Independent drivetrains on tandem bicycle The Next CEO of Stack OverflowRear-steer tandem with middle child saddleTandem position - front or backTandem for limited space?Why is the rear wheel of my tandem bike skidding?Claud Butler Tandem - add a front derailleur?Why is a tandem harder to ride uphill than a single rider bike?Pull Inexperienced Tandem Stoker?Help Identify North Woods “6 Speed” Tandem?Help identifying tandem frameAdult tandem trike conversionPlease help identify my 1940's (?) Tandem Bicycle

What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?

Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

How do I fit a non linear curve?

Can Sneak Attack be used when hitting with an improvised weapon?

What flight has the highest ratio of timezone difference to flight time?

Is there a reasonable and studied concept of reduction between regular languages?

Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?

Lucky Feat: How can "more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll"?

What CSS properties can the br tag have?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Physiological effects of huge anime eyes

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Can I board the first leg of the flight without having final country's visa?

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

Does higher Oxidation/ reduction potential translate to higher energy storage in battery?

Defamation due to breach of confidentiality

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

Computationally populating tables with probability data

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

How to get the last not-null value in an ordered column of a huge table?

Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico

The Ultimate Number Sequence Puzzle

Getting Stale Gas Out of a Gas Tank w/out Dropping the Tank



Independent drivetrains on tandem bicycle



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowRear-steer tandem with middle child saddleTandem position - front or backTandem for limited space?Why is the rear wheel of my tandem bike skidding?Claud Butler Tandem - add a front derailleur?Why is a tandem harder to ride uphill than a single rider bike?Pull Inexperienced Tandem Stoker?Help Identify North Woods “6 Speed” Tandem?Help identifying tandem frameAdult tandem trike conversionPlease help identify my 1940's (?) Tandem Bicycle










4















On a standard tandem frame, is it possible to build a tandem bicycle with independent drivetrains for the two riders? Is there a custom frame builder that would build a tandem like this?



I'm aware of the half-recumbent tandem that has independent drivetrains, but I'm specifically interested in the classic/normal tandem frame.



EDIT: By independent drivetrain, I mean that I would like each rider to be able to coast independently of the other. The cadence can remain constant between front and back when both are pedaling.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    What do you mean by "independent drive trains"? Ultimately, they've gotta connect at the rear wheel. Even if you put a chain down each side and had separate freewheels, that would just mean that only the rider who was pedalling hardest would be contributing, so you'd have only half the power.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 19 at 17:24






  • 2





    It's important to be clear what exactly you're after: do you want one rider to be able to pedal while the other rests? This would take independent freewheel mechanisms or equivalent. Do you want the riders to pedal at different cadences? A fixed ratio could be achieved with a front chain that doesn't use 1:1 gearing but this might have issues starting and the effort would come in and out of phase, with rather odd effects. There are various harebrained schemes for front wheel drive bikes. The captain could power a system like that while the stoker powered a normal drivetrain

    – Chris H
    Mar 19 at 17:26











  • You'd need a left free-wheel and most importantly at least a left-sided rear derailleur which I both doubt to exist. To apply power both riders would need to keep the free-wheel engaged at all times. If there's only the slightest freewheeling on one side, no power is applied. And there will always be the risk of hitting heels and toes unless the frame is rather long.

    – Carel
    Mar 19 at 18:21











  • @Carel there are BMXs with left side freewheels aren't there? Single speed though

    – Chris H
    Mar 19 at 18:56







  • 3





    It needs to be noted that one reason such schemes are not more popular is that there is an advantage, in terms of the balance of the bike, in having the two cranks more or less in sync. (And, yes, cyclists on a tandem are always cranks. ;-) )

    – Daniel R Hicks
    Mar 19 at 20:16















4















On a standard tandem frame, is it possible to build a tandem bicycle with independent drivetrains for the two riders? Is there a custom frame builder that would build a tandem like this?



I'm aware of the half-recumbent tandem that has independent drivetrains, but I'm specifically interested in the classic/normal tandem frame.



EDIT: By independent drivetrain, I mean that I would like each rider to be able to coast independently of the other. The cadence can remain constant between front and back when both are pedaling.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    What do you mean by "independent drive trains"? Ultimately, they've gotta connect at the rear wheel. Even if you put a chain down each side and had separate freewheels, that would just mean that only the rider who was pedalling hardest would be contributing, so you'd have only half the power.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 19 at 17:24






  • 2





    It's important to be clear what exactly you're after: do you want one rider to be able to pedal while the other rests? This would take independent freewheel mechanisms or equivalent. Do you want the riders to pedal at different cadences? A fixed ratio could be achieved with a front chain that doesn't use 1:1 gearing but this might have issues starting and the effort would come in and out of phase, with rather odd effects. There are various harebrained schemes for front wheel drive bikes. The captain could power a system like that while the stoker powered a normal drivetrain

    – Chris H
    Mar 19 at 17:26











  • You'd need a left free-wheel and most importantly at least a left-sided rear derailleur which I both doubt to exist. To apply power both riders would need to keep the free-wheel engaged at all times. If there's only the slightest freewheeling on one side, no power is applied. And there will always be the risk of hitting heels and toes unless the frame is rather long.

    – Carel
    Mar 19 at 18:21











  • @Carel there are BMXs with left side freewheels aren't there? Single speed though

    – Chris H
    Mar 19 at 18:56







  • 3





    It needs to be noted that one reason such schemes are not more popular is that there is an advantage, in terms of the balance of the bike, in having the two cranks more or less in sync. (And, yes, cyclists on a tandem are always cranks. ;-) )

    – Daniel R Hicks
    Mar 19 at 20:16













4












4








4








On a standard tandem frame, is it possible to build a tandem bicycle with independent drivetrains for the two riders? Is there a custom frame builder that would build a tandem like this?



I'm aware of the half-recumbent tandem that has independent drivetrains, but I'm specifically interested in the classic/normal tandem frame.



EDIT: By independent drivetrain, I mean that I would like each rider to be able to coast independently of the other. The cadence can remain constant between front and back when both are pedaling.










share|improve this question
















On a standard tandem frame, is it possible to build a tandem bicycle with independent drivetrains for the two riders? Is there a custom frame builder that would build a tandem like this?



I'm aware of the half-recumbent tandem that has independent drivetrains, but I'm specifically interested in the classic/normal tandem frame.



EDIT: By independent drivetrain, I mean that I would like each rider to be able to coast independently of the other. The cadence can remain constant between front and back when both are pedaling.







drivetrain tandems






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 11:38







happyraul

















asked Mar 19 at 16:00









happyraulhappyraul

235




235







  • 2





    What do you mean by "independent drive trains"? Ultimately, they've gotta connect at the rear wheel. Even if you put a chain down each side and had separate freewheels, that would just mean that only the rider who was pedalling hardest would be contributing, so you'd have only half the power.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 19 at 17:24






  • 2





    It's important to be clear what exactly you're after: do you want one rider to be able to pedal while the other rests? This would take independent freewheel mechanisms or equivalent. Do you want the riders to pedal at different cadences? A fixed ratio could be achieved with a front chain that doesn't use 1:1 gearing but this might have issues starting and the effort would come in and out of phase, with rather odd effects. There are various harebrained schemes for front wheel drive bikes. The captain could power a system like that while the stoker powered a normal drivetrain

    – Chris H
    Mar 19 at 17:26











  • You'd need a left free-wheel and most importantly at least a left-sided rear derailleur which I both doubt to exist. To apply power both riders would need to keep the free-wheel engaged at all times. If there's only the slightest freewheeling on one side, no power is applied. And there will always be the risk of hitting heels and toes unless the frame is rather long.

    – Carel
    Mar 19 at 18:21











  • @Carel there are BMXs with left side freewheels aren't there? Single speed though

    – Chris H
    Mar 19 at 18:56







  • 3





    It needs to be noted that one reason such schemes are not more popular is that there is an advantage, in terms of the balance of the bike, in having the two cranks more or less in sync. (And, yes, cyclists on a tandem are always cranks. ;-) )

    – Daniel R Hicks
    Mar 19 at 20:16












  • 2





    What do you mean by "independent drive trains"? Ultimately, they've gotta connect at the rear wheel. Even if you put a chain down each side and had separate freewheels, that would just mean that only the rider who was pedalling hardest would be contributing, so you'd have only half the power.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 19 at 17:24






  • 2





    It's important to be clear what exactly you're after: do you want one rider to be able to pedal while the other rests? This would take independent freewheel mechanisms or equivalent. Do you want the riders to pedal at different cadences? A fixed ratio could be achieved with a front chain that doesn't use 1:1 gearing but this might have issues starting and the effort would come in and out of phase, with rather odd effects. There are various harebrained schemes for front wheel drive bikes. The captain could power a system like that while the stoker powered a normal drivetrain

    – Chris H
    Mar 19 at 17:26











  • You'd need a left free-wheel and most importantly at least a left-sided rear derailleur which I both doubt to exist. To apply power both riders would need to keep the free-wheel engaged at all times. If there's only the slightest freewheeling on one side, no power is applied. And there will always be the risk of hitting heels and toes unless the frame is rather long.

    – Carel
    Mar 19 at 18:21











  • @Carel there are BMXs with left side freewheels aren't there? Single speed though

    – Chris H
    Mar 19 at 18:56







  • 3





    It needs to be noted that one reason such schemes are not more popular is that there is an advantage, in terms of the balance of the bike, in having the two cranks more or less in sync. (And, yes, cyclists on a tandem are always cranks. ;-) )

    – Daniel R Hicks
    Mar 19 at 20:16







2




2





What do you mean by "independent drive trains"? Ultimately, they've gotta connect at the rear wheel. Even if you put a chain down each side and had separate freewheels, that would just mean that only the rider who was pedalling hardest would be contributing, so you'd have only half the power.

– David Richerby
Mar 19 at 17:24





What do you mean by "independent drive trains"? Ultimately, they've gotta connect at the rear wheel. Even if you put a chain down each side and had separate freewheels, that would just mean that only the rider who was pedalling hardest would be contributing, so you'd have only half the power.

– David Richerby
Mar 19 at 17:24




2




2





It's important to be clear what exactly you're after: do you want one rider to be able to pedal while the other rests? This would take independent freewheel mechanisms or equivalent. Do you want the riders to pedal at different cadences? A fixed ratio could be achieved with a front chain that doesn't use 1:1 gearing but this might have issues starting and the effort would come in and out of phase, with rather odd effects. There are various harebrained schemes for front wheel drive bikes. The captain could power a system like that while the stoker powered a normal drivetrain

– Chris H
Mar 19 at 17:26





It's important to be clear what exactly you're after: do you want one rider to be able to pedal while the other rests? This would take independent freewheel mechanisms or equivalent. Do you want the riders to pedal at different cadences? A fixed ratio could be achieved with a front chain that doesn't use 1:1 gearing but this might have issues starting and the effort would come in and out of phase, with rather odd effects. There are various harebrained schemes for front wheel drive bikes. The captain could power a system like that while the stoker powered a normal drivetrain

– Chris H
Mar 19 at 17:26













You'd need a left free-wheel and most importantly at least a left-sided rear derailleur which I both doubt to exist. To apply power both riders would need to keep the free-wheel engaged at all times. If there's only the slightest freewheeling on one side, no power is applied. And there will always be the risk of hitting heels and toes unless the frame is rather long.

– Carel
Mar 19 at 18:21





You'd need a left free-wheel and most importantly at least a left-sided rear derailleur which I both doubt to exist. To apply power both riders would need to keep the free-wheel engaged at all times. If there's only the slightest freewheeling on one side, no power is applied. And there will always be the risk of hitting heels and toes unless the frame is rather long.

– Carel
Mar 19 at 18:21













@Carel there are BMXs with left side freewheels aren't there? Single speed though

– Chris H
Mar 19 at 18:56






@Carel there are BMXs with left side freewheels aren't there? Single speed though

– Chris H
Mar 19 at 18:56





3




3





It needs to be noted that one reason such schemes are not more popular is that there is an advantage, in terms of the balance of the bike, in having the two cranks more or less in sync. (And, yes, cyclists on a tandem are always cranks. ;-) )

– Daniel R Hicks
Mar 19 at 20:16





It needs to be noted that one reason such schemes are not more popular is that there is an advantage, in terms of the balance of the bike, in having the two cranks more or less in sync. (And, yes, cyclists on a tandem are always cranks. ;-) )

– Daniel R Hicks
Mar 19 at 20:16










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














Here's a picture of a half recumbent tandem
enter image description here
from https://www.ucycle.com/merchant/2856/images/zoom/hase-pino-allround.jpg



Here is a link to a video of people riding a recumbent tandem.
https://binged.it/2TXkxJC
The video does a good job of explaining that the front crank has a freewheel mechanism that lets the riders pedal at different speeds. The front rider can also stop pedaling.



If this is what is meant as "independent drivetrains" then the functionality is in the crank rather than the frame itself.



The key to having a regular tandem like the recumbent tandem in the video is to find someone who makes a crank with a freewheeling chain ring. Like the old school Schwinn Suburban's from the late 70s with Shimano Positron FFS (Front Freewheel System).



Here's a link to a product for mountain bikes with a freewheeling chain ring
https://dirtmountainbike.com/news/hxr-easy-shift-crankset-allows-change-gear-without-pedalling.html



With this part - or something like it - any tandem frame builder should be able to get you going.






share|improve this answer

























  • One downside of the front rider being able to stop pedalling but not the back is that at least on conventional tandems the front rider is commonly the stronger rider. That may not be the case here of course

    – Chris H
    Mar 20 at 9:41


















4














As Chris H points out in his comment, this could mean two different things.



The half-recumbent/half-upright design does have separate gearing for each rider.



There's a different system that some conventional recumbents use that gives each rider the ability to coast independently, but they pedal at the same cadence: both sets of cranks drive a jackshaft (located just in front of the stoker's crank), which in turn drives the rear wheel.



There have been numerous ideas for bike drivetrains over the past century, and it's easy to imagine that other ideas have been tried out and lost to history.






share|improve this answer






























    3














    I know of two solutions to your question - I'll post two brands, however they are not meant as an advertisement, rather as a starting point for further search.



    One is used by Onderwater Fiets from Amsterdam. Their tandems (and also more persons bikes) combine the stoker and pilot function and are meant for families. There, the drive is permanent between the last bottom bracket and the rear wheel and other bottom brackets are somehow free-wheeled so the passengers in front can pedal individually.



    The other is R&B Fly, not much can be found about those on the Internet. Funny thing, I own one, hence the independent drive can be further inspected. There, each chainring (single for the pilot; double, same size for the stoker) attached to the crankset is freewheeled, thus pedalling can be done independent. Anyway, this bike awaits some renovation, I haven't ridden it yet.



    Thus, it is possible to build a tandem with independent drivetrains and with enough invention you can even build one where the cadence don't need to match (add a front derailleur and triple chainring to the pilot's seat for higher / same / lower cadence as the stoker).






    share|improve this answer























    • You might also need to add a chain tensioner (last para), but that shouldn't be too hard. Those Amsterdam ones you mention are presumably rear-steer rather like the ones I asked about a few years ago

      – Chris H
      Mar 20 at 17:03











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "126"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59856%2findependent-drivetrains-on-tandem-bicycle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    Here's a picture of a half recumbent tandem
    enter image description here
    from https://www.ucycle.com/merchant/2856/images/zoom/hase-pino-allround.jpg



    Here is a link to a video of people riding a recumbent tandem.
    https://binged.it/2TXkxJC
    The video does a good job of explaining that the front crank has a freewheel mechanism that lets the riders pedal at different speeds. The front rider can also stop pedaling.



    If this is what is meant as "independent drivetrains" then the functionality is in the crank rather than the frame itself.



    The key to having a regular tandem like the recumbent tandem in the video is to find someone who makes a crank with a freewheeling chain ring. Like the old school Schwinn Suburban's from the late 70s with Shimano Positron FFS (Front Freewheel System).



    Here's a link to a product for mountain bikes with a freewheeling chain ring
    https://dirtmountainbike.com/news/hxr-easy-shift-crankset-allows-change-gear-without-pedalling.html



    With this part - or something like it - any tandem frame builder should be able to get you going.






    share|improve this answer

























    • One downside of the front rider being able to stop pedalling but not the back is that at least on conventional tandems the front rider is commonly the stronger rider. That may not be the case here of course

      – Chris H
      Mar 20 at 9:41















    4














    Here's a picture of a half recumbent tandem
    enter image description here
    from https://www.ucycle.com/merchant/2856/images/zoom/hase-pino-allround.jpg



    Here is a link to a video of people riding a recumbent tandem.
    https://binged.it/2TXkxJC
    The video does a good job of explaining that the front crank has a freewheel mechanism that lets the riders pedal at different speeds. The front rider can also stop pedaling.



    If this is what is meant as "independent drivetrains" then the functionality is in the crank rather than the frame itself.



    The key to having a regular tandem like the recumbent tandem in the video is to find someone who makes a crank with a freewheeling chain ring. Like the old school Schwinn Suburban's from the late 70s with Shimano Positron FFS (Front Freewheel System).



    Here's a link to a product for mountain bikes with a freewheeling chain ring
    https://dirtmountainbike.com/news/hxr-easy-shift-crankset-allows-change-gear-without-pedalling.html



    With this part - or something like it - any tandem frame builder should be able to get you going.






    share|improve this answer

























    • One downside of the front rider being able to stop pedalling but not the back is that at least on conventional tandems the front rider is commonly the stronger rider. That may not be the case here of course

      – Chris H
      Mar 20 at 9:41













    4












    4








    4







    Here's a picture of a half recumbent tandem
    enter image description here
    from https://www.ucycle.com/merchant/2856/images/zoom/hase-pino-allround.jpg



    Here is a link to a video of people riding a recumbent tandem.
    https://binged.it/2TXkxJC
    The video does a good job of explaining that the front crank has a freewheel mechanism that lets the riders pedal at different speeds. The front rider can also stop pedaling.



    If this is what is meant as "independent drivetrains" then the functionality is in the crank rather than the frame itself.



    The key to having a regular tandem like the recumbent tandem in the video is to find someone who makes a crank with a freewheeling chain ring. Like the old school Schwinn Suburban's from the late 70s with Shimano Positron FFS (Front Freewheel System).



    Here's a link to a product for mountain bikes with a freewheeling chain ring
    https://dirtmountainbike.com/news/hxr-easy-shift-crankset-allows-change-gear-without-pedalling.html



    With this part - or something like it - any tandem frame builder should be able to get you going.






    share|improve this answer















    Here's a picture of a half recumbent tandem
    enter image description here
    from https://www.ucycle.com/merchant/2856/images/zoom/hase-pino-allround.jpg



    Here is a link to a video of people riding a recumbent tandem.
    https://binged.it/2TXkxJC
    The video does a good job of explaining that the front crank has a freewheel mechanism that lets the riders pedal at different speeds. The front rider can also stop pedaling.



    If this is what is meant as "independent drivetrains" then the functionality is in the crank rather than the frame itself.



    The key to having a regular tandem like the recumbent tandem in the video is to find someone who makes a crank with a freewheeling chain ring. Like the old school Schwinn Suburban's from the late 70s with Shimano Positron FFS (Front Freewheel System).



    Here's a link to a product for mountain bikes with a freewheeling chain ring
    https://dirtmountainbike.com/news/hxr-easy-shift-crankset-allows-change-gear-without-pedalling.html



    With this part - or something like it - any tandem frame builder should be able to get you going.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 19 at 21:11









    Swifty

    2,9281727




    2,9281727










    answered Mar 19 at 19:07









    DavidDavid

    3013




    3013












    • One downside of the front rider being able to stop pedalling but not the back is that at least on conventional tandems the front rider is commonly the stronger rider. That may not be the case here of course

      – Chris H
      Mar 20 at 9:41

















    • One downside of the front rider being able to stop pedalling but not the back is that at least on conventional tandems the front rider is commonly the stronger rider. That may not be the case here of course

      – Chris H
      Mar 20 at 9:41
















    One downside of the front rider being able to stop pedalling but not the back is that at least on conventional tandems the front rider is commonly the stronger rider. That may not be the case here of course

    – Chris H
    Mar 20 at 9:41





    One downside of the front rider being able to stop pedalling but not the back is that at least on conventional tandems the front rider is commonly the stronger rider. That may not be the case here of course

    – Chris H
    Mar 20 at 9:41











    4














    As Chris H points out in his comment, this could mean two different things.



    The half-recumbent/half-upright design does have separate gearing for each rider.



    There's a different system that some conventional recumbents use that gives each rider the ability to coast independently, but they pedal at the same cadence: both sets of cranks drive a jackshaft (located just in front of the stoker's crank), which in turn drives the rear wheel.



    There have been numerous ideas for bike drivetrains over the past century, and it's easy to imagine that other ideas have been tried out and lost to history.






    share|improve this answer



























      4














      As Chris H points out in his comment, this could mean two different things.



      The half-recumbent/half-upright design does have separate gearing for each rider.



      There's a different system that some conventional recumbents use that gives each rider the ability to coast independently, but they pedal at the same cadence: both sets of cranks drive a jackshaft (located just in front of the stoker's crank), which in turn drives the rear wheel.



      There have been numerous ideas for bike drivetrains over the past century, and it's easy to imagine that other ideas have been tried out and lost to history.






      share|improve this answer

























        4












        4








        4







        As Chris H points out in his comment, this could mean two different things.



        The half-recumbent/half-upright design does have separate gearing for each rider.



        There's a different system that some conventional recumbents use that gives each rider the ability to coast independently, but they pedal at the same cadence: both sets of cranks drive a jackshaft (located just in front of the stoker's crank), which in turn drives the rear wheel.



        There have been numerous ideas for bike drivetrains over the past century, and it's easy to imagine that other ideas have been tried out and lost to history.






        share|improve this answer













        As Chris H points out in his comment, this could mean two different things.



        The half-recumbent/half-upright design does have separate gearing for each rider.



        There's a different system that some conventional recumbents use that gives each rider the ability to coast independently, but they pedal at the same cadence: both sets of cranks drive a jackshaft (located just in front of the stoker's crank), which in turn drives the rear wheel.



        There have been numerous ideas for bike drivetrains over the past century, and it's easy to imagine that other ideas have been tried out and lost to history.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 19 at 17:51









        Adam RiceAdam Rice

        5,9421534




        5,9421534





















            3














            I know of two solutions to your question - I'll post two brands, however they are not meant as an advertisement, rather as a starting point for further search.



            One is used by Onderwater Fiets from Amsterdam. Their tandems (and also more persons bikes) combine the stoker and pilot function and are meant for families. There, the drive is permanent between the last bottom bracket and the rear wheel and other bottom brackets are somehow free-wheeled so the passengers in front can pedal individually.



            The other is R&B Fly, not much can be found about those on the Internet. Funny thing, I own one, hence the independent drive can be further inspected. There, each chainring (single for the pilot; double, same size for the stoker) attached to the crankset is freewheeled, thus pedalling can be done independent. Anyway, this bike awaits some renovation, I haven't ridden it yet.



            Thus, it is possible to build a tandem with independent drivetrains and with enough invention you can even build one where the cadence don't need to match (add a front derailleur and triple chainring to the pilot's seat for higher / same / lower cadence as the stoker).






            share|improve this answer























            • You might also need to add a chain tensioner (last para), but that shouldn't be too hard. Those Amsterdam ones you mention are presumably rear-steer rather like the ones I asked about a few years ago

              – Chris H
              Mar 20 at 17:03















            3














            I know of two solutions to your question - I'll post two brands, however they are not meant as an advertisement, rather as a starting point for further search.



            One is used by Onderwater Fiets from Amsterdam. Their tandems (and also more persons bikes) combine the stoker and pilot function and are meant for families. There, the drive is permanent between the last bottom bracket and the rear wheel and other bottom brackets are somehow free-wheeled so the passengers in front can pedal individually.



            The other is R&B Fly, not much can be found about those on the Internet. Funny thing, I own one, hence the independent drive can be further inspected. There, each chainring (single for the pilot; double, same size for the stoker) attached to the crankset is freewheeled, thus pedalling can be done independent. Anyway, this bike awaits some renovation, I haven't ridden it yet.



            Thus, it is possible to build a tandem with independent drivetrains and with enough invention you can even build one where the cadence don't need to match (add a front derailleur and triple chainring to the pilot's seat for higher / same / lower cadence as the stoker).






            share|improve this answer























            • You might also need to add a chain tensioner (last para), but that shouldn't be too hard. Those Amsterdam ones you mention are presumably rear-steer rather like the ones I asked about a few years ago

              – Chris H
              Mar 20 at 17:03













            3












            3








            3







            I know of two solutions to your question - I'll post two brands, however they are not meant as an advertisement, rather as a starting point for further search.



            One is used by Onderwater Fiets from Amsterdam. Their tandems (and also more persons bikes) combine the stoker and pilot function and are meant for families. There, the drive is permanent between the last bottom bracket and the rear wheel and other bottom brackets are somehow free-wheeled so the passengers in front can pedal individually.



            The other is R&B Fly, not much can be found about those on the Internet. Funny thing, I own one, hence the independent drive can be further inspected. There, each chainring (single for the pilot; double, same size for the stoker) attached to the crankset is freewheeled, thus pedalling can be done independent. Anyway, this bike awaits some renovation, I haven't ridden it yet.



            Thus, it is possible to build a tandem with independent drivetrains and with enough invention you can even build one where the cadence don't need to match (add a front derailleur and triple chainring to the pilot's seat for higher / same / lower cadence as the stoker).






            share|improve this answer













            I know of two solutions to your question - I'll post two brands, however they are not meant as an advertisement, rather as a starting point for further search.



            One is used by Onderwater Fiets from Amsterdam. Their tandems (and also more persons bikes) combine the stoker and pilot function and are meant for families. There, the drive is permanent between the last bottom bracket and the rear wheel and other bottom brackets are somehow free-wheeled so the passengers in front can pedal individually.



            The other is R&B Fly, not much can be found about those on the Internet. Funny thing, I own one, hence the independent drive can be further inspected. There, each chainring (single for the pilot; double, same size for the stoker) attached to the crankset is freewheeled, thus pedalling can be done independent. Anyway, this bike awaits some renovation, I haven't ridden it yet.



            Thus, it is possible to build a tandem with independent drivetrains and with enough invention you can even build one where the cadence don't need to match (add a front derailleur and triple chainring to the pilot's seat for higher / same / lower cadence as the stoker).







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 20 at 14:49









            MikeMike

            3,80211026




            3,80211026












            • You might also need to add a chain tensioner (last para), but that shouldn't be too hard. Those Amsterdam ones you mention are presumably rear-steer rather like the ones I asked about a few years ago

              – Chris H
              Mar 20 at 17:03

















            • You might also need to add a chain tensioner (last para), but that shouldn't be too hard. Those Amsterdam ones you mention are presumably rear-steer rather like the ones I asked about a few years ago

              – Chris H
              Mar 20 at 17:03
















            You might also need to add a chain tensioner (last para), but that shouldn't be too hard. Those Amsterdam ones you mention are presumably rear-steer rather like the ones I asked about a few years ago

            – Chris H
            Mar 20 at 17:03





            You might also need to add a chain tensioner (last para), but that shouldn't be too hard. Those Amsterdam ones you mention are presumably rear-steer rather like the ones I asked about a few years ago

            – Chris H
            Mar 20 at 17:03

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59856%2findependent-drivetrains-on-tandem-bicycle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer