Can I use Seifert-van Kampen theorem infinite times The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InPerturbation trick in the proof of Seifert-van-KampenSeifert-van-Kampen and free product with amalgamationFundamental group via Van KampenHow to use Seifert–van Kampen to find $pi_1( RP^n ∨ RP^n)$Practicing Seifert van KampenRealising Seifert-van Kampen in 2-complexesComputing fundamental group with Seifert-van Kampen theoremChoosing Open Sets in Applying the Seifert-Van Kampen Theorem to Topological space$H_1(F)$ for an orientable, compact, connected surfacehow to calculate the fundamental group using van kampen theorem?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

How to obtain a position of last non-zero element

How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic wars mean?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Output the Arecibo Message

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

What's the name of these plastic connectors

What is the light source in the black hole images?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Falsification in Math vs Science



Can I use Seifert-van Kampen theorem infinite times



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InPerturbation trick in the proof of Seifert-van-KampenSeifert-van-Kampen and free product with amalgamationFundamental group via Van KampenHow to use Seifert–van Kampen to find $pi_1( RP^n ∨ RP^n)$Practicing Seifert van KampenRealising Seifert-van Kampen in 2-complexesComputing fundamental group with Seifert-van Kampen theoremChoosing Open Sets in Applying the Seifert-Van Kampen Theorem to Topological space$H_1(F)$ for an orientable, compact, connected surfacehow to calculate the fundamental group using van kampen theorem?










5












$begingroup$


I know the definition of Seifert-van Kampen theorem for a topological space "made" with 2 parts. Is not difficult to see that if I use the theorem a finite number of times to calculate a the fundamental group of a topological space made from finite many parts, it is valid. But, can I use the theorem infinite times? For example, to show that te fundamental group of a orientable surface of infinite genus is isomorphic to the free group with infinite generators?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    I know the definition of Seifert-van Kampen theorem for a topological space "made" with 2 parts. Is not difficult to see that if I use the theorem a finite number of times to calculate a the fundamental group of a topological space made from finite many parts, it is valid. But, can I use the theorem infinite times? For example, to show that te fundamental group of a orientable surface of infinite genus is isomorphic to the free group with infinite generators?



    Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      I know the definition of Seifert-van Kampen theorem for a topological space "made" with 2 parts. Is not difficult to see that if I use the theorem a finite number of times to calculate a the fundamental group of a topological space made from finite many parts, it is valid. But, can I use the theorem infinite times? For example, to show that te fundamental group of a orientable surface of infinite genus is isomorphic to the free group with infinite generators?



      Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I know the definition of Seifert-van Kampen theorem for a topological space "made" with 2 parts. Is not difficult to see that if I use the theorem a finite number of times to calculate a the fundamental group of a topological space made from finite many parts, it is valid. But, can I use the theorem infinite times? For example, to show that te fundamental group of a orientable surface of infinite genus is isomorphic to the free group with infinite generators?



      Thanks.







      general-topology algebraic-topology fundamental-groups






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 24 at 4:48









      J.RodriguezJ.Rodriguez

      301110




      301110




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          As Joshua Mundinger has nicely explained, you can "iterate" the Seifert-van Kampen theorem infinitely many times by taking a direct limit, using the fact that $pi_1$ preserves direct limits of open inclusions. However, there is also a more direct way to use Seifert-van Kampen for infinite open covers: there is a version of the theorem that applies to covers by an arbitrary number of open sets, rather than just two open sets.



          Here's one version of the statement (this is Theorem 1.20 in Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, for instance). Suppose $(X,*)$ is a pointed space and $(U_i)_iin I$ is an open cover of $X$ such that $*in U_i$ for all $i$. Suppose furthermore that $U_i$, $U_icap U_j$, and $U_icap U_jcap U_k$ are path-connected for all $i,j,kin I$. Then $pi_1(X,*)$ is isomorphic (via the obvious map) to the quotient of the free product of the groups $pi_1(U_i,*)$ by relations which say the two maps $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)to pi_1(U_i,*)$ and $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)topi_1(U_j,*)$ become equal.



          Note that this is useful not just for infinite covers, but also for finite covers by more than two sets, allowing you to compute the final result all at once rather than needing to iterate.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            5












            $begingroup$

            If we have an infinite cover of a space $X$, one approach is to compute $pi_1$ of finite unions of those covers, thus reducing the problem to the case of an increasing union $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq cdots subseteq X = bigcup_i=1^infty U_i$. This is handled via a direct limit of the fundamental groups of the open sets $U_i$.




            Given a space $X$ which is an increasing union of open sets $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq ldots$, with a specified basepoint $ast in U_1$, we have a diagram
            $$requireAMScd
            beginCD
            pi_1(U_1,ast) @> >> pi_1(U_2,ast) @>>> ldots \
            @VVV @VVV \
            pi_1(X, ast) @= pi_1(X,ast) @= ldots
            endCD$$

            which gives a map from the direct limit
            $$Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast).$$




            Claim: $Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast)$ is an isomorphism.




            Proof: To see that $Phi$ is surjective, observe that if $gamma: (S^1, ast) to (X,ast)$ is a based loop, then $gamma(S^1) subseteq cup_i=1^infty U_i$ is compact, so its image is contained in a finite subcover of $U_i_i=1^infty$ and thus in $U_i$ for some $i$.



            In the wise words of one of my topology professors, "injectivity is just surjectivity, one dimension higher." If $[gamma_1]$ and $[gamma_2]$ are homotopy classes in the direct limit which are (based) homotopic in $X$ via $H: S^1 times I to X$, then the image of $H$ is (by the same argument) contained in $U_j$ for some $j$, which insures that $[gamma_1] = [gamma_2]$ in $pi_1(U_k,ast)$ for $k geq j$. This shows injectivity.




            While a direct limit of a system of groups may be intimidating, it allows us to compute. For instance, if $F_n$ is the free group on generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n$, with maps $F_n to F_n+1$ given by including the generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n subseteq x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n+1$, then
            $$ varinjlim F_n = F_infty,$$
            where $F_infty$ is the free group on infinitely many generators $x_1, x_2,ldots$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              What would it even mean to apply the theorem infinitely many times? That would have to be some sort of inductive process - and you have to be very careful about the sorts of infinities you get out of that.



              In this case, adding one hole at a time, we get as subgroups a chain of free groups on increasing numbers of generators - but since there are still infinitely many holes at any stage of the process, there will be another factor that we simply can't cleanly measure this way.



              Now, we can take the direct limit of those free subgroups we found to say that there's an infinite free group that's a subgroup of the fundamental group. We can't say more without additional tools.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160109%2fcan-i-use-seifert-van-kampen-theorem-infinite-times%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                4












                $begingroup$

                As Joshua Mundinger has nicely explained, you can "iterate" the Seifert-van Kampen theorem infinitely many times by taking a direct limit, using the fact that $pi_1$ preserves direct limits of open inclusions. However, there is also a more direct way to use Seifert-van Kampen for infinite open covers: there is a version of the theorem that applies to covers by an arbitrary number of open sets, rather than just two open sets.



                Here's one version of the statement (this is Theorem 1.20 in Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, for instance). Suppose $(X,*)$ is a pointed space and $(U_i)_iin I$ is an open cover of $X$ such that $*in U_i$ for all $i$. Suppose furthermore that $U_i$, $U_icap U_j$, and $U_icap U_jcap U_k$ are path-connected for all $i,j,kin I$. Then $pi_1(X,*)$ is isomorphic (via the obvious map) to the quotient of the free product of the groups $pi_1(U_i,*)$ by relations which say the two maps $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)to pi_1(U_i,*)$ and $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)topi_1(U_j,*)$ become equal.



                Note that this is useful not just for infinite covers, but also for finite covers by more than two sets, allowing you to compute the final result all at once rather than needing to iterate.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  As Joshua Mundinger has nicely explained, you can "iterate" the Seifert-van Kampen theorem infinitely many times by taking a direct limit, using the fact that $pi_1$ preserves direct limits of open inclusions. However, there is also a more direct way to use Seifert-van Kampen for infinite open covers: there is a version of the theorem that applies to covers by an arbitrary number of open sets, rather than just two open sets.



                  Here's one version of the statement (this is Theorem 1.20 in Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, for instance). Suppose $(X,*)$ is a pointed space and $(U_i)_iin I$ is an open cover of $X$ such that $*in U_i$ for all $i$. Suppose furthermore that $U_i$, $U_icap U_j$, and $U_icap U_jcap U_k$ are path-connected for all $i,j,kin I$. Then $pi_1(X,*)$ is isomorphic (via the obvious map) to the quotient of the free product of the groups $pi_1(U_i,*)$ by relations which say the two maps $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)to pi_1(U_i,*)$ and $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)topi_1(U_j,*)$ become equal.



                  Note that this is useful not just for infinite covers, but also for finite covers by more than two sets, allowing you to compute the final result all at once rather than needing to iterate.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    4












                    4








                    4





                    $begingroup$

                    As Joshua Mundinger has nicely explained, you can "iterate" the Seifert-van Kampen theorem infinitely many times by taking a direct limit, using the fact that $pi_1$ preserves direct limits of open inclusions. However, there is also a more direct way to use Seifert-van Kampen for infinite open covers: there is a version of the theorem that applies to covers by an arbitrary number of open sets, rather than just two open sets.



                    Here's one version of the statement (this is Theorem 1.20 in Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, for instance). Suppose $(X,*)$ is a pointed space and $(U_i)_iin I$ is an open cover of $X$ such that $*in U_i$ for all $i$. Suppose furthermore that $U_i$, $U_icap U_j$, and $U_icap U_jcap U_k$ are path-connected for all $i,j,kin I$. Then $pi_1(X,*)$ is isomorphic (via the obvious map) to the quotient of the free product of the groups $pi_1(U_i,*)$ by relations which say the two maps $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)to pi_1(U_i,*)$ and $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)topi_1(U_j,*)$ become equal.



                    Note that this is useful not just for infinite covers, but also for finite covers by more than two sets, allowing you to compute the final result all at once rather than needing to iterate.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    As Joshua Mundinger has nicely explained, you can "iterate" the Seifert-van Kampen theorem infinitely many times by taking a direct limit, using the fact that $pi_1$ preserves direct limits of open inclusions. However, there is also a more direct way to use Seifert-van Kampen for infinite open covers: there is a version of the theorem that applies to covers by an arbitrary number of open sets, rather than just two open sets.



                    Here's one version of the statement (this is Theorem 1.20 in Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, for instance). Suppose $(X,*)$ is a pointed space and $(U_i)_iin I$ is an open cover of $X$ such that $*in U_i$ for all $i$. Suppose furthermore that $U_i$, $U_icap U_j$, and $U_icap U_jcap U_k$ are path-connected for all $i,j,kin I$. Then $pi_1(X,*)$ is isomorphic (via the obvious map) to the quotient of the free product of the groups $pi_1(U_i,*)$ by relations which say the two maps $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)to pi_1(U_i,*)$ and $pi_1(U_icap U_j,*)topi_1(U_j,*)$ become equal.



                    Note that this is useful not just for infinite covers, but also for finite covers by more than two sets, allowing you to compute the final result all at once rather than needing to iterate.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 24 at 6:22









                    Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

                    193k14220352




                    193k14220352





















                        5












                        $begingroup$

                        If we have an infinite cover of a space $X$, one approach is to compute $pi_1$ of finite unions of those covers, thus reducing the problem to the case of an increasing union $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq cdots subseteq X = bigcup_i=1^infty U_i$. This is handled via a direct limit of the fundamental groups of the open sets $U_i$.




                        Given a space $X$ which is an increasing union of open sets $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq ldots$, with a specified basepoint $ast in U_1$, we have a diagram
                        $$requireAMScd
                        beginCD
                        pi_1(U_1,ast) @> >> pi_1(U_2,ast) @>>> ldots \
                        @VVV @VVV \
                        pi_1(X, ast) @= pi_1(X,ast) @= ldots
                        endCD$$

                        which gives a map from the direct limit
                        $$Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast).$$




                        Claim: $Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast)$ is an isomorphism.




                        Proof: To see that $Phi$ is surjective, observe that if $gamma: (S^1, ast) to (X,ast)$ is a based loop, then $gamma(S^1) subseteq cup_i=1^infty U_i$ is compact, so its image is contained in a finite subcover of $U_i_i=1^infty$ and thus in $U_i$ for some $i$.



                        In the wise words of one of my topology professors, "injectivity is just surjectivity, one dimension higher." If $[gamma_1]$ and $[gamma_2]$ are homotopy classes in the direct limit which are (based) homotopic in $X$ via $H: S^1 times I to X$, then the image of $H$ is (by the same argument) contained in $U_j$ for some $j$, which insures that $[gamma_1] = [gamma_2]$ in $pi_1(U_k,ast)$ for $k geq j$. This shows injectivity.




                        While a direct limit of a system of groups may be intimidating, it allows us to compute. For instance, if $F_n$ is the free group on generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n$, with maps $F_n to F_n+1$ given by including the generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n subseteq x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n+1$, then
                        $$ varinjlim F_n = F_infty,$$
                        where $F_infty$ is the free group on infinitely many generators $x_1, x_2,ldots$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          5












                          $begingroup$

                          If we have an infinite cover of a space $X$, one approach is to compute $pi_1$ of finite unions of those covers, thus reducing the problem to the case of an increasing union $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq cdots subseteq X = bigcup_i=1^infty U_i$. This is handled via a direct limit of the fundamental groups of the open sets $U_i$.




                          Given a space $X$ which is an increasing union of open sets $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq ldots$, with a specified basepoint $ast in U_1$, we have a diagram
                          $$requireAMScd
                          beginCD
                          pi_1(U_1,ast) @> >> pi_1(U_2,ast) @>>> ldots \
                          @VVV @VVV \
                          pi_1(X, ast) @= pi_1(X,ast) @= ldots
                          endCD$$

                          which gives a map from the direct limit
                          $$Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast).$$




                          Claim: $Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast)$ is an isomorphism.




                          Proof: To see that $Phi$ is surjective, observe that if $gamma: (S^1, ast) to (X,ast)$ is a based loop, then $gamma(S^1) subseteq cup_i=1^infty U_i$ is compact, so its image is contained in a finite subcover of $U_i_i=1^infty$ and thus in $U_i$ for some $i$.



                          In the wise words of one of my topology professors, "injectivity is just surjectivity, one dimension higher." If $[gamma_1]$ and $[gamma_2]$ are homotopy classes in the direct limit which are (based) homotopic in $X$ via $H: S^1 times I to X$, then the image of $H$ is (by the same argument) contained in $U_j$ for some $j$, which insures that $[gamma_1] = [gamma_2]$ in $pi_1(U_k,ast)$ for $k geq j$. This shows injectivity.




                          While a direct limit of a system of groups may be intimidating, it allows us to compute. For instance, if $F_n$ is the free group on generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n$, with maps $F_n to F_n+1$ given by including the generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n subseteq x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n+1$, then
                          $$ varinjlim F_n = F_infty,$$
                          where $F_infty$ is the free group on infinitely many generators $x_1, x_2,ldots$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            5












                            5








                            5





                            $begingroup$

                            If we have an infinite cover of a space $X$, one approach is to compute $pi_1$ of finite unions of those covers, thus reducing the problem to the case of an increasing union $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq cdots subseteq X = bigcup_i=1^infty U_i$. This is handled via a direct limit of the fundamental groups of the open sets $U_i$.




                            Given a space $X$ which is an increasing union of open sets $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq ldots$, with a specified basepoint $ast in U_1$, we have a diagram
                            $$requireAMScd
                            beginCD
                            pi_1(U_1,ast) @> >> pi_1(U_2,ast) @>>> ldots \
                            @VVV @VVV \
                            pi_1(X, ast) @= pi_1(X,ast) @= ldots
                            endCD$$

                            which gives a map from the direct limit
                            $$Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast).$$




                            Claim: $Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast)$ is an isomorphism.




                            Proof: To see that $Phi$ is surjective, observe that if $gamma: (S^1, ast) to (X,ast)$ is a based loop, then $gamma(S^1) subseteq cup_i=1^infty U_i$ is compact, so its image is contained in a finite subcover of $U_i_i=1^infty$ and thus in $U_i$ for some $i$.



                            In the wise words of one of my topology professors, "injectivity is just surjectivity, one dimension higher." If $[gamma_1]$ and $[gamma_2]$ are homotopy classes in the direct limit which are (based) homotopic in $X$ via $H: S^1 times I to X$, then the image of $H$ is (by the same argument) contained in $U_j$ for some $j$, which insures that $[gamma_1] = [gamma_2]$ in $pi_1(U_k,ast)$ for $k geq j$. This shows injectivity.




                            While a direct limit of a system of groups may be intimidating, it allows us to compute. For instance, if $F_n$ is the free group on generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n$, with maps $F_n to F_n+1$ given by including the generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n subseteq x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n+1$, then
                            $$ varinjlim F_n = F_infty,$$
                            where $F_infty$ is the free group on infinitely many generators $x_1, x_2,ldots$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            If we have an infinite cover of a space $X$, one approach is to compute $pi_1$ of finite unions of those covers, thus reducing the problem to the case of an increasing union $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq cdots subseteq X = bigcup_i=1^infty U_i$. This is handled via a direct limit of the fundamental groups of the open sets $U_i$.




                            Given a space $X$ which is an increasing union of open sets $U_1 subseteq U_2 subseteq ldots$, with a specified basepoint $ast in U_1$, we have a diagram
                            $$requireAMScd
                            beginCD
                            pi_1(U_1,ast) @> >> pi_1(U_2,ast) @>>> ldots \
                            @VVV @VVV \
                            pi_1(X, ast) @= pi_1(X,ast) @= ldots
                            endCD$$

                            which gives a map from the direct limit
                            $$Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast).$$




                            Claim: $Phi: varinjlim pi_1(U_i, ast) to pi_1(X,ast)$ is an isomorphism.




                            Proof: To see that $Phi$ is surjective, observe that if $gamma: (S^1, ast) to (X,ast)$ is a based loop, then $gamma(S^1) subseteq cup_i=1^infty U_i$ is compact, so its image is contained in a finite subcover of $U_i_i=1^infty$ and thus in $U_i$ for some $i$.



                            In the wise words of one of my topology professors, "injectivity is just surjectivity, one dimension higher." If $[gamma_1]$ and $[gamma_2]$ are homotopy classes in the direct limit which are (based) homotopic in $X$ via $H: S^1 times I to X$, then the image of $H$ is (by the same argument) contained in $U_j$ for some $j$, which insures that $[gamma_1] = [gamma_2]$ in $pi_1(U_k,ast)$ for $k geq j$. This shows injectivity.




                            While a direct limit of a system of groups may be intimidating, it allows us to compute. For instance, if $F_n$ is the free group on generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n$, with maps $F_n to F_n+1$ given by including the generators $x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n subseteq x_1,x_2,ldots, x_n+1$, then
                            $$ varinjlim F_n = F_infty,$$
                            where $F_infty$ is the free group on infinitely many generators $x_1, x_2,ldots$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Mar 24 at 5:31









                            Joshua MundingerJoshua Mundinger

                            2,9321028




                            2,9321028





















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                What would it even mean to apply the theorem infinitely many times? That would have to be some sort of inductive process - and you have to be very careful about the sorts of infinities you get out of that.



                                In this case, adding one hole at a time, we get as subgroups a chain of free groups on increasing numbers of generators - but since there are still infinitely many holes at any stage of the process, there will be another factor that we simply can't cleanly measure this way.



                                Now, we can take the direct limit of those free subgroups we found to say that there's an infinite free group that's a subgroup of the fundamental group. We can't say more without additional tools.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$

















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  What would it even mean to apply the theorem infinitely many times? That would have to be some sort of inductive process - and you have to be very careful about the sorts of infinities you get out of that.



                                  In this case, adding one hole at a time, we get as subgroups a chain of free groups on increasing numbers of generators - but since there are still infinitely many holes at any stage of the process, there will be another factor that we simply can't cleanly measure this way.



                                  Now, we can take the direct limit of those free subgroups we found to say that there's an infinite free group that's a subgroup of the fundamental group. We can't say more without additional tools.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    What would it even mean to apply the theorem infinitely many times? That would have to be some sort of inductive process - and you have to be very careful about the sorts of infinities you get out of that.



                                    In this case, adding one hole at a time, we get as subgroups a chain of free groups on increasing numbers of generators - but since there are still infinitely many holes at any stage of the process, there will be another factor that we simply can't cleanly measure this way.



                                    Now, we can take the direct limit of those free subgroups we found to say that there's an infinite free group that's a subgroup of the fundamental group. We can't say more without additional tools.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    What would it even mean to apply the theorem infinitely many times? That would have to be some sort of inductive process - and you have to be very careful about the sorts of infinities you get out of that.



                                    In this case, adding one hole at a time, we get as subgroups a chain of free groups on increasing numbers of generators - but since there are still infinitely many holes at any stage of the process, there will be another factor that we simply can't cleanly measure this way.



                                    Now, we can take the direct limit of those free subgroups we found to say that there's an infinite free group that's a subgroup of the fundamental group. We can't say more without additional tools.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Mar 24 at 5:27









                                    jmerryjmerry

                                    17k11633




                                    17k11633



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160109%2fcan-i-use-seifert-van-kampen-theorem-infinite-times%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                                        Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

                                        Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576