Is a union of closures of cells in a CW complex closed? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShowing that $bigcap_n=1^inftyV_nneq emptyset$A topological space is extremally disconnected iff every two disjoint open sets have disjoint closuresWhat does the closure of a subset of a CW-complex look like? Like this?Every n-cell of an n-dimensional CW complex is open.Closure of Union contains Union of ClosuresIs a limit point in a sequential space the limit of some sequence?Why is closure finiteness necessary in this proof that every $n$-cell of an $n$-dimensional CW complex is open?$X$ is normal if and only if $Asubseteq U$ implies there exists $V$ such that $Asubseteq VsubseteqoverlineVsubseteq U$Closed Subspace of a Normal Topological Space is NormalIs a bouquet of circles always a CW complex?
How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?
APIPA and LAN Broadcast Domain
Why does the nucleus not repel itself?
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
How to display lines in a file like ls displays files in a directory?
Geography at the pixel level
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
How come people say “Would of”?
Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?
Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?
Can I have a signal generator on while it's not connected?
The phrase "to the numbers born"?
Match Roman Numerals
I am an eight letter word. What am I?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
Can there be female White Walkers?
Ubuntu Server install with full GUI
Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)
Is a union of closures of cells in a CW complex closed?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShowing that $bigcap_n=1^inftyV_nneq emptyset$A topological space is extremally disconnected iff every two disjoint open sets have disjoint closuresWhat does the closure of a subset of a CW-complex look like? Like this?Every n-cell of an n-dimensional CW complex is open.Closure of Union contains Union of ClosuresIs a limit point in a sequential space the limit of some sequence?Why is closure finiteness necessary in this proof that every $n$-cell of an $n$-dimensional CW complex is open?$X$ is normal if and only if $Asubseteq U$ implies there exists $V$ such that $Asubseteq VsubseteqoverlineVsubseteq U$Closed Subspace of a Normal Topological Space is NormalIs a bouquet of circles always a CW complex?
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a CW complex with cell-partition $mathcalC subset mathcalP(X)$, and $mathcalD subset mathcalC$. Is $A = bigcup overlineD(X) : D in mathcalD$ closed in $X$, where $overlineD(X)$ is the closure of $D$ in $X$?
I think I can prove the result when $X$ is first-countable as follows. Suppose $A$ is not closed in $X$. Let $x in overlineA(X) setminus A$. Since $X$ is first-countable, there exists a decreasing neighborhood basis $(U_n in mathcalT_X(x) : n in mathbbN)$ at $x$, where $mathcalT_X(x)$ is the set of neighborhoods of $x$. Let $D_n in mathcalD$ be such that $D_n cap U_n neq emptyset$ and $D_n cap bigcup overlineD_m(X) : m < n = emptyset$. Let $x_n in D_n$. Then $x_n to x$. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, $x_n = overlineD_n(X) cap x_n$ is closed in $overlineD_n(X)$. Since $mathcalT_X$ is coherent with $mathcalC$, $B = x_n : n in mathbbN$ is closed in $X$, which contradicts $x in overlineB(X) setminus B$.
Can this result be proved without assuming first-countability?
EDIT: Seems like the proof above is incomplete. It should also show that $overlineC(X) cap B$ is closed in $X$ for all $C in mathcalC setminus mathcalD$. Following Eric's suggestion below, since $X$ is closure-finite, $overlineC(X)$ intersects only finitely many cells in $mathcalD$, which means $overlineC(X) cap B$ is finite and so closed in $overlineC(X)$. After this, coherence can be applied, which completes the proof.
POST-ACCEPT EDIT: This result is also true for normal CW complexes, which is where the closure of each cell is a sub-complex. This is because sub-complexes are closed under arbitrary unions and intersections. The counter-example given in the accepted answer is neither locally finite or normal, as required. This and other results can be found from the book "The Topology of CW Complexes".
general-topology algebraic-topology cw-complexes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a CW complex with cell-partition $mathcalC subset mathcalP(X)$, and $mathcalD subset mathcalC$. Is $A = bigcup overlineD(X) : D in mathcalD$ closed in $X$, where $overlineD(X)$ is the closure of $D$ in $X$?
I think I can prove the result when $X$ is first-countable as follows. Suppose $A$ is not closed in $X$. Let $x in overlineA(X) setminus A$. Since $X$ is first-countable, there exists a decreasing neighborhood basis $(U_n in mathcalT_X(x) : n in mathbbN)$ at $x$, where $mathcalT_X(x)$ is the set of neighborhoods of $x$. Let $D_n in mathcalD$ be such that $D_n cap U_n neq emptyset$ and $D_n cap bigcup overlineD_m(X) : m < n = emptyset$. Let $x_n in D_n$. Then $x_n to x$. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, $x_n = overlineD_n(X) cap x_n$ is closed in $overlineD_n(X)$. Since $mathcalT_X$ is coherent with $mathcalC$, $B = x_n : n in mathbbN$ is closed in $X$, which contradicts $x in overlineB(X) setminus B$.
Can this result be proved without assuming first-countability?
EDIT: Seems like the proof above is incomplete. It should also show that $overlineC(X) cap B$ is closed in $X$ for all $C in mathcalC setminus mathcalD$. Following Eric's suggestion below, since $X$ is closure-finite, $overlineC(X)$ intersects only finitely many cells in $mathcalD$, which means $overlineC(X) cap B$ is finite and so closed in $overlineC(X)$. After this, coherence can be applied, which completes the proof.
POST-ACCEPT EDIT: This result is also true for normal CW complexes, which is where the closure of each cell is a sub-complex. This is because sub-complexes are closed under arbitrary unions and intersections. The counter-example given in the accepted answer is neither locally finite or normal, as required. This and other results can be found from the book "The Topology of CW Complexes".
general-topology algebraic-topology cw-complexes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a CW complex with cell-partition $mathcalC subset mathcalP(X)$, and $mathcalD subset mathcalC$. Is $A = bigcup overlineD(X) : D in mathcalD$ closed in $X$, where $overlineD(X)$ is the closure of $D$ in $X$?
I think I can prove the result when $X$ is first-countable as follows. Suppose $A$ is not closed in $X$. Let $x in overlineA(X) setminus A$. Since $X$ is first-countable, there exists a decreasing neighborhood basis $(U_n in mathcalT_X(x) : n in mathbbN)$ at $x$, where $mathcalT_X(x)$ is the set of neighborhoods of $x$. Let $D_n in mathcalD$ be such that $D_n cap U_n neq emptyset$ and $D_n cap bigcup overlineD_m(X) : m < n = emptyset$. Let $x_n in D_n$. Then $x_n to x$. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, $x_n = overlineD_n(X) cap x_n$ is closed in $overlineD_n(X)$. Since $mathcalT_X$ is coherent with $mathcalC$, $B = x_n : n in mathbbN$ is closed in $X$, which contradicts $x in overlineB(X) setminus B$.
Can this result be proved without assuming first-countability?
EDIT: Seems like the proof above is incomplete. It should also show that $overlineC(X) cap B$ is closed in $X$ for all $C in mathcalC setminus mathcalD$. Following Eric's suggestion below, since $X$ is closure-finite, $overlineC(X)$ intersects only finitely many cells in $mathcalD$, which means $overlineC(X) cap B$ is finite and so closed in $overlineC(X)$. After this, coherence can be applied, which completes the proof.
POST-ACCEPT EDIT: This result is also true for normal CW complexes, which is where the closure of each cell is a sub-complex. This is because sub-complexes are closed under arbitrary unions and intersections. The counter-example given in the accepted answer is neither locally finite or normal, as required. This and other results can be found from the book "The Topology of CW Complexes".
general-topology algebraic-topology cw-complexes
$endgroup$
Let $X$ be a CW complex with cell-partition $mathcalC subset mathcalP(X)$, and $mathcalD subset mathcalC$. Is $A = bigcup overlineD(X) : D in mathcalD$ closed in $X$, where $overlineD(X)$ is the closure of $D$ in $X$?
I think I can prove the result when $X$ is first-countable as follows. Suppose $A$ is not closed in $X$. Let $x in overlineA(X) setminus A$. Since $X$ is first-countable, there exists a decreasing neighborhood basis $(U_n in mathcalT_X(x) : n in mathbbN)$ at $x$, where $mathcalT_X(x)$ is the set of neighborhoods of $x$. Let $D_n in mathcalD$ be such that $D_n cap U_n neq emptyset$ and $D_n cap bigcup overlineD_m(X) : m < n = emptyset$. Let $x_n in D_n$. Then $x_n to x$. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, $x_n = overlineD_n(X) cap x_n$ is closed in $overlineD_n(X)$. Since $mathcalT_X$ is coherent with $mathcalC$, $B = x_n : n in mathbbN$ is closed in $X$, which contradicts $x in overlineB(X) setminus B$.
Can this result be proved without assuming first-countability?
EDIT: Seems like the proof above is incomplete. It should also show that $overlineC(X) cap B$ is closed in $X$ for all $C in mathcalC setminus mathcalD$. Following Eric's suggestion below, since $X$ is closure-finite, $overlineC(X)$ intersects only finitely many cells in $mathcalD$, which means $overlineC(X) cap B$ is finite and so closed in $overlineC(X)$. After this, coherence can be applied, which completes the proof.
POST-ACCEPT EDIT: This result is also true for normal CW complexes, which is where the closure of each cell is a sub-complex. This is because sub-complexes are closed under arbitrary unions and intersections. The counter-example given in the accepted answer is neither locally finite or normal, as required. This and other results can be found from the book "The Topology of CW Complexes".
general-topology algebraic-topology cw-complexes
general-topology algebraic-topology cw-complexes
edited Mar 30 at 6:29
kaba
asked Mar 24 at 5:26
kabakaba
27417
27417
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is not true in general. For instance, let $Asubset S^1$ be any non-closed subset. For each $ain A$, attach a $2$-cell to $S^1$ via the constant map $S^1to S^1$ with value $a$ and let $X$ be the resulting CW complex. Then the union of the closures of all the $2$-cells in $X$ is not closed, since its intersection with $S^1$ is $A$.
(Incidentally, your proof in the first-countable case is not quite correct, since you have not actually shown that $B$ has closed intersection with each closed cell; you only checked this for the cells $D_n$. To prove it for an arbitrary closed cell, you need to use the fact that a closed cell can only intersect finitely many of the $D_n$.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice. Never thought the possibility of having a dense set of vertices.
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 24 at 6:18
1
$begingroup$
The points in the set $A$ are not all vertices of the CW complex, i.e. they are not all points in the $0$-skeleton. The 1-skeleton in this example is $S^1$, and it has only finitely many vertices. The definition of a CW complex allows a 2-cell attaching map for this example to be an arbitrary continuous function from $S^1$ to the $1$-skeleton, even a constant function whose image is not a vertex.
$endgroup$
– Lee Mosher
Mar 24 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@LeeMosher I see the 2-cells are non-normal cells (whose closure is not a subcomplex). Thanks for that!
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 25 at 5:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160139%2fis-a-union-of-closures-of-cells-in-a-cw-complex-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is not true in general. For instance, let $Asubset S^1$ be any non-closed subset. For each $ain A$, attach a $2$-cell to $S^1$ via the constant map $S^1to S^1$ with value $a$ and let $X$ be the resulting CW complex. Then the union of the closures of all the $2$-cells in $X$ is not closed, since its intersection with $S^1$ is $A$.
(Incidentally, your proof in the first-countable case is not quite correct, since you have not actually shown that $B$ has closed intersection with each closed cell; you only checked this for the cells $D_n$. To prove it for an arbitrary closed cell, you need to use the fact that a closed cell can only intersect finitely many of the $D_n$.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice. Never thought the possibility of having a dense set of vertices.
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 24 at 6:18
1
$begingroup$
The points in the set $A$ are not all vertices of the CW complex, i.e. they are not all points in the $0$-skeleton. The 1-skeleton in this example is $S^1$, and it has only finitely many vertices. The definition of a CW complex allows a 2-cell attaching map for this example to be an arbitrary continuous function from $S^1$ to the $1$-skeleton, even a constant function whose image is not a vertex.
$endgroup$
– Lee Mosher
Mar 24 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@LeeMosher I see the 2-cells are non-normal cells (whose closure is not a subcomplex). Thanks for that!
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 25 at 5:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is not true in general. For instance, let $Asubset S^1$ be any non-closed subset. For each $ain A$, attach a $2$-cell to $S^1$ via the constant map $S^1to S^1$ with value $a$ and let $X$ be the resulting CW complex. Then the union of the closures of all the $2$-cells in $X$ is not closed, since its intersection with $S^1$ is $A$.
(Incidentally, your proof in the first-countable case is not quite correct, since you have not actually shown that $B$ has closed intersection with each closed cell; you only checked this for the cells $D_n$. To prove it for an arbitrary closed cell, you need to use the fact that a closed cell can only intersect finitely many of the $D_n$.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very nice. Never thought the possibility of having a dense set of vertices.
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 24 at 6:18
1
$begingroup$
The points in the set $A$ are not all vertices of the CW complex, i.e. they are not all points in the $0$-skeleton. The 1-skeleton in this example is $S^1$, and it has only finitely many vertices. The definition of a CW complex allows a 2-cell attaching map for this example to be an arbitrary continuous function from $S^1$ to the $1$-skeleton, even a constant function whose image is not a vertex.
$endgroup$
– Lee Mosher
Mar 24 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@LeeMosher I see the 2-cells are non-normal cells (whose closure is not a subcomplex). Thanks for that!
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 25 at 5:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is not true in general. For instance, let $Asubset S^1$ be any non-closed subset. For each $ain A$, attach a $2$-cell to $S^1$ via the constant map $S^1to S^1$ with value $a$ and let $X$ be the resulting CW complex. Then the union of the closures of all the $2$-cells in $X$ is not closed, since its intersection with $S^1$ is $A$.
(Incidentally, your proof in the first-countable case is not quite correct, since you have not actually shown that $B$ has closed intersection with each closed cell; you only checked this for the cells $D_n$. To prove it for an arbitrary closed cell, you need to use the fact that a closed cell can only intersect finitely many of the $D_n$.)
$endgroup$
This is not true in general. For instance, let $Asubset S^1$ be any non-closed subset. For each $ain A$, attach a $2$-cell to $S^1$ via the constant map $S^1to S^1$ with value $a$ and let $X$ be the resulting CW complex. Then the union of the closures of all the $2$-cells in $X$ is not closed, since its intersection with $S^1$ is $A$.
(Incidentally, your proof in the first-countable case is not quite correct, since you have not actually shown that $B$ has closed intersection with each closed cell; you only checked this for the cells $D_n$. To prove it for an arbitrary closed cell, you need to use the fact that a closed cell can only intersect finitely many of the $D_n$.)
answered Mar 24 at 5:53
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
193k14220352
193k14220352
$begingroup$
Very nice. Never thought the possibility of having a dense set of vertices.
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 24 at 6:18
1
$begingroup$
The points in the set $A$ are not all vertices of the CW complex, i.e. they are not all points in the $0$-skeleton. The 1-skeleton in this example is $S^1$, and it has only finitely many vertices. The definition of a CW complex allows a 2-cell attaching map for this example to be an arbitrary continuous function from $S^1$ to the $1$-skeleton, even a constant function whose image is not a vertex.
$endgroup$
– Lee Mosher
Mar 24 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@LeeMosher I see the 2-cells are non-normal cells (whose closure is not a subcomplex). Thanks for that!
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 25 at 5:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Very nice. Never thought the possibility of having a dense set of vertices.
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 24 at 6:18
1
$begingroup$
The points in the set $A$ are not all vertices of the CW complex, i.e. they are not all points in the $0$-skeleton. The 1-skeleton in this example is $S^1$, and it has only finitely many vertices. The definition of a CW complex allows a 2-cell attaching map for this example to be an arbitrary continuous function from $S^1$ to the $1$-skeleton, even a constant function whose image is not a vertex.
$endgroup$
– Lee Mosher
Mar 24 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@LeeMosher I see the 2-cells are non-normal cells (whose closure is not a subcomplex). Thanks for that!
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 25 at 5:13
$begingroup$
Very nice. Never thought the possibility of having a dense set of vertices.
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 24 at 6:18
$begingroup$
Very nice. Never thought the possibility of having a dense set of vertices.
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 24 at 6:18
1
1
$begingroup$
The points in the set $A$ are not all vertices of the CW complex, i.e. they are not all points in the $0$-skeleton. The 1-skeleton in this example is $S^1$, and it has only finitely many vertices. The definition of a CW complex allows a 2-cell attaching map for this example to be an arbitrary continuous function from $S^1$ to the $1$-skeleton, even a constant function whose image is not a vertex.
$endgroup$
– Lee Mosher
Mar 24 at 13:57
$begingroup$
The points in the set $A$ are not all vertices of the CW complex, i.e. they are not all points in the $0$-skeleton. The 1-skeleton in this example is $S^1$, and it has only finitely many vertices. The definition of a CW complex allows a 2-cell attaching map for this example to be an arbitrary continuous function from $S^1$ to the $1$-skeleton, even a constant function whose image is not a vertex.
$endgroup$
– Lee Mosher
Mar 24 at 13:57
$begingroup$
@LeeMosher I see the 2-cells are non-normal cells (whose closure is not a subcomplex). Thanks for that!
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 25 at 5:13
$begingroup$
@LeeMosher I see the 2-cells are non-normal cells (whose closure is not a subcomplex). Thanks for that!
$endgroup$
– kaba
Mar 25 at 5:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160139%2fis-a-union-of-closures-of-cells-in-a-cw-complex-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown