Fdtxjr

For a non-Jew, is there a punishment for not observing the 7 Noahide Laws?

How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?

Sequence of Tenses: Translating the subjunctive

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Pole-zeros of a real-valued causal FIR system

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

Where does the Z80 processor start executing from?

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

Closest Prime Number

Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars

Lay out the Carpet

Gears on left are inverse to gears on right?

Crossing the line between justified force and brutality

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

How to write papers efficiently when English isn't my first language?

How can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?

Type int? vs type int

How to draw lines on a tikz-cd diagram

How do I extract a value from a time formatted value in excel?

How to check is there any negative term in a large list?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

Why not increase contact surface when reentering the atmosphere?

Do you say the plural TO or OF something? [closed]

Should I say “She is in the park” or “She is at the park”?“feint toward” or “feint to”, “to” vs “toward”Write plural of/to the following words(Shoot or fire) at something or somebodyIs there any difference between “changing mind on something” and “changing mind about something”“Fell onto” x “Fell on” What's the difference?head to/ towards/forHow to say where I was born“The file I sent (to) you”. Using the prepositionAre these sentences grammatically correct in formal and informal English?

3

1

Are these sentences both correct?

What is the plural of boy?

What is the plural to boy?

Are they interchangeable?

prepositions grammaticality-in-context

share|improve this question

edited Mar 18 at 11:32

CJ Dennis

2,053717

asked Mar 17 at 8:50

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

5641313

closed as off-topic by Mari-Lou A, Hellion, Lambie, fred2, Varun Nair Mar 19 at 5:58

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – Mari-Lou A, Hellion, fred2, Varun Nair

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).
  
  – userr2684291
  Mar 17 at 13:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Are you asking with regard to a certain version of English?
  
  – Davo
  Mar 18 at 14:12
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

1

Are these sentences both correct?

What is the plural of boy?

What is the plural to boy?

Are they interchangeable?

prepositions grammaticality-in-context

share|improve this question

edited Mar 18 at 11:32

CJ Dennis

2,053717

asked Mar 17 at 8:50

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

5641313

closed as off-topic by Mari-Lou A, Hellion, Lambie, fred2, Varun Nair Mar 19 at 5:58

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – Mari-Lou A, Hellion, fred2, Varun Nair

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).
  
  – userr2684291
  Mar 17 at 13:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Are you asking with regard to a certain version of English?
  
  – Davo
  Mar 18 at 14:12
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Are these sentences both correct?

What is the plural of boy?

What is the plural to boy?

Are they interchangeable?

prepositions grammaticality-in-context

share|improve this question

edited Mar 18 at 11:32

CJ Dennis

2,053717

asked Mar 17 at 8:50

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

5641313

share|improve this question

edited Mar 18 at 11:32

CJ Dennis

2,053717

asked Mar 17 at 8:50

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

5641313

share|improve this question

edited Mar 18 at 11:32

CJ Dennis

2,053717

asked Mar 17 at 8:50

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

5641313

edited Mar 18 at 11:32

CJ Dennis

2,053717

edited Mar 18 at 11:32

CJ Dennis

2,053717

asked Mar 17 at 8:50

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

5641313

asked Mar 17 at 8:50

Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

5641313

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

9

It’s always the plural of something.

What is the plural of “boy”?

To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.

“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.

The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.

What's the plural of “tooth”?

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 8:59

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,904521

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."
  
  – Kumar sadhu
  Mar 17 at 9:32
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.
  
  – Chris Melville
  Mar 17 at 9:55
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.
  
  – amI
  Mar 17 at 9:57
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

"there is no singular to audience."

This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.

The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:

There is no plural form of 'sheep'

There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'

This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.

In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.

Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 15:55

FSCKurFSCKur

311

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.
  
  – fred2
  Mar 17 at 17:05
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."
  
  – amI
  Mar 17 at 18:17
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!
  
  – FSCKur
  Mar 17 at 18:21
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

9

It’s always the plural of something.

What is the plural of “boy”?

To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.

“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.

The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.

What's the plural of “tooth”?

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 8:59

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,904521

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."
  
  – Kumar sadhu
  Mar 17 at 9:32
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.
  
  – Chris Melville
  Mar 17 at 9:55
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.
  
  – amI
  Mar 17 at 9:57
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

9

It’s always the plural of something.

What is the plural of “boy”?

To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.

“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.

The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.

What's the plural of “tooth”?

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 8:59

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,904521

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."
  
  – Kumar sadhu
  Mar 17 at 9:32
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.
  
  – Chris Melville
  Mar 17 at 9:55
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  4
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.
  
  – amI
  Mar 17 at 9:57
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

It’s always the plural of something.

What is the plural of “boy”?

To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.

“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.

The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.

What's the plural of “tooth”?

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 8:59

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,904521

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 8:59

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,904521

answered Mar 17 at 8:59

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,904521

answered Mar 17 at 8:59

Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,904521

3

"there is no singular to audience."

This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.

The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:

There is no plural form of 'sheep'

There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'

This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.

In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.

Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 15:55

FSCKurFSCKur

311

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.
  
  – fred2
  Mar 17 at 17:05
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."
  
  – amI
  Mar 17 at 18:17
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!
  
  – FSCKur
  Mar 17 at 18:21
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

"there is no singular to audience."

This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.

The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:

There is no plural form of 'sheep'

There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'

This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.

In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.

Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 15:55

FSCKurFSCKur

311

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.
  
  – fred2
  Mar 17 at 17:05
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."
  
  – amI
  Mar 17 at 18:17
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!
  
  – FSCKur
  Mar 17 at 18:21
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

"there is no singular to audience."

This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.

The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:

There is no plural form of 'sheep'

There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'

This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.

In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.

Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 15:55

FSCKurFSCKur

311

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 17 at 15:55

FSCKurFSCKur

311

answered Mar 17 at 15:55

FSCKurFSCKur

311

answered Mar 17 at 15:55

FSCKurFSCKur

311