Rigid body kinetic energy extra term The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InEnergy functions and LyapunovBest book for Three-Body Problemn-body systems and bifurcationsEnergy surface of Hamiltonian system is compactFind the energy function and show that energy decreases with timeMax acceleration of body with unlimited powerConservation of Energy in Dynamical System PotentialEuler-Lagrange Equation for Purely Kinetic LagrangianNumerical method preserves energySystematic way of obtaining conservation laws in dynamical systems

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

If my opponent casts Ultimate Price on my Phantasmal Bear, can I save it by casting Snap or Curfew?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Short story: child made less intelligent and less attractive

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?

What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?

Output the Arecibo Message

Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

The difference between dialogue marks

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Geography at the pixel level

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?



Rigid body kinetic energy extra term



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InEnergy functions and LyapunovBest book for Three-Body Problemn-body systems and bifurcationsEnergy surface of Hamiltonian system is compactFind the energy function and show that energy decreases with timeMax acceleration of body with unlimited powerConservation of Energy in Dynamical System PotentialEuler-Lagrange Equation for Purely Kinetic LagrangianNumerical method preserves energySystematic way of obtaining conservation laws in dynamical systems










0












$begingroup$


I am looking at the derivation of the kinetic energy of a rigid body, with an initial velocity:



$v = v_com + w times r$



I start with:
$T = int frac12 v cdot v dm=int frac12(v_com + w times r) cdot (v_com + w times r) dm$



and after expanding all terms and substituting known variables I end up with



$T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw)+Mv_com cdot w times r $



I was wondering why this last term ends up disappearing since the final solution listed in my textbook is $T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw) $










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasser
    Mar 24 at 6:58











  • $begingroup$
    @Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    @slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:20
















0












$begingroup$


I am looking at the derivation of the kinetic energy of a rigid body, with an initial velocity:



$v = v_com + w times r$



I start with:
$T = int frac12 v cdot v dm=int frac12(v_com + w times r) cdot (v_com + w times r) dm$



and after expanding all terms and substituting known variables I end up with



$T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw)+Mv_com cdot w times r $



I was wondering why this last term ends up disappearing since the final solution listed in my textbook is $T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw) $










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasser
    Mar 24 at 6:58











  • $begingroup$
    @Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    @slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:20














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am looking at the derivation of the kinetic energy of a rigid body, with an initial velocity:



$v = v_com + w times r$



I start with:
$T = int frac12 v cdot v dm=int frac12(v_com + w times r) cdot (v_com + w times r) dm$



and after expanding all terms and substituting known variables I end up with



$T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw)+Mv_com cdot w times r $



I was wondering why this last term ends up disappearing since the final solution listed in my textbook is $T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw) $










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am looking at the derivation of the kinetic energy of a rigid body, with an initial velocity:



$v = v_com + w times r$



I start with:
$T = int frac12 v cdot v dm=int frac12(v_com + w times r) cdot (v_com + w times r) dm$



and after expanding all terms and substituting known variables I end up with



$T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw)+Mv_com cdot w times r $



I was wondering why this last term ends up disappearing since the final solution listed in my textbook is $T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw) $







dynamical-systems cross-product






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 24 at 6:13









sladerslader

1




1











  • $begingroup$
    isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasser
    Mar 24 at 6:58











  • $begingroup$
    @Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    @slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:20

















  • $begingroup$
    isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasser
    Mar 24 at 6:58











  • $begingroup$
    @Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    @slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:20
















$begingroup$
isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Mar 24 at 6:58





$begingroup$
isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Mar 24 at 6:58













$begingroup$
@Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 24 at 15:18




$begingroup$
@Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 24 at 15:18












$begingroup$
@slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 24 at 15:20





$begingroup$
@slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 24 at 15:20











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160184%2frigid-body-kinetic-energy-extra-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20















0












$begingroup$

When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20













0












0








0





$begingroup$

When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 24 at 16:26









Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair

20.8k21543




20.8k21543











  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20
















  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20















$begingroup$
perfect, thank you for the explanation
$endgroup$
– slader
Mar 24 at 17:20




$begingroup$
perfect, thank you for the explanation
$endgroup$
– slader
Mar 24 at 17:20

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160184%2frigid-body-kinetic-energy-extra-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

Urgehal History Discography Band members References External links Navigation menu"Mediateket: Urgehal""Interview with Enzifer of Urgehal, 2007""Urgehal - Interview"Urgehal"Urgehal Frontman Trondr Nefas Dies at 35"Urgehal9042691cb161873230(data)0000 0001 0669 4224no2016126817ee6ccef6-e558-44b6-b059-dbbb5b913b24145036459145036459