How to evaluate the integral $int_0^infty fraclog xx^p (x-1), dx$?How many ways to calculate: $sum_n=-infty^+inftyfrac1(u+n)^2$ where $u not in BbbZ$Finding integral $int_0^infty fracx^alphalogx1-x^2dx$ using complex analysis - residuesHow much makes $sumlimits_i=-infty^infty frac1i2pi+x$?integral with $logleft(fracx+1x-1right)$Evaluating $frac1pi int_0^pi e^2costheta dtheta$How to evaluate improper integral $int_0^inftyfractan^-1xe^ax-1dx$?Evaluate $int_-infty^infty fraclog(1+x^2) dx1+x^2$ Using Complex AnalysisEvaluate $int_ - infty^infty fracdx1+x^2$ using complex integrationAn explanation or hints to evaluate $textPVint_0^infty frace^-x(x+log (x))1-e^-xdx$Evaluate log improper integral $int_a^infty -frac1c (1-x) x$.Integral $int_frac12^1 fracln xsqrtx^2+1dx$How to evaluate $int_-infty^inftyfracxarctanfrac1x log(1+x^2)1+x^2dx$A line integral involving $log zeta(s)$

How does buying out courses with grant money work?

Crossing the line between justified force and brutality

Is `x >> pure y` equivalent to `liftM (const y) x`

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

How to draw lines on a tikz-cd diagram

Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?

Large drywall patch supports

You cannot touch me, but I can touch you, who am I?

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?

Method to test if a number is a perfect power?

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Pole-zeros of a real-valued causal FIR system

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

How easy is it to start Magic from scratch?

Why are there no referendums in the US?

Type int? vs type int

Why not increase contact surface when reentering the atmosphere?

What is the best translation for "slot" in the context of multiplayer video games?

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?



How to evaluate the integral $int_0^infty fraclog xx^p (x-1), dx$?


How many ways to calculate: $sum_n=-infty^+inftyfrac1(u+n)^2$ where $u not in BbbZ$Finding integral $int_0^infty fracx^alphalogx1-x^2dx$ using complex analysis - residuesHow much makes $sumlimits_i=-infty^infty frac1i2pi+x$?integral with $logleft(fracx+1x-1right)$Evaluating $frac1pi int_0^pi e^2costheta dtheta$How to evaluate improper integral $int_0^inftyfractan^-1xe^ax-1dx$?Evaluate $int_-infty^infty fraclog(1+x^2) dx1+x^2$ Using Complex AnalysisEvaluate $int_ - infty^infty fracdx1+x^2$ using complex integrationAn explanation or hints to evaluate $textPVint_0^infty frace^-x(x+log (x))1-e^-xdx$Evaluate log improper integral $int_a^infty -frac1c (1-x) x$.Integral $int_frac12^1 fracln xsqrtx^2+1dx$How to evaluate $int_-infty^inftyfracxarctanfrac1x log(1+x^2)1+x^2dx$A line integral involving $log zeta(s)$













3












$begingroup$



How to evaluate the integral
$$
I_p=int_0^infty fraclog xx^p (x-1), dx,?$$




Attempt:



My first idea was to find the area of convergence, which gives me $p in (0,1)$. Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.



But I'm stuck here. Because there is no term to describe $I_1$. Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/a/2843081/155436
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:18















3












$begingroup$



How to evaluate the integral
$$
I_p=int_0^infty fraclog xx^p (x-1), dx,?$$




Attempt:



My first idea was to find the area of convergence, which gives me $p in (0,1)$. Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.



But I'm stuck here. Because there is no term to describe $I_1$. Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/a/2843081/155436
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:18













3












3








3





$begingroup$



How to evaluate the integral
$$
I_p=int_0^infty fraclog xx^p (x-1), dx,?$$




Attempt:



My first idea was to find the area of convergence, which gives me $p in (0,1)$. Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.



But I'm stuck here. Because there is no term to describe $I_1$. Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





How to evaluate the integral
$$
I_p=int_0^infty fraclog xx^p (x-1), dx,?$$




Attempt:



My first idea was to find the area of convergence, which gives me $p in (0,1)$. Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.



But I'm stuck here. Because there is no term to describe $I_1$. Any ideas?







integration complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 17 at 19:28









Jack

27.6k1782203




27.6k1782203










asked Mar 17 at 15:54









openspaceopenspace

3,3512822




3,3512822











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/a/2843081/155436
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:18
















  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/a/2843081/155436
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:18















$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/2843081/155436
$endgroup$
– Count Iblis
Mar 18 at 0:18




$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/2843081/155436
$endgroup$
– Count Iblis
Mar 18 at 0:18










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

We can take from here the following representation of the digamma function:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac1-x^s1-xdxRightarrow psi_1(s)=int_0^1 fracx^s-1ln xx-1dx$$
Now we are just one step away to solve it by splitting the integral into two pieces because we have:
$$int_1^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dxoversetlarge x=frac1t=int_0^1 fract^p-1ln tt-1dt$$




$$int_0^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dx=int_0^1 fracx^-pln xx-1dx+int_0^1fracx^p-1ln xx-1dx=psi_1(1-p)+psi_1(p)=boxedfracpi^2sin^2 (pi p)$$
Above follows by the the trigamma's reflection formula.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkViola that is cute and probably what OP intended to find (seeing the complex analysis tag)! I wish I knew to do that myself from scratch (I don't have a good knowledge of complex analysis).
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 18 at 9:47







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you. And I thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function, which was key to my solution herein.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:45


















4












$begingroup$

Well use $$Re s>0implies int_0^inftyfracue^-su1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0frac1(n+s)^2.$$With the substitution $u=ln x$ followed by the identity $int_Bbb Rg(u)du=int_0^infty [g(u)+g(-u)]du$, $$I_1=int_0^inftyfracu (e^-pu+e^-(1-p)u)1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0left(frac1(n+1-p)^2+frac1(n+p)^2right).$$
This is evaluated here as $pi^2csc^2pi p.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's beautiful! Thanks for your answer, I was quite interested in this problem.+1
    $endgroup$
    – Awe Kumar Jha
    Mar 17 at 17:02











  • $begingroup$
    Using the relation: $zeta(2, x)=psi_1(x)$ further simplification is avaible using the reflection formula for the trigamma function. I didn't find that formula for the Hurwitz Zeta function (on google), altough there must exist one.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 17 at 18:22







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zacky Thanks; fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 17 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:27










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine; you might consider providing readers with a reference to your first equation since this is the thrust of the development. And I just thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:42


















2












$begingroup$

The OP stated at the end of the posted question




Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.




Rather than analyze a contour integral of $f(z)=fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$, we analyze the integral



$$I(p)=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz$$



where $C$ is the classical keyhole contour where the branch cut for $log(z)$ is take along the positive real axis and $arg(z)in [0,2pi)$. Inasmuch as $fraclog(z)z^p(z-1)$ is analytic in and on $C$, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



$$beginalign
0&=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_0^2pi fraclog(Re^iphi)R^pe^ipphi(Re^iphi-1),iRe^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,Rto infty+int_R^1+nufraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx\\
&+underbraceint_2pi^pi fraclog(1+nu e^iphi)(1+nu e^iphi)^pnu e^iphi,inu e^iphi,dphi_to -ipi (i2pi )e^-i2pi p,,textas,,nuto0+int_1-nu^epsilon fraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_2pi^0 fraclog(epsilon e^iphi)(epsilon e^iphi)^p(epsilon e^iphi-1),iepsilon e^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,epsilonto 0tag1
endalign$$




Letting $epsilonto 0^+$, $Rto infty$, and $nu to 0^+$ in $(1)$, we obtain



$$(1-e^-i2pi p)int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=i2pi e^-i2pi p,,textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dxright)+(ipi)left(i2pi e^-i2pi p right)tag2$$



where $textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx+ipiright)$ denotes the Cauchy Principal Value (CPV) integral.




We can evaluate the CVP integral as follows.



$$beginalign
textPVint_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx&=lim_nuto 0^+left(int_0^1-nufrac1x^p(x-1),dx+int_1+nu^inftyfrac1x^p(x-1),dxright)\\
&=lim_nuto 0^+left(-sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1-nux^n-p,dx+sum_n=0^inftyint_1+nu^infty x^-n-p-1,dxright)\\
&=sum_n=0^infty left(frac1n+p-frac1n-p+1right)tag3
endalign$$



The series on the right-hand side of $(3)$ is the partial fraction representation of $pi cot(pi p)$ for $pin (0,1)$ (SEE HERE).




Substituting $(3)$ into $(2)$, dividing both sides by $(1-e^-i2pi p)$, we find



$$int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=fracpi^2sin^2(pi p)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @openspace Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And feel free to up vote an answer as you see fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    2 days ago



















0












$begingroup$

Too Long for comment



If $p≥2$ were some natural number, we could write the indefinite integral as,
$$
I = log x left[ log left( 1-frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)x^r-1 right] - text Li _2 left( frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)^2x^r-1 + C
$$

However, I don't know how this can be related to your problem, as you say $0<p<1$ which seems absurd.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    web.archive.org/web/20110617053801/http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/…
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:13










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151702%2fhow-to-evaluate-the-integral-int-0-infty-frac-log-xxp-x-1-dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

We can take from here the following representation of the digamma function:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac1-x^s1-xdxRightarrow psi_1(s)=int_0^1 fracx^s-1ln xx-1dx$$
Now we are just one step away to solve it by splitting the integral into two pieces because we have:
$$int_1^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dxoversetlarge x=frac1t=int_0^1 fract^p-1ln tt-1dt$$




$$int_0^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dx=int_0^1 fracx^-pln xx-1dx+int_0^1fracx^p-1ln xx-1dx=psi_1(1-p)+psi_1(p)=boxedfracpi^2sin^2 (pi p)$$
Above follows by the the trigamma's reflection formula.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkViola that is cute and probably what OP intended to find (seeing the complex analysis tag)! I wish I knew to do that myself from scratch (I don't have a good knowledge of complex analysis).
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 18 at 9:47







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you. And I thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function, which was key to my solution herein.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:45















6












$begingroup$

We can take from here the following representation of the digamma function:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac1-x^s1-xdxRightarrow psi_1(s)=int_0^1 fracx^s-1ln xx-1dx$$
Now we are just one step away to solve it by splitting the integral into two pieces because we have:
$$int_1^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dxoversetlarge x=frac1t=int_0^1 fract^p-1ln tt-1dt$$




$$int_0^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dx=int_0^1 fracx^-pln xx-1dx+int_0^1fracx^p-1ln xx-1dx=psi_1(1-p)+psi_1(p)=boxedfracpi^2sin^2 (pi p)$$
Above follows by the the trigamma's reflection formula.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkViola that is cute and probably what OP intended to find (seeing the complex analysis tag)! I wish I knew to do that myself from scratch (I don't have a good knowledge of complex analysis).
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 18 at 9:47







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you. And I thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function, which was key to my solution herein.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:45













6












6








6





$begingroup$

We can take from here the following representation of the digamma function:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac1-x^s1-xdxRightarrow psi_1(s)=int_0^1 fracx^s-1ln xx-1dx$$
Now we are just one step away to solve it by splitting the integral into two pieces because we have:
$$int_1^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dxoversetlarge x=frac1t=int_0^1 fract^p-1ln tt-1dt$$




$$int_0^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dx=int_0^1 fracx^-pln xx-1dx+int_0^1fracx^p-1ln xx-1dx=psi_1(1-p)+psi_1(p)=boxedfracpi^2sin^2 (pi p)$$
Above follows by the the trigamma's reflection formula.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



We can take from here the following representation of the digamma function:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac1-x^s1-xdxRightarrow psi_1(s)=int_0^1 fracx^s-1ln xx-1dx$$
Now we are just one step away to solve it by splitting the integral into two pieces because we have:
$$int_1^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dxoversetlarge x=frac1t=int_0^1 fract^p-1ln tt-1dt$$




$$int_0^infty fracln xx^p(x-1)dx=int_0^1 fracx^-pln xx-1dx+int_0^1fracx^p-1ln xx-1dx=psi_1(1-p)+psi_1(p)=boxedfracpi^2sin^2 (pi p)$$
Above follows by the the trigamma's reflection formula.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 17 at 18:28

























answered Mar 17 at 18:20









ZackyZacky

7,75511062




7,75511062











  • $begingroup$
    Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkViola that is cute and probably what OP intended to find (seeing the complex analysis tag)! I wish I knew to do that myself from scratch (I don't have a good knowledge of complex analysis).
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 18 at 9:47







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you. And I thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function, which was key to my solution herein.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:45
















  • $begingroup$
    Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkViola that is cute and probably what OP intended to find (seeing the complex analysis tag)! I wish I knew to do that myself from scratch (I don't have a good knowledge of complex analysis).
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 18 at 9:47







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you. And I thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function, which was key to my solution herein.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:45















$begingroup$
Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 18 at 3:26




$begingroup$
Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 18 at 3:26












$begingroup$
@MarkViola that is cute and probably what OP intended to find (seeing the complex analysis tag)! I wish I knew to do that myself from scratch (I don't have a good knowledge of complex analysis).
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 18 at 9:47





$begingroup$
@MarkViola that is cute and probably what OP intended to find (seeing the complex analysis tag)! I wish I knew to do that myself from scratch (I don't have a good knowledge of complex analysis).
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 18 at 9:47





1




1




$begingroup$
Thank you. And I thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function, which was key to my solution herein.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 18 at 16:45




$begingroup$
Thank you. And I thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function, which was key to my solution herein.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 18 at 16:45











4












$begingroup$

Well use $$Re s>0implies int_0^inftyfracue^-su1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0frac1(n+s)^2.$$With the substitution $u=ln x$ followed by the identity $int_Bbb Rg(u)du=int_0^infty [g(u)+g(-u)]du$, $$I_1=int_0^inftyfracu (e^-pu+e^-(1-p)u)1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0left(frac1(n+1-p)^2+frac1(n+p)^2right).$$
This is evaluated here as $pi^2csc^2pi p.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's beautiful! Thanks for your answer, I was quite interested in this problem.+1
    $endgroup$
    – Awe Kumar Jha
    Mar 17 at 17:02











  • $begingroup$
    Using the relation: $zeta(2, x)=psi_1(x)$ further simplification is avaible using the reflection formula for the trigamma function. I didn't find that formula for the Hurwitz Zeta function (on google), altough there must exist one.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 17 at 18:22







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zacky Thanks; fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 17 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:27










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine; you might consider providing readers with a reference to your first equation since this is the thrust of the development. And I just thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:42















4












$begingroup$

Well use $$Re s>0implies int_0^inftyfracue^-su1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0frac1(n+s)^2.$$With the substitution $u=ln x$ followed by the identity $int_Bbb Rg(u)du=int_0^infty [g(u)+g(-u)]du$, $$I_1=int_0^inftyfracu (e^-pu+e^-(1-p)u)1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0left(frac1(n+1-p)^2+frac1(n+p)^2right).$$
This is evaluated here as $pi^2csc^2pi p.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's beautiful! Thanks for your answer, I was quite interested in this problem.+1
    $endgroup$
    – Awe Kumar Jha
    Mar 17 at 17:02











  • $begingroup$
    Using the relation: $zeta(2, x)=psi_1(x)$ further simplification is avaible using the reflection formula for the trigamma function. I didn't find that formula for the Hurwitz Zeta function (on google), altough there must exist one.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 17 at 18:22







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zacky Thanks; fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 17 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:27










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine; you might consider providing readers with a reference to your first equation since this is the thrust of the development. And I just thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:42













4












4








4





$begingroup$

Well use $$Re s>0implies int_0^inftyfracue^-su1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0frac1(n+s)^2.$$With the substitution $u=ln x$ followed by the identity $int_Bbb Rg(u)du=int_0^infty [g(u)+g(-u)]du$, $$I_1=int_0^inftyfracu (e^-pu+e^-(1-p)u)1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0left(frac1(n+1-p)^2+frac1(n+p)^2right).$$
This is evaluated here as $pi^2csc^2pi p.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Well use $$Re s>0implies int_0^inftyfracue^-su1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0frac1(n+s)^2.$$With the substitution $u=ln x$ followed by the identity $int_Bbb Rg(u)du=int_0^infty [g(u)+g(-u)]du$, $$I_1=int_0^inftyfracu (e^-pu+e^-(1-p)u)1-e^-udu=sum_nge 0left(frac1(n+1-p)^2+frac1(n+p)^2right).$$
This is evaluated here as $pi^2csc^2pi p.$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 18 at 17:44

























answered Mar 17 at 16:57









J.G.J.G.

32.1k23250




32.1k23250







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's beautiful! Thanks for your answer, I was quite interested in this problem.+1
    $endgroup$
    – Awe Kumar Jha
    Mar 17 at 17:02











  • $begingroup$
    Using the relation: $zeta(2, x)=psi_1(x)$ further simplification is avaible using the reflection formula for the trigamma function. I didn't find that formula for the Hurwitz Zeta function (on google), altough there must exist one.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 17 at 18:22







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zacky Thanks; fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 17 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:27










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine; you might consider providing readers with a reference to your first equation since this is the thrust of the development. And I just thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:42












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's beautiful! Thanks for your answer, I was quite interested in this problem.+1
    $endgroup$
    – Awe Kumar Jha
    Mar 17 at 17:02











  • $begingroup$
    Using the relation: $zeta(2, x)=psi_1(x)$ further simplification is avaible using the reflection formula for the trigamma function. I didn't find that formula for the Hurwitz Zeta function (on google), altough there must exist one.
    $endgroup$
    – Zacky
    Mar 17 at 18:22







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zacky Thanks; fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 17 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 3:27










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine; you might consider providing readers with a reference to your first equation since this is the thrust of the development. And I just thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 18 at 16:42







1




1




$begingroup$
That's beautiful! Thanks for your answer, I was quite interested in this problem.+1
$endgroup$
– Awe Kumar Jha
Mar 17 at 17:02





$begingroup$
That's beautiful! Thanks for your answer, I was quite interested in this problem.+1
$endgroup$
– Awe Kumar Jha
Mar 17 at 17:02













$begingroup$
Using the relation: $zeta(2, x)=psi_1(x)$ further simplification is avaible using the reflection formula for the trigamma function. I didn't find that formula for the Hurwitz Zeta function (on google), altough there must exist one.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 17 at 18:22





$begingroup$
Using the relation: $zeta(2, x)=psi_1(x)$ further simplification is avaible using the reflection formula for the trigamma function. I didn't find that formula for the Hurwitz Zeta function (on google), altough there must exist one.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 17 at 18:22





1




1




$begingroup$
@Zacky Thanks; fixed.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Mar 17 at 18:26




$begingroup$
@Zacky Thanks; fixed.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Mar 17 at 18:26












$begingroup$
@J.G. Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 18 at 3:27




$begingroup$
@J.G. Nice solution. I posted one in which I avoid any reference to special functions and instead uses contour integration and makes use of the partial fraction expansion of the cotangent function. Let me know what you think.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 18 at 3:27












$begingroup$
Your solution is fine; you might consider providing readers with a reference to your first equation since this is the thrust of the development. And I just thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 18 at 16:42




$begingroup$
Your solution is fine; you might consider providing readers with a reference to your first equation since this is the thrust of the development. And I just thought it might be of interest to you to see THESE derivations of the partial fraction representation of the cotangent function.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 18 at 16:42











2












$begingroup$

The OP stated at the end of the posted question




Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.




Rather than analyze a contour integral of $f(z)=fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$, we analyze the integral



$$I(p)=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz$$



where $C$ is the classical keyhole contour where the branch cut for $log(z)$ is take along the positive real axis and $arg(z)in [0,2pi)$. Inasmuch as $fraclog(z)z^p(z-1)$ is analytic in and on $C$, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



$$beginalign
0&=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_0^2pi fraclog(Re^iphi)R^pe^ipphi(Re^iphi-1),iRe^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,Rto infty+int_R^1+nufraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx\\
&+underbraceint_2pi^pi fraclog(1+nu e^iphi)(1+nu e^iphi)^pnu e^iphi,inu e^iphi,dphi_to -ipi (i2pi )e^-i2pi p,,textas,,nuto0+int_1-nu^epsilon fraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_2pi^0 fraclog(epsilon e^iphi)(epsilon e^iphi)^p(epsilon e^iphi-1),iepsilon e^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,epsilonto 0tag1
endalign$$




Letting $epsilonto 0^+$, $Rto infty$, and $nu to 0^+$ in $(1)$, we obtain



$$(1-e^-i2pi p)int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=i2pi e^-i2pi p,,textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dxright)+(ipi)left(i2pi e^-i2pi p right)tag2$$



where $textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx+ipiright)$ denotes the Cauchy Principal Value (CPV) integral.




We can evaluate the CVP integral as follows.



$$beginalign
textPVint_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx&=lim_nuto 0^+left(int_0^1-nufrac1x^p(x-1),dx+int_1+nu^inftyfrac1x^p(x-1),dxright)\\
&=lim_nuto 0^+left(-sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1-nux^n-p,dx+sum_n=0^inftyint_1+nu^infty x^-n-p-1,dxright)\\
&=sum_n=0^infty left(frac1n+p-frac1n-p+1right)tag3
endalign$$



The series on the right-hand side of $(3)$ is the partial fraction representation of $pi cot(pi p)$ for $pin (0,1)$ (SEE HERE).




Substituting $(3)$ into $(2)$, dividing both sides by $(1-e^-i2pi p)$, we find



$$int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=fracpi^2sin^2(pi p)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @openspace Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And feel free to up vote an answer as you see fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    2 days ago
















2












$begingroup$

The OP stated at the end of the posted question




Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.




Rather than analyze a contour integral of $f(z)=fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$, we analyze the integral



$$I(p)=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz$$



where $C$ is the classical keyhole contour where the branch cut for $log(z)$ is take along the positive real axis and $arg(z)in [0,2pi)$. Inasmuch as $fraclog(z)z^p(z-1)$ is analytic in and on $C$, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



$$beginalign
0&=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_0^2pi fraclog(Re^iphi)R^pe^ipphi(Re^iphi-1),iRe^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,Rto infty+int_R^1+nufraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx\\
&+underbraceint_2pi^pi fraclog(1+nu e^iphi)(1+nu e^iphi)^pnu e^iphi,inu e^iphi,dphi_to -ipi (i2pi )e^-i2pi p,,textas,,nuto0+int_1-nu^epsilon fraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_2pi^0 fraclog(epsilon e^iphi)(epsilon e^iphi)^p(epsilon e^iphi-1),iepsilon e^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,epsilonto 0tag1
endalign$$




Letting $epsilonto 0^+$, $Rto infty$, and $nu to 0^+$ in $(1)$, we obtain



$$(1-e^-i2pi p)int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=i2pi e^-i2pi p,,textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dxright)+(ipi)left(i2pi e^-i2pi p right)tag2$$



where $textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx+ipiright)$ denotes the Cauchy Principal Value (CPV) integral.




We can evaluate the CVP integral as follows.



$$beginalign
textPVint_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx&=lim_nuto 0^+left(int_0^1-nufrac1x^p(x-1),dx+int_1+nu^inftyfrac1x^p(x-1),dxright)\\
&=lim_nuto 0^+left(-sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1-nux^n-p,dx+sum_n=0^inftyint_1+nu^infty x^-n-p-1,dxright)\\
&=sum_n=0^infty left(frac1n+p-frac1n-p+1right)tag3
endalign$$



The series on the right-hand side of $(3)$ is the partial fraction representation of $pi cot(pi p)$ for $pin (0,1)$ (SEE HERE).




Substituting $(3)$ into $(2)$, dividing both sides by $(1-e^-i2pi p)$, we find



$$int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=fracpi^2sin^2(pi p)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @openspace Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And feel free to up vote an answer as you see fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    2 days ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$

The OP stated at the end of the posted question




Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.




Rather than analyze a contour integral of $f(z)=fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$, we analyze the integral



$$I(p)=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz$$



where $C$ is the classical keyhole contour where the branch cut for $log(z)$ is take along the positive real axis and $arg(z)in [0,2pi)$. Inasmuch as $fraclog(z)z^p(z-1)$ is analytic in and on $C$, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



$$beginalign
0&=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_0^2pi fraclog(Re^iphi)R^pe^ipphi(Re^iphi-1),iRe^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,Rto infty+int_R^1+nufraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx\\
&+underbraceint_2pi^pi fraclog(1+nu e^iphi)(1+nu e^iphi)^pnu e^iphi,inu e^iphi,dphi_to -ipi (i2pi )e^-i2pi p,,textas,,nuto0+int_1-nu^epsilon fraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_2pi^0 fraclog(epsilon e^iphi)(epsilon e^iphi)^p(epsilon e^iphi-1),iepsilon e^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,epsilonto 0tag1
endalign$$




Letting $epsilonto 0^+$, $Rto infty$, and $nu to 0^+$ in $(1)$, we obtain



$$(1-e^-i2pi p)int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=i2pi e^-i2pi p,,textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dxright)+(ipi)left(i2pi e^-i2pi p right)tag2$$



where $textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx+ipiright)$ denotes the Cauchy Principal Value (CPV) integral.




We can evaluate the CVP integral as follows.



$$beginalign
textPVint_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx&=lim_nuto 0^+left(int_0^1-nufrac1x^p(x-1),dx+int_1+nu^inftyfrac1x^p(x-1),dxright)\\
&=lim_nuto 0^+left(-sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1-nux^n-p,dx+sum_n=0^inftyint_1+nu^infty x^-n-p-1,dxright)\\
&=sum_n=0^infty left(frac1n+p-frac1n-p+1right)tag3
endalign$$



The series on the right-hand side of $(3)$ is the partial fraction representation of $pi cot(pi p)$ for $pin (0,1)$ (SEE HERE).




Substituting $(3)$ into $(2)$, dividing both sides by $(1-e^-i2pi p)$, we find



$$int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=fracpi^2sin^2(pi p)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The OP stated at the end of the posted question




Now let's consider the function $f(z) = fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$. Then we can use Cauchy theorem and residuals.




Rather than analyze a contour integral of $f(z)=fraclog^2 zz^p (z-1)$, we analyze the integral



$$I(p)=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz$$



where $C$ is the classical keyhole contour where the branch cut for $log(z)$ is take along the positive real axis and $arg(z)in [0,2pi)$. Inasmuch as $fraclog(z)z^p(z-1)$ is analytic in and on $C$, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



$$beginalign
0&=oint_C fraclog(z)z^p(z-1),dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_0^2pi fraclog(Re^iphi)R^pe^ipphi(Re^iphi-1),iRe^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,Rto infty+int_R^1+nufraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx\\
&+underbraceint_2pi^pi fraclog(1+nu e^iphi)(1+nu e^iphi)^pnu e^iphi,inu e^iphi,dphi_to -ipi (i2pi )e^-i2pi p,,textas,,nuto0+int_1-nu^epsilon fraclog(x)+i2pix^pe^i2pi p(x-1),dx+underbraceint_2pi^0 fraclog(epsilon e^iphi)(epsilon e^iphi)^p(epsilon e^iphi-1),iepsilon e^iphi,dphi_to 0,,textas,,epsilonto 0tag1
endalign$$




Letting $epsilonto 0^+$, $Rto infty$, and $nu to 0^+$ in $(1)$, we obtain



$$(1-e^-i2pi p)int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=i2pi e^-i2pi p,,textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dxright)+(ipi)left(i2pi e^-i2pi p right)tag2$$



where $textPVleft(int_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx+ipiright)$ denotes the Cauchy Principal Value (CPV) integral.




We can evaluate the CVP integral as follows.



$$beginalign
textPVint_0^infty frac1x^p(x-1),dx&=lim_nuto 0^+left(int_0^1-nufrac1x^p(x-1),dx+int_1+nu^inftyfrac1x^p(x-1),dxright)\\
&=lim_nuto 0^+left(-sum_n=0^inftyint_0^1-nux^n-p,dx+sum_n=0^inftyint_1+nu^infty x^-n-p-1,dxright)\\
&=sum_n=0^infty left(frac1n+p-frac1n-p+1right)tag3
endalign$$



The series on the right-hand side of $(3)$ is the partial fraction representation of $pi cot(pi p)$ for $pin (0,1)$ (SEE HERE).




Substituting $(3)$ into $(2)$, dividing both sides by $(1-e^-i2pi p)$, we find



$$int_0^infty fraclog(x)x^p(x-1),dx=fracpi^2sin^2(pi p)$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 18 at 16:10

























answered Mar 18 at 3:24









Mark ViolaMark Viola

134k1278176




134k1278176











  • $begingroup$
    @openspace Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And feel free to up vote an answer as you see fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    2 days ago

















  • $begingroup$
    @openspace Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And feel free to up vote an answer as you see fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    2 days ago
















$begingroup$
@openspace Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And feel free to up vote an answer as you see fit.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
2 days ago





$begingroup$
@openspace Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And feel free to up vote an answer as you see fit.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
2 days ago












0












$begingroup$

Too Long for comment



If $p≥2$ were some natural number, we could write the indefinite integral as,
$$
I = log x left[ log left( 1-frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)x^r-1 right] - text Li _2 left( frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)^2x^r-1 + C
$$

However, I don't know how this can be related to your problem, as you say $0<p<1$ which seems absurd.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    web.archive.org/web/20110617053801/http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/…
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:13















0












$begingroup$

Too Long for comment



If $p≥2$ were some natural number, we could write the indefinite integral as,
$$
I = log x left[ log left( 1-frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)x^r-1 right] - text Li _2 left( frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)^2x^r-1 + C
$$

However, I don't know how this can be related to your problem, as you say $0<p<1$ which seems absurd.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    web.archive.org/web/20110617053801/http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/…
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:13













0












0








0





$begingroup$

Too Long for comment



If $p≥2$ were some natural number, we could write the indefinite integral as,
$$
I = log x left[ log left( 1-frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)x^r-1 right] - text Li _2 left( frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)^2x^r-1 + C
$$

However, I don't know how this can be related to your problem, as you say $0<p<1$ which seems absurd.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Too Long for comment



If $p≥2$ were some natural number, we could write the indefinite integral as,
$$
I = log x left[ log left( 1-frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)x^r-1 right] - text Li _2 left( frac 1x right) + sum_r=2^p frac 1(r-1)^2x^r-1 + C
$$

However, I don't know how this can be related to your problem, as you say $0<p<1$ which seems absurd.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 17 at 16:39









Awe Kumar JhaAwe Kumar Jha

570113




570113











  • $begingroup$
    web.archive.org/web/20110617053801/http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/…
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:13
















  • $begingroup$
    web.archive.org/web/20110617053801/http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/…
    $endgroup$
    – Count Iblis
    Mar 18 at 0:13















$begingroup$
web.archive.org/web/20110617053801/http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/…
$endgroup$
– Count Iblis
Mar 18 at 0:13




$begingroup$
web.archive.org/web/20110617053801/http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/…
$endgroup$
– Count Iblis
Mar 18 at 0:13

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151702%2fhow-to-evaluate-the-integral-int-0-infty-frac-log-xxp-x-1-dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye