Is there a fiber bundle/espace-etale interpretation of sheaves on a Grothendieck siteLocal vs. global in the definition of a sheafPullback of sheaves and pullback of schemesDifferentiating (pre)sheaves by their stalks and etale topologiesMoving from sheaves over spaces to sheaves over sitesFunctor of points definition of a space modeled on a siteWhat does the pushforward of an etale sheaf over a field correspond to in terms of Galois cohomology?Why the Skyscraper Sheaf is Named as Such, Intuition and InterpretationSheaves on a scheme compared with sheaves on its étale siteCharacterizing Morphism of SheavesDifferent notions of torsors in algebraic geometry
What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?
What does "tick" mean in this sentence?
Limit max CPU usage SQL SERVER with WSRM
Proving an identity involving cross products and coplanar vectors
Animation: customize bounce interpolation
Check if object is null and return null
Air travel with refrigerated insulin
Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?
Do I have to know the General Relativity theory to understand the concept of inertial frame?
Ways of geometrical multiplication
How do I Interface a PS/2 Keyboard without Modern Techniques?
Difference between shutdown options
The Digit Triangles
Showing mass murder in a kid's book
Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?
What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"
Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience
Anime with legendary swords made from talismans and a man who could change them with a shattered body
How to leave product feedback on macOS?
How to preserve electronics (computers, iPads and phones) for hundreds of years
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?
Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
Is there a fiber bundle/espace-etale interpretation of sheaves on a Grothendieck site
Local vs. global in the definition of a sheafPullback of sheaves and pullback of schemesDifferentiating (pre)sheaves by their stalks and etale topologiesMoving from sheaves over spaces to sheaves over sitesFunctor of points definition of a space modeled on a siteWhat does the pushforward of an etale sheaf over a field correspond to in terms of Galois cohomology?Why the Skyscraper Sheaf is Named as Such, Intuition and InterpretationSheaves on a scheme compared with sheaves on its étale siteCharacterizing Morphism of SheavesDifferent notions of torsors in algebraic geometry
$begingroup$
Whenever I'm doing sheaf things and I have a construction that involves sheafifying, I find it convenient to think "the thing that has the same stalks but sections must be locally trivial sections to espace etale" - it's a nice way to think of/characterize sheafification, sections of sheaves, define pullbacks, etc.
Can we do the same thing on a general, reasonable site (e.g. etale, flat, etc), i.e. for say $mathscrF$ a sheaf on a scheme $X$ on the etale site, can we form something like $coprod mathscrF_x$ as $x$ runs over geometric points, suitably "Grothendieck topologized" so that the Grothendieck continuous sections over $U to X$ are precisely $mathscrF(U to X)$?
algebraic-geometry category-theory sheaf-theory etale-cohomology grothendieck-topologies
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Whenever I'm doing sheaf things and I have a construction that involves sheafifying, I find it convenient to think "the thing that has the same stalks but sections must be locally trivial sections to espace etale" - it's a nice way to think of/characterize sheafification, sections of sheaves, define pullbacks, etc.
Can we do the same thing on a general, reasonable site (e.g. etale, flat, etc), i.e. for say $mathscrF$ a sheaf on a scheme $X$ on the etale site, can we form something like $coprod mathscrF_x$ as $x$ runs over geometric points, suitably "Grothendieck topologized" so that the Grothendieck continuous sections over $U to X$ are precisely $mathscrF(U to X)$?
algebraic-geometry category-theory sheaf-theory etale-cohomology grothendieck-topologies
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is a "Grothendieck continuous" morphism? And what category is it supposed to be a morphism of?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 16:21
$begingroup$
I don't know, that's part of the question of what such a formulation would mean.
$endgroup$
– edgarlorp
Mar 14 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
Ok. The problem is that Grothendieck topologies very specifically generalize the property of topological spaces that they produce a sheaf theory, and not that they produce a notion of continuous map.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 19:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Whenever I'm doing sheaf things and I have a construction that involves sheafifying, I find it convenient to think "the thing that has the same stalks but sections must be locally trivial sections to espace etale" - it's a nice way to think of/characterize sheafification, sections of sheaves, define pullbacks, etc.
Can we do the same thing on a general, reasonable site (e.g. etale, flat, etc), i.e. for say $mathscrF$ a sheaf on a scheme $X$ on the etale site, can we form something like $coprod mathscrF_x$ as $x$ runs over geometric points, suitably "Grothendieck topologized" so that the Grothendieck continuous sections over $U to X$ are precisely $mathscrF(U to X)$?
algebraic-geometry category-theory sheaf-theory etale-cohomology grothendieck-topologies
$endgroup$
Whenever I'm doing sheaf things and I have a construction that involves sheafifying, I find it convenient to think "the thing that has the same stalks but sections must be locally trivial sections to espace etale" - it's a nice way to think of/characterize sheafification, sections of sheaves, define pullbacks, etc.
Can we do the same thing on a general, reasonable site (e.g. etale, flat, etc), i.e. for say $mathscrF$ a sheaf on a scheme $X$ on the etale site, can we form something like $coprod mathscrF_x$ as $x$ runs over geometric points, suitably "Grothendieck topologized" so that the Grothendieck continuous sections over $U to X$ are precisely $mathscrF(U to X)$?
algebraic-geometry category-theory sheaf-theory etale-cohomology grothendieck-topologies
algebraic-geometry category-theory sheaf-theory etale-cohomology grothendieck-topologies
edited Mar 14 at 18:00
edgarlorp
asked Mar 14 at 7:26
edgarlorpedgarlorp
1076
1076
$begingroup$
What is a "Grothendieck continuous" morphism? And what category is it supposed to be a morphism of?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 16:21
$begingroup$
I don't know, that's part of the question of what such a formulation would mean.
$endgroup$
– edgarlorp
Mar 14 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
Ok. The problem is that Grothendieck topologies very specifically generalize the property of topological spaces that they produce a sheaf theory, and not that they produce a notion of continuous map.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 19:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is a "Grothendieck continuous" morphism? And what category is it supposed to be a morphism of?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 16:21
$begingroup$
I don't know, that's part of the question of what such a formulation would mean.
$endgroup$
– edgarlorp
Mar 14 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
Ok. The problem is that Grothendieck topologies very specifically generalize the property of topological spaces that they produce a sheaf theory, and not that they produce a notion of continuous map.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 19:51
$begingroup$
What is a "Grothendieck continuous" morphism? And what category is it supposed to be a morphism of?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 16:21
$begingroup$
What is a "Grothendieck continuous" morphism? And what category is it supposed to be a morphism of?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 16:21
$begingroup$
I don't know, that's part of the question of what such a formulation would mean.
$endgroup$
– edgarlorp
Mar 14 at 17:53
$begingroup$
I don't know, that's part of the question of what such a formulation would mean.
$endgroup$
– edgarlorp
Mar 14 at 17:53
1
1
$begingroup$
Ok. The problem is that Grothendieck topologies very specifically generalize the property of topological spaces that they produce a sheaf theory, and not that they produce a notion of continuous map.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 19:51
$begingroup$
Ok. The problem is that Grothendieck topologies very specifically generalize the property of topological spaces that they produce a sheaf theory, and not that they produce a notion of continuous map.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 19:51
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147674%2fis-there-a-fiber-bundle-espace-etale-interpretation-of-sheaves-on-a-grothendieck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147674%2fis-there-a-fiber-bundle-espace-etale-interpretation-of-sheaves-on-a-grothendieck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What is a "Grothendieck continuous" morphism? And what category is it supposed to be a morphism of?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 16:21
$begingroup$
I don't know, that's part of the question of what such a formulation would mean.
$endgroup$
– edgarlorp
Mar 14 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
Ok. The problem is that Grothendieck topologies very specifically generalize the property of topological spaces that they produce a sheaf theory, and not that they produce a notion of continuous map.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Mar 14 at 19:51