Confusion about tensor fields taking values in vector fields rather than functions Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)A question about Killing vector and Riemann curvature tensorA question about a definition of Ricci curvatureShow isometry of flow on a compact Riemannian manifold where the vector field is KillingUsing index notation to write $d^2=0$ in terms of a torsion free connection.connection laplacian on general vector bundlesBasic question: Riemannian Curvature is nondegenerateHow to derive the Riemann Curvature Tensor?Curvature tensor for a manifold with torsionWhat comes after the curvature tensor in “higher derivatives”?Relation between the Curvature of a Connection and the Curvature of the Induced Connection on the Frame Bundle
If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"
Simulating Exploding Dice
Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"
Slither Like a Snake
Passing functions in C++
New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff
Two different pronunciation of "понял"
What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?
Limit for e and 1/e
How does modal jazz use chord progressions?
What is the electric potential inside a point charge?
Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?
How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?
Why use gamma over alpha radiation?
Direct Experience of Meditation
How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?
I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign
Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?
Statistical model of ligand substitution
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
Estimate capacitor parameters
Who can trigger ship-wide alerts in Star Trek?
Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?
Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?
Confusion about tensor fields taking values in vector fields rather than functions
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)A question about Killing vector and Riemann curvature tensorA question about a definition of Ricci curvatureShow isometry of flow on a compact Riemannian manifold where the vector field is KillingUsing index notation to write $d^2=0$ in terms of a torsion free connection.connection laplacian on general vector bundlesBasic question: Riemannian Curvature is nondegenerateHow to derive the Riemann Curvature Tensor?Curvature tensor for a manifold with torsionWhat comes after the curvature tensor in “higher derivatives”?Relation between the Curvature of a Connection and the Curvature of the Induced Connection on the Frame Bundle
$begingroup$
I'm beginning with tensorial calculus and I have some questions. Let $(M,g)$ a riemannian manifold with $nabla$ his Levi Civita connection. The curvature tensor $R$ is defined as
beginalign*
R : mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M) &to mathfrakX(M)\
(X,Y,Z) &mapsto R(X,Y)Z
endalign*
where
$$R(X,Y)Z = nabla_X nabla_Y Z - nabla_Y nabla_X Z - nabla_[X,Y]Z.$$
In all books of differential geometry, they said that $R$ is a $(1,3)$ tensor but I don't know why, because a $(1,3)$ tensor is a multilinear map
$$Omega^1(M) times mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M)timesmathfrakX(M) to C^infty(M).$$
I think that I don't understand any concept or because for example, let $X in mathfrakX(M)$, then $nabla X : TM to TM$, $(nabla X)(v_p) = nabla_v_pX$, is a $(1,1)$ tensor field and I don't know why.
$textbfRemark$: $Omega^1(M)$ is the set of all 1-forms, $alpha : M to TM^*$.
differential-geometry tensors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm beginning with tensorial calculus and I have some questions. Let $(M,g)$ a riemannian manifold with $nabla$ his Levi Civita connection. The curvature tensor $R$ is defined as
beginalign*
R : mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M) &to mathfrakX(M)\
(X,Y,Z) &mapsto R(X,Y)Z
endalign*
where
$$R(X,Y)Z = nabla_X nabla_Y Z - nabla_Y nabla_X Z - nabla_[X,Y]Z.$$
In all books of differential geometry, they said that $R$ is a $(1,3)$ tensor but I don't know why, because a $(1,3)$ tensor is a multilinear map
$$Omega^1(M) times mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M)timesmathfrakX(M) to C^infty(M).$$
I think that I don't understand any concept or because for example, let $X in mathfrakX(M)$, then $nabla X : TM to TM$, $(nabla X)(v_p) = nabla_v_pX$, is a $(1,1)$ tensor field and I don't know why.
$textbfRemark$: $Omega^1(M)$ is the set of all 1-forms, $alpha : M to TM^*$.
differential-geometry tensors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm beginning with tensorial calculus and I have some questions. Let $(M,g)$ a riemannian manifold with $nabla$ his Levi Civita connection. The curvature tensor $R$ is defined as
beginalign*
R : mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M) &to mathfrakX(M)\
(X,Y,Z) &mapsto R(X,Y)Z
endalign*
where
$$R(X,Y)Z = nabla_X nabla_Y Z - nabla_Y nabla_X Z - nabla_[X,Y]Z.$$
In all books of differential geometry, they said that $R$ is a $(1,3)$ tensor but I don't know why, because a $(1,3)$ tensor is a multilinear map
$$Omega^1(M) times mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M)timesmathfrakX(M) to C^infty(M).$$
I think that I don't understand any concept or because for example, let $X in mathfrakX(M)$, then $nabla X : TM to TM$, $(nabla X)(v_p) = nabla_v_pX$, is a $(1,1)$ tensor field and I don't know why.
$textbfRemark$: $Omega^1(M)$ is the set of all 1-forms, $alpha : M to TM^*$.
differential-geometry tensors
$endgroup$
I'm beginning with tensorial calculus and I have some questions. Let $(M,g)$ a riemannian manifold with $nabla$ his Levi Civita connection. The curvature tensor $R$ is defined as
beginalign*
R : mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M) &to mathfrakX(M)\
(X,Y,Z) &mapsto R(X,Y)Z
endalign*
where
$$R(X,Y)Z = nabla_X nabla_Y Z - nabla_Y nabla_X Z - nabla_[X,Y]Z.$$
In all books of differential geometry, they said that $R$ is a $(1,3)$ tensor but I don't know why, because a $(1,3)$ tensor is a multilinear map
$$Omega^1(M) times mathfrakX(M) times mathfrakX(M)timesmathfrakX(M) to C^infty(M).$$
I think that I don't understand any concept or because for example, let $X in mathfrakX(M)$, then $nabla X : TM to TM$, $(nabla X)(v_p) = nabla_v_pX$, is a $(1,1)$ tensor field and I don't know why.
$textbfRemark$: $Omega^1(M)$ is the set of all 1-forms, $alpha : M to TM^*$.
differential-geometry tensors
differential-geometry tensors
edited Mar 25 at 19:19
Michael Albanese
64.8k1599315
64.8k1599315
asked Mar 25 at 18:58
hal97hal97
907
907
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A $(p, q)$-tensor field on a smooth manifold $M$ is a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$.
Given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to mathfrakX(M)$, there is an associated $(p + 1, q)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^p+1timesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(beta, alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q) := beta(S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q)).$$
Likewise, given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to Omega^1(M)$, there is an associated $(p, q + 1)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q+1 to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, Y, X_1, dots, X_q) := (S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q))(Y).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162188%2fconfusion-about-tensor-fields-taking-values-in-vector-fields-rather-than-functio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A $(p, q)$-tensor field on a smooth manifold $M$ is a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$.
Given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to mathfrakX(M)$, there is an associated $(p + 1, q)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^p+1timesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(beta, alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q) := beta(S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q)).$$
Likewise, given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to Omega^1(M)$, there is an associated $(p, q + 1)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q+1 to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, Y, X_1, dots, X_q) := (S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q))(Y).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A $(p, q)$-tensor field on a smooth manifold $M$ is a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$.
Given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to mathfrakX(M)$, there is an associated $(p + 1, q)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^p+1timesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(beta, alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q) := beta(S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q)).$$
Likewise, given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to Omega^1(M)$, there is an associated $(p, q + 1)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q+1 to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, Y, X_1, dots, X_q) := (S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q))(Y).$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A $(p, q)$-tensor field on a smooth manifold $M$ is a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$.
Given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to mathfrakX(M)$, there is an associated $(p + 1, q)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^p+1timesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(beta, alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q) := beta(S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q)).$$
Likewise, given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to Omega^1(M)$, there is an associated $(p, q + 1)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q+1 to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, Y, X_1, dots, X_q) := (S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q))(Y).$$
$endgroup$
A $(p, q)$-tensor field on a smooth manifold $M$ is a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$.
Given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to mathfrakX(M)$, there is an associated $(p + 1, q)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^p+1timesmathfrakX(M)^q to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(beta, alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q) := beta(S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q)).$$
Likewise, given a $C^infty(M)$-multilinear map $S : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q to Omega^1(M)$, there is an associated $(p, q + 1)$-tensor field $T : Omega^1(M)^ptimesmathfrakX(M)^q+1 to C^infty(M)$ defined by
$$T(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, Y, X_1, dots, X_q) := (S(alpha^1, dots, alpha^p, X_1, dots, X_q))(Y).$$
answered Mar 25 at 19:19
Michael AlbaneseMichael Albanese
64.8k1599315
64.8k1599315
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162188%2fconfusion-about-tensor-fields-taking-values-in-vector-fields-rather-than-functio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown