If $phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a group onto homomorphism then show that $|G'|$ divides $|G|$If $G$ is a finitely generated abelian group, then $G cong mathbbZ^r/phi(mathbbZ^s)$Homomorphism theorem and group productLet $G=langle arangle$ and $G'=langle brangle$ of order 12 and 4. Prove that there is a onto homomorphism with $o(Ker~ phi)=3$.Prove that a homomorphism $phi$ must be trivial.Does there exist an onto group homomorphism from $mathbbRto mathbbZ$?No homomorphism from $Z_16oplus Z_2$ onto $Z_4oplus Z_4$.For ring homomorphism $phi:Rto S$, prove that $phi$ is an isomorphism iff $phi$ is onto and $ker(phi)=left 0_R right $.Prove that if H is a group of odd order, there exists no nontrivial homomorphism from D_2017 to H?Suppose there is homomorphism from finite group G onto $Z_10$ Then G has Normal Subgroup of index 5 and 2.If $phi:G to overline G$ is group homomorphism, then prove that $|phi(G)|$ divides $|G|$.

What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?

Should I assume I have passed probation?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment

Should I warn new/prospective PhD Student that supervisor is terrible?

How to reduce predictors the right way for a logistic regression model

Can I cause damage to electrical appliances by unplugging them when they are turned on?

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?

Usage of an old photo with expired copyright

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Is there anyway, I can have two passwords for my wi-fi

Is it feasible to let a newcomer play the "Gandalf"-like figure I created for my campaign?

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

Alignment of six matrices

How can I safely use "Thalidomide" in my novel while respecting the trademark?

Why would five hundred and five be same as one?

How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

Is there a reason to prefer HFS+ over APFS for disk images in High Sierra and/or Mojave?

Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?

Can you identify this lizard-like creature I observed in the UK?

Integral Notations in Quantum Mechanics

Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?



If $phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a group onto homomorphism then show that $|G'|$ divides $|G|$


If $G$ is a finitely generated abelian group, then $G cong mathbbZ^r/phi(mathbbZ^s)$Homomorphism theorem and group productLet $G=langle arangle$ and $G'=langle brangle$ of order 12 and 4. Prove that there is a onto homomorphism with $o(Ker~ phi)=3$.Prove that a homomorphism $phi$ must be trivial.Does there exist an onto group homomorphism from $mathbbRto mathbbZ$?No homomorphism from $Z_16oplus Z_2$ onto $Z_4oplus Z_4$.For ring homomorphism $phi:Rto S$, prove that $phi$ is an isomorphism iff $phi$ is onto and $ker(phi)=left 0_R right $.Prove that if H is a group of odd order, there exists no nontrivial homomorphism from D_2017 to H?Suppose there is homomorphism from finite group G onto $Z_10$ Then G has Normal Subgroup of index 5 and 2.If $phi:G to overline G$ is group homomorphism, then prove that $|phi(G)|$ divides $|G|$.













0












$begingroup$



If $phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a (finite) group onto homomorphism then show that $|G'|$ divides $|G|$




$phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a group onto homomorphism then by Isomorphism theorem,



$G/Ker~ phi simeq G'$ and then $|G/Ker~ phi|= |G'|$ i.e $$|Ker~ phi|=fracG $$



But $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ can be concluded only when $|Ker~ phi|$ exist finitely. What to do?



Is any other alternative method to solve?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The statement only makes sense for finite groups $G$. Since $ker(phi)$ is a subgroup of $G$, any situations where the kernel is infinite are irrelevant.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is a finite group, then $ker phi subset G$ is also finite.
    $endgroup$
    – u1571372
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde Without using Isomorphism theorem directly.
    $endgroup$
    – rama_ran
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    We could just show that the cardinalities $|G/ker(phi)|$ and $|G'|$ coincide. This is "less" than the "isomorphism theorem". But the proof would be suspiciously similar to the proof of the isomorphism theorem. So no real progress. Perhaps one would ask why you don't want the isomorphism theorem; it is so basic.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:25















0












$begingroup$



If $phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a (finite) group onto homomorphism then show that $|G'|$ divides $|G|$




$phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a group onto homomorphism then by Isomorphism theorem,



$G/Ker~ phi simeq G'$ and then $|G/Ker~ phi|= |G'|$ i.e $$|Ker~ phi|=fracG $$



But $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ can be concluded only when $|Ker~ phi|$ exist finitely. What to do?



Is any other alternative method to solve?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The statement only makes sense for finite groups $G$. Since $ker(phi)$ is a subgroup of $G$, any situations where the kernel is infinite are irrelevant.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is a finite group, then $ker phi subset G$ is also finite.
    $endgroup$
    – u1571372
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde Without using Isomorphism theorem directly.
    $endgroup$
    – rama_ran
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    We could just show that the cardinalities $|G/ker(phi)|$ and $|G'|$ coincide. This is "less" than the "isomorphism theorem". But the proof would be suspiciously similar to the proof of the isomorphism theorem. So no real progress. Perhaps one would ask why you don't want the isomorphism theorem; it is so basic.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:25













0












0








0





$begingroup$



If $phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a (finite) group onto homomorphism then show that $|G'|$ divides $|G|$




$phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a group onto homomorphism then by Isomorphism theorem,



$G/Ker~ phi simeq G'$ and then $|G/Ker~ phi|= |G'|$ i.e $$|Ker~ phi|=fracG $$



But $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ can be concluded only when $|Ker~ phi|$ exist finitely. What to do?



Is any other alternative method to solve?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





If $phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a (finite) group onto homomorphism then show that $|G'|$ divides $|G|$




$phi: Grightarrow G'$ be a group onto homomorphism then by Isomorphism theorem,



$G/Ker~ phi simeq G'$ and then $|G/Ker~ phi|= |G'|$ i.e $$|Ker~ phi|=fracG $$



But $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ can be concluded only when $|Ker~ phi|$ exist finitely. What to do?



Is any other alternative method to solve?







abstract-algebra group-theory group-isomorphism group-homomorphism






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 10 '16 at 19:10







rama_ran

















asked Oct 10 '16 at 18:58









rama_ranrama_ran

300314




300314











  • $begingroup$
    The statement only makes sense for finite groups $G$. Since $ker(phi)$ is a subgroup of $G$, any situations where the kernel is infinite are irrelevant.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is a finite group, then $ker phi subset G$ is also finite.
    $endgroup$
    – u1571372
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde Without using Isomorphism theorem directly.
    $endgroup$
    – rama_ran
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    We could just show that the cardinalities $|G/ker(phi)|$ and $|G'|$ coincide. This is "less" than the "isomorphism theorem". But the proof would be suspiciously similar to the proof of the isomorphism theorem. So no real progress. Perhaps one would ask why you don't want the isomorphism theorem; it is so basic.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:25
















  • $begingroup$
    The statement only makes sense for finite groups $G$. Since $ker(phi)$ is a subgroup of $G$, any situations where the kernel is infinite are irrelevant.
    $endgroup$
    – Kaj Hansen
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is a finite group, then $ker phi subset G$ is also finite.
    $endgroup$
    – u1571372
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde Without using Isomorphism theorem directly.
    $endgroup$
    – rama_ran
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    We could just show that the cardinalities $|G/ker(phi)|$ and $|G'|$ coincide. This is "less" than the "isomorphism theorem". But the proof would be suspiciously similar to the proof of the isomorphism theorem. So no real progress. Perhaps one would ask why you don't want the isomorphism theorem; it is so basic.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Oct 10 '16 at 19:25















$begingroup$
The statement only makes sense for finite groups $G$. Since $ker(phi)$ is a subgroup of $G$, any situations where the kernel is infinite are irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Kaj Hansen
Oct 10 '16 at 19:02




$begingroup$
The statement only makes sense for finite groups $G$. Since $ker(phi)$ is a subgroup of $G$, any situations where the kernel is infinite are irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Kaj Hansen
Oct 10 '16 at 19:02












$begingroup$
If $G$ is a finite group, then $ker phi subset G$ is also finite.
$endgroup$
– u1571372
Oct 10 '16 at 19:02




$begingroup$
If $G$ is a finite group, then $ker phi subset G$ is also finite.
$endgroup$
– u1571372
Oct 10 '16 at 19:02












$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde Without using Isomorphism theorem directly.
$endgroup$
– rama_ran
Oct 10 '16 at 19:20




$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde Without using Isomorphism theorem directly.
$endgroup$
– rama_ran
Oct 10 '16 at 19:20












$begingroup$
We could just show that the cardinalities $|G/ker(phi)|$ and $|G'|$ coincide. This is "less" than the "isomorphism theorem". But the proof would be suspiciously similar to the proof of the isomorphism theorem. So no real progress. Perhaps one would ask why you don't want the isomorphism theorem; it is so basic.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Oct 10 '16 at 19:25




$begingroup$
We could just show that the cardinalities $|G/ker(phi)|$ and $|G'|$ coincide. This is "less" than the "isomorphism theorem". But the proof would be suspiciously similar to the proof of the isomorphism theorem. So no real progress. Perhaps one would ask why you don't want the isomorphism theorem; it is so basic.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Oct 10 '16 at 19:25










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

It is slightly more clear to stick to $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$, and not to divide by $|Ker phi|$.



This clearly shows the divisibility in case $|G|$ is finite. If $G$ is not finite, I'd say the question does not make sense. But if one were to make sense of it then it would be again the equality $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$ that is relevant.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Since the problem asks us to prove $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ we assume that $G$ and $G'$ are already finite groups, which implies that $kerphi$ is also finite (as it is a subgroup of $G$)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Ok. Understood. Is any other alternative method to solve?
      $endgroup$
      – rama_ran
      Oct 10 '16 at 19:09











    • $begingroup$
      This is probably the simplest way to solve it.
      $endgroup$
      – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo
      Oct 10 '16 at 19:15










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1962674%2fif-phi-g-rightarrow-g-be-a-group-onto-homomorphism-then-show-that-g-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    It is slightly more clear to stick to $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$, and not to divide by $|Ker phi|$.



    This clearly shows the divisibility in case $|G|$ is finite. If $G$ is not finite, I'd say the question does not make sense. But if one were to make sense of it then it would be again the equality $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$ that is relevant.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      It is slightly more clear to stick to $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$, and not to divide by $|Ker phi|$.



      This clearly shows the divisibility in case $|G|$ is finite. If $G$ is not finite, I'd say the question does not make sense. But if one were to make sense of it then it would be again the equality $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$ that is relevant.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        It is slightly more clear to stick to $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$, and not to divide by $|Ker phi|$.



        This clearly shows the divisibility in case $|G|$ is finite. If $G$ is not finite, I'd say the question does not make sense. But if one were to make sense of it then it would be again the equality $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$ that is relevant.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is slightly more clear to stick to $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$, and not to divide by $|Ker phi|$.



        This clearly shows the divisibility in case $|G|$ is finite. If $G$ is not finite, I'd say the question does not make sense. But if one were to make sense of it then it would be again the equality $|G'| |Ker phi|= |G|$ that is relevant.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Oct 10 '16 at 19:05









        quidquid

        37.2k95193




        37.2k95193





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Since the problem asks us to prove $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ we assume that $G$ and $G'$ are already finite groups, which implies that $kerphi$ is also finite (as it is a subgroup of $G$)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Ok. Understood. Is any other alternative method to solve?
              $endgroup$
              – rama_ran
              Oct 10 '16 at 19:09











            • $begingroup$
              This is probably the simplest way to solve it.
              $endgroup$
              – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo
              Oct 10 '16 at 19:15















            0












            $begingroup$

            Since the problem asks us to prove $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ we assume that $G$ and $G'$ are already finite groups, which implies that $kerphi$ is also finite (as it is a subgroup of $G$)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Ok. Understood. Is any other alternative method to solve?
              $endgroup$
              – rama_ran
              Oct 10 '16 at 19:09











            • $begingroup$
              This is probably the simplest way to solve it.
              $endgroup$
              – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo
              Oct 10 '16 at 19:15













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Since the problem asks us to prove $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ we assume that $G$ and $G'$ are already finite groups, which implies that $kerphi$ is also finite (as it is a subgroup of $G$)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Since the problem asks us to prove $|G'|$ divides $|G|$ we assume that $G$ and $G'$ are already finite groups, which implies that $kerphi$ is also finite (as it is a subgroup of $G$)







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Oct 10 '16 at 19:02









            Jorge Fernández HidalgoJorge Fernández Hidalgo

            76.8k1394195




            76.8k1394195











            • $begingroup$
              Ok. Understood. Is any other alternative method to solve?
              $endgroup$
              – rama_ran
              Oct 10 '16 at 19:09











            • $begingroup$
              This is probably the simplest way to solve it.
              $endgroup$
              – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo
              Oct 10 '16 at 19:15
















            • $begingroup$
              Ok. Understood. Is any other alternative method to solve?
              $endgroup$
              – rama_ran
              Oct 10 '16 at 19:09











            • $begingroup$
              This is probably the simplest way to solve it.
              $endgroup$
              – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo
              Oct 10 '16 at 19:15















            $begingroup$
            Ok. Understood. Is any other alternative method to solve?
            $endgroup$
            – rama_ran
            Oct 10 '16 at 19:09





            $begingroup$
            Ok. Understood. Is any other alternative method to solve?
            $endgroup$
            – rama_ran
            Oct 10 '16 at 19:09













            $begingroup$
            This is probably the simplest way to solve it.
            $endgroup$
            – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo
            Oct 10 '16 at 19:15




            $begingroup$
            This is probably the simplest way to solve it.
            $endgroup$
            – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo
            Oct 10 '16 at 19:15

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1962674%2fif-phi-g-rightarrow-g-be-a-group-onto-homomorphism-then-show-that-g-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers