A formula on partitions The Next CEO of Stack OverflowA question on partitions of nProof of the duality of the dominance order on partitionsbijection between number of partitions of 2n satisfying certain conditions with number of partitions of nOrdered set partitionsOn multiplicity representations of integer partitions of fixed lengthMinimizing over partitions $f(lambda) = sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^4/(sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^2)^2$Combinatorial proof of an identity involving integer partitions and their conjugatesIdentity from integer partitions and Ferrers diagramsProving that the number of pairs of monotone sequences is equal to the number of partitions of $m$Degree of generating polynomial associated with two partitions

free fall ellipse or parabola?

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Why do we say 'Un seul M' and not 'Une seule M' even though M is a "consonne"

What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

What is the process for cleansing a very negative action

Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?

Graph of the history of databases

Audio Conversion With ADS1243

how one can write a nice vector parser, something that does pgfvecparseA=B-C; D=E x F;

Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers

What was Carter Burke's job for "the company" in Aliens?

How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?

What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?

Aggressive Under-Indexing and no data for missing index

Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?



A formula on partitions



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowA question on partitions of nProof of the duality of the dominance order on partitionsbijection between number of partitions of 2n satisfying certain conditions with number of partitions of nOrdered set partitionsOn multiplicity representations of integer partitions of fixed lengthMinimizing over partitions $f(lambda) = sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^4/(sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^2)^2$Combinatorial proof of an identity involving integer partitions and their conjugatesIdentity from integer partitions and Ferrers diagramsProving that the number of pairs of monotone sequences is equal to the number of partitions of $m$Degree of generating polynomial associated with two partitions










4












$begingroup$


Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?




$sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?




    $sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$











    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?




      $sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$











      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?




      $sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$








      combinatorics integer-partitions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 11 '11 at 6:19









      MecMec

      2,28021529




      2,28021529




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



            Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



            The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
              $endgroup$
              – Mec
              Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










            • $begingroup$
              Brief explanation added above.
              $endgroup$
              – David Bevan
              Nov 12 '11 at 9:57


















            1












            $begingroup$

            I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
              It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
              The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81059%2fa-formula-on-partitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                2












                $begingroup$

                This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 11 '11 at 22:33







                    user940

















                    answered Nov 11 '11 at 21:12









                    Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen

                    88.6k5111229




                    88.6k5111229





















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



                        Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



                        The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mec
                          Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










                        • $begingroup$
                          Brief explanation added above.
                          $endgroup$
                          – David Bevan
                          Nov 12 '11 at 9:57















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



                        Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



                        The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mec
                          Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










                        • $begingroup$
                          Brief explanation added above.
                          $endgroup$
                          – David Bevan
                          Nov 12 '11 at 9:57













                        2












                        2








                        2





                        $begingroup$

                        The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



                        Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



                        The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



                        Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



                        The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited Nov 12 '11 at 9:56

























                        answered Nov 11 '11 at 13:01









                        David BevanDavid Bevan

                        4,16111226




                        4,16111226











                        • $begingroup$
                          how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mec
                          Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










                        • $begingroup$
                          Brief explanation added above.
                          $endgroup$
                          – David Bevan
                          Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
















                        • $begingroup$
                          how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mec
                          Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










                        • $begingroup$
                          Brief explanation added above.
                          $endgroup$
                          – David Bevan
                          Nov 12 '11 at 9:57















                        $begingroup$
                        how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mec
                        Nov 11 '11 at 19:47




                        $begingroup$
                        how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mec
                        Nov 11 '11 at 19:47












                        $begingroup$
                        Brief explanation added above.
                        $endgroup$
                        – David Bevan
                        Nov 12 '11 at 9:57




                        $begingroup$
                        Brief explanation added above.
                        $endgroup$
                        – David Bevan
                        Nov 12 '11 at 9:57











                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 11 '11 at 7:57









                            Greg MartinGreg Martin

                            36.5k23565




                            36.5k23565





















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
                                It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
                                The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$

















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
                                  It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
                                  The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
                                    It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
                                    The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$



                                    Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
                                    It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
                                    The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                    edited Mar 23 at 10:48

























                                    answered Mar 19 at 19:50









                                    tellerteller

                                    63




                                    63



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81059%2fa-formula-on-partitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                                        Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                                        Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers