Do all natural numbers exist on these three lines? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to find the sum of Big-Oh's?Proof with $Theta$Prove that even + odd is odd.Is this a valid proof of the squeeze theorem?Proof: Fibonacci Sequence (2 parts)3 different proofsFor any natural numbers a, b, c, d if a*b = c*d is it possible that a + b + c + d is prime numberFor all natural numbers $n,; n^2-n$ is even.Proof that Cardinality of Primes is Cardinality of Natural NumbersShow that no ∞-persistent numbers exist.

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Can I board the first leg of the flight without having final country's visa?

Inductor and Capacitor in Parallel

Ising model simulation

Point distance program written without a framework

Audio Conversion With ADS1243

Plausibility of squid whales

Do scriptures give a method to recognize a truly self-realized person/jivanmukta?

Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?

What's the commands of Cisco query bgp neighbor table, bgp table and router table?

What difference does it make using sed with/without whitespaces?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Yu-Gi-Oh cards in Python 3

Can this note be analyzed as a non-chord tone?

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

Is Nisuin Biblical or Rabbinic?

Scary film where a woman has vaginal teeth

Asymptote: 3d graph over a disc

Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)

How can the PCs determine if an item is a phylactery?

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Which Pokemon have a special animation when running with them out of their pokeball?

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact



Do all natural numbers exist on these three lines?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to find the sum of Big-Oh's?Proof with $Theta$Prove that even + odd is odd.Is this a valid proof of the squeeze theorem?Proof: Fibonacci Sequence (2 parts)3 different proofsFor any natural numbers a, b, c, d if a*b = c*d is it possible that a + b + c + d is prime numberFor all natural numbers $n,; n^2-n$ is even.Proof that Cardinality of Primes is Cardinality of Natural NumbersShow that no ∞-persistent numbers exist.










0












$begingroup$


The lines given by
$$f_1:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_1(n)=(6n+1)cdot2^k$$
$$f_2:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_2(n)=(6n+3)cdot2^k$$
$$f_3:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_3(n)=(6n+5)cdot2^k$$
where $n,k$ are arbitrary whole numbers.



By ignoring the $2^k$ I can see that any given odd number will appear on one of the lines, and when multiplied by a factor of 2 will give any even number. How do you suppose I would go about and prove all of the natural numbers exist on the lines?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    The lines given by
    $$f_1:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_1(n)=(6n+1)cdot2^k$$
    $$f_2:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_2(n)=(6n+3)cdot2^k$$
    $$f_3:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_3(n)=(6n+5)cdot2^k$$
    where $n,k$ are arbitrary whole numbers.



    By ignoring the $2^k$ I can see that any given odd number will appear on one of the lines, and when multiplied by a factor of 2 will give any even number. How do you suppose I would go about and prove all of the natural numbers exist on the lines?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      The lines given by
      $$f_1:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_1(n)=(6n+1)cdot2^k$$
      $$f_2:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_2(n)=(6n+3)cdot2^k$$
      $$f_3:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_3(n)=(6n+5)cdot2^k$$
      where $n,k$ are arbitrary whole numbers.



      By ignoring the $2^k$ I can see that any given odd number will appear on one of the lines, and when multiplied by a factor of 2 will give any even number. How do you suppose I would go about and prove all of the natural numbers exist on the lines?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The lines given by
      $$f_1:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_1(n)=(6n+1)cdot2^k$$
      $$f_2:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_2(n)=(6n+3)cdot2^k$$
      $$f_3:mathbbWrightarrow mathbbN,~~f_3(n)=(6n+5)cdot2^k$$
      where $n,k$ are arbitrary whole numbers.



      By ignoring the $2^k$ I can see that any given odd number will appear on one of the lines, and when multiplied by a factor of 2 will give any even number. How do you suppose I would go about and prove all of the natural numbers exist on the lines?







      proof-writing






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 19 at 22:18









      Alex MaslachAlex Maslach

      275




      275




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Your observation is pretty much correct, you just need to formalise it. You can start by proving that every odd $x$ is in one of the sequences, probably by assuming that there's an $x$ not in $f_1$ or $f_2$, and hence showing that it must be in $f_3$. After that, if you can then prove that any even number can be written as $2^kcdot x$ for some odd $x$, you're done.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154695%2fdo-all-natural-numbers-exist-on-these-three-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Your observation is pretty much correct, you just need to formalise it. You can start by proving that every odd $x$ is in one of the sequences, probably by assuming that there's an $x$ not in $f_1$ or $f_2$, and hence showing that it must be in $f_3$. After that, if you can then prove that any even number can be written as $2^kcdot x$ for some odd $x$, you're done.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              Your observation is pretty much correct, you just need to formalise it. You can start by proving that every odd $x$ is in one of the sequences, probably by assuming that there's an $x$ not in $f_1$ or $f_2$, and hence showing that it must be in $f_3$. After that, if you can then prove that any even number can be written as $2^kcdot x$ for some odd $x$, you're done.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Your observation is pretty much correct, you just need to formalise it. You can start by proving that every odd $x$ is in one of the sequences, probably by assuming that there's an $x$ not in $f_1$ or $f_2$, and hence showing that it must be in $f_3$. After that, if you can then prove that any even number can be written as $2^kcdot x$ for some odd $x$, you're done.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Your observation is pretty much correct, you just need to formalise it. You can start by proving that every odd $x$ is in one of the sequences, probably by assuming that there's an $x$ not in $f_1$ or $f_2$, and hence showing that it must be in $f_3$. After that, if you can then prove that any even number can be written as $2^kcdot x$ for some odd $x$, you're done.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 19 at 22:24









                ConManConMan

                7,9671324




                7,9671324



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154695%2fdo-all-natural-numbers-exist-on-these-three-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye