Rigid body kinetic energy extra term The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InEnergy functions and LyapunovBest book for Three-Body Problemn-body systems and bifurcationsEnergy surface of Hamiltonian system is compactFind the energy function and show that energy decreases with timeMax acceleration of body with unlimited powerConservation of Energy in Dynamical System PotentialEuler-Lagrange Equation for Purely Kinetic LagrangianNumerical method preserves energySystematic way of obtaining conservation laws in dynamical systems

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

If my opponent casts Ultimate Price on my Phantasmal Bear, can I save it by casting Snap or Curfew?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Short story: child made less intelligent and less attractive

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?

What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?

Output the Arecibo Message

Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

The difference between dialogue marks

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Geography at the pixel level

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?



Rigid body kinetic energy extra term



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InEnergy functions and LyapunovBest book for Three-Body Problemn-body systems and bifurcationsEnergy surface of Hamiltonian system is compactFind the energy function and show that energy decreases with timeMax acceleration of body with unlimited powerConservation of Energy in Dynamical System PotentialEuler-Lagrange Equation for Purely Kinetic LagrangianNumerical method preserves energySystematic way of obtaining conservation laws in dynamical systems










0












$begingroup$


I am looking at the derivation of the kinetic energy of a rigid body, with an initial velocity:



$v = v_com + w times r$



I start with:
$T = int frac12 v cdot v dm=int frac12(v_com + w times r) cdot (v_com + w times r) dm$



and after expanding all terms and substituting known variables I end up with



$T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw)+Mv_com cdot w times r $



I was wondering why this last term ends up disappearing since the final solution listed in my textbook is $T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw) $










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasser
    Mar 24 at 6:58











  • $begingroup$
    @Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    @slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:20
















0












$begingroup$


I am looking at the derivation of the kinetic energy of a rigid body, with an initial velocity:



$v = v_com + w times r$



I start with:
$T = int frac12 v cdot v dm=int frac12(v_com + w times r) cdot (v_com + w times r) dm$



and after expanding all terms and substituting known variables I end up with



$T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw)+Mv_com cdot w times r $



I was wondering why this last term ends up disappearing since the final solution listed in my textbook is $T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw) $










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasser
    Mar 24 at 6:58











  • $begingroup$
    @Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    @slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:20














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am looking at the derivation of the kinetic energy of a rigid body, with an initial velocity:



$v = v_com + w times r$



I start with:
$T = int frac12 v cdot v dm=int frac12(v_com + w times r) cdot (v_com + w times r) dm$



and after expanding all terms and substituting known variables I end up with



$T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw)+Mv_com cdot w times r $



I was wondering why this last term ends up disappearing since the final solution listed in my textbook is $T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw) $










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am looking at the derivation of the kinetic energy of a rigid body, with an initial velocity:



$v = v_com + w times r$



I start with:
$T = int frac12 v cdot v dm=int frac12(v_com + w times r) cdot (v_com + w times r) dm$



and after expanding all terms and substituting known variables I end up with



$T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw)+Mv_com cdot w times r $



I was wondering why this last term ends up disappearing since the final solution listed in my textbook is $T = frac12M(v_com cdot v_com)+frac12 (w cdot Iw) $







dynamical-systems cross-product






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 24 at 6:13









sladerslader

1




1











  • $begingroup$
    isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasser
    Mar 24 at 6:58











  • $begingroup$
    @Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    @slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:20

















  • $begingroup$
    isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasser
    Mar 24 at 6:58











  • $begingroup$
    @Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    @slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 24 at 15:20
















$begingroup$
isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Mar 24 at 6:58





$begingroup$
isn't $v_com$ perpendicular to $wtimes r$? so dot product is zero.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Mar 24 at 6:58













$begingroup$
@Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 24 at 15:18




$begingroup$
@Nasser - no, the direction in which an object is headed has no a priori relationship to how the object is spinning.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 24 at 15:18












$begingroup$
@slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 24 at 15:20





$begingroup$
@slader - how can you have $r$ in your final expression for $T$? $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$ being integrated. It is only defined insdie the integration. Once the integration is finished, there is no longer such a thing as $r$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 24 at 15:20











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160184%2frigid-body-kinetic-energy-extra-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20















0












$begingroup$

When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20













0












0








0





$begingroup$

When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



When you expand $T = int frac12(v_com + omega times r) cdot (v_com + omega times r) dm$, you get



$$T = frac 12 int v_com^2 ,dm + frac 12 int |omega times r|^2, dm + int v_comomega times r,dm$$



As you've noted, the first two terms simplify to $frac 12 Mv_com^2 + frac 12(omega cdot Iomega)$. But in the last term, $r$ is not constant, so it does not simplify to $Mv_comomega times r$. And as I said in the comment, $r$ is not even defined outside the integral.



Instead, since $v_com$ and $omega$ are constant, we get
$$int v_comomega times r,dm = v_comomega times int r,dm$$



So the question remains, what is $int r,dm$? This can be a little tricky to recognize. $r$ is the location of the differential element $dm$, relative to the center of mass. If we fix an arbitrary coordinate system and let $R$ be the position vector, then $r = R - R_com$, where $R_com$ is the center of mass. So
$$int r,dm = int (R - R_com),dm = int R,dm - MR_com$$



But the center of mass is defined by $$R_com := fracint R,dmM$$



So you end up with $$int r,dm = 0$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 24 at 16:26









Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair

20.8k21543




20.8k21543











  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20
















  • $begingroup$
    perfect, thank you for the explanation
    $endgroup$
    – slader
    Mar 24 at 17:20















$begingroup$
perfect, thank you for the explanation
$endgroup$
– slader
Mar 24 at 17:20




$begingroup$
perfect, thank you for the explanation
$endgroup$
– slader
Mar 24 at 17:20

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160184%2frigid-body-kinetic-energy-extra-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye