prove that for $G$ a multiplicative nonabelian group of order $pq$, where $p$ and $q$ are prime numbers, any proper subgroup of $G$ is abelianNonabelian $p$-groups all of whose proper subgroups are abelian.For what numbers $n$ every group of order $n$ is abelian?Prove that a finite abelian group is simple if and only if its order is prime.A finite group with the property that all of its proper subgroups are abelianProve that $ AB$ is a subgroup of order $mn$ if $m$ and $n$ are relatively prime.Using Lagrange's theorem, prove that a non-abelian group of order $10$ must have a subgroup of order $5$.Which of the following group has a proper subgroup that is not cyclic?Center of Simple Abelian Group and Simple Nonabelian GroupProof verification: Prove whether or not every proper subgroup of a nonabelian group is nonabelian.Show that the order of group $G$ is $1$ or a prime number
Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?
Should I warn new/prospective PhD Student that supervisor is terrible?
How were servants to the Kaiser of Imperial Germany treated and where may I find more information on them
How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?
Can I run 125kHz RF circuit on a breadboard?
Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match
Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?
Alignment of six matrices
Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?
Personal or impersonal in a technical resume
The Digit Triangles
Is there anyway, I can have two passwords for my wi-fi
How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?
Echo with obfuscation
What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?
What does "tick" mean in this sentence?
Integral Notations in Quantum Mechanics
Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment
How do I Interface a PS/2 Keyboard without Modern Techniques?
Sound waves in different octaves
Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?
Anime with legendary swords made from talismans and a man who could change them with a shattered body
How would a solely written language work mechanically
prove that for $G$ a multiplicative nonabelian group of order $pq$, where $p$ and $q$ are prime numbers, any proper subgroup of $G$ is abelian
Nonabelian $p$-groups all of whose proper subgroups are abelian.For what numbers $n$ every group of order $n$ is abelian?Prove that a finite abelian group is simple if and only if its order is prime.A finite group with the property that all of its proper subgroups are abelianProve that $ AB$ is a subgroup of order $mn$ if $m$ and $n$ are relatively prime.Using Lagrange's theorem, prove that a non-abelian group of order $10$ must have a subgroup of order $5$.Which of the following group has a proper subgroup that is not cyclic?Center of Simple Abelian Group and Simple Nonabelian GroupProof verification: Prove whether or not every proper subgroup of a nonabelian group is nonabelian.Show that the order of group $G$ is $1$ or a prime number
$begingroup$
I need to prove that for $G$ a multiplicative nonabelian group of order $pq$, where $p$ and $q$ are prime numbers, any proper subgroup of $G$ is abelian. I use that, from Lagrange's theorem, the order of the proper subgroups must divide the order of the group and so the subgroups have the orders $p,q$. If $(p,q)=1$, then there exist $k,linmathbbZ$ such that $pk+gl=1$ and so, for an $x$ of a subgroup of order $p$ we obtain $x=x^lq$ and similarly, for an $y$ of order $q$ $y=y^pk$. Also, $p|lq-1$ and $q|pk-1$. This are the only valuable information I obtained. How can I prove this?
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need to prove that for $G$ a multiplicative nonabelian group of order $pq$, where $p$ and $q$ are prime numbers, any proper subgroup of $G$ is abelian. I use that, from Lagrange's theorem, the order of the proper subgroups must divide the order of the group and so the subgroups have the orders $p,q$. If $(p,q)=1$, then there exist $k,linmathbbZ$ such that $pk+gl=1$ and so, for an $x$ of a subgroup of order $p$ we obtain $x=x^lq$ and similarly, for an $y$ of order $q$ $y=y^pk$. Also, $p|lq-1$ and $q|pk-1$. This are the only valuable information I obtained. How can I prove this?
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You need just the first line.
$endgroup$
– the_fox
Mar 14 at 8:24
$begingroup$
Try to avoid unnecessary assumptions. You don't need to assume that the group $G$ is multiplicative, and you don't need to assume that it is nonabelian.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Mar 14 at 8:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need to prove that for $G$ a multiplicative nonabelian group of order $pq$, where $p$ and $q$ are prime numbers, any proper subgroup of $G$ is abelian. I use that, from Lagrange's theorem, the order of the proper subgroups must divide the order of the group and so the subgroups have the orders $p,q$. If $(p,q)=1$, then there exist $k,linmathbbZ$ such that $pk+gl=1$ and so, for an $x$ of a subgroup of order $p$ we obtain $x=x^lq$ and similarly, for an $y$ of order $q$ $y=y^pk$. Also, $p|lq-1$ and $q|pk-1$. This are the only valuable information I obtained. How can I prove this?
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
I need to prove that for $G$ a multiplicative nonabelian group of order $pq$, where $p$ and $q$ are prime numbers, any proper subgroup of $G$ is abelian. I use that, from Lagrange's theorem, the order of the proper subgroups must divide the order of the group and so the subgroups have the orders $p,q$. If $(p,q)=1$, then there exist $k,linmathbbZ$ such that $pk+gl=1$ and so, for an $x$ of a subgroup of order $p$ we obtain $x=x^lq$ and similarly, for an $y$ of order $q$ $y=y^pk$. Also, $p|lq-1$ and $q|pk-1$. This are the only valuable information I obtained. How can I prove this?
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
asked Mar 14 at 7:58
user651754
$begingroup$
You need just the first line.
$endgroup$
– the_fox
Mar 14 at 8:24
$begingroup$
Try to avoid unnecessary assumptions. You don't need to assume that the group $G$ is multiplicative, and you don't need to assume that it is nonabelian.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Mar 14 at 8:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need just the first line.
$endgroup$
– the_fox
Mar 14 at 8:24
$begingroup$
Try to avoid unnecessary assumptions. You don't need to assume that the group $G$ is multiplicative, and you don't need to assume that it is nonabelian.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Mar 14 at 8:38
$begingroup$
You need just the first line.
$endgroup$
– the_fox
Mar 14 at 8:24
$begingroup$
You need just the first line.
$endgroup$
– the_fox
Mar 14 at 8:24
$begingroup$
Try to avoid unnecessary assumptions. You don't need to assume that the group $G$ is multiplicative, and you don't need to assume that it is nonabelian.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Mar 14 at 8:38
$begingroup$
Try to avoid unnecessary assumptions. You don't need to assume that the group $G$ is multiplicative, and you don't need to assume that it is nonabelian.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Mar 14 at 8:38
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: use Lagrange's Theorem, the order of a subgroup divides the order of the whole group. And, a group of prime order must be cyclic (also follows from Lagrange).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By Lagrange's theorem we can say that order of any proper subgroup of $G$ is either of order $p$ or of order $q.$ Since $p$ and $q$ are primes and we know that any group of prime order is cyclic so any proper subgroup of the group $G$ is cyclic and hence abelian.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147698%2fprove-that-for-g-a-multiplicative-nonabelian-group-of-order-pq-where-p-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: use Lagrange's Theorem, the order of a subgroup divides the order of the whole group. And, a group of prime order must be cyclic (also follows from Lagrange).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: use Lagrange's Theorem, the order of a subgroup divides the order of the whole group. And, a group of prime order must be cyclic (also follows from Lagrange).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: use Lagrange's Theorem, the order of a subgroup divides the order of the whole group. And, a group of prime order must be cyclic (also follows from Lagrange).
$endgroup$
Hint: use Lagrange's Theorem, the order of a subgroup divides the order of the whole group. And, a group of prime order must be cyclic (also follows from Lagrange).
answered Mar 14 at 8:10
Nicky HeksterNicky Hekster
29k63456
29k63456
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By Lagrange's theorem we can say that order of any proper subgroup of $G$ is either of order $p$ or of order $q.$ Since $p$ and $q$ are primes and we know that any group of prime order is cyclic so any proper subgroup of the group $G$ is cyclic and hence abelian.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By Lagrange's theorem we can say that order of any proper subgroup of $G$ is either of order $p$ or of order $q.$ Since $p$ and $q$ are primes and we know that any group of prime order is cyclic so any proper subgroup of the group $G$ is cyclic and hence abelian.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By Lagrange's theorem we can say that order of any proper subgroup of $G$ is either of order $p$ or of order $q.$ Since $p$ and $q$ are primes and we know that any group of prime order is cyclic so any proper subgroup of the group $G$ is cyclic and hence abelian.
$endgroup$
By Lagrange's theorem we can say that order of any proper subgroup of $G$ is either of order $p$ or of order $q.$ Since $p$ and $q$ are primes and we know that any group of prime order is cyclic so any proper subgroup of the group $G$ is cyclic and hence abelian.
answered Mar 14 at 8:24
Dbchatto67Dbchatto67
1,995319
1,995319
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147698%2fprove-that-for-g-a-multiplicative-nonabelian-group-of-order-pq-where-p-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You need just the first line.
$endgroup$
– the_fox
Mar 14 at 8:24
$begingroup$
Try to avoid unnecessary assumptions. You don't need to assume that the group $G$ is multiplicative, and you don't need to assume that it is nonabelian.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Mar 14 at 8:38