How to prove that $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ is not a field? [duplicate]Nonconstant polynomials do not generate maximal ideals in $mathbb Z[x]$Variation of the universal property for the field of fractionsRing homomorphism inquiry.Proof of Cayley-Hamilton via fieldsProof for maximal ideals in $mathbbZ[x]$Field homomorphism into itselfMapping property of complex fraction fieldLet $phi: R rightarrow S$ be an injective homomorphism between two rings $R$ and $S$. Prove or provide a counterexample:An elementary proof that $k[x,y]/(xy-1)cong k[x]_x$, where $k$ is a fieldRing Homomorphism from $mathbbZ$ to a Field $F$How to how that $mathsfKer(f)=nmathbb Z$ where $n$ is the characteristic of $R$?

What is paid subscription needed for in Mortal Kombat 11?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

Roman Numeral Treatment of Suspensions

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

Crossing the line between justified force and brutality

Is it appropriate to ask a job candidate if we can record their interview?

Do the temporary hit points from the Battlerager barbarian's Reckless Abandon stack if I make multiple attacks on my turn?

How did Arya survive the stabbing?

Is there a korbon needed for conversion?

How to pronounce the slash sign

Why escape if the_content isnt?

Flow chart document symbol

Why not increase contact surface when reentering the atmosphere?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

Would a high gravity rocky planet be guaranteed to have an atmosphere?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

Why does indent disappear in lists?

Proof of work - lottery approach

Do sorcerers' Subtle Spells require a skill check to be unseen?

How can a function with a hole (removable discontinuity) equal a function with no hole?

Different result between scanning in Epson's "color negative film" mode and scanning in positive -> invert curve in post?

Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle



How to prove that $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ is not a field? [duplicate]


Nonconstant polynomials do not generate maximal ideals in $mathbb Z[x]$Variation of the universal property for the field of fractionsRing homomorphism inquiry.Proof of Cayley-Hamilton via fieldsProof for maximal ideals in $mathbbZ[x]$Field homomorphism into itselfMapping property of complex fraction fieldLet $phi: R rightarrow S$ be an injective homomorphism between two rings $R$ and $S$. Prove or provide a counterexample:An elementary proof that $k[x,y]/(xy-1)cong k[x]_x$, where $k$ is a fieldRing Homomorphism from $mathbbZ$ to a Field $F$How to how that $mathsfKer(f)=nmathbb Z$ where $n$ is the characteristic of $R$?













5












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Nonconstant polynomials do not generate maximal ideals in $mathbb Z[x]$

    4 answers




How to prove that $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ is not a field, where $g$ is a non constant polynomial in $mathbbZ[X]$?




(The key is to show that $f : mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ is not injective.)



edit 1:
Now I'm trying to find the characteristic of the given ring.
Consider the map: $g: mathbbZ to mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$, where $m mapsto 1 + 1 + cdots + 1 $ (m times). Since the $ker f$ is an ideal of $mathbbZ$, it has to be of the form $nmathbbZ$, where $n$ is the characteristic. So I guess the characteristic is $0$...no?



edit 2: Thank you for all the replies below! I looked through the answer but it's a little advanced for me... I figured it out eventually using some more basic ideas and I'll put it here when I get some time...Thanks again!



edit 3:



My solution:



Step 1: Prove there is a $a in mathbbZ$ such that $g(a) neq 0, pm 1$ and let $p$ be a prime number that divides $g(a)$.



Suppose $g(X) = sum_i = 1^na_iX^i$, then $g(X) = 0$ has at most $n$ integer solutions, $p(X) = g(X) -1 = 0$ has at most $n$ integer solutions, and so is $q(X) = g(X)+1 = 0$. There are at most $3n$ integers that satisfy $g(a) = 0,pm1$, but $mathbbZ$ is infinite, so there has to be a $a in mathbbZ$ such that $g(a) neq 0, pm 1$.



Step 2: Prove that there is a unique well-defined surjective morphism of rings $f: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ sending $X$ to $a$ mod $p$ and that it yields a homomorphism of rings $phi: mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$.



Observe that $gmathbbZ[X]$ is in the kernel, so the map factor through $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$.



Step 3: Show that the resulting map is not injective.



Note that the map $phi$ is injective if and only if $ker f = gmathbbZ[X]$, but actually $gmathbbZ[X] subset ker f$. Alternatively, according to my prof, if the map was injective, $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ would identify with a subring of $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ so it would have characteristic $p$, contradiction!



Step 4: We use that if $g: K to A$ where $K$ is a field, then $g$ is either injective or the zero map.
Since the above map is not a zero map and we proved that it's not injective, $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ can't be a field.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by user26857 abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 20 at 10:08


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can you prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse in that quotient ring?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 17 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    No...My prof said we should try to find the characteristic of the ring $Z[X]/gZ[X]$ first but I have no idea what it looks like...I think I should find a map $phi: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ$ first and show that the kernel is $gmathbbZ[X]$ but I'm not sure if I'm on the right track...
    $endgroup$
    – yunadesu
    Mar 17 at 23:47






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried to prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 17 at 23:50






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It may have a multiplicative inverse. Let $g(x)=2x+3$. Then $2$ has a multiplicative inverse ($x+2$) in the quotient ring.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 18 at 0:00






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since $mathbbZ[x]/gmathbbZ[x]$ is a field if and only if the ideal $gmathbbZ[x]$ is maximal, we can just show that the ideal is properly contained in an ideal that isn't the whole ring $mathbbZ[x]$. Probably the simplest such ideal is to pick an appropriate prime $p in mathbbZ$ so that the ideal generated by both $p$ and $g$ is a proper ideal of $mathbbZ[x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – JonHales
    Mar 18 at 1:47
















5












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Nonconstant polynomials do not generate maximal ideals in $mathbb Z[x]$

    4 answers




How to prove that $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ is not a field, where $g$ is a non constant polynomial in $mathbbZ[X]$?




(The key is to show that $f : mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ is not injective.)



edit 1:
Now I'm trying to find the characteristic of the given ring.
Consider the map: $g: mathbbZ to mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$, where $m mapsto 1 + 1 + cdots + 1 $ (m times). Since the $ker f$ is an ideal of $mathbbZ$, it has to be of the form $nmathbbZ$, where $n$ is the characteristic. So I guess the characteristic is $0$...no?



edit 2: Thank you for all the replies below! I looked through the answer but it's a little advanced for me... I figured it out eventually using some more basic ideas and I'll put it here when I get some time...Thanks again!



edit 3:



My solution:



Step 1: Prove there is a $a in mathbbZ$ such that $g(a) neq 0, pm 1$ and let $p$ be a prime number that divides $g(a)$.



Suppose $g(X) = sum_i = 1^na_iX^i$, then $g(X) = 0$ has at most $n$ integer solutions, $p(X) = g(X) -1 = 0$ has at most $n$ integer solutions, and so is $q(X) = g(X)+1 = 0$. There are at most $3n$ integers that satisfy $g(a) = 0,pm1$, but $mathbbZ$ is infinite, so there has to be a $a in mathbbZ$ such that $g(a) neq 0, pm 1$.



Step 2: Prove that there is a unique well-defined surjective morphism of rings $f: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ sending $X$ to $a$ mod $p$ and that it yields a homomorphism of rings $phi: mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$.



Observe that $gmathbbZ[X]$ is in the kernel, so the map factor through $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$.



Step 3: Show that the resulting map is not injective.



Note that the map $phi$ is injective if and only if $ker f = gmathbbZ[X]$, but actually $gmathbbZ[X] subset ker f$. Alternatively, according to my prof, if the map was injective, $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ would identify with a subring of $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ so it would have characteristic $p$, contradiction!



Step 4: We use that if $g: K to A$ where $K$ is a field, then $g$ is either injective or the zero map.
Since the above map is not a zero map and we proved that it's not injective, $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ can't be a field.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by user26857 abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 20 at 10:08


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can you prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse in that quotient ring?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 17 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    No...My prof said we should try to find the characteristic of the ring $Z[X]/gZ[X]$ first but I have no idea what it looks like...I think I should find a map $phi: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ$ first and show that the kernel is $gmathbbZ[X]$ but I'm not sure if I'm on the right track...
    $endgroup$
    – yunadesu
    Mar 17 at 23:47






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried to prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 17 at 23:50






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It may have a multiplicative inverse. Let $g(x)=2x+3$. Then $2$ has a multiplicative inverse ($x+2$) in the quotient ring.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 18 at 0:00






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since $mathbbZ[x]/gmathbbZ[x]$ is a field if and only if the ideal $gmathbbZ[x]$ is maximal, we can just show that the ideal is properly contained in an ideal that isn't the whole ring $mathbbZ[x]$. Probably the simplest such ideal is to pick an appropriate prime $p in mathbbZ$ so that the ideal generated by both $p$ and $g$ is a proper ideal of $mathbbZ[x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – JonHales
    Mar 18 at 1:47














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Nonconstant polynomials do not generate maximal ideals in $mathbb Z[x]$

    4 answers




How to prove that $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ is not a field, where $g$ is a non constant polynomial in $mathbbZ[X]$?




(The key is to show that $f : mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ is not injective.)



edit 1:
Now I'm trying to find the characteristic of the given ring.
Consider the map: $g: mathbbZ to mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$, where $m mapsto 1 + 1 + cdots + 1 $ (m times). Since the $ker f$ is an ideal of $mathbbZ$, it has to be of the form $nmathbbZ$, where $n$ is the characteristic. So I guess the characteristic is $0$...no?



edit 2: Thank you for all the replies below! I looked through the answer but it's a little advanced for me... I figured it out eventually using some more basic ideas and I'll put it here when I get some time...Thanks again!



edit 3:



My solution:



Step 1: Prove there is a $a in mathbbZ$ such that $g(a) neq 0, pm 1$ and let $p$ be a prime number that divides $g(a)$.



Suppose $g(X) = sum_i = 1^na_iX^i$, then $g(X) = 0$ has at most $n$ integer solutions, $p(X) = g(X) -1 = 0$ has at most $n$ integer solutions, and so is $q(X) = g(X)+1 = 0$. There are at most $3n$ integers that satisfy $g(a) = 0,pm1$, but $mathbbZ$ is infinite, so there has to be a $a in mathbbZ$ such that $g(a) neq 0, pm 1$.



Step 2: Prove that there is a unique well-defined surjective morphism of rings $f: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ sending $X$ to $a$ mod $p$ and that it yields a homomorphism of rings $phi: mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$.



Observe that $gmathbbZ[X]$ is in the kernel, so the map factor through $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$.



Step 3: Show that the resulting map is not injective.



Note that the map $phi$ is injective if and only if $ker f = gmathbbZ[X]$, but actually $gmathbbZ[X] subset ker f$. Alternatively, according to my prof, if the map was injective, $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ would identify with a subring of $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ so it would have characteristic $p$, contradiction!



Step 4: We use that if $g: K to A$ where $K$ is a field, then $g$ is either injective or the zero map.
Since the above map is not a zero map and we proved that it's not injective, $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ can't be a field.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:



  • Nonconstant polynomials do not generate maximal ideals in $mathbb Z[x]$

    4 answers




How to prove that $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ is not a field, where $g$ is a non constant polynomial in $mathbbZ[X]$?




(The key is to show that $f : mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ is not injective.)



edit 1:
Now I'm trying to find the characteristic of the given ring.
Consider the map: $g: mathbbZ to mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$, where $m mapsto 1 + 1 + cdots + 1 $ (m times). Since the $ker f$ is an ideal of $mathbbZ$, it has to be of the form $nmathbbZ$, where $n$ is the characteristic. So I guess the characteristic is $0$...no?



edit 2: Thank you for all the replies below! I looked through the answer but it's a little advanced for me... I figured it out eventually using some more basic ideas and I'll put it here when I get some time...Thanks again!



edit 3:



My solution:



Step 1: Prove there is a $a in mathbbZ$ such that $g(a) neq 0, pm 1$ and let $p$ be a prime number that divides $g(a)$.



Suppose $g(X) = sum_i = 1^na_iX^i$, then $g(X) = 0$ has at most $n$ integer solutions, $p(X) = g(X) -1 = 0$ has at most $n$ integer solutions, and so is $q(X) = g(X)+1 = 0$. There are at most $3n$ integers that satisfy $g(a) = 0,pm1$, but $mathbbZ$ is infinite, so there has to be a $a in mathbbZ$ such that $g(a) neq 0, pm 1$.



Step 2: Prove that there is a unique well-defined surjective morphism of rings $f: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ sending $X$ to $a$ mod $p$ and that it yields a homomorphism of rings $phi: mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$.



Observe that $gmathbbZ[X]$ is in the kernel, so the map factor through $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$.



Step 3: Show that the resulting map is not injective.



Note that the map $phi$ is injective if and only if $ker f = gmathbbZ[X]$, but actually $gmathbbZ[X] subset ker f$. Alternatively, according to my prof, if the map was injective, $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ would identify with a subring of $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$ so it would have characteristic $p$, contradiction!



Step 4: We use that if $g: K to A$ where $K$ is a field, then $g$ is either injective or the zero map.
Since the above map is not a zero map and we proved that it's not injective, $mathbbZ[X]/gmathbbZ[X]$ can't be a field.





This question already has an answer here:



  • Nonconstant polynomials do not generate maximal ideals in $mathbb Z[x]$

    4 answers







abstract-algebra maximal-and-prime-ideals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 5:34







yunadesu

















asked Mar 17 at 23:40









yunadesuyunadesu

293




293




marked as duplicate by user26857 abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 20 at 10:08


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by user26857 abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 20 at 10:08


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can you prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse in that quotient ring?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 17 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    No...My prof said we should try to find the characteristic of the ring $Z[X]/gZ[X]$ first but I have no idea what it looks like...I think I should find a map $phi: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ$ first and show that the kernel is $gmathbbZ[X]$ but I'm not sure if I'm on the right track...
    $endgroup$
    – yunadesu
    Mar 17 at 23:47






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried to prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 17 at 23:50






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It may have a multiplicative inverse. Let $g(x)=2x+3$. Then $2$ has a multiplicative inverse ($x+2$) in the quotient ring.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 18 at 0:00






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since $mathbbZ[x]/gmathbbZ[x]$ is a field if and only if the ideal $gmathbbZ[x]$ is maximal, we can just show that the ideal is properly contained in an ideal that isn't the whole ring $mathbbZ[x]$. Probably the simplest such ideal is to pick an appropriate prime $p in mathbbZ$ so that the ideal generated by both $p$ and $g$ is a proper ideal of $mathbbZ[x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – JonHales
    Mar 18 at 1:47













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can you prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse in that quotient ring?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 17 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    No...My prof said we should try to find the characteristic of the ring $Z[X]/gZ[X]$ first but I have no idea what it looks like...I think I should find a map $phi: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ$ first and show that the kernel is $gmathbbZ[X]$ but I'm not sure if I'm on the right track...
    $endgroup$
    – yunadesu
    Mar 17 at 23:47






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried to prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse?
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 17 at 23:50






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It may have a multiplicative inverse. Let $g(x)=2x+3$. Then $2$ has a multiplicative inverse ($x+2$) in the quotient ring.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 18 at 0:00






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since $mathbbZ[x]/gmathbbZ[x]$ is a field if and only if the ideal $gmathbbZ[x]$ is maximal, we can just show that the ideal is properly contained in an ideal that isn't the whole ring $mathbbZ[x]$. Probably the simplest such ideal is to pick an appropriate prime $p in mathbbZ$ so that the ideal generated by both $p$ and $g$ is a proper ideal of $mathbbZ[x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – JonHales
    Mar 18 at 1:47








2




2




$begingroup$
Can you prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse in that quotient ring?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 17 at 23:43




$begingroup$
Can you prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse in that quotient ring?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 17 at 23:43












$begingroup$
No...My prof said we should try to find the characteristic of the ring $Z[X]/gZ[X]$ first but I have no idea what it looks like...I think I should find a map $phi: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ$ first and show that the kernel is $gmathbbZ[X]$ but I'm not sure if I'm on the right track...
$endgroup$
– yunadesu
Mar 17 at 23:47




$begingroup$
No...My prof said we should try to find the characteristic of the ring $Z[X]/gZ[X]$ first but I have no idea what it looks like...I think I should find a map $phi: mathbbZ[X] to mathbbZ$ first and show that the kernel is $gmathbbZ[X]$ but I'm not sure if I'm on the right track...
$endgroup$
– yunadesu
Mar 17 at 23:47




3




3




$begingroup$
Have you tried to prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 17 at 23:50




$begingroup$
Have you tried to prove that 2 has no multiplicative inverse?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 17 at 23:50




4




4




$begingroup$
It may have a multiplicative inverse. Let $g(x)=2x+3$. Then $2$ has a multiplicative inverse ($x+2$) in the quotient ring.
$endgroup$
– Robert Shore
Mar 18 at 0:00




$begingroup$
It may have a multiplicative inverse. Let $g(x)=2x+3$. Then $2$ has a multiplicative inverse ($x+2$) in the quotient ring.
$endgroup$
– Robert Shore
Mar 18 at 0:00




7




7




$begingroup$
Since $mathbbZ[x]/gmathbbZ[x]$ is a field if and only if the ideal $gmathbbZ[x]$ is maximal, we can just show that the ideal is properly contained in an ideal that isn't the whole ring $mathbbZ[x]$. Probably the simplest such ideal is to pick an appropriate prime $p in mathbbZ$ so that the ideal generated by both $p$ and $g$ is a proper ideal of $mathbbZ[x]$.
$endgroup$
– JonHales
Mar 18 at 1:47





$begingroup$
Since $mathbbZ[x]/gmathbbZ[x]$ is a field if and only if the ideal $gmathbbZ[x]$ is maximal, we can just show that the ideal is properly contained in an ideal that isn't the whole ring $mathbbZ[x]$. Probably the simplest such ideal is to pick an appropriate prime $p in mathbbZ$ so that the ideal generated by both $p$ and $g$ is a proper ideal of $mathbbZ[x]$.
$endgroup$
– JonHales
Mar 18 at 1:47











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

My answer expands on JonHales comment. Suppose your polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n + cdots + a_0$, with $a_iinBbbZ$, $a_nne 0$, and $n > 0$. Choose a prime $p$ with $pnmid a_n$. Then mod $p$, $g(x)$ still has degree $n$.



Thus $BbbZ[x]/(g,p)simeq BbbF_p[x]/(g)ne 0$, so $(g,p)$ is a proper ideal of $BbbZ[x]$. Moreover, it properly contains $(g)$, since $(g)cap BbbZ=(0)$. Thus $(g)$ is not maximal, and $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



Edit



In response to the OP's edit, saying that they found this solution a bit advanced, I thought I'd translate the solution into more basic ideas for future readers.



Again, if our polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n+cdots + a_0$, then if $p$ is a prime integer with $pnmid a_n$, $p$ is nonzero, but not a unit in $BbbZ[x]/(g)$. Therefore $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



Proof.



By contradiction. Assume $p cdot c(x) equiv 1 pmodg(x)$ for some polynomial $c(x)$. Then $pc(x)-1 = g(x)h(x)$ for some polynomial $h(x)$, so $pc(x) = g(x)h(x)-1$. Write $h(x)=pq(x)+r(x)$, where the coefficients of $r$ are either between $0$ and $p-1$ (inclusive).



Then $$pc(x)=g(x)(pq(x)+r(x))-1=pg(x)q(x) + g(x)r(x)-1,$$
and
$$p(c(x)-g(x)q(x))=g(x)r(x)-1.$$
Now if $r(x)=0$, we have that the left hand side is divisible by $p$, and the right hand side is $-1$, so this is impossible.



On the other hand, if $r(x)ne 0$, $g(x)r(x)$ has positive degree, and it's leading term is $a_nb_m$, where $b_m$ is the leading term of $r(x)$. However $p$ must divide $g(x)r(x)-1$, so it must divide the leading term, so $pmid a_nb_m$. However $pnmid a_n$, and $1le b_mle p-1$, so $pnmid b_m$ either. Thus $pnmid a_nb_m$. Contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    My answer expands on JonHales comment. Suppose your polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n + cdots + a_0$, with $a_iinBbbZ$, $a_nne 0$, and $n > 0$. Choose a prime $p$ with $pnmid a_n$. Then mod $p$, $g(x)$ still has degree $n$.



    Thus $BbbZ[x]/(g,p)simeq BbbF_p[x]/(g)ne 0$, so $(g,p)$ is a proper ideal of $BbbZ[x]$. Moreover, it properly contains $(g)$, since $(g)cap BbbZ=(0)$. Thus $(g)$ is not maximal, and $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



    Edit



    In response to the OP's edit, saying that they found this solution a bit advanced, I thought I'd translate the solution into more basic ideas for future readers.



    Again, if our polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n+cdots + a_0$, then if $p$ is a prime integer with $pnmid a_n$, $p$ is nonzero, but not a unit in $BbbZ[x]/(g)$. Therefore $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



    Proof.



    By contradiction. Assume $p cdot c(x) equiv 1 pmodg(x)$ for some polynomial $c(x)$. Then $pc(x)-1 = g(x)h(x)$ for some polynomial $h(x)$, so $pc(x) = g(x)h(x)-1$. Write $h(x)=pq(x)+r(x)$, where the coefficients of $r$ are either between $0$ and $p-1$ (inclusive).



    Then $$pc(x)=g(x)(pq(x)+r(x))-1=pg(x)q(x) + g(x)r(x)-1,$$
    and
    $$p(c(x)-g(x)q(x))=g(x)r(x)-1.$$
    Now if $r(x)=0$, we have that the left hand side is divisible by $p$, and the right hand side is $-1$, so this is impossible.



    On the other hand, if $r(x)ne 0$, $g(x)r(x)$ has positive degree, and it's leading term is $a_nb_m$, where $b_m$ is the leading term of $r(x)$. However $p$ must divide $g(x)r(x)-1$, so it must divide the leading term, so $pmid a_nb_m$. However $pnmid a_n$, and $1le b_mle p-1$, so $pnmid b_m$ either. Thus $pnmid a_nb_m$. Contradiction.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      6












      $begingroup$

      My answer expands on JonHales comment. Suppose your polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n + cdots + a_0$, with $a_iinBbbZ$, $a_nne 0$, and $n > 0$. Choose a prime $p$ with $pnmid a_n$. Then mod $p$, $g(x)$ still has degree $n$.



      Thus $BbbZ[x]/(g,p)simeq BbbF_p[x]/(g)ne 0$, so $(g,p)$ is a proper ideal of $BbbZ[x]$. Moreover, it properly contains $(g)$, since $(g)cap BbbZ=(0)$. Thus $(g)$ is not maximal, and $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



      Edit



      In response to the OP's edit, saying that they found this solution a bit advanced, I thought I'd translate the solution into more basic ideas for future readers.



      Again, if our polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n+cdots + a_0$, then if $p$ is a prime integer with $pnmid a_n$, $p$ is nonzero, but not a unit in $BbbZ[x]/(g)$. Therefore $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



      Proof.



      By contradiction. Assume $p cdot c(x) equiv 1 pmodg(x)$ for some polynomial $c(x)$. Then $pc(x)-1 = g(x)h(x)$ for some polynomial $h(x)$, so $pc(x) = g(x)h(x)-1$. Write $h(x)=pq(x)+r(x)$, where the coefficients of $r$ are either between $0$ and $p-1$ (inclusive).



      Then $$pc(x)=g(x)(pq(x)+r(x))-1=pg(x)q(x) + g(x)r(x)-1,$$
      and
      $$p(c(x)-g(x)q(x))=g(x)r(x)-1.$$
      Now if $r(x)=0$, we have that the left hand side is divisible by $p$, and the right hand side is $-1$, so this is impossible.



      On the other hand, if $r(x)ne 0$, $g(x)r(x)$ has positive degree, and it's leading term is $a_nb_m$, where $b_m$ is the leading term of $r(x)$. However $p$ must divide $g(x)r(x)-1$, so it must divide the leading term, so $pmid a_nb_m$. However $pnmid a_n$, and $1le b_mle p-1$, so $pnmid b_m$ either. Thus $pnmid a_nb_m$. Contradiction.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        My answer expands on JonHales comment. Suppose your polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n + cdots + a_0$, with $a_iinBbbZ$, $a_nne 0$, and $n > 0$. Choose a prime $p$ with $pnmid a_n$. Then mod $p$, $g(x)$ still has degree $n$.



        Thus $BbbZ[x]/(g,p)simeq BbbF_p[x]/(g)ne 0$, so $(g,p)$ is a proper ideal of $BbbZ[x]$. Moreover, it properly contains $(g)$, since $(g)cap BbbZ=(0)$. Thus $(g)$ is not maximal, and $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



        Edit



        In response to the OP's edit, saying that they found this solution a bit advanced, I thought I'd translate the solution into more basic ideas for future readers.



        Again, if our polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n+cdots + a_0$, then if $p$ is a prime integer with $pnmid a_n$, $p$ is nonzero, but not a unit in $BbbZ[x]/(g)$. Therefore $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



        Proof.



        By contradiction. Assume $p cdot c(x) equiv 1 pmodg(x)$ for some polynomial $c(x)$. Then $pc(x)-1 = g(x)h(x)$ for some polynomial $h(x)$, so $pc(x) = g(x)h(x)-1$. Write $h(x)=pq(x)+r(x)$, where the coefficients of $r$ are either between $0$ and $p-1$ (inclusive).



        Then $$pc(x)=g(x)(pq(x)+r(x))-1=pg(x)q(x) + g(x)r(x)-1,$$
        and
        $$p(c(x)-g(x)q(x))=g(x)r(x)-1.$$
        Now if $r(x)=0$, we have that the left hand side is divisible by $p$, and the right hand side is $-1$, so this is impossible.



        On the other hand, if $r(x)ne 0$, $g(x)r(x)$ has positive degree, and it's leading term is $a_nb_m$, where $b_m$ is the leading term of $r(x)$. However $p$ must divide $g(x)r(x)-1$, so it must divide the leading term, so $pmid a_nb_m$. However $pnmid a_n$, and $1le b_mle p-1$, so $pnmid b_m$ either. Thus $pnmid a_nb_m$. Contradiction.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        My answer expands on JonHales comment. Suppose your polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n + cdots + a_0$, with $a_iinBbbZ$, $a_nne 0$, and $n > 0$. Choose a prime $p$ with $pnmid a_n$. Then mod $p$, $g(x)$ still has degree $n$.



        Thus $BbbZ[x]/(g,p)simeq BbbF_p[x]/(g)ne 0$, so $(g,p)$ is a proper ideal of $BbbZ[x]$. Moreover, it properly contains $(g)$, since $(g)cap BbbZ=(0)$. Thus $(g)$ is not maximal, and $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



        Edit



        In response to the OP's edit, saying that they found this solution a bit advanced, I thought I'd translate the solution into more basic ideas for future readers.



        Again, if our polynomial is $g(x)=a_nx^n+cdots + a_0$, then if $p$ is a prime integer with $pnmid a_n$, $p$ is nonzero, but not a unit in $BbbZ[x]/(g)$. Therefore $BbbZ[x]/(g)$ is not a field.



        Proof.



        By contradiction. Assume $p cdot c(x) equiv 1 pmodg(x)$ for some polynomial $c(x)$. Then $pc(x)-1 = g(x)h(x)$ for some polynomial $h(x)$, so $pc(x) = g(x)h(x)-1$. Write $h(x)=pq(x)+r(x)$, where the coefficients of $r$ are either between $0$ and $p-1$ (inclusive).



        Then $$pc(x)=g(x)(pq(x)+r(x))-1=pg(x)q(x) + g(x)r(x)-1,$$
        and
        $$p(c(x)-g(x)q(x))=g(x)r(x)-1.$$
        Now if $r(x)=0$, we have that the left hand side is divisible by $p$, and the right hand side is $-1$, so this is impossible.



        On the other hand, if $r(x)ne 0$, $g(x)r(x)$ has positive degree, and it's leading term is $a_nb_m$, where $b_m$ is the leading term of $r(x)$. However $p$ must divide $g(x)r(x)-1$, so it must divide the leading term, so $pmid a_nb_m$. However $pnmid a_n$, and $1le b_mle p-1$, so $pnmid b_m$ either. Thus $pnmid a_nb_m$. Contradiction.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 19 at 0:16

























        answered Mar 18 at 2:59









        jgonjgon

        16.1k32143




        16.1k32143













            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers