Show that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMaximal ideals in a subring of the field of fractionsLet $M$ be a maximal ideal in $R$ such that for all $xin M$, $x+1$ is a unit. Show that $R$ is a local ring with maximal ideal $M$Unique maximal ideal implies set of non-units is an idealOn rings with a unique maximal idealA Commutative Ring Having a Unique Prime Ideal (Dummit and Foote, Prob 7.4.40(i))how can I prove that $D^-1R$ has a unique maximal ideal?Local Ring with an another definitionShow that the Group Ring $F_p[G]$ where $G$ is a $p$-Group has a unique maximal ideal.Every maximal ideal is a prime idealSome details about $boldsymbolR_P$ has a unique maximal ideal proveProve that a given set is the unique maximal ideal of R

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?

Straighten subgroup lattice

Can there be female White Walkers?

What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Match Roman Numerals

What is this business jet?

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

The phrase "to the numbers born"?

Falsification in Math vs Science

How to translate "being like"?

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)



Show that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMaximal ideals in a subring of the field of fractionsLet $M$ be a maximal ideal in $R$ such that for all $xin M$, $x+1$ is a unit. Show that $R$ is a local ring with maximal ideal $M$Unique maximal ideal implies set of non-units is an idealOn rings with a unique maximal idealA Commutative Ring Having a Unique Prime Ideal (Dummit and Foote, Prob 7.4.40(i))how can I prove that $D^-1R$ has a unique maximal ideal?Local Ring with an another definitionShow that the Group Ring $F_p[G]$ where $G$ is a $p$-Group has a unique maximal ideal.Every maximal ideal is a prime idealSome details about $boldsymbolR_P$ has a unique maximal ideal proveProve that a given set is the unique maximal ideal of R










2












$begingroup$


Problem is:




Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $P$ be a prime ideal.



(a) Prove that the set of non-units in $R_P$ is the ideal $P_P$.



(b) Deduce that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal.




I tried (a) as:



Let $u$
be a non-unit in $R_p$
and $p$
be any elements in $R_p.$
Then, since $u$
is not unit, $upneq1$
and $puneq1.$
Suppose that $up$
or $pu$
is a unit in $R_p.$
Then there exists $q$
such that, say, $upq=1.$
Then $u(pq)=1.$
So, $u$
is a unit in $R_p.$
This is contradiction. So, the set of non-units in $R_p$
is an ideal in $R_P.$



So, I have to show that the set of non-units is equal to $P_P$ and (b)



But I am stuck at this point.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Problem is:




    Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $P$ be a prime ideal.



    (a) Prove that the set of non-units in $R_P$ is the ideal $P_P$.



    (b) Deduce that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal.




    I tried (a) as:



    Let $u$
    be a non-unit in $R_p$
    and $p$
    be any elements in $R_p.$
    Then, since $u$
    is not unit, $upneq1$
    and $puneq1.$
    Suppose that $up$
    or $pu$
    is a unit in $R_p.$
    Then there exists $q$
    such that, say, $upq=1.$
    Then $u(pq)=1.$
    So, $u$
    is a unit in $R_p.$
    This is contradiction. So, the set of non-units in $R_p$
    is an ideal in $R_P.$



    So, I have to show that the set of non-units is equal to $P_P$ and (b)



    But I am stuck at this point.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      Problem is:




      Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $P$ be a prime ideal.



      (a) Prove that the set of non-units in $R_P$ is the ideal $P_P$.



      (b) Deduce that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal.




      I tried (a) as:



      Let $u$
      be a non-unit in $R_p$
      and $p$
      be any elements in $R_p.$
      Then, since $u$
      is not unit, $upneq1$
      and $puneq1.$
      Suppose that $up$
      or $pu$
      is a unit in $R_p.$
      Then there exists $q$
      such that, say, $upq=1.$
      Then $u(pq)=1.$
      So, $u$
      is a unit in $R_p.$
      This is contradiction. So, the set of non-units in $R_p$
      is an ideal in $R_P.$



      So, I have to show that the set of non-units is equal to $P_P$ and (b)



      But I am stuck at this point.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Problem is:




      Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $P$ be a prime ideal.



      (a) Prove that the set of non-units in $R_P$ is the ideal $P_P$.



      (b) Deduce that $R_P$ has a unique maximal ideal.




      I tried (a) as:



      Let $u$
      be a non-unit in $R_p$
      and $p$
      be any elements in $R_p.$
      Then, since $u$
      is not unit, $upneq1$
      and $puneq1.$
      Suppose that $up$
      or $pu$
      is a unit in $R_p.$
      Then there exists $q$
      such that, say, $upq=1.$
      Then $u(pq)=1.$
      So, $u$
      is a unit in $R_p.$
      This is contradiction. So, the set of non-units in $R_p$
      is an ideal in $R_P.$



      So, I have to show that the set of non-units is equal to $P_P$ and (b)



      But I am stuck at this point.







      abstract-algebra ring-theory localization






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jun 13 '16 at 9:49









      user 1

      6,02682244




      6,02682244










      asked Jun 10 '16 at 18:06









      Darae-UriDarae-Uri

      45529




      45529




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          The ideal $P_P$ is
          $$
          P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
          $$
          Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
          $$
          fracasfracxt=frac11
          $$
          By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.



          On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.



          Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
            $endgroup$
            – user 1
            Jun 13 '16 at 14:06










          • $begingroup$
            @user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
            $endgroup$
            – egreg
            Jun 13 '16 at 14:16











          • $begingroup$
            it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
            $endgroup$
            – user 1
            Jun 13 '16 at 14:17










          • $begingroup$
            @user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
            $endgroup$
            – egreg
            Jun 13 '16 at 14:34











          • $begingroup$
            not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
            $endgroup$
            – user 1
            Jun 13 '16 at 14:36


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,



          $M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$



          $M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.



          $M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            -2












            $begingroup$

            Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):



            enter image description here



            It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
            Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$

            On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$



            For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1821264%2fshow-that-r-p-has-a-unique-maximal-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              The ideal $P_P$ is
              $$
              P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
              $$
              Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
              $$
              fracasfracxt=frac11
              $$
              By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.



              On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.



              Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:06










              • $begingroup$
                @user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
                $endgroup$
                – egreg
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:16











              • $begingroup$
                it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:17










              • $begingroup$
                @user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
                $endgroup$
                – egreg
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:34











              • $begingroup$
                not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:36















              4












              $begingroup$

              The ideal $P_P$ is
              $$
              P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
              $$
              Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
              $$
              fracasfracxt=frac11
              $$
              By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.



              On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.



              Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:06










              • $begingroup$
                @user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
                $endgroup$
                – egreg
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:16











              • $begingroup$
                it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:17










              • $begingroup$
                @user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
                $endgroup$
                – egreg
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:34











              • $begingroup$
                not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:36













              4












              4








              4





              $begingroup$

              The ideal $P_P$ is
              $$
              P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
              $$
              Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
              $$
              fracasfracxt=frac11
              $$
              By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.



              On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.



              Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              The ideal $P_P$ is
              $$
              P_P=leftfracas: ain P, sin Rsetminus Pright
              $$
              Let's prove that no element of $P_P$ is a unit. Suppose $ain P$, $sin S=Rsetminus P$, $xin R$ and $tin S$ be such that
              $$
              fracasfracxt=frac11
              $$
              By definition there exists $uin S$ with $u(ax-st)=0$ or $uax=ust$. This is a contradiction because $uaxin P$, but $ustin S$.



              On the other hand, every element of $R_P$ not in $P_P$ is a unit. Indeed, if $a/snotin P_P$, we have $anotin P$, so $(a/s)^-1=s/a$.



              Therefore the set of nonunits is an ideal and the ring is local, by general results. The maximal ideal is the set of nonunits, which we proved to be $P_P$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Jun 11 '16 at 9:51









              egregegreg

              186k1486208




              186k1486208











              • $begingroup$
                Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:06










              • $begingroup$
                @user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
                $endgroup$
                – egreg
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:16











              • $begingroup$
                it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:17










              • $begingroup$
                @user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
                $endgroup$
                – egreg
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:34











              • $begingroup$
                not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:36
















              • $begingroup$
                Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:06










              • $begingroup$
                @user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
                $endgroup$
                – egreg
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:16











              • $begingroup$
                it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:17










              • $begingroup$
                @user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
                $endgroup$
                – egreg
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:34











              • $begingroup$
                not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
                $endgroup$
                – user 1
                Jun 13 '16 at 14:36















              $begingroup$
              Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
              $endgroup$
              – user 1
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:06




              $begingroup$
              Which is the same argument in the picture I gave one hour ago :)
              $endgroup$
              – user 1
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:06












              $begingroup$
              @user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
              $endgroup$
              – egreg
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:16





              $begingroup$
              @user1 Basically so; but I redid it without looking in a book. By the way, I'm unsure adding a picture of a book is not a copyright violation. Of course, the general argument is folklore and not subject to copyright.
              $endgroup$
              – egreg
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:16













              $begingroup$
              it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
              $endgroup$
              – user 1
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:17




              $begingroup$
              it is not copyright violation. it is from google books.
              $endgroup$
              – user 1
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:17












              $begingroup$
              @user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
              $endgroup$
              – egreg
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:34





              $begingroup$
              @user1 Do you think that all books on that site are free? You're wrong.
              $endgroup$
              – egreg
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:34













              $begingroup$
              not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
              $endgroup$
              – user 1
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:36




              $begingroup$
              not the book, but parts of it. BTW do you think an snapshot of (half of) a page is copyright violation?
              $endgroup$
              – user 1
              Jun 13 '16 at 14:36











              0












              $begingroup$

              Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,



              $M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$



              $M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.



              $M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,



                $M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$



                $M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.



                $M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,



                  $M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$



                  $M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.



                  $M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Let $xin R$, denote by $[x]$ the class of $x$ in $R_P$, let $[M]=[p],pin P$,



                  $M$ is an ideal, if $[x],[y]in in M, [z]in R_P$ $[x]+[y]=[x+y]in M$, $[zx]in M$ since $x+y, zxin P$



                  $M$ is distinct of $R_P$, suppose $1in M$, this implies $1=pin P$ impossible since $P$ is an ideal.



                  $M$ is maximal. Let $N$ an ideal which contains strictly $M$, there exists $[s]in N$, $[s]$ is not in $M$ this implies $sin R-P$ thus $[s]$ is invertible and $1in N$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jun 10 '16 at 18:32









                  Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

                  60.4k11446




                  60.4k11446





















                      -2












                      $begingroup$

                      Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):



                      enter image description here



                      It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
                      Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$

                      On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$



                      For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        -2












                        $begingroup$

                        Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):



                        enter image description here



                        It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
                        Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$

                        On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$



                        For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          -2












                          -2








                          -2





                          $begingroup$

                          Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):



                          enter image description here



                          It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
                          Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$

                          On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$



                          For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          Part (a) is Lemma 5.20 of the Sharp's book, "Steps in Commutative Algebra" (page 89):



                          enter image description here



                          It is easy to see that $I$ is an ideal of $R_P$.
                          Sharp proves that $R_psetminus I$ is the set of units. One direction is easy: for any $a/snotin I,$ one has $ain S$, so $dfracasdfracsa=dfrac11.$

                          On the other hand, if $b/t$ is a unit, say $dfracbtdfraccv=dfrac11,$ then there exists $win S$ such that $wbc=wtvin Rsetminus P.$ Hence $bnotin P,$ which means $b/tnotin I.$



                          For part (b), note that a ring is local if and only if the set of non-units of the ring is an ideal (this is lemma 3.13 of the book).







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Jan 23 '17 at 17:56

























                          answered Jun 11 '16 at 8:18









                          user 1user 1

                          6,02682244




                          6,02682244



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1821264%2fshow-that-r-p-has-a-unique-maximal-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                              Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

                              Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576