$
C_1 d_1(x,y) leq d_2(x,y) leq C_2d_1(x,y)
$$

for all $x,y in X$. Let now $x in A$ be given. Since $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, there exists $epsilon > 0$ such that
$$
B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A.
$$

Here, $B(x,epsilon; d_1)$ denotes the open ball (with respect to $d_1$)
$$
left y in X : d_1(x,y) < epsilon right.
$$

Now, consider the open ball (with respect to $d_2$):
$$
B := Bleft( x, C_1epsilon; d_2right).
$$

We claim that $B subseteq B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A$ which would complete the proof. Indeed, if $y in B$ then
beginalign*
d_1(x,y)leq fracd_2(x,y)C_1 < fracC_1epsilonC_1 = epsilon.
endalign*

Hence, $y in B(x,epsilon;d_1) subseteq A$. By symmetry, you can then conclude that open subsets of $(X,d_2)$ are open in $(X,d_1)$ as well. This means that equivalent metrics induce the same topology on $X$.




Edit: Let's instead only assume that $d_1$ and $d_2$ satisfy the following property:




A sequence $(x_n)$ converges to $x in X$ with respect to $d_1$ if and only if it converges to $x$ with respect to $d_2$.




If $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, then it will still be open with respect to $d_2$. To verify this, it would be enough to check that $A^complement$ is closed with respect to $d_2$. To this end, let $(x_n)$ be a sequence in $A^complement$ converging to $x in X$ with respect to $d_2$. Then, we have $x_n to x$ in $(X,d_1)$ by assumption. Since $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_1)$, we get that $x in A^complement$. This ensures that $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_2)$, and so $A$ is open in this same space.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Any hint to prove that because d1 and d2 are equivalent there exists C1 and C2 such that...? I thaugh in that but I can only prove it to the other side, I mean if there exists some C1 and C2 such that... then d1 and d2 are equivalent. Sorry for the inconveniences, I edited the question adding that part but it didn’t save it or something
    $endgroup$
    – Pablo Valentin Cortes Castillo
    Mar 19 at 22:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of equivalence does not necessarily imply this criterion. In fact, I think you have the wrong definition of equivalence. Typically, one would either assume that such $C_1, C_2 > 0$ exist. Or, more generally, that a sequence converges to $x$ in $(X,d_1)$ if and only if it also converges to $x$ with respect to $(X,d_2)$. See my edit for a proof using this more general definition.
    $endgroup$
    – rolandcyp
    Mar 19 at 22:20














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Let $A subseteq X$ be open with respect to $d_1$. Because $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent, there exists $C_1,C_2 > 0$ such that
$$
C_1 d_1(x,y) leq d_2(x,y) leq C_2d_1(x,y)
$$

for all $x,y in X$. Let now $x in A$ be given. Since $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, there exists $epsilon > 0$ such that
$$
B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A.
$$

Here, $B(x,epsilon; d_1)$ denotes the open ball (with respect to $d_1$)
$$
left y in X : d_1(x,y) < epsilon right.
$$

Now, consider the open ball (with respect to $d_2$):
$$
B := Bleft( x, C_1epsilon; d_2right).
$$

We claim that $B subseteq B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A$ which would complete the proof. Indeed, if $y in B$ then
beginalign*
d_1(x,y)leq fracd_2(x,y)C_1 < fracC_1epsilonC_1 = epsilon.
endalign*

Hence, $y in B(x,epsilon;d_1) subseteq A$. By symmetry, you can then conclude that open subsets of $(X,d_2)$ are open in $(X,d_1)$ as well. This means that equivalent metrics induce the same topology on $X$.




Edit: Let's instead only assume that $d_1$ and $d_2$ satisfy the following property:




A sequence $(x_n)$ converges to $x in X$ with respect to $d_1$ if and only if it converges to $x$ with respect to $d_2$.




If $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, then it will still be open with respect to $d_2$. To verify this, it would be enough to check that $A^complement$ is closed with respect to $d_2$. To this end, let $(x_n)$ be a sequence in $A^complement$ converging to $x in X$ with respect to $d_2$. Then, we have $x_n to x$ in $(X,d_1)$ by assumption. Since $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_1)$, we get that $x in A^complement$. This ensures that $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_2)$, and so $A$ is open in this same space.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Let $A subseteq X$ be open with respect to $d_1$. Because $d_1$ and $d_2$ are equivalent, there exists $C_1,C_2 > 0$ such that
$$
C_1 d_1(x,y) leq d_2(x,y) leq C_2d_1(x,y)
$$

for all $x,y in X$. Let now $x in A$ be given. Since $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, there exists $epsilon > 0$ such that
$$
B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A.
$$

Here, $B(x,epsilon; d_1)$ denotes the open ball (with respect to $d_1$)
$$
left y in X : d_1(x,y) < epsilon right.
$$

Now, consider the open ball (with respect to $d_2$):
$$
B := Bleft( x, C_1epsilon; d_2right).
$$

We claim that $B subseteq B(x,epsilon; d_1) subseteq A$ which would complete the proof. Indeed, if $y in B$ then
beginalign*
d_1(x,y)leq fracd_2(x,y)C_1 < fracC_1epsilonC_1 = epsilon.
endalign*

Hence, $y in B(x,epsilon;d_1) subseteq A$. By symmetry, you can then conclude that open subsets of $(X,d_2)$ are open in $(X,d_1)$ as well. This means that equivalent metrics induce the same topology on $X$.




Edit: Let's instead only assume that $d_1$ and $d_2$ satisfy the following property:




A sequence $(x_n)$ converges to $x in X$ with respect to $d_1$ if and only if it converges to $x$ with respect to $d_2$.




If $A$ is open with respect to $d_1$, then it will still be open with respect to $d_2$. To verify this, it would be enough to check that $A^complement$ is closed with respect to $d_2$. To this end, let $(x_n)$ be a sequence in $A^complement$ converging to $x in X$ with respect to $d_2$. Then, we have $x_n to x$ in $(X,d_1)$ by assumption. Since $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_1)$, we get that $x in A^complement$. This ensures that $A^complement$ is closed in $(X,d_2)$, and so $A$ is open in this same space.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 19 at 22:18

























answered Mar 19 at 21:44









rolandcyprolandcyp

1,976316




1,976316











  • $begingroup$
    Any hint to prove that because d1 and d2 are equivalent there exists C1 and C2 such that...? I thaugh in that but I can only prove it to the other side, I mean if there exists some C1 and C2 such that... then d1 and d2 are equivalent. Sorry for the inconveniences, I edited the question adding that part but it didn’t save it or something
    $endgroup$
    – Pablo Valentin Cortes Castillo
    Mar 19 at 22:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of equivalence does not necessarily imply this criterion. In fact, I think you have the wrong definition of equivalence. Typically, one would either assume that such $C_1, C_2 > 0$ exist. Or, more generally, that a sequence converges to $x$ in $(X,d_1)$ if and only if it also converges to $x$ with respect to $(X,d_2)$. See my edit for a proof using this more general definition.
    $endgroup$
    – rolandcyp
    Mar 19 at 22:20

















  • $begingroup$
    Any hint to prove that because d1 and d2 are equivalent there exists C1 and C2 such that...? I thaugh in that but I can only prove it to the other side, I mean if there exists some C1 and C2 such that... then d1 and d2 are equivalent. Sorry for the inconveniences, I edited the question adding that part but it didn’t save it or something
    $endgroup$
    – Pablo Valentin Cortes Castillo
    Mar 19 at 22:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your definition of equivalence does not necessarily imply this criterion. In fact, I think you have the wrong definition of equivalence. Typically, one would either assume that such $C_1, C_2 > 0$ exist. Or, more generally, that a sequence converges to $x$ in $(X,d_1)$ if and only if it also converges to $x$ with respect to $(X,d_2)$. See my edit for a proof using this more general definition.
    $endgroup$
    – rolandcyp
    Mar 19 at 22:20
















$begingroup$
Any hint to prove that because d1 and d2 are equivalent there exists C1 and C2 such that...? I thaugh in that but I can only prove it to the other side, I mean if there exists some C1 and C2 such that... then d1 and d2 are equivalent. Sorry for the inconveniences, I edited the question adding that part but it didn’t save it or something
$endgroup$
– Pablo Valentin Cortes Castillo
Mar 19 at 22:05




$begingroup$
Any hint to prove that because d1 and d2 are equivalent there exists C1 and C2 such that...? I thaugh in that but I can only prove it to the other side, I mean if there exists some C1 and C2 such that... then d1 and d2 are equivalent. Sorry for the inconveniences, I edited the question adding that part but it didn’t save it or something
$endgroup$
– Pablo Valentin Cortes Castillo
Mar 19 at 22:05




1




1




$begingroup$
Your definition of equivalence does not necessarily imply this criterion. In fact, I think you have the wrong definition of equivalence. Typically, one would either assume that such $C_1, C_2 > 0$ exist. Or, more generally, that a sequence converges to $x$ in $(X,d_1)$ if and only if it also converges to $x$ with respect to $(X,d_2)$. See my edit for a proof using this more general definition.
$endgroup$
– rolandcyp
Mar 19 at 22:20





$begingroup$
Your definition of equivalence does not necessarily imply this criterion. In fact, I think you have the wrong definition of equivalence. Typically, one would either assume that such $C_1, C_2 > 0$ exist. Or, more generally, that a sequence converges to $x$ in $(X,d_1)$ if and only if it also converges to $x$ with respect to $(X,d_2)$. See my edit for a proof using this more general definition.
$endgroup$
– rolandcyp
Mar 19 at 22:20


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154648%2flet-d-1-and-d-2-be-two-equivalent-metrics-if-a-is-an-open-subset-of-x-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye