Writing a Permutation as a product of Disjoint CyclesHow to Write Permutation as the Product of Transpositions?Writing a Permutation as a product of Disjoint CyclesHow to Write Permutation as the Product of Transpositions?Permutation of cycles as transpositionExpressing a permuation as a product of disjoint cycles.Abstract product of disjoint cyclesPermutation written as product of transpositionsIf a permutation is a cycle, can I factorize it as a product of disjoint cycles?Permutation and Disjoint cycles questionProve that every permutation is the product of disjoint cyclesPermutation as disjoint cycles
Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?
Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?
Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping a dual land?
Isometric embedding of a genus g surface
How were servants to the Kaiser of Imperial Germany treated and where may I find more information on them
Echo with obfuscation
Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment
What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
Proving an identity involving cross products and coplanar vectors
Limit max CPU usage SQL SERVER with WSRM
Is there a reason to prefer HFS+ over APFS for disk images in High Sierra and/or Mojave?
What happens if I try to grapple an illusory duplicate from the Mirror Image spell?
Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
How to make a list of partial sums using forEach
In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?
What (the heck) is a Super Worm Equinox Moon?
Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?
Can I cause damage to electrical appliances by unplugging them when they are turned on?
Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?
Animation: customize bounce interpolation
Writing a Permutation as a product of Disjoint Cycles
How to Write Permutation as the Product of Transpositions?Writing a Permutation as a product of Disjoint CyclesHow to Write Permutation as the Product of Transpositions?Permutation of cycles as transpositionExpressing a permuation as a product of disjoint cycles.Abstract product of disjoint cyclesPermutation written as product of transpositionsIf a permutation is a cycle, can I factorize it as a product of disjoint cycles?Permutation and Disjoint cycles questionProve that every permutation is the product of disjoint cyclesPermutation as disjoint cycles
$begingroup$
How do i write a permutation as a product of disjoint cycles ?
I know that in order to determine a cycle we need to start with the smallest element and move on till the mapping points to itself.Then start with the next non repeating smallest element..But how to write this as a product of disjoint cycles?
group-theory permutations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How do i write a permutation as a product of disjoint cycles ?
I know that in order to determine a cycle we need to start with the smallest element and move on till the mapping points to itself.Then start with the next non repeating smallest element..But how to write this as a product of disjoint cycles?
group-theory permutations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suppose it is worth mentioning that disjoint cycles commute, that is, may be multiplied in any order. Hence (4)(1532) is also a valid answer.
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:19
$begingroup$
@A.Sh From the method i have described i got (1532)(4).Is this itself the way to get Disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:21
$begingroup$
Well, yes, you do (always) end up with disjoint cycles by performing your algorithm. Also, if you do exactly as described, you will end up with (1532)(4), so you have done correctly. Since disjoint cycles are permutations that act on entirely different sets of elements, they can be applied in any order. Just mentioning it, in case you would encounter a similar situation in the future : )
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:31
$begingroup$
@A.Sh okay.thanks
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How do i write a permutation as a product of disjoint cycles ?
I know that in order to determine a cycle we need to start with the smallest element and move on till the mapping points to itself.Then start with the next non repeating smallest element..But how to write this as a product of disjoint cycles?
group-theory permutations
$endgroup$
How do i write a permutation as a product of disjoint cycles ?
I know that in order to determine a cycle we need to start with the smallest element and move on till the mapping points to itself.Then start with the next non repeating smallest element..But how to write this as a product of disjoint cycles?
group-theory permutations
group-theory permutations
edited Oct 8 '15 at 11:46
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.7k8160251
65.7k8160251
asked Oct 8 '15 at 7:07
technotechno
3222826
3222826
$begingroup$
I suppose it is worth mentioning that disjoint cycles commute, that is, may be multiplied in any order. Hence (4)(1532) is also a valid answer.
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:19
$begingroup$
@A.Sh From the method i have described i got (1532)(4).Is this itself the way to get Disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:21
$begingroup$
Well, yes, you do (always) end up with disjoint cycles by performing your algorithm. Also, if you do exactly as described, you will end up with (1532)(4), so you have done correctly. Since disjoint cycles are permutations that act on entirely different sets of elements, they can be applied in any order. Just mentioning it, in case you would encounter a similar situation in the future : )
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:31
$begingroup$
@A.Sh okay.thanks
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I suppose it is worth mentioning that disjoint cycles commute, that is, may be multiplied in any order. Hence (4)(1532) is also a valid answer.
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:19
$begingroup$
@A.Sh From the method i have described i got (1532)(4).Is this itself the way to get Disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:21
$begingroup$
Well, yes, you do (always) end up with disjoint cycles by performing your algorithm. Also, if you do exactly as described, you will end up with (1532)(4), so you have done correctly. Since disjoint cycles are permutations that act on entirely different sets of elements, they can be applied in any order. Just mentioning it, in case you would encounter a similar situation in the future : )
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:31
$begingroup$
@A.Sh okay.thanks
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:38
$begingroup$
I suppose it is worth mentioning that disjoint cycles commute, that is, may be multiplied in any order. Hence (4)(1532) is also a valid answer.
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:19
$begingroup$
I suppose it is worth mentioning that disjoint cycles commute, that is, may be multiplied in any order. Hence (4)(1532) is also a valid answer.
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:19
$begingroup$
@A.Sh From the method i have described i got (1532)(4).Is this itself the way to get Disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:21
$begingroup$
@A.Sh From the method i have described i got (1532)(4).Is this itself the way to get Disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:21
$begingroup$
Well, yes, you do (always) end up with disjoint cycles by performing your algorithm. Also, if you do exactly as described, you will end up with (1532)(4), so you have done correctly. Since disjoint cycles are permutations that act on entirely different sets of elements, they can be applied in any order. Just mentioning it, in case you would encounter a similar situation in the future : )
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:31
$begingroup$
Well, yes, you do (always) end up with disjoint cycles by performing your algorithm. Also, if you do exactly as described, you will end up with (1532)(4), so you have done correctly. Since disjoint cycles are permutations that act on entirely different sets of elements, they can be applied in any order. Just mentioning it, in case you would encounter a similar situation in the future : )
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:31
$begingroup$
@A.Sh okay.thanks
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:38
$begingroup$
@A.Sh okay.thanks
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:38
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, we note that writing it as a product of disjoint cycles means that each number appears only once throughout all of the cycles.
We see that $1mapsto 5$, $5mapsto 3$, $3mapsto 2$, $2mapsto 1$. So, we can express this in cycle notation as
$$(1532).$$
Now, we see what is left over... well, that is just $4$, which is fixed by the permutation in question. So, the permutation can be written as
$$(1532)(4),mbox or equivalently, just (1532).$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thanks.As i have described in the question what i get by applying is (1532)(4) =>(1532).Is this itself the method to get disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
That's all you need to do :)
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles.
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:22
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I mean, that's all I did above. Wasn't it?
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Yeah...got it now
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:39
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
$4$ is the only one invariant, while the others mingle among them, thus there are only two cycles
$$(1,5,3,2)$$
It's customary not to write any singleton.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with the first number than you go to the number with is under this number and so on until you get back to the start number...... In your case you start with 1 then go to 5 then to 3 to 2 and are back at one,.... So the first cycle is (1;5;2;3)
Then you look at the numbers which aren't in the first cycle e.g. 4 and do the same again.... ( you can, but you do not have to mention cycles with length 1 if it is known in which Sn the permutation is or it is otherwise clear how long the permutation is.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1469981%2fwriting-a-permutation-as-a-product-of-disjoint-cycles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, we note that writing it as a product of disjoint cycles means that each number appears only once throughout all of the cycles.
We see that $1mapsto 5$, $5mapsto 3$, $3mapsto 2$, $2mapsto 1$. So, we can express this in cycle notation as
$$(1532).$$
Now, we see what is left over... well, that is just $4$, which is fixed by the permutation in question. So, the permutation can be written as
$$(1532)(4),mbox or equivalently, just (1532).$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thanks.As i have described in the question what i get by applying is (1532)(4) =>(1532).Is this itself the method to get disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
That's all you need to do :)
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles.
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:22
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I mean, that's all I did above. Wasn't it?
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Yeah...got it now
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:39
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
First, we note that writing it as a product of disjoint cycles means that each number appears only once throughout all of the cycles.
We see that $1mapsto 5$, $5mapsto 3$, $3mapsto 2$, $2mapsto 1$. So, we can express this in cycle notation as
$$(1532).$$
Now, we see what is left over... well, that is just $4$, which is fixed by the permutation in question. So, the permutation can be written as
$$(1532)(4),mbox or equivalently, just (1532).$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thanks.As i have described in the question what i get by applying is (1532)(4) =>(1532).Is this itself the method to get disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
That's all you need to do :)
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles.
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:22
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I mean, that's all I did above. Wasn't it?
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Yeah...got it now
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:39
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
First, we note that writing it as a product of disjoint cycles means that each number appears only once throughout all of the cycles.
We see that $1mapsto 5$, $5mapsto 3$, $3mapsto 2$, $2mapsto 1$. So, we can express this in cycle notation as
$$(1532).$$
Now, we see what is left over... well, that is just $4$, which is fixed by the permutation in question. So, the permutation can be written as
$$(1532)(4),mbox or equivalently, just (1532).$$
$endgroup$
First, we note that writing it as a product of disjoint cycles means that each number appears only once throughout all of the cycles.
We see that $1mapsto 5$, $5mapsto 3$, $3mapsto 2$, $2mapsto 1$. So, we can express this in cycle notation as
$$(1532).$$
Now, we see what is left over... well, that is just $4$, which is fixed by the permutation in question. So, the permutation can be written as
$$(1532)(4),mbox or equivalently, just (1532).$$
edited Oct 5 '18 at 8:06
answered Oct 8 '15 at 7:14
eloiprimeeloiprime
2,1651721
2,1651721
1
$begingroup$
Thanks.As i have described in the question what i get by applying is (1532)(4) =>(1532).Is this itself the method to get disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
That's all you need to do :)
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles.
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:22
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I mean, that's all I did above. Wasn't it?
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Yeah...got it now
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:39
|
show 5 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Thanks.As i have described in the question what i get by applying is (1532)(4) =>(1532).Is this itself the method to get disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
That's all you need to do :)
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles.
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:22
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I mean, that's all I did above. Wasn't it?
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Yeah...got it now
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:39
1
1
$begingroup$
Thanks.As i have described in the question what i get by applying is (1532)(4) =>(1532).Is this itself the method to get disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
Thanks.As i have described in the question what i get by applying is (1532)(4) =>(1532).Is this itself the method to get disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
That's all you need to do :)
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
That's all you need to do :)
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 7:20
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles.
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:22
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles.
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:22
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, I mean, that's all I did above. Wasn't it?
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Yes, I mean, that's all I did above. Wasn't it?
$endgroup$
– eloiprime
Oct 8 '15 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Yeah...got it now
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:39
$begingroup$
Yeah...got it now
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:39
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
$4$ is the only one invariant, while the others mingle among them, thus there are only two cycles
$$(1,5,3,2)$$
It's customary not to write any singleton.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$4$ is the only one invariant, while the others mingle among them, thus there are only two cycles
$$(1,5,3,2)$$
It's customary not to write any singleton.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$4$ is the only one invariant, while the others mingle among them, thus there are only two cycles
$$(1,5,3,2)$$
It's customary not to write any singleton.
$endgroup$
$4$ is the only one invariant, while the others mingle among them, thus there are only two cycles
$$(1,5,3,2)$$
It's customary not to write any singleton.
answered Oct 8 '15 at 7:15
MASLMASL
708313
708313
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with the first number than you go to the number with is under this number and so on until you get back to the start number...... In your case you start with 1 then go to 5 then to 3 to 2 and are back at one,.... So the first cycle is (1;5;2;3)
Then you look at the numbers which aren't in the first cycle e.g. 4 and do the same again.... ( you can, but you do not have to mention cycles with length 1 if it is known in which Sn the permutation is or it is otherwise clear how long the permutation is.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with the first number than you go to the number with is under this number and so on until you get back to the start number...... In your case you start with 1 then go to 5 then to 3 to 2 and are back at one,.... So the first cycle is (1;5;2;3)
Then you look at the numbers which aren't in the first cycle e.g. 4 and do the same again.... ( you can, but you do not have to mention cycles with length 1 if it is known in which Sn the permutation is or it is otherwise clear how long the permutation is.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with the first number than you go to the number with is under this number and so on until you get back to the start number...... In your case you start with 1 then go to 5 then to 3 to 2 and are back at one,.... So the first cycle is (1;5;2;3)
Then you look at the numbers which aren't in the first cycle e.g. 4 and do the same again.... ( you can, but you do not have to mention cycles with length 1 if it is known in which Sn the permutation is or it is otherwise clear how long the permutation is.)
$endgroup$
You start with the first number than you go to the number with is under this number and so on until you get back to the start number...... In your case you start with 1 then go to 5 then to 3 to 2 and are back at one,.... So the first cycle is (1;5;2;3)
Then you look at the numbers which aren't in the first cycle e.g. 4 and do the same again.... ( you can, but you do not have to mention cycles with length 1 if it is known in which Sn the permutation is or it is otherwise clear how long the permutation is.)
answered Oct 8 '15 at 7:19
BörgeBörge
1,037415
1,037415
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:23
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:23
$begingroup$
okay.. so if i use the method i described in the question ie: finding the smallest etc... i will get the product of disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1469981%2fwriting-a-permutation-as-a-product-of-disjoint-cycles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I suppose it is worth mentioning that disjoint cycles commute, that is, may be multiplied in any order. Hence (4)(1532) is also a valid answer.
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:19
$begingroup$
@A.Sh From the method i have described i got (1532)(4).Is this itself the way to get Disjoint cycles?
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 7:21
$begingroup$
Well, yes, you do (always) end up with disjoint cycles by performing your algorithm. Also, if you do exactly as described, you will end up with (1532)(4), so you have done correctly. Since disjoint cycles are permutations that act on entirely different sets of elements, they can be applied in any order. Just mentioning it, in case you would encounter a similar situation in the future : )
$endgroup$
– A.Sh
Oct 8 '15 at 7:31
$begingroup$
@A.Sh okay.thanks
$endgroup$
– techno
Oct 8 '15 at 9:38