Prove for all $nin mathbbN$ that $sum_i=0^n icdot F_2i = (n+1)F_2n + 1 - F_2n + 2$.Showing that an equation holds true with a Fibonacci sequence: $F_n+m = F_n-1F_m + F_n F_m+1$Proof by Induction: Alternating Sum of Fibonacci NumbersFibonacci sequencesQuestion regarding the Fibonacci sequenceFibonacci numeration systemHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Fibonacci proof question $sum_i=1^nF_i = F_n+2 - 1$Inductively proving a fibonacci numbers statementSeries with inverse Fibonacci productsStrong Inductive proof for inequality using Fibonacci sequence

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

Is it appropriate to ask a job candidate if we can record their interview?

Return the Closest Prime Number

Where does the Z80 processor start executing from?

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

Would this custom Sorcerer variant that can only learn any verbal-component-only spell be unbalanced?

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

when is out of tune ok?

How do I extract a value from a time formatted value in excel?

Two monoidal structures and copowering

Do the temporary hit points from the Battlerager barbarian's Reckless Abandon stack if I make multiple attacks on my turn?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

Large drywall patch supports

System.debug(JSON.Serialize(o)) Not longer shows full string

Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?

Lay out the Carpet

Proof of work - lottery approach

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

How to safely derail a train during transit?

Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?



Prove for all $nin mathbbN$ that $sum_i=0^n icdot F_2i = (n+1)F_2n + 1 - F_2n + 2$.


Showing that an equation holds true with a Fibonacci sequence: $F_n+m = F_n-1F_m + F_n F_m+1$Proof by Induction: Alternating Sum of Fibonacci NumbersFibonacci sequencesQuestion regarding the Fibonacci sequenceFibonacci numeration systemHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Fibonacci proof question $sum_i=1^nF_i = F_n+2 - 1$Inductively proving a fibonacci numbers statementSeries with inverse Fibonacci productsStrong Inductive proof for inequality using Fibonacci sequence













3












$begingroup$


$F_n$ denotes the Fibonacci sequence where $n$ is the term of the Fibonacci number in the sequence. ($F_0=0$, $F_1=1$, $F_2=1$, $F_3=2$, $F_4=3$, ... $F_n=F_n-1 + F_n-2$)



I want to prove this using strong induction and have formulated base cases for when $n=0$ and when $n=1$.



My induction hypothesis is that for all $kin mathbbN$, $kgeq 1$ we can assume that for $k-1$, $sum_i=0^k-1 icdot F_2i = (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k$ and that for $k$, $sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i = (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2$.



For my induction step I want to show that for $k+1$, $sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i = (k+2)F_2k + 3 - F_2k + 4$. I've been stuck on the equation below for the past couple of hours trying to figure out how I can derive the equation for $k + 1$.



beginalign*
sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i\
&= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k - 1 icdot F_2i\
&= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k\
endalign*



Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    $F_n$ denotes the Fibonacci sequence where $n$ is the term of the Fibonacci number in the sequence. ($F_0=0$, $F_1=1$, $F_2=1$, $F_3=2$, $F_4=3$, ... $F_n=F_n-1 + F_n-2$)



    I want to prove this using strong induction and have formulated base cases for when $n=0$ and when $n=1$.



    My induction hypothesis is that for all $kin mathbbN$, $kgeq 1$ we can assume that for $k-1$, $sum_i=0^k-1 icdot F_2i = (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k$ and that for $k$, $sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i = (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2$.



    For my induction step I want to show that for $k+1$, $sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i = (k+2)F_2k + 3 - F_2k + 4$. I've been stuck on the equation below for the past couple of hours trying to figure out how I can derive the equation for $k + 1$.



    beginalign*
    sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i\
    &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k - 1 icdot F_2i\
    &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k\
    endalign*



    Any help is appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      $F_n$ denotes the Fibonacci sequence where $n$ is the term of the Fibonacci number in the sequence. ($F_0=0$, $F_1=1$, $F_2=1$, $F_3=2$, $F_4=3$, ... $F_n=F_n-1 + F_n-2$)



      I want to prove this using strong induction and have formulated base cases for when $n=0$ and when $n=1$.



      My induction hypothesis is that for all $kin mathbbN$, $kgeq 1$ we can assume that for $k-1$, $sum_i=0^k-1 icdot F_2i = (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k$ and that for $k$, $sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i = (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2$.



      For my induction step I want to show that for $k+1$, $sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i = (k+2)F_2k + 3 - F_2k + 4$. I've been stuck on the equation below for the past couple of hours trying to figure out how I can derive the equation for $k + 1$.



      beginalign*
      sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i\
      &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k - 1 icdot F_2i\
      &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k\
      endalign*



      Any help is appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      $F_n$ denotes the Fibonacci sequence where $n$ is the term of the Fibonacci number in the sequence. ($F_0=0$, $F_1=1$, $F_2=1$, $F_3=2$, $F_4=3$, ... $F_n=F_n-1 + F_n-2$)



      I want to prove this using strong induction and have formulated base cases for when $n=0$ and when $n=1$.



      My induction hypothesis is that for all $kin mathbbN$, $kgeq 1$ we can assume that for $k-1$, $sum_i=0^k-1 icdot F_2i = (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k$ and that for $k$, $sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i = (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2$.



      For my induction step I want to show that for $k+1$, $sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i = (k+2)F_2k + 3 - F_2k + 4$. I've been stuck on the equation below for the past couple of hours trying to figure out how I can derive the equation for $k + 1$.



      beginalign*
      sum_i=0^k+1 icdot F_2i &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k icdot F_2i\
      &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + sum_i=0^k - 1 icdot F_2i\
      &= (k + 1)cdot F_2k + 2 + (k + 1)F_2k + 1 - F_2k + 2 + (k)F_2k - 1 - F_2k\
      endalign*



      Any help is appreciated.







      discrete-mathematics induction fibonacci-numbers






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 17 at 22:45









      ivyleaf57ivyleaf57

      514




      514




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3152182%2fprove-for-all-n-in-mathbbn-that-sum-i-0n-i-cdot-f-2i-n1f-2n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02















          1












          $begingroup$

          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          beginalign
          sum_i=0^k+1iF_2i&=(k+1)F_2k+2+(k+1)F_2k+1-F_2k+2\
          &=kF_2k+2+(k+1)(F_2k+3-F_2k+2)\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-F_2k+2\
          &=(k+1)F_2k+3-(F_2k+4-F_2k+3)\
          &=(k+2)F_2k+3-F_2k+4.
          endalign







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 17 at 22:55









          Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown

          107k1162135




          107k1162135











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
            $endgroup$
            – ivyleaf57
            Mar 17 at 23:02















          $begingroup$
          Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
          $endgroup$
          – ivyleaf57
          Mar 17 at 23:02




          $begingroup$
          Thanks, It seems like you were able to get the answer using ordinary induction. I was told that whenever you see Fibonacci numbers you should go straight to strong induction. Is there a way to know which you should start with? Or should you always start with ordinary induction and then move to strong induction if you need to assume more?
          $endgroup$
          – ivyleaf57
          Mar 17 at 23:02

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3152182%2fprove-for-all-n-in-mathbbn-that-sum-i-0n-i-cdot-f-2i-n1f-2n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye