Evaluate $I=int_0^inftyfrac(x^2+x+1)dx(x^3+x+1)sqrtx$Solving $int_-infty^inftyfrac1(4+x^2)sqrt4+x^2 space dx$Computing $int_-infty^infty fraccos xx^2 + a^2dx$ using residue calculusSolution of Definite integral:$int_-infty^infty int_-infty^infty frac1sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2e^i(k_1x+k_2y)dxdy$Evaluate $int_0^inftyfracxarctan x(1+x^2)^2dx$Evaluate $int_0^inftyfracsin (7sqrtx)sqrtxdx$How do I evaluate $ int_0^infty frac1sqrt2 pi s e^-z^2/2s cdot frac12e^-s/2 , ds$?Evaluate $int_0^infty fracdx1+x^2017$Evaluate the integral $ int_(0,1) frac1sqrt x$A faster way to evaluate $int_1^inftyfracsqrt4+t^2t^3,mathrm dt$?Evaluate $int_0^fracpi2fracdxleft(sqrtsin x+sqrtcos xright)^2$
What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"
Crossing the line between justified force and brutality
What does the word "Atten" mean?
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?
Different result between scanning in Epson's "color negative film" mode and scanning in positive -> invert curve in post?
Are student evaluations of teaching assistants read by others in the faculty?
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Pre-amplifier input protection
Roman Numeral Treatment of Suspensions
Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?
Integer addition + constant, is it a group?
How can a function with a hole (removable discontinuity) equal a function with no hole?
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?
How did Arya survive the stabbing?
How can I kill an app using Terminal?
Is there a korbon needed for conversion?
Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?
How to check is there any negative term in a large list?
CREATE opcode: what does it really do?
Avoiding estate tax by giving multiple gifts
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
Evaluate $I=int_0^inftyfrac(x^2+x+1)dx(x^3+x+1)sqrtx$
Solving $int_-infty^inftyfrac1(4+x^2)sqrt4+x^2 space dx$Computing $int_-infty^infty fraccos xx^2 + a^2dx$ using residue calculusSolution of Definite integral:$int_-infty^infty int_-infty^infty frac1sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2e^i(k_1x+k_2y)dxdy$Evaluate $int_0^inftyfracxarctan x(1+x^2)^2dx$Evaluate $int_0^inftyfracsin (7sqrtx)sqrtxdx$How do I evaluate $ int_0^infty frac1sqrt2 pi s e^-z^2/2s cdot frac12e^-s/2 , ds$?Evaluate $int_0^infty fracdx1+x^2017$Evaluate the integral $ int_(0,1) frac1sqrt x$A faster way to evaluate $int_1^inftyfracsqrt4+t^2t^3},mathrm dt$?Evaluate $int_0^{fracpi2fracdxleft(sqrtsin x+sqrtcos xright)^2$
$begingroup$
Evaluate $$I=int_0^inftyfrac(x^2+x+1)dx(x^3+x+1)sqrtx$$
My try:
Letting $sqrtx=t$ we get
$$I=2int_0^infty fract^4+t^2+1(t^6+t^2+1),dt$$
Now
$$t^4+t^2+1=(t^2+1)^2-(t^2+1)+1$$
$$t^6+t^2+1=(t^2+1)^3-2(t^2+1)^2+(t^2+1)+1$$
Any clue then?
calculus integration polynomials definite-integrals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Evaluate $$I=int_0^inftyfrac(x^2+x+1)dx(x^3+x+1)sqrtx$$
My try:
Letting $sqrtx=t$ we get
$$I=2int_0^infty fract^4+t^2+1(t^6+t^2+1),dt$$
Now
$$t^4+t^2+1=(t^2+1)^2-(t^2+1)+1$$
$$t^6+t^2+1=(t^2+1)^3-2(t^2+1)^2+(t^2+1)+1$$
Any clue then?
calculus integration polynomials definite-integrals
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Please share the source. If I recall correctly this is an open problem from Brilliant dot org, although I have to search a little in order to show it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 2:56
1
$begingroup$
Here: brilliant.org/problems/…
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 3:02
$begingroup$
Yes you are right
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:06
4
$begingroup$
Although the integral has a closed form, it is an egregiously complicated combination of nested radicals. It will be much better to focus on the original problem itself for your mental sanity, which has a very simple answer.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Evaluate $$I=int_0^inftyfrac(x^2+x+1)dx(x^3+x+1)sqrtx$$
My try:
Letting $sqrtx=t$ we get
$$I=2int_0^infty fract^4+t^2+1(t^6+t^2+1),dt$$
Now
$$t^4+t^2+1=(t^2+1)^2-(t^2+1)+1$$
$$t^6+t^2+1=(t^2+1)^3-2(t^2+1)^2+(t^2+1)+1$$
Any clue then?
calculus integration polynomials definite-integrals
$endgroup$
Evaluate $$I=int_0^inftyfrac(x^2+x+1)dx(x^3+x+1)sqrtx$$
My try:
Letting $sqrtx=t$ we get
$$I=2int_0^infty fract^4+t^2+1(t^6+t^2+1),dt$$
Now
$$t^4+t^2+1=(t^2+1)^2-(t^2+1)+1$$
$$t^6+t^2+1=(t^2+1)^3-2(t^2+1)^2+(t^2+1)+1$$
Any clue then?
calculus integration polynomials definite-integrals
calculus integration polynomials definite-integrals
edited Mar 17 at 20:49
clathratus
4,9641438
4,9641438
asked Mar 8 at 2:51
Umesh shankarUmesh shankar
3,05931220
3,05931220
$begingroup$
Please share the source. If I recall correctly this is an open problem from Brilliant dot org, although I have to search a little in order to show it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 2:56
1
$begingroup$
Here: brilliant.org/problems/…
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 3:02
$begingroup$
Yes you are right
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:06
4
$begingroup$
Although the integral has a closed form, it is an egregiously complicated combination of nested radicals. It will be much better to focus on the original problem itself for your mental sanity, which has a very simple answer.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please share the source. If I recall correctly this is an open problem from Brilliant dot org, although I have to search a little in order to show it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 2:56
1
$begingroup$
Here: brilliant.org/problems/…
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 3:02
$begingroup$
Yes you are right
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:06
4
$begingroup$
Although the integral has a closed form, it is an egregiously complicated combination of nested radicals. It will be much better to focus on the original problem itself for your mental sanity, which has a very simple answer.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 3:46
$begingroup$
Please share the source. If I recall correctly this is an open problem from Brilliant dot org, although I have to search a little in order to show it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 2:56
$begingroup$
Please share the source. If I recall correctly this is an open problem from Brilliant dot org, although I have to search a little in order to show it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 2:56
1
1
$begingroup$
Here: brilliant.org/problems/…
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 3:02
$begingroup$
Here: brilliant.org/problems/…
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 3:02
$begingroup$
Yes you are right
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:06
$begingroup$
Yes you are right
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:06
4
4
$begingroup$
Although the integral has a closed form, it is an egregiously complicated combination of nested radicals. It will be much better to focus on the original problem itself for your mental sanity, which has a very simple answer.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 3:46
$begingroup$
Although the integral has a closed form, it is an egregiously complicated combination of nested radicals. It will be much better to focus on the original problem itself for your mental sanity, which has a very simple answer.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 3:46
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let me attack the original problem, as stated in Brilliant.org.
Question. If
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracx^2 + x + 1x^3 + x + 1 fracmathrmdxsqrtx, $$
then what is the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$?
Remark. Once we identify the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$, the problem of determining $alpha$ reduces to solving the quartic equation. Since such formula is known, it suffices to answer to the question.
Step 1 - Reduction to algebraic sum. First, write $p(x) = x^2 + x + 1$ and $q(x) = x^3 + x + 1$ for simplicity. Then $alpha$ is written as
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracp(x)q(x)sqrtx , mathrmdx. $$
Let $operatornameLog$ denote the complex logarithm so that $ImoperatornameLog(z) in [0, 2pi)$. In other words, the branch cut is chosen as $[0, infty)$. Then by employing the standard keyhole contour, we may write
beginalign*
alpha
&= frac12pi left( int_infty-i0^+^-i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz + int_i0^+^infty+i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz right) \
&= i sum_q(x) = 0 frac p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x), tag1
endalign*
where the sum in the last line runs over all complex $x$'s solving $p(x)=0$, which itself is a consequence of the residue theorem.
Step 2 - Identifying the nature of the sum. Since $q(x)$ is a cubic polynomial with only simple zeros, the sum in $text(1)$ involves 3 terms, which we write as $z_1, z_2, z_3$. Then
$$alpha = z_1 + z_2 + z_3. $$
Also, consider
$$ y = left( fraci p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x) right)^2 = -fracp(x)^2xq'(x)^2 $$
and let $mathcalZ = z_1^2, z_2^2, z_3^2$ be the set of all possible values of $y$ given $q(x) = 0$. Rearranging this equality, we obtain $ yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 = 0 $, and so, we observe that
$ q(x) $ and $yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2$ shares a root whenever $y in mathcalZ$.
On the other hand, if we regard both as polynomials with coefficients in $mathbbC[y]$, then the resultant between them is given by
$$ operatornameresleft(q(x), yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 right) = 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9. $$
Since the resultant between two complex polynomials is zero exactly when they share a root, it follows that $mathcalZ = y : 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 $, or equivalently,
$$ 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 = 961(y - z_1^2)(y - z_2^2)(y - z_3^2). $$
In particular, by Vieta's formulas, we check that
$$
z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 = frac620961 = frac2031, qquad
z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 = frac131961, \
z_1^2 z_2^2 z_3^2 = frac9961 = left(frac331right)^2.
$$
Moreover, although not immediate from the previous computation, we can in fact check that $z_1 z_2 z_3$ is not a negative real number, and so, $z_1 z_2 z_3 = frac331$.
Step 3 - Conclusion. From the conclusion of the previous step, we can identify the equation that $alpha$ satisfies. Indeed,
beginalign*
alpha^2
= left( z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 right) + 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
= frac2031+ 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
endalign*
and
$$ left( alpha^2 - frac2031 right)^2
= 4 left( z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 right) + 8 z_1 z_2 z_3 (z_1 + z_2 + z_3) = frac524961 + frac2431alpha.$$
Rearranging, we obtain
$$ 31 alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha = 4. $$
Moreover, it turns out that this equation has the unique positive zero, which is exactly $frac1pi$ times what WolframAlpha yields (as demonstrated in @Infiaria's answer).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Where is $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$ coming from ?
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 7:15
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici, Frankly speaking, I have no idea why. For me, it was already a miracle that $$alpha=sum_k=1^3sqrtxi_k$$ holds. (Although it is straightforward that the square of each summand corresponds to zero of $p(u)$ by the choice of substitution, it seems not entirely clear to me as to why the sign of each square root concur with the principal branch.)
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 7:37
$begingroup$
[I am extremely sorry to put the following comment. : ( ] i haven't understood the very first step where you have written $alpha$ as a sum. Is this a part of complex analysis ? Can you please tell me which things are required to understand this ? Frankly speaking i haven't taken the complex analysis course, is the following explanation has something to do with residues theorem?
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 14:11
1
$begingroup$
@MDesmond, No worries :) And as you have correctly guessed, this is related to residue theorem. I was lazy enough not to straighten out every detail.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 14:58
3
$begingroup$
Ramanujan would have liked this. +1 but he would rather get the integral in radicals form and say that it was obviously a root of such and such equation.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Mar 8 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to Wolfram Alpha, the answer is
$$fracpisqrt186left(sqrt40-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+sqrt80+14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93+sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+36sqrtfrac18640-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)right)$$
which is approximately $4.34952$. Alternatively, it is simply the positive solution of
$$frac314pi^4x^4 - frac10pi^2x^2 - frac6pix - 1 = 0 $$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Oh my god the answer is too heavy
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
Do you know how to see that it is a root of that polynomial?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 8 at 5:05
$begingroup$
What i guess is, there is nothing to do wih integral, the key is hidden in the way the polynomial is constructed.
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 5:10
$begingroup$
I do not know how you got the last result but simpler would be $2pi r_1$ where $r_1$ is the positive root of $124 t^4-40 t^2-12 t-1=0$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 6:15
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139655%2fevaluate-i-int-0-infty-fracx2x1dxx3x1-sqrtx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let me attack the original problem, as stated in Brilliant.org.
Question. If
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracx^2 + x + 1x^3 + x + 1 fracmathrmdxsqrtx, $$
then what is the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$?
Remark. Once we identify the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$, the problem of determining $alpha$ reduces to solving the quartic equation. Since such formula is known, it suffices to answer to the question.
Step 1 - Reduction to algebraic sum. First, write $p(x) = x^2 + x + 1$ and $q(x) = x^3 + x + 1$ for simplicity. Then $alpha$ is written as
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracp(x)q(x)sqrtx , mathrmdx. $$
Let $operatornameLog$ denote the complex logarithm so that $ImoperatornameLog(z) in [0, 2pi)$. In other words, the branch cut is chosen as $[0, infty)$. Then by employing the standard keyhole contour, we may write
beginalign*
alpha
&= frac12pi left( int_infty-i0^+^-i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz + int_i0^+^infty+i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz right) \
&= i sum_q(x) = 0 frac p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x), tag1
endalign*
where the sum in the last line runs over all complex $x$'s solving $p(x)=0$, which itself is a consequence of the residue theorem.
Step 2 - Identifying the nature of the sum. Since $q(x)$ is a cubic polynomial with only simple zeros, the sum in $text(1)$ involves 3 terms, which we write as $z_1, z_2, z_3$. Then
$$alpha = z_1 + z_2 + z_3. $$
Also, consider
$$ y = left( fraci p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x) right)^2 = -fracp(x)^2xq'(x)^2 $$
and let $mathcalZ = z_1^2, z_2^2, z_3^2$ be the set of all possible values of $y$ given $q(x) = 0$. Rearranging this equality, we obtain $ yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 = 0 $, and so, we observe that
$ q(x) $ and $yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2$ shares a root whenever $y in mathcalZ$.
On the other hand, if we regard both as polynomials with coefficients in $mathbbC[y]$, then the resultant between them is given by
$$ operatornameresleft(q(x), yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 right) = 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9. $$
Since the resultant between two complex polynomials is zero exactly when they share a root, it follows that $mathcalZ = y : 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 $, or equivalently,
$$ 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 = 961(y - z_1^2)(y - z_2^2)(y - z_3^2). $$
In particular, by Vieta's formulas, we check that
$$
z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 = frac620961 = frac2031, qquad
z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 = frac131961, \
z_1^2 z_2^2 z_3^2 = frac9961 = left(frac331right)^2.
$$
Moreover, although not immediate from the previous computation, we can in fact check that $z_1 z_2 z_3$ is not a negative real number, and so, $z_1 z_2 z_3 = frac331$.
Step 3 - Conclusion. From the conclusion of the previous step, we can identify the equation that $alpha$ satisfies. Indeed,
beginalign*
alpha^2
= left( z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 right) + 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
= frac2031+ 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
endalign*
and
$$ left( alpha^2 - frac2031 right)^2
= 4 left( z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 right) + 8 z_1 z_2 z_3 (z_1 + z_2 + z_3) = frac524961 + frac2431alpha.$$
Rearranging, we obtain
$$ 31 alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha = 4. $$
Moreover, it turns out that this equation has the unique positive zero, which is exactly $frac1pi$ times what WolframAlpha yields (as demonstrated in @Infiaria's answer).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Where is $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$ coming from ?
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 7:15
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici, Frankly speaking, I have no idea why. For me, it was already a miracle that $$alpha=sum_k=1^3sqrtxi_k$$ holds. (Although it is straightforward that the square of each summand corresponds to zero of $p(u)$ by the choice of substitution, it seems not entirely clear to me as to why the sign of each square root concur with the principal branch.)
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 7:37
$begingroup$
[I am extremely sorry to put the following comment. : ( ] i haven't understood the very first step where you have written $alpha$ as a sum. Is this a part of complex analysis ? Can you please tell me which things are required to understand this ? Frankly speaking i haven't taken the complex analysis course, is the following explanation has something to do with residues theorem?
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 14:11
1
$begingroup$
@MDesmond, No worries :) And as you have correctly guessed, this is related to residue theorem. I was lazy enough not to straighten out every detail.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 14:58
3
$begingroup$
Ramanujan would have liked this. +1 but he would rather get the integral in radicals form and say that it was obviously a root of such and such equation.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Mar 8 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let me attack the original problem, as stated in Brilliant.org.
Question. If
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracx^2 + x + 1x^3 + x + 1 fracmathrmdxsqrtx, $$
then what is the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$?
Remark. Once we identify the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$, the problem of determining $alpha$ reduces to solving the quartic equation. Since such formula is known, it suffices to answer to the question.
Step 1 - Reduction to algebraic sum. First, write $p(x) = x^2 + x + 1$ and $q(x) = x^3 + x + 1$ for simplicity. Then $alpha$ is written as
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracp(x)q(x)sqrtx , mathrmdx. $$
Let $operatornameLog$ denote the complex logarithm so that $ImoperatornameLog(z) in [0, 2pi)$. In other words, the branch cut is chosen as $[0, infty)$. Then by employing the standard keyhole contour, we may write
beginalign*
alpha
&= frac12pi left( int_infty-i0^+^-i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz + int_i0^+^infty+i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz right) \
&= i sum_q(x) = 0 frac p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x), tag1
endalign*
where the sum in the last line runs over all complex $x$'s solving $p(x)=0$, which itself is a consequence of the residue theorem.
Step 2 - Identifying the nature of the sum. Since $q(x)$ is a cubic polynomial with only simple zeros, the sum in $text(1)$ involves 3 terms, which we write as $z_1, z_2, z_3$. Then
$$alpha = z_1 + z_2 + z_3. $$
Also, consider
$$ y = left( fraci p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x) right)^2 = -fracp(x)^2xq'(x)^2 $$
and let $mathcalZ = z_1^2, z_2^2, z_3^2$ be the set of all possible values of $y$ given $q(x) = 0$. Rearranging this equality, we obtain $ yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 = 0 $, and so, we observe that
$ q(x) $ and $yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2$ shares a root whenever $y in mathcalZ$.
On the other hand, if we regard both as polynomials with coefficients in $mathbbC[y]$, then the resultant between them is given by
$$ operatornameresleft(q(x), yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 right) = 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9. $$
Since the resultant between two complex polynomials is zero exactly when they share a root, it follows that $mathcalZ = y : 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 $, or equivalently,
$$ 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 = 961(y - z_1^2)(y - z_2^2)(y - z_3^2). $$
In particular, by Vieta's formulas, we check that
$$
z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 = frac620961 = frac2031, qquad
z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 = frac131961, \
z_1^2 z_2^2 z_3^2 = frac9961 = left(frac331right)^2.
$$
Moreover, although not immediate from the previous computation, we can in fact check that $z_1 z_2 z_3$ is not a negative real number, and so, $z_1 z_2 z_3 = frac331$.
Step 3 - Conclusion. From the conclusion of the previous step, we can identify the equation that $alpha$ satisfies. Indeed,
beginalign*
alpha^2
= left( z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 right) + 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
= frac2031+ 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
endalign*
and
$$ left( alpha^2 - frac2031 right)^2
= 4 left( z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 right) + 8 z_1 z_2 z_3 (z_1 + z_2 + z_3) = frac524961 + frac2431alpha.$$
Rearranging, we obtain
$$ 31 alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha = 4. $$
Moreover, it turns out that this equation has the unique positive zero, which is exactly $frac1pi$ times what WolframAlpha yields (as demonstrated in @Infiaria's answer).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Where is $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$ coming from ?
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 7:15
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici, Frankly speaking, I have no idea why. For me, it was already a miracle that $$alpha=sum_k=1^3sqrtxi_k$$ holds. (Although it is straightforward that the square of each summand corresponds to zero of $p(u)$ by the choice of substitution, it seems not entirely clear to me as to why the sign of each square root concur with the principal branch.)
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 7:37
$begingroup$
[I am extremely sorry to put the following comment. : ( ] i haven't understood the very first step where you have written $alpha$ as a sum. Is this a part of complex analysis ? Can you please tell me which things are required to understand this ? Frankly speaking i haven't taken the complex analysis course, is the following explanation has something to do with residues theorem?
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 14:11
1
$begingroup$
@MDesmond, No worries :) And as you have correctly guessed, this is related to residue theorem. I was lazy enough not to straighten out every detail.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 14:58
3
$begingroup$
Ramanujan would have liked this. +1 but he would rather get the integral in radicals form and say that it was obviously a root of such and such equation.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Mar 8 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let me attack the original problem, as stated in Brilliant.org.
Question. If
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracx^2 + x + 1x^3 + x + 1 fracmathrmdxsqrtx, $$
then what is the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$?
Remark. Once we identify the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$, the problem of determining $alpha$ reduces to solving the quartic equation. Since such formula is known, it suffices to answer to the question.
Step 1 - Reduction to algebraic sum. First, write $p(x) = x^2 + x + 1$ and $q(x) = x^3 + x + 1$ for simplicity. Then $alpha$ is written as
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracp(x)q(x)sqrtx , mathrmdx. $$
Let $operatornameLog$ denote the complex logarithm so that $ImoperatornameLog(z) in [0, 2pi)$. In other words, the branch cut is chosen as $[0, infty)$. Then by employing the standard keyhole contour, we may write
beginalign*
alpha
&= frac12pi left( int_infty-i0^+^-i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz + int_i0^+^infty+i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz right) \
&= i sum_q(x) = 0 frac p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x), tag1
endalign*
where the sum in the last line runs over all complex $x$'s solving $p(x)=0$, which itself is a consequence of the residue theorem.
Step 2 - Identifying the nature of the sum. Since $q(x)$ is a cubic polynomial with only simple zeros, the sum in $text(1)$ involves 3 terms, which we write as $z_1, z_2, z_3$. Then
$$alpha = z_1 + z_2 + z_3. $$
Also, consider
$$ y = left( fraci p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x) right)^2 = -fracp(x)^2xq'(x)^2 $$
and let $mathcalZ = z_1^2, z_2^2, z_3^2$ be the set of all possible values of $y$ given $q(x) = 0$. Rearranging this equality, we obtain $ yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 = 0 $, and so, we observe that
$ q(x) $ and $yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2$ shares a root whenever $y in mathcalZ$.
On the other hand, if we regard both as polynomials with coefficients in $mathbbC[y]$, then the resultant between them is given by
$$ operatornameresleft(q(x), yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 right) = 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9. $$
Since the resultant between two complex polynomials is zero exactly when they share a root, it follows that $mathcalZ = y : 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 $, or equivalently,
$$ 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 = 961(y - z_1^2)(y - z_2^2)(y - z_3^2). $$
In particular, by Vieta's formulas, we check that
$$
z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 = frac620961 = frac2031, qquad
z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 = frac131961, \
z_1^2 z_2^2 z_3^2 = frac9961 = left(frac331right)^2.
$$
Moreover, although not immediate from the previous computation, we can in fact check that $z_1 z_2 z_3$ is not a negative real number, and so, $z_1 z_2 z_3 = frac331$.
Step 3 - Conclusion. From the conclusion of the previous step, we can identify the equation that $alpha$ satisfies. Indeed,
beginalign*
alpha^2
= left( z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 right) + 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
= frac2031+ 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
endalign*
and
$$ left( alpha^2 - frac2031 right)^2
= 4 left( z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 right) + 8 z_1 z_2 z_3 (z_1 + z_2 + z_3) = frac524961 + frac2431alpha.$$
Rearranging, we obtain
$$ 31 alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha = 4. $$
Moreover, it turns out that this equation has the unique positive zero, which is exactly $frac1pi$ times what WolframAlpha yields (as demonstrated in @Infiaria's answer).
$endgroup$
Let me attack the original problem, as stated in Brilliant.org.
Question. If
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracx^2 + x + 1x^3 + x + 1 fracmathrmdxsqrtx, $$
then what is the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$?
Remark. Once we identify the value of $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$, the problem of determining $alpha$ reduces to solving the quartic equation. Since such formula is known, it suffices to answer to the question.
Step 1 - Reduction to algebraic sum. First, write $p(x) = x^2 + x + 1$ and $q(x) = x^3 + x + 1$ for simplicity. Then $alpha$ is written as
$$ alpha = frac1pi int_0^infty fracp(x)q(x)sqrtx , mathrmdx. $$
Let $operatornameLog$ denote the complex logarithm so that $ImoperatornameLog(z) in [0, 2pi)$. In other words, the branch cut is chosen as $[0, infty)$. Then by employing the standard keyhole contour, we may write
beginalign*
alpha
&= frac12pi left( int_infty-i0^+^-i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz + int_i0^+^infty+i0^+ fracp(z)q(z)e^-frac12operatornameLog(z) , mathrmdz right) \
&= i sum_q(x) = 0 frac p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x), tag1
endalign*
where the sum in the last line runs over all complex $x$'s solving $p(x)=0$, which itself is a consequence of the residue theorem.
Step 2 - Identifying the nature of the sum. Since $q(x)$ is a cubic polynomial with only simple zeros, the sum in $text(1)$ involves 3 terms, which we write as $z_1, z_2, z_3$. Then
$$alpha = z_1 + z_2 + z_3. $$
Also, consider
$$ y = left( fraci p(x)q'(x) e^-frac12operatornameLog(x) right)^2 = -fracp(x)^2xq'(x)^2 $$
and let $mathcalZ = z_1^2, z_2^2, z_3^2$ be the set of all possible values of $y$ given $q(x) = 0$. Rearranging this equality, we obtain $ yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 = 0 $, and so, we observe that
$ q(x) $ and $yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2$ shares a root whenever $y in mathcalZ$.
On the other hand, if we regard both as polynomials with coefficients in $mathbbC[y]$, then the resultant between them is given by
$$ operatornameresleft(q(x), yxq'(x)^2 + p(x)^2 right) = 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9. $$
Since the resultant between two complex polynomials is zero exactly when they share a root, it follows that $mathcalZ = y : 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 $, or equivalently,
$$ 961y^3 - 620y^2 + 131y - 9 = 961(y - z_1^2)(y - z_2^2)(y - z_3^2). $$
In particular, by Vieta's formulas, we check that
$$
z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 = frac620961 = frac2031, qquad
z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 = frac131961, \
z_1^2 z_2^2 z_3^2 = frac9961 = left(frac331right)^2.
$$
Moreover, although not immediate from the previous computation, we can in fact check that $z_1 z_2 z_3$ is not a negative real number, and so, $z_1 z_2 z_3 = frac331$.
Step 3 - Conclusion. From the conclusion of the previous step, we can identify the equation that $alpha$ satisfies. Indeed,
beginalign*
alpha^2
= left( z_1^2 + z_2^2 + z_3^2 right) + 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
= frac2031+ 2left( z_1z_2 + z_2z_3 + z_3z_1 right)
endalign*
and
$$ left( alpha^2 - frac2031 right)^2
= 4 left( z_1^2 z_2^2 + z_2^2 z_3^2 + z_3^2 z_1^2 right) + 8 z_1 z_2 z_3 (z_1 + z_2 + z_3) = frac524961 + frac2431alpha.$$
Rearranging, we obtain
$$ 31 alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha = 4. $$
Moreover, it turns out that this equation has the unique positive zero, which is exactly $frac1pi$ times what WolframAlpha yields (as demonstrated in @Infiaria's answer).
edited Mar 18 at 9:01
answered Mar 8 at 6:36
Sangchul LeeSangchul Lee
96.2k12171282
96.2k12171282
$begingroup$
Where is $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$ coming from ?
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 7:15
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici, Frankly speaking, I have no idea why. For me, it was already a miracle that $$alpha=sum_k=1^3sqrtxi_k$$ holds. (Although it is straightforward that the square of each summand corresponds to zero of $p(u)$ by the choice of substitution, it seems not entirely clear to me as to why the sign of each square root concur with the principal branch.)
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 7:37
$begingroup$
[I am extremely sorry to put the following comment. : ( ] i haven't understood the very first step where you have written $alpha$ as a sum. Is this a part of complex analysis ? Can you please tell me which things are required to understand this ? Frankly speaking i haven't taken the complex analysis course, is the following explanation has something to do with residues theorem?
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 14:11
1
$begingroup$
@MDesmond, No worries :) And as you have correctly guessed, this is related to residue theorem. I was lazy enough not to straighten out every detail.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 14:58
3
$begingroup$
Ramanujan would have liked this. +1 but he would rather get the integral in radicals form and say that it was obviously a root of such and such equation.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Mar 8 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Where is $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$ coming from ?
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 7:15
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici, Frankly speaking, I have no idea why. For me, it was already a miracle that $$alpha=sum_k=1^3sqrtxi_k$$ holds. (Although it is straightforward that the square of each summand corresponds to zero of $p(u)$ by the choice of substitution, it seems not entirely clear to me as to why the sign of each square root concur with the principal branch.)
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 7:37
$begingroup$
[I am extremely sorry to put the following comment. : ( ] i haven't understood the very first step where you have written $alpha$ as a sum. Is this a part of complex analysis ? Can you please tell me which things are required to understand this ? Frankly speaking i haven't taken the complex analysis course, is the following explanation has something to do with residues theorem?
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 14:11
1
$begingroup$
@MDesmond, No worries :) And as you have correctly guessed, this is related to residue theorem. I was lazy enough not to straighten out every detail.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 14:58
3
$begingroup$
Ramanujan would have liked this. +1 but he would rather get the integral in radicals form and say that it was obviously a root of such and such equation.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Mar 8 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Where is $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$ coming from ?
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 7:15
$begingroup$
Where is $31alpha^4 - 40alpha^2 - 24alpha$ coming from ?
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 7:15
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici, Frankly speaking, I have no idea why. For me, it was already a miracle that $$alpha=sum_k=1^3sqrtxi_k$$ holds. (Although it is straightforward that the square of each summand corresponds to zero of $p(u)$ by the choice of substitution, it seems not entirely clear to me as to why the sign of each square root concur with the principal branch.)
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 7:37
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici, Frankly speaking, I have no idea why. For me, it was already a miracle that $$alpha=sum_k=1^3sqrtxi_k$$ holds. (Although it is straightforward that the square of each summand corresponds to zero of $p(u)$ by the choice of substitution, it seems not entirely clear to me as to why the sign of each square root concur with the principal branch.)
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 7:37
$begingroup$
[I am extremely sorry to put the following comment. : ( ] i haven't understood the very first step where you have written $alpha$ as a sum. Is this a part of complex analysis ? Can you please tell me which things are required to understand this ? Frankly speaking i haven't taken the complex analysis course, is the following explanation has something to do with residues theorem?
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 14:11
$begingroup$
[I am extremely sorry to put the following comment. : ( ] i haven't understood the very first step where you have written $alpha$ as a sum. Is this a part of complex analysis ? Can you please tell me which things are required to understand this ? Frankly speaking i haven't taken the complex analysis course, is the following explanation has something to do with residues theorem?
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 14:11
1
1
$begingroup$
@MDesmond, No worries :) And as you have correctly guessed, this is related to residue theorem. I was lazy enough not to straighten out every detail.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 14:58
$begingroup$
@MDesmond, No worries :) And as you have correctly guessed, this is related to residue theorem. I was lazy enough not to straighten out every detail.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 14:58
3
3
$begingroup$
Ramanujan would have liked this. +1 but he would rather get the integral in radicals form and say that it was obviously a root of such and such equation.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Mar 8 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Ramanujan would have liked this. +1 but he would rather get the integral in radicals form and say that it was obviously a root of such and such equation.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
Mar 8 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to Wolfram Alpha, the answer is
$$fracpisqrt186left(sqrt40-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+sqrt80+14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93+sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+36sqrtfrac18640-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)right)$$
which is approximately $4.34952$. Alternatively, it is simply the positive solution of
$$frac314pi^4x^4 - frac10pi^2x^2 - frac6pix - 1 = 0 $$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Oh my god the answer is too heavy
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
Do you know how to see that it is a root of that polynomial?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 8 at 5:05
$begingroup$
What i guess is, there is nothing to do wih integral, the key is hidden in the way the polynomial is constructed.
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 5:10
$begingroup$
I do not know how you got the last result but simpler would be $2pi r_1$ where $r_1$ is the positive root of $124 t^4-40 t^2-12 t-1=0$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 6:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to Wolfram Alpha, the answer is
$$fracpisqrt186left(sqrt40-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+sqrt80+14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93+sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+36sqrtfrac18640-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)right)$$
which is approximately $4.34952$. Alternatively, it is simply the positive solution of
$$frac314pi^4x^4 - frac10pi^2x^2 - frac6pix - 1 = 0 $$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Oh my god the answer is too heavy
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
Do you know how to see that it is a root of that polynomial?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 8 at 5:05
$begingroup$
What i guess is, there is nothing to do wih integral, the key is hidden in the way the polynomial is constructed.
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 5:10
$begingroup$
I do not know how you got the last result but simpler would be $2pi r_1$ where $r_1$ is the positive root of $124 t^4-40 t^2-12 t-1=0$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 6:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to Wolfram Alpha, the answer is
$$fracpisqrt186left(sqrt40-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+sqrt80+14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93+sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+36sqrtfrac18640-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)right)$$
which is approximately $4.34952$. Alternatively, it is simply the positive solution of
$$frac314pi^4x^4 - frac10pi^2x^2 - frac6pix - 1 = 0 $$
$endgroup$
According to Wolfram Alpha, the answer is
$$fracpisqrt186left(sqrt40-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+sqrt80+14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93+sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)+36sqrtfrac18640-14sqrt[3]frac247-3sqrt93-sqrt[3]4left(47-3sqrt93right)right)$$
which is approximately $4.34952$. Alternatively, it is simply the positive solution of
$$frac314pi^4x^4 - frac10pi^2x^2 - frac6pix - 1 = 0 $$
edited Mar 8 at 4:04
answered Mar 8 at 3:58
InfiariaInfiaria
46811
46811
1
$begingroup$
Oh my god the answer is too heavy
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
Do you know how to see that it is a root of that polynomial?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 8 at 5:05
$begingroup$
What i guess is, there is nothing to do wih integral, the key is hidden in the way the polynomial is constructed.
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 5:10
$begingroup$
I do not know how you got the last result but simpler would be $2pi r_1$ where $r_1$ is the positive root of $124 t^4-40 t^2-12 t-1=0$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 6:15
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Oh my god the answer is too heavy
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:59
1
$begingroup$
Do you know how to see that it is a root of that polynomial?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 8 at 5:05
$begingroup$
What i guess is, there is nothing to do wih integral, the key is hidden in the way the polynomial is constructed.
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 5:10
$begingroup$
I do not know how you got the last result but simpler would be $2pi r_1$ where $r_1$ is the positive root of $124 t^4-40 t^2-12 t-1=0$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 6:15
1
1
$begingroup$
Oh my god the answer is too heavy
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:59
$begingroup$
Oh my god the answer is too heavy
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:59
1
1
$begingroup$
Do you know how to see that it is a root of that polynomial?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 8 at 5:05
$begingroup$
Do you know how to see that it is a root of that polynomial?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 8 at 5:05
$begingroup$
What i guess is, there is nothing to do wih integral, the key is hidden in the way the polynomial is constructed.
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 5:10
$begingroup$
What i guess is, there is nothing to do wih integral, the key is hidden in the way the polynomial is constructed.
$endgroup$
– M Desmond
Mar 8 at 5:10
$begingroup$
I do not know how you got the last result but simpler would be $2pi r_1$ where $r_1$ is the positive root of $124 t^4-40 t^2-12 t-1=0$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 6:15
$begingroup$
I do not know how you got the last result but simpler would be $2pi r_1$ where $r_1$ is the positive root of $124 t^4-40 t^2-12 t-1=0$
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 8 at 6:15
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139655%2fevaluate-i-int-0-infty-fracx2x1dxx3x1-sqrtx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Please share the source. If I recall correctly this is an open problem from Brilliant dot org, although I have to search a little in order to show it.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 2:56
1
$begingroup$
Here: brilliant.org/problems/…
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Mar 8 at 3:02
$begingroup$
Yes you are right
$endgroup$
– Umesh shankar
Mar 8 at 3:06
4
$begingroup$
Although the integral has a closed form, it is an egregiously complicated combination of nested radicals. It will be much better to focus on the original problem itself for your mental sanity, which has a very simple answer.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Mar 8 at 3:46