A formula on partitions The Next CEO of Stack OverflowA question on partitions of nProof of the duality of the dominance order on partitionsbijection between number of partitions of 2n satisfying certain conditions with number of partitions of nOrdered set partitionsOn multiplicity representations of integer partitions of fixed lengthMinimizing over partitions $f(lambda) = sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^4/(sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^2)^2$Combinatorial proof of an identity involving integer partitions and their conjugatesIdentity from integer partitions and Ferrers diagramsProving that the number of pairs of monotone sequences is equal to the number of partitions of $m$Degree of generating polynomial associated with two partitions
free fall ellipse or parabola?
Why did early computer designers eschew integers?
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
Why do we say 'Un seul M' and not 'Une seule M' even though M is a "consonne"
What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?
Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?
What is the process for cleansing a very negative action
Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?
Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?
TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?
Graph of the history of databases
Audio Conversion With ADS1243
how one can write a nice vector parser, something that does pgfvecparseA=B-C; D=E x F;
Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)
Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?
Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers
What was Carter Burke's job for "the company" in Aliens?
How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?
What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?
Aggressive Under-Indexing and no data for missing index
Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight
Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish
"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"
Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?
A formula on partitions
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowA question on partitions of nProof of the duality of the dominance order on partitionsbijection between number of partitions of 2n satisfying certain conditions with number of partitions of nOrdered set partitionsOn multiplicity representations of integer partitions of fixed lengthMinimizing over partitions $f(lambda) = sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^4/(sum limits_i = 1^N |lambda_i|^2)^2$Combinatorial proof of an identity involving integer partitions and their conjugatesIdentity from integer partitions and Ferrers diagramsProving that the number of pairs of monotone sequences is equal to the number of partitions of $m$Degree of generating polynomial associated with two partitions
$begingroup$
Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?
$sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$
combinatorics integer-partitions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?
$sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$
combinatorics integer-partitions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?
$sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$
combinatorics integer-partitions
$endgroup$
Suppose that $lambda,mu$ are integer partitions, with conjugates $lambda^*,mu^*$. Could you help me to prove the following formula, please?
$sum_i,jmathrmmin(lambda_i,mu_j)=sum_klambda^*_kmu^*_k$
combinatorics integer-partitions
combinatorics integer-partitions
asked Nov 11 '11 at 6:19
MecMec
2,28021529
2,28021529
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:
Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:
The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
$endgroup$
– Mec
Nov 11 '11 at 19:47
$begingroup$
Brief explanation added above.
$endgroup$
– David Bevan
Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81059%2fa-formula-on-partitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.
$endgroup$
This is really the same answer as David Bevan's, but formulated a bit differently. Both sides of the equation count triples $(i,j,k)$ where $kleqlambda_i$ and $kleqmu_j$. If you fix $i$ and $j$ you have $min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ different choices for $k$, while if you fix $k$ you have $lambda^*_k$ choices for $i$ and independently $mu^*_k$ choices for $j$.
edited Nov 11 '11 at 22:33
user940
answered Nov 11 '11 at 21:12
Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen
88.6k5111229
88.6k5111229
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:
Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:
The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
$endgroup$
– Mec
Nov 11 '11 at 19:47
$begingroup$
Brief explanation added above.
$endgroup$
– David Bevan
Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:
Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:
The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
$endgroup$
– Mec
Nov 11 '11 at 19:47
$begingroup$
Brief explanation added above.
$endgroup$
– David Bevan
Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:
Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:
The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.
$endgroup$
The identity describes two ways of counting the cubic ‘cells’ in a plane partition:
Let $n_i,j = min(lambda_i,mu_j)$ be a plane partition, then the $k$th ‘storey’ is rectangular with dimensions $lambda^star_ktimesmu^star_k$:
The cells in the $k$th storey are the $(i,j)$ for which both $lambda_igeqslant k$ and $mu_jgeqslant k$. But $lambda^star_k$ is the number of $i$ for which $lambda_igeqslant k$, and $mu^star_k$ is the number of $j$ for which $mu_jgeqslant k$.
edited Nov 12 '11 at 9:56
answered Nov 11 '11 at 13:01
David BevanDavid Bevan
4,16111226
4,16111226
$begingroup$
how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
$endgroup$
– Mec
Nov 11 '11 at 19:47
$begingroup$
Brief explanation added above.
$endgroup$
– David Bevan
Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
$endgroup$
– Mec
Nov 11 '11 at 19:47
$begingroup$
Brief explanation added above.
$endgroup$
– David Bevan
Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
$begingroup$
how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
$endgroup$
– Mec
Nov 11 '11 at 19:47
$begingroup$
how can i prove that the $k$th storey is rectangular with dimensions $lambda_k^*mu^*_k$? I'm finding some difficulties
$endgroup$
– Mec
Nov 11 '11 at 19:47
$begingroup$
Brief explanation added above.
$endgroup$
– David Bevan
Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
$begingroup$
Brief explanation added above.
$endgroup$
– David Bevan
Nov 12 '11 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?
$endgroup$
I think induction on the integer that $mu$ partitions works. Subtract 1 from the smallest part of $mu$, and show that both sides decrease by the same amount?
answered Nov 11 '11 at 7:57
Greg MartinGreg Martin
36.5k23565
36.5k23565
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.
$endgroup$
Suppose two finite integer non negative sequences $t$ and $s$; let min($t,$s) be the sequence $[min(t_i,s_j)]$, reordered anyway.
It is immediate that $min(t_i,s_j)=> k$ is equivalent to $t=> k$ and $s=> k$; hence the conjugate dual sequence is the following: $s*.t*$.
The result follows since we know that the sum of a finite, integer non negative sequence and the sum of its conjugate are equal.
edited Mar 23 at 10:48
answered Mar 19 at 19:50
tellerteller
63
63
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81059%2fa-formula-on-partitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown