Is “staff” singular or plural? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“England (have/has) been the weaker side…”?I - plural or singular?Is “mathematics” singular or plural?Between + plural or singular?Plural or singular for 'hair'?Is it correct to say “spendings”?Singular or Plural matching?plural-singularThe majority: plural or singularsingular vs plural problem of “profile” in “We first build up a detailed profile of our customers and their requirements.”“The farthest reach” or “the farthest reaches”?

Can an undergraduate be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Is bread bad for ducks?

How do PCB vias affect signal quality?

Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?

Short story: man watches girlfriend's spaceship entering a 'black hole' (?) forever

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

How to quickly solve partial fractions equation?

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Does adding complexity mean a more secure cipher?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?



Is “staff” singular or plural?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“England (have/has) been the weaker side…”?I - plural or singular?Is “mathematics” singular or plural?Between + plural or singular?Plural or singular for 'hair'?Is it correct to say “spendings”?Singular or Plural matching?plural-singularThe majority: plural or singularsingular vs plural problem of “profile” in “We first build up a detailed profile of our customers and their requirements.”“The farthest reach” or “the farthest reaches”?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10















In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 14:57











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    Mar 23 at 20:32


















10















In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 14:57











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    Mar 23 at 20:32














10












10








10


2






In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question
















In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?







singular-vs-plural subject-verb-agreement grammatical-number






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 24 at 6:06









Solomon Ucko

1094




1094










asked Mar 23 at 11:51









oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534




534







  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 14:57











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    Mar 23 at 20:32













  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 14:57











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    Mar 23 at 20:32








3




3





Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

– David K
Mar 23 at 14:57





Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

– David K
Mar 23 at 14:57













BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

– chrylis
Mar 23 at 20:32






BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

– chrylis
Mar 23 at 20:32











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














EDIT



I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



We can correctly say:



When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




Meaning of staff in English
Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
an organization:



There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



There are over a hundred staff in the company.



He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




[ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:36






  • 2





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:46






  • 2





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:49






  • 1





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    Mar 23 at 14:21






  • 1





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 19:58


















7














In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




The staff in this shop are very helpful.







share|improve this answer























  • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 12:38











  • A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    Mar 23 at 12:49











  • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 13:35


















1














In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201939%2fis-staff-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:36






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:46






    • 2





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:49






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      Mar 23 at 14:21






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      Mar 23 at 19:58















    8














    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:36






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:46






    • 2





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:49






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      Mar 23 at 14:21






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      Mar 23 at 19:58













    8












    8








    8







    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer















    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 23 at 14:01

























    answered Mar 23 at 12:00









    chasly from UKchasly from UK

    2,964313




    2,964313







    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:36






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:46






    • 2





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:49






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      Mar 23 at 14:21






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      Mar 23 at 19:58












    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:36






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:46






    • 2





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:49






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      Mar 23 at 14:21






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      Mar 23 at 19:58







    3




    3





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:36





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:36




    2




    2





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:46





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:46




    2




    2





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:49





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:49




    1




    1





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    Mar 23 at 14:21





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    Mar 23 at 14:21




    1




    1





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 19:58





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 19:58













    7














    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer























    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 12:38











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      Mar 23 at 12:49











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 13:35















    7














    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer























    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 12:38











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      Mar 23 at 12:49











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 13:35













    7












    7








    7







    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer













    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 23 at 12:04









    Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

    1,870219




    1,870219












    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 12:38











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      Mar 23 at 12:49











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 13:35

















    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 12:38











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      Mar 23 at 12:49











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 13:35
















    Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 12:38





    Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 12:38













    A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    Mar 23 at 12:49





    A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    Mar 23 at 12:49













    Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 13:35





    Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 13:35











    1














    In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



    It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



      It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



        It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






        share|improve this answer













        In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



        It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 23 at 17:16









        user45266user45266

        1,433116




        1,433116



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201939%2fis-staff-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye