Show that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMaximal ideals in a subring of the field of fractionsLet $M$ be a maximal ideal in $R$ such that for all $xin M$, $x+1$ is a unit. Show that $R$ is a local ring with maximal ideal $M$Unique maximal ideal implies set of non-units is an idealOn rings with a unique maximal idealA Commutative Ring Having a Unique Prime Ideal (Dummit and Foote, Prob 7.4.40(i))how can I prove that $D^-1R$ has a unique maximal ideal?Local Ring with an another definitionShow that the Group Ring $F_p[G]$ where $G$ is a $p$-Group has a unique maximal ideal.Every maximal ideal is a prime idealSome details about $boldsymbolR_P$ has a unique maximal ideal proveProve that a given set is the unique maximal ideal of R
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?
Straighten subgroup lattice
Can there be female White Walkers?
What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?
How to type a long/em dash `—`
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
Ubuntu Server install with full GUI
A word that means fill it to the required quantity
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Match Roman Numerals
What is this business jet?
How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?
The phrase "to the numbers born"?
Falsification in Math vs Science
How to translate "being like"?
Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?
How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?
Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)
Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation
Loose spokes after only a few rides
Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)
Show that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMaximal ideals in a subring of the field of fractionsLet $M$ be a maximal ideal in $R$ such that for all $xin M$, $x+1$ is a unit. Show that $R$ is a local ring with maximal ideal $M$Unique maximal ideal implies set of non-units is an idealOn rings with a unique maximal idealA Commutative Ring Having a Unique Prime Ideal (Dummit and Foote, Prob 7.4.40(i))how can I prove that $D^-1R$ has a unique maximal ideal?Local Ring with an another definitionShow that the Group Ring $F_p[G]$ where $G$ is a $p$-Group has a unique maximal ideal.Every maximal ideal is a prime idealSome details about $boldsymbolR_P$ has a unique maximal ideal proveProve that a given set is the unique maximal ideal of R
$begingroup$
Problem is:
Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $P$ be a prime ideal.
(a) Prove that the set of non-units in $R_P$ is the ideal $P_P$.
(b) Deduce that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal.
I tried (a) as:
Let $u$
be a non-unit in $R_p$
and $p$
be any elements in $R_p.$
Then, since $u$
is not unit, $upneq1$
and $puneq1.$
Suppose that $up$
or $pu$
is a unit in $R_p.$
Then there exists $q$
such that, say, $upq=1.$
Then $u(pq)=1.$
So, $u$
is a unit in $R_p.$
This is contradiction. So, the set of non-units in $R_p$
is an ideal in $R_P.$
So, I have to show that the set of non-units is equal to $P_P$ and (b)
But I am stuck at this point.
abstract-algebra ring-theory localization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem is:
Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $P$ be a prime ideal.
(a) Prove that the set of non-units in $R_P$ is the ideal $P_P$.
(b) Deduce that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal.
I tried (a) as:
Let $u$
be a non-unit in $R_p$
and $p$
be any elements in $R_p.$
Then, since $u$
is not unit, $upneq1$
and $puneq1.$
Suppose that $up$
or $pu$
is a unit in $R_p.$
Then there exists $q$
such that, say, $upq=1.$
Then $u(pq)=1.$
So, $u$
is a unit in $R_p.$
This is contradiction. So, the set of non-units in $R_p$
is an ideal in $R_P.$
So, I have to show that the set of non-units is equal to $P_P$ and (b)
But I am stuck at this point.
abstract-algebra ring-theory localization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem is:
Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $P$ be a prime ideal.
(a) Prove that the set of non-units in $R_P$ is the ideal $P_P$.
(b) Deduce that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal.
I tried (a) as:
Let $u$
be a non-unit in $R_p$
and $p$
be any elements in $R_p.$
Then, since $u$
is not unit, $upneq1$
and $puneq1.$
Suppose that $up$
or $pu$
is a unit in $R_p.$
Then there exists $q$
such that, say, $upq=1.$
Then $u(pq)=1.$
So, $u$
is a unit in $R_p.$
This is contradiction. So, the set of non-units in $R_p$
is an ideal in $R_P.$
So, I have to show that the set of non-units is equal to $P_P$ and (b)
But I am stuck at this point.
abstract-algebra ring-theory localization
$endgroup$
Problem is:
Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $P$ be a prime ideal.
(a) Prove that the set of non-units in $R_P$ is the ideal $P_P$.
(b) Deduce that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal.
I tried (a) as:
Let $u$
be a non-unit in $R_p$
and $p$
be any elements in $R_p.$
Then, since $u$
is not unit, $upneq1$
and $puneq1.$
Suppose that $up$
or $pu$
is a unit in $R_p.$
Then there exists $q$
such that, say, $upq=1.$
Then $u(pq)=1.$
So, $u$
is a unit in $R_p.$
This is contradiction. So, the set of non-units in $R_p$
is an ideal in $R_P.$
So, I have to show that the set of non-units is equal to $P_P$ and (b)
But I am stuck at this point.
abstract-algebra ring-theory localization
abstract-algebra ring-theory localization
edited Jun 13 '16 at 9:49
user 1
6,02682244
6,02682244
asked Jun 10 '16 at 18:06
Darae-UriDarae-Uri
45529
45529
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The ideal $P_P$ is
$$
P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
$$
Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
$$
fracasfracxt=frac11
$$
By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.
On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.
Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:16
$begingroup$
it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:17
$begingroup$
@user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:34
$begingroup$
not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,
$M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$
$M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.
$M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):

It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$
On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$
For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1821264%2fshow-that-r-p-has-a-unique-maximal-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The ideal $P_P$ is
$$
P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
$$
Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
$$
fracasfracxt=frac11
$$
By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.
On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.
Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:16
$begingroup$
it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:17
$begingroup$
@user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:34
$begingroup$
not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The ideal $P_P$ is
$$
P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
$$
Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
$$
fracasfracxt=frac11
$$
By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.
On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.
Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:16
$begingroup$
it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:17
$begingroup$
@user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:34
$begingroup$
not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The ideal $P_P$ is
$$
P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
$$
Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
$$
fracasfracxt=frac11
$$
By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.
On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.
Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.
$endgroup$
The ideal $P_P$ is
$$
P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
$$
Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
$$
fracasfracxt=frac11
$$
By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.
On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.
Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.
answered Jun 11 '16 at 9:51
egregegreg
186k1486208
186k1486208
$begingroup$
Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:16
$begingroup$
it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:17
$begingroup$
@user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:34
$begingroup$
not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:16
$begingroup$
it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:17
$begingroup$
@user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:34
$begingroup$
not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:36
$begingroup$
Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:06
$begingroup$
Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:16
$begingroup$
@user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:16
$begingroup$
it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:17
$begingroup$
it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:17
$begingroup$
@user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:34
$begingroup$
@user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jun 13 '16 at 14:34
$begingroup$
not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:36
$begingroup$
not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
$endgroup$
– user 1
Jun 13 '16 at 14:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,
$M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$
$M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.
$M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,
$M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$
$M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.
$M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,
$M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$
$M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.
$M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.
$endgroup$
Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,
$M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$
$M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.
$M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.
answered Jun 10 '16 at 18:32
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
60.4k11446
60.4k11446
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):

It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$
On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$
For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):

It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$
On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$
For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):

It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$
On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$
For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).
$endgroup$
Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):

It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$
On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$
For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).
edited Jan 23 '17 at 17:56
answered Jun 11 '16 at 8:18
user 1user 1
6,02682244
6,02682244
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1821264%2fshow-that-r-p-has-a-unique-maximal-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown