A formula on partitions The Next CEO of Stack OverflowA question on partitions of nProof of the duality of the dominance order on partitionsbijection between number of partitions of 2n satisfying certain conditions with number of partitions of nOrdered set partitionsOn multiplicity representations of integer partitions of fixed lengthMinimizing over partitions $f(lambda) = sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^4/(sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^2)^2$Combinatorial proof of an identity involving integer partitions and their conjugatesIdentity from integer partitions and Ferrers diagramsProving that the number of pairs of monotone sequences is equal to the number of partitions of $m$Degree of generating polynomial associated with two partitions

free fall ellipse or parabola?

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Why do we say 'Un seul M' and not 'Une seule M' even though M is a "consonne"

What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

What is the process for cleansing a very negative action

Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?

Graph of the history of databases

Audio Conversion With ADS1243

how one can write a nice vector parser, something that does pgfvecparseA=B-C; D=E x F;

Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers

What was Carter Burke's job for "the company" in Aliens?

How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?

What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?

Aggressive Under-Indexing and no data for missing index

Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?



A formula on partitions



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowA question on partitions of nProof of the duality of the dominance order on partitionsbijection between number of partitions of 2n satisfying certain conditions with number of partitions of nOrdered set partitionsOn multiplicity representations of integer partitions of fixed lengthMinimizing over partitions $f(lambda) = sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^4/(sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^2)^2$Combinatorial proof of an identity involving integer partitions and their conjugatesIdentity from integer partitions and Ferrers diagramsProving that the number of pairs of monotone sequences is equal to the number of partitions of $m$Degree of generating polynomial associated with two partitions










4












$begingroup$


Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?




$sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?




    $sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$











    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?




      $sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$











      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?




      $sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$








      combinatorics integer-partitions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 11 '11 at 6:19









      MecMec

      2,28021529




      2,28021529




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



            Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



            The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
              $endgroup$
              – Mec
              Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










            • $begingroup$
              Brief explanation added above.
              $endgroup$
              – David Bevan
              Nov 12 '11 at 9:57


















            1












            $begingroup$

            I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
              It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
              The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81059%2fa-formula-on-partitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                2












                $begingroup$

                This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 11 '11 at 22:33







                    user940

















                    answered Nov 11 '11 at 21:12









                    Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen

                    88.6k5111229




                    88.6k5111229





















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



                        Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



                        The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mec
                          Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










                        • $begingroup$
                          Brief explanation added above.
                          $endgroup$
                          – David Bevan
                          Nov 12 '11 at 9:57















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



                        Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



                        The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mec
                          Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










                        • $begingroup$
                          Brief explanation added above.
                          $endgroup$
                          – David Bevan
                          Nov 12 '11 at 9:57













                        2












                        2








                        2





                        $begingroup$

                        The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



                        Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



                        The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:



                        Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:



                        The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited Nov 12 '11 at 9:56

























                        answered Nov 11 '11 at 13:01









                        David BevanDavid Bevan

                        4,16111226




                        4,16111226











                        • $begingroup$
                          how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mec
                          Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










                        • $begingroup$
                          Brief explanation added above.
                          $endgroup$
                          – David Bevan
                          Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
















                        • $begingroup$
                          how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                          $endgroup$
                          – Mec
                          Nov 11 '11 at 19:47










                        • $begingroup$
                          Brief explanation added above.
                          $endgroup$
                          – David Bevan
                          Nov 12 '11 at 9:57















                        $begingroup$
                        how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mec
                        Nov 11 '11 at 19:47




                        $begingroup$
                        how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mec
                        Nov 11 '11 at 19:47












                        $begingroup$
                        Brief explanation added above.
                        $endgroup$
                        – David Bevan
                        Nov 12 '11 at 9:57




                        $begingroup$
                        Brief explanation added above.
                        $endgroup$
                        – David Bevan
                        Nov 12 '11 at 9:57











                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 11 '11 at 7:57









                            Greg MartinGreg Martin

                            36.5k23565




                            36.5k23565





















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
                                It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
                                The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$

















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
                                  It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
                                  The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
                                    It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
                                    The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$



                                    Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
                                    It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
                                    The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                    edited Mar 23 at 10:48

























                                    answered Mar 19 at 19:50









                                    tellerteller

                                    63




                                    63



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81059%2fa-formula-on-partitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

                                        random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                                        How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer