Prove for all $nin mathbbN$ that $sum_i=0^n icdot F_2i = (n+1)F_2n + 1 - F_2n + 2$.Showing that an equation holds true with a Fibonacci sequence: $F_n+m = F_n-1F_m + F_n F_m+1$Proof by Induction: Alternating Sum of Fibonacci NumbersFibonacci sequencesQuestion regarding the Fibonacci sequenceFibonacci numeration systemHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Fibonacci proof question $sum_i=1^nF_i = F_n+2 - 1$Inductively proving a fibonacci numbers statementSeries with inverse Fibonacci productsStrong Inductive proof for inequality using Fibonacci sequence

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

Is it appropriate to ask a job candidate if we can record their interview?

Return the Closest Prime Number

Where does the Z80 processor start executing from?

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

Would this custom Sorcerer variant that can only learn any verbal-component-only spell be unbalanced?

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

when is out of tune ok?

How do I extract a value from a time formatted value in excel?

Two monoidal structures and copowering

Do the temporary hit points from the Battlerager barbarian's Reckless Abandon stack if I make multiple attacks on my turn?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

Large drywall patch supports

System.debug(JSON.Serialize(o)) Not longer shows full string

Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?

Lay out the Carpet

Proof of work - lottery approach

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

How to safely derail a train during transit?

Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?



Prove for all $nin mathbbN$ that $sum_i=0^n icdot F_2i = (n+1)F_2n + 1 - F_2n + 2$.


Showing that an equation holds true with a Fibonacci sequence: $F_n+m = F_n-1F_m + F_n F_m+1$Proof by Induction: Alternating Sum of Fibonacci NumbersFibonacci sequencesQuestion regarding the Fibonacci sequenceFibonacci numeration systemHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Fibonacci proof question $sum_i=1^nF_i = F_n+2 - 1$Inductively proving a fibonacci numbers statementSeries with inverse Fibonacci productsStrong Inductive proof for inequality using Fibonacci sequence













3












$begingroup$


$F_n$ denotes the Fibonacci sequence where $n$ is the term of the Fibonacci number in the sequence. ($F_0=0$, $F_1=1$, $F_2=1$, $F_3=2$, $F_4=3$, ... $F_n=F_n-1 + F_n-2$)



I want to prove this using strong induction and have formulated base cases for when $n=0$ and when $n=1$.



My induction hypothesis is that for all $kin mathbbN$, $kgeq 1$ we can assume that for $k-1$, $sum_i=0^k-1 icdot F_2i = (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k$ and that for $k$, $sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i = (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2$.



For my induction step I want to show that for $k+1$, $sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i = (k+2)F_2k + 3 - F_2k + 4$. I've been stuck on the equation below for the past couple of hours trying to figure out how I can derive the equation for $k + 1$.



beginalign*
sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i\
&= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k - 1 icdot F_2i\
&= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k\
endalign*



Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    $F_n$ denotes the Fibonacci sequence where $n$ is the term of the Fibonacci number in the sequence. ($F_0=0$, $F_1=1$, $F_2=1$, $F_3=2$, $F_4=3$, ... $F_n=F_n-1 + F_n-2$)



    I want to prove this using strong induction and have formulated base cases for when $n=0$ and when $n=1$.



    My induction hypothesis is that for all $kin mathbbN$, $kgeq 1$ we can assume that for $k-1$, $sum_i=0^k-1 icdot F_2i = (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k$ and that for $k$, $sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i = (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2$.



    For my induction step I want to show that for $k+1$, $sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i = (k+2)F_2k + 3 - F_2k + 4$. I've been stuck on the equation below for the past couple of hours trying to figure out how I can derive the equation for $k + 1$.



    beginalign*
    sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i\
    &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k - 1 icdot F_2i\
    &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k\
    endalign*



    Any help is appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      $F_n$ denotes the Fibonacci sequence where $n$ is the term of the Fibonacci number in the sequence. ($F_0=0$, $F_1=1$, $F_2=1$, $F_3=2$, $F_4=3$, ... $F_n=F_n-1 + F_n-2$)



      I want to prove this using strong induction and have formulated base cases for when $n=0$ and when $n=1$.



      My induction hypothesis is that for all $kin mathbbN$, $kgeq 1$ we can assume that for $k-1$, $sum_i=0^k-1 icdot F_2i = (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k$ and that for $k$, $sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i = (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2$.



      For my induction step I want to show that for $k+1$, $sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i = (k+2)F_2k + 3 - F_2k + 4$. I've been stuck on the equation below for the past couple of hours trying to figure out how I can derive the equation for $k + 1$.



      beginalign*
      sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i\
      &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k - 1 icdot F_2i\
      &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k\
      endalign*



      Any help is appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      $F_n$ denotes the Fibonacci sequence where $n$ is the term of the Fibonacci number in the sequence. ($F_0=0$, $F_1=1$, $F_2=1$, $F_3=2$, $F_4=3$, ... $F_n=F_n-1 + F_n-2$)



      I want to prove this using strong induction and have formulated base cases for when $n=0$ and when $n=1$.



      My induction hypothesis is that for all $kin mathbbN$, $kgeq 1$ we can assume that for $k-1$, $sum_i=0^k-1 icdot F_2i = (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k$ and that for $k$, $sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i = (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2$.



      For my induction step I want to show that for $k+1$, $sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i = (k+2)F_2k + 3 - F_2k + 4$. I've been stuck on the equation below for the past couple of hours trying to figure out how I can derive the equation for $k + 1$.



      beginalign*
      sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i\
      &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k - 1 icdot F_2i\
      &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k\
      endalign*



      Any help is appreciated.







      discrete-mathematics induction fibonacci-numbers






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 17 at 22:45









      ivyleaf57ivyleaf57

      514




      514




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3152182%2fprove-for-all-n-in-mathbbn-that-sum-i-0n-i-cdot-f-2i-n1f-2n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02















          1












          $begingroup$

          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 17 at 22:55









          Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown

          107k1162135




          107k1162135











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02















          $begingroup$
          Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
          $endgroup$
          – ivyleaf57
          Mar 17 at 23:02




          $begingroup$
          Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
          $endgroup$
          – ivyleaf57
          Mar 17 at 23:02

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3152182%2fprove-for-all-n-in-mathbbn-that-sum-i-0n-i-cdot-f-2i-n1f-2n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

          Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

          Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers