Solving integral with complex path integrals Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Contour integration of $int_-infty^infty frac1-b+x^2(1-b+x^2)^2 + 4bx^2dx = pi$Real integral $ int_-infty^infty fracdx1+x^2 $ with the help of complex friendsComplex Contour Integration - Complex AnalysisGeometric interpretation of complex path integralEvaluating the integral $int_-infty^infty fracsin^2(x)x^2e^i t x dx$Compute integral using residue theoremMistake with using residue theory for calculating $int_-infty^inftyfracsin(x)xdx$Is undergraduate “complex analysis” actually kind of “complex calculus”? Please provide references.Simplify complex integral using parityIntegral of a complex function over contour

Should you tell Jews they are breaking a commandment?

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Why use gamma over alpha radiation?

Autumning in love

Can I throw a longsword at someone?

How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?

Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?

Unable to start mainnet node docker container

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

What is the largest species of polychaete?

Area of a 2D convex hull

Strange behaviour of Check

Fishing simulator

Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?

Blender game recording at the wrong time

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign

Do we know why communications with Beresheet and NASA were lost during the attempted landing of the Moon lander?

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Statistical model of ligand substitution

Slither Like a Snake

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Stars Make Stars



Solving integral with complex path integrals



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Contour integration of $int_-infty^infty frac1-b+x^2(1-b+x^2)^2 + 4bx^2dx = pi$Real integral $ int_-infty^infty fracdx1+x^2 $ with the help of complex friendsComplex Contour Integration - Complex AnalysisGeometric interpretation of complex path integralEvaluating the integral $int_-infty^infty fracsin^2(x)x^2e^i t x dx$Compute integral using residue theoremMistake with using residue theory for calculating $int_-infty^inftyfracsin(x)xdx$Is undergraduate “complex analysis” actually kind of “complex calculus”? Please provide references.Simplify complex integral using parityIntegral of a complex function over contour










1












$begingroup$


Dear math stackexchange,



I'm trying to show this:



$$ int_-infty^infty frace^ax1+e^x dx = fracpisin(api), 0<a<1$$



I tried:
$$int_-infty^infty f(x) dx = lim_Rtoinfty int_-R^R f(x) dx = lim_Rtoinfty int_-R^R frace^ax1+e^x dx$$



Then i want to split the integration on the boundaries of a rectangle defined by the vertices:
$$ z = pm R, z = pm R + 2 pi i $$



This is obviously $ z in mathbbC$ so i need to expand on a complex function that covers the real of the normal function. Maybe just: $frace^az1+e^z$



Now i should just have to solve 4 path integrals, However they are quite difficult i think so i think i am on wrong path (No pun intended).



I would love some hints and tips to go about this problem










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    No, this is the right path for this problem. A circular arc would be much harder to deal with. Recall that there are infinitely many poles on the imaginary axis.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 19:48










  • $begingroup$
    If you're interested in a different strategy, convert it to a Beta integral with $u=frac11+e^-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 25 at 19:57















1












$begingroup$


Dear math stackexchange,



I'm trying to show this:



$$ int_-infty^infty frace^ax1+e^x dx = fracpisin(api), 0<a<1$$



I tried:
$$int_-infty^infty f(x) dx = lim_Rtoinfty int_-R^R f(x) dx = lim_Rtoinfty int_-R^R frace^ax1+e^x dx$$



Then i want to split the integration on the boundaries of a rectangle defined by the vertices:
$$ z = pm R, z = pm R + 2 pi i $$



This is obviously $ z in mathbbC$ so i need to expand on a complex function that covers the real of the normal function. Maybe just: $frace^az1+e^z$



Now i should just have to solve 4 path integrals, However they are quite difficult i think so i think i am on wrong path (No pun intended).



I would love some hints and tips to go about this problem










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    No, this is the right path for this problem. A circular arc would be much harder to deal with. Recall that there are infinitely many poles on the imaginary axis.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 19:48










  • $begingroup$
    If you're interested in a different strategy, convert it to a Beta integral with $u=frac11+e^-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 25 at 19:57













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Dear math stackexchange,



I'm trying to show this:



$$ int_-infty^infty frace^ax1+e^x dx = fracpisin(api), 0<a<1$$



I tried:
$$int_-infty^infty f(x) dx = lim_Rtoinfty int_-R^R f(x) dx = lim_Rtoinfty int_-R^R frace^ax1+e^x dx$$



Then i want to split the integration on the boundaries of a rectangle defined by the vertices:
$$ z = pm R, z = pm R + 2 pi i $$



This is obviously $ z in mathbbC$ so i need to expand on a complex function that covers the real of the normal function. Maybe just: $frace^az1+e^z$



Now i should just have to solve 4 path integrals, However they are quite difficult i think so i think i am on wrong path (No pun intended).



I would love some hints and tips to go about this problem










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Dear math stackexchange,



I'm trying to show this:



$$ int_-infty^infty frace^ax1+e^x dx = fracpisin(api), 0<a<1$$



I tried:
$$int_-infty^infty f(x) dx = lim_Rtoinfty int_-R^R f(x) dx = lim_Rtoinfty int_-R^R frace^ax1+e^x dx$$



Then i want to split the integration on the boundaries of a rectangle defined by the vertices:
$$ z = pm R, z = pm R + 2 pi i $$



This is obviously $ z in mathbbC$ so i need to expand on a complex function that covers the real of the normal function. Maybe just: $frace^az1+e^z$



Now i should just have to solve 4 path integrals, However they are quite difficult i think so i think i am on wrong path (No pun intended).



I would love some hints and tips to go about this problem







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 25 at 19:27









Pernk DernetsPernk Dernets

386




386











  • $begingroup$
    No, this is the right path for this problem. A circular arc would be much harder to deal with. Recall that there are infinitely many poles on the imaginary axis.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 19:48










  • $begingroup$
    If you're interested in a different strategy, convert it to a Beta integral with $u=frac11+e^-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 25 at 19:57
















  • $begingroup$
    No, this is the right path for this problem. A circular arc would be much harder to deal with. Recall that there are infinitely many poles on the imaginary axis.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 19:48










  • $begingroup$
    If you're interested in a different strategy, convert it to a Beta integral with $u=frac11+e^-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Mar 25 at 19:57















$begingroup$
No, this is the right path for this problem. A circular arc would be much harder to deal with. Recall that there are infinitely many poles on the imaginary axis.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Mar 25 at 19:48




$begingroup$
No, this is the right path for this problem. A circular arc would be much harder to deal with. Recall that there are infinitely many poles on the imaginary axis.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Mar 25 at 19:48












$begingroup$
If you're interested in a different strategy, convert it to a Beta integral with $u=frac11+e^-x$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Mar 25 at 19:57




$begingroup$
If you're interested in a different strategy, convert it to a Beta integral with $u=frac11+e^-x$.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Mar 25 at 19:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

So, the thing about those path integrals - the reason you chose that path - is that some will tend to variations on the integral we want to evaluate, and the others will go to zero. That is how we use the residue theorem to evaluate integrals; we don't start with a closed path, so we come back around to close it with pieces we can understand.




  • $int_-R^R$ : This is simple - it goes to $int_-infty^infty f(x),dx$, the integral we want to evaluate.


  • $int_R^R+2pi i$ : $dfrace^ax1+e^x = dfrace^(a-1)x1+e^-x$. When the real part of $z$ is $R$ and $s$ is real, $|e^sx|=e^sR$. Applied here,
    $$left|frace^(a-1)x1+e^-xright| = frace^(a-1)R1+e^-x le frace^(a-1)R1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi i$, and it goes to zero.


  • $int_R+2pi i^-R+2pi i$ : For this, we use the identity $f(x+2pi i) = e^2pi i af(x)$; the translation leaves the denominator unchanged, and multiplies the numerator by a fixed quantity. Since we trace this integral backwards, there's an extra $-1$ factor, and this one tends to $-e^2pi i aint_-infty^inftyf(x),dx$.


  • $int_-R+2pi i^-R$ : On this vertical segment, it's the $1$ term in the denominator that dominates. We get
    $$left|frace^ax1+e^xright| = frace^-aRlefrace^-aR1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi$, and it goes to zero.

Adding up the pieces, we get a limit that's a sum of two constant multiples of the integral we're trying to evaluate. In order to solve for that integral, we need a second evaluation of the contour integral - and that calls for the residue theorem. There's exactly one pole in the rectangle enclosed, at $pi i$.



Can you take it from here?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Jmerry thank you so much for providing such an in depth answer. I understand the method now and i'm trying to follow along. I really appreciate your help. But how come $f(x+2 pi i ) =f(x) e^2 pi i a $ ? I am getting: $f(x+2 pi i ) = frace^axe^2 pi i1+e^xe^2 pi i $
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 25 at 21:01











  • $begingroup$
    That's not correct in the numerator - recall that the $+2pi i$ gets multiplied by $a$ too. In the denominator - what's $e^2pi i$?
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    Off course! $e^2 pi i$ is just $1$. And i see my mistake in the denominator. So with your help i can just find the residue, set it equal to the remaining two integrals, use the $f(x + 2 pi i)$ trick to rewrite one of the integral, such that it's equal to the original integral with a front fractor. And lastly isolate the original integral. It works out! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 26 at 10:43











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162220%2fsolving-integral-with-complex-path-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

So, the thing about those path integrals - the reason you chose that path - is that some will tend to variations on the integral we want to evaluate, and the others will go to zero. That is how we use the residue theorem to evaluate integrals; we don't start with a closed path, so we come back around to close it with pieces we can understand.




  • $int_-R^R$ : This is simple - it goes to $int_-infty^infty f(x),dx$, the integral we want to evaluate.


  • $int_R^R+2pi i$ : $dfrace^ax1+e^x = dfrace^(a-1)x1+e^-x$. When the real part of $z$ is $R$ and $s$ is real, $|e^sx|=e^sR$. Applied here,
    $$left|frace^(a-1)x1+e^-xright| = frace^(a-1)R1+e^-x le frace^(a-1)R1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi i$, and it goes to zero.


  • $int_R+2pi i^-R+2pi i$ : For this, we use the identity $f(x+2pi i) = e^2pi i af(x)$; the translation leaves the denominator unchanged, and multiplies the numerator by a fixed quantity. Since we trace this integral backwards, there's an extra $-1$ factor, and this one tends to $-e^2pi i aint_-infty^inftyf(x),dx$.


  • $int_-R+2pi i^-R$ : On this vertical segment, it's the $1$ term in the denominator that dominates. We get
    $$left|frace^ax1+e^xright| = frace^-aRlefrace^-aR1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi$, and it goes to zero.

Adding up the pieces, we get a limit that's a sum of two constant multiples of the integral we're trying to evaluate. In order to solve for that integral, we need a second evaluation of the contour integral - and that calls for the residue theorem. There's exactly one pole in the rectangle enclosed, at $pi i$.



Can you take it from here?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Jmerry thank you so much for providing such an in depth answer. I understand the method now and i'm trying to follow along. I really appreciate your help. But how come $f(x+2 pi i ) =f(x) e^2 pi i a $ ? I am getting: $f(x+2 pi i ) = frace^axe^2 pi i1+e^xe^2 pi i $
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 25 at 21:01











  • $begingroup$
    That's not correct in the numerator - recall that the $+2pi i$ gets multiplied by $a$ too. In the denominator - what's $e^2pi i$?
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    Off course! $e^2 pi i$ is just $1$. And i see my mistake in the denominator. So with your help i can just find the residue, set it equal to the remaining two integrals, use the $f(x + 2 pi i)$ trick to rewrite one of the integral, such that it's equal to the original integral with a front fractor. And lastly isolate the original integral. It works out! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 26 at 10:43















4












$begingroup$

So, the thing about those path integrals - the reason you chose that path - is that some will tend to variations on the integral we want to evaluate, and the others will go to zero. That is how we use the residue theorem to evaluate integrals; we don't start with a closed path, so we come back around to close it with pieces we can understand.




  • $int_-R^R$ : This is simple - it goes to $int_-infty^infty f(x),dx$, the integral we want to evaluate.


  • $int_R^R+2pi i$ : $dfrace^ax1+e^x = dfrace^(a-1)x1+e^-x$. When the real part of $z$ is $R$ and $s$ is real, $|e^sx|=e^sR$. Applied here,
    $$left|frace^(a-1)x1+e^-xright| = frace^(a-1)R1+e^-x le frace^(a-1)R1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi i$, and it goes to zero.


  • $int_R+2pi i^-R+2pi i$ : For this, we use the identity $f(x+2pi i) = e^2pi i af(x)$; the translation leaves the denominator unchanged, and multiplies the numerator by a fixed quantity. Since we trace this integral backwards, there's an extra $-1$ factor, and this one tends to $-e^2pi i aint_-infty^inftyf(x),dx$.


  • $int_-R+2pi i^-R$ : On this vertical segment, it's the $1$ term in the denominator that dominates. We get
    $$left|frace^ax1+e^xright| = frace^-aRlefrace^-aR1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi$, and it goes to zero.

Adding up the pieces, we get a limit that's a sum of two constant multiples of the integral we're trying to evaluate. In order to solve for that integral, we need a second evaluation of the contour integral - and that calls for the residue theorem. There's exactly one pole in the rectangle enclosed, at $pi i$.



Can you take it from here?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Jmerry thank you so much for providing such an in depth answer. I understand the method now and i'm trying to follow along. I really appreciate your help. But how come $f(x+2 pi i ) =f(x) e^2 pi i a $ ? I am getting: $f(x+2 pi i ) = frace^axe^2 pi i1+e^xe^2 pi i $
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 25 at 21:01











  • $begingroup$
    That's not correct in the numerator - recall that the $+2pi i$ gets multiplied by $a$ too. In the denominator - what's $e^2pi i$?
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    Off course! $e^2 pi i$ is just $1$. And i see my mistake in the denominator. So with your help i can just find the residue, set it equal to the remaining two integrals, use the $f(x + 2 pi i)$ trick to rewrite one of the integral, such that it's equal to the original integral with a front fractor. And lastly isolate the original integral. It works out! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 26 at 10:43













4












4








4





$begingroup$

So, the thing about those path integrals - the reason you chose that path - is that some will tend to variations on the integral we want to evaluate, and the others will go to zero. That is how we use the residue theorem to evaluate integrals; we don't start with a closed path, so we come back around to close it with pieces we can understand.




  • $int_-R^R$ : This is simple - it goes to $int_-infty^infty f(x),dx$, the integral we want to evaluate.


  • $int_R^R+2pi i$ : $dfrace^ax1+e^x = dfrace^(a-1)x1+e^-x$. When the real part of $z$ is $R$ and $s$ is real, $|e^sx|=e^sR$. Applied here,
    $$left|frace^(a-1)x1+e^-xright| = frace^(a-1)R1+e^-x le frace^(a-1)R1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi i$, and it goes to zero.


  • $int_R+2pi i^-R+2pi i$ : For this, we use the identity $f(x+2pi i) = e^2pi i af(x)$; the translation leaves the denominator unchanged, and multiplies the numerator by a fixed quantity. Since we trace this integral backwards, there's an extra $-1$ factor, and this one tends to $-e^2pi i aint_-infty^inftyf(x),dx$.


  • $int_-R+2pi i^-R$ : On this vertical segment, it's the $1$ term in the denominator that dominates. We get
    $$left|frace^ax1+e^xright| = frace^-aRlefrace^-aR1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi$, and it goes to zero.

Adding up the pieces, we get a limit that's a sum of two constant multiples of the integral we're trying to evaluate. In order to solve for that integral, we need a second evaluation of the contour integral - and that calls for the residue theorem. There's exactly one pole in the rectangle enclosed, at $pi i$.



Can you take it from here?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



So, the thing about those path integrals - the reason you chose that path - is that some will tend to variations on the integral we want to evaluate, and the others will go to zero. That is how we use the residue theorem to evaluate integrals; we don't start with a closed path, so we come back around to close it with pieces we can understand.




  • $int_-R^R$ : This is simple - it goes to $int_-infty^infty f(x),dx$, the integral we want to evaluate.


  • $int_R^R+2pi i$ : $dfrace^ax1+e^x = dfrace^(a-1)x1+e^-x$. When the real part of $z$ is $R$ and $s$ is real, $|e^sx|=e^sR$. Applied here,
    $$left|frace^(a-1)x1+e^-xright| = frace^(a-1)R1+e^-x le frace^(a-1)R1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi i$, and it goes to zero.


  • $int_R+2pi i^-R+2pi i$ : For this, we use the identity $f(x+2pi i) = e^2pi i af(x)$; the translation leaves the denominator unchanged, and multiplies the numerator by a fixed quantity. Since we trace this integral backwards, there's an extra $-1$ factor, and this one tends to $-e^2pi i aint_-infty^inftyf(x),dx$.


  • $int_-R+2pi i^-R$ : On this vertical segment, it's the $1$ term in the denominator that dominates. We get
    $$left|frace^ax1+e^xright| = frace^-aRlefrace^-aR1-e^-Rto 0$$
    Integrate that along a path of fixed length $2pi$, and it goes to zero.

Adding up the pieces, we get a limit that's a sum of two constant multiples of the integral we're trying to evaluate. In order to solve for that integral, we need a second evaluation of the contour integral - and that calls for the residue theorem. There's exactly one pole in the rectangle enclosed, at $pi i$.



Can you take it from here?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 25 at 19:50









jmerryjmerry

17.1k11633




17.1k11633











  • $begingroup$
    Jmerry thank you so much for providing such an in depth answer. I understand the method now and i'm trying to follow along. I really appreciate your help. But how come $f(x+2 pi i ) =f(x) e^2 pi i a $ ? I am getting: $f(x+2 pi i ) = frace^axe^2 pi i1+e^xe^2 pi i $
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 25 at 21:01











  • $begingroup$
    That's not correct in the numerator - recall that the $+2pi i$ gets multiplied by $a$ too. In the denominator - what's $e^2pi i$?
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    Off course! $e^2 pi i$ is just $1$. And i see my mistake in the denominator. So with your help i can just find the residue, set it equal to the remaining two integrals, use the $f(x + 2 pi i)$ trick to rewrite one of the integral, such that it's equal to the original integral with a front fractor. And lastly isolate the original integral. It works out! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 26 at 10:43
















  • $begingroup$
    Jmerry thank you so much for providing such an in depth answer. I understand the method now and i'm trying to follow along. I really appreciate your help. But how come $f(x+2 pi i ) =f(x) e^2 pi i a $ ? I am getting: $f(x+2 pi i ) = frace^axe^2 pi i1+e^xe^2 pi i $
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 25 at 21:01











  • $begingroup$
    That's not correct in the numerator - recall that the $+2pi i$ gets multiplied by $a$ too. In the denominator - what's $e^2pi i$?
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Mar 25 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    Off course! $e^2 pi i$ is just $1$. And i see my mistake in the denominator. So with your help i can just find the residue, set it equal to the remaining two integrals, use the $f(x + 2 pi i)$ trick to rewrite one of the integral, such that it's equal to the original integral with a front fractor. And lastly isolate the original integral. It works out! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Pernk Dernets
    Mar 26 at 10:43















$begingroup$
Jmerry thank you so much for providing such an in depth answer. I understand the method now and i'm trying to follow along. I really appreciate your help. But how come $f(x+2 pi i ) =f(x) e^2 pi i a $ ? I am getting: $f(x+2 pi i ) = frace^axe^2 pi i1+e^xe^2 pi i $
$endgroup$
– Pernk Dernets
Mar 25 at 21:01





$begingroup$
Jmerry thank you so much for providing such an in depth answer. I understand the method now and i'm trying to follow along. I really appreciate your help. But how come $f(x+2 pi i ) =f(x) e^2 pi i a $ ? I am getting: $f(x+2 pi i ) = frace^axe^2 pi i1+e^xe^2 pi i $
$endgroup$
– Pernk Dernets
Mar 25 at 21:01













$begingroup$
That's not correct in the numerator - recall that the $+2pi i$ gets multiplied by $a$ too. In the denominator - what's $e^2pi i$?
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Mar 25 at 21:04




$begingroup$
That's not correct in the numerator - recall that the $+2pi i$ gets multiplied by $a$ too. In the denominator - what's $e^2pi i$?
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Mar 25 at 21:04












$begingroup$
Off course! $e^2 pi i$ is just $1$. And i see my mistake in the denominator. So with your help i can just find the residue, set it equal to the remaining two integrals, use the $f(x + 2 pi i)$ trick to rewrite one of the integral, such that it's equal to the original integral with a front fractor. And lastly isolate the original integral. It works out! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Pernk Dernets
Mar 26 at 10:43




$begingroup$
Off course! $e^2 pi i$ is just $1$. And i see my mistake in the denominator. So with your help i can just find the residue, set it equal to the remaining two integrals, use the $f(x + 2 pi i)$ trick to rewrite one of the integral, such that it's equal to the original integral with a front fractor. And lastly isolate the original integral. It works out! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Pernk Dernets
Mar 26 at 10:43

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162220%2fsolving-integral-with-complex-path-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye