Translating a sentence into a predicate formulaExpress statements using symbolic logicWhat does 'any' mean in predicate calculusWould including the outside quantifier make more sense/be logically correct?Translating English to QuantifiersTranslating English to symbolic logicOrder of statements in implicationTranslating this nested quantifier to english (negation of nested quantifiers)How do I translate sentences from English to predicate logic?Nested Quantifiers (And vs Implies)Need someone to check if I am reading nested quantifiers correctly

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?

What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?

Language involving irrational number is not a CFL

Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?

Visualizing the difference curve in a 2D plot?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting in 15 days (a colleague left this week)

How would a solely written language work mechanically

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

How do I Interface a PS/2 Keyboard without Modern Techniques?

How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?

How much do grades matter for a future academia position?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

How to reduce predictors the right way for a logistic regression model

Ways of geometrical multiplication

In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?

If the only attacker is removed from combat, is a creature still counted as having attacked this turn?

What does "tick" mean in this sentence?

Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

When is "ei" a diphthong?

Proving an identity involving cross products and coplanar vectors

Can you identify this lizard-like creature I observed in the UK?

Usage of an old photo with expired copyright



Translating a sentence into a predicate formula


Express statements using symbolic logicWhat does 'any' mean in predicate calculusWould including the outside quantifier make more sense/be logically correct?Translating English to QuantifiersTranslating English to symbolic logicOrder of statements in implicationTranslating this nested quantifier to english (negation of nested quantifiers)How do I translate sentences from English to predicate logic?Nested Quantifiers (And vs Implies)Need someone to check if I am reading nested quantifiers correctly













0












$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are



  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”

(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.



  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30











  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31















0












$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are



  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”

(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.



  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30











  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are



  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”

(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.



  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are



  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”

(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.



  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.






discrete-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 23 at 16:25









N. F. Taussig

44.8k103358




44.8k103358










asked Jan 23 at 16:16









Jinlin LIJinlin LI

1




1







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30











  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30











  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31







1




1




$begingroup$
Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:18




$begingroup$
Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:18












$begingroup$
How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:30





$begingroup$
How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:30













$begingroup$
How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:31




$begingroup$
How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people





share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084689%2ftranslating-a-sentence-into-a-predicate-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people





share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59















0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people





share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59













0












0








0





$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people





share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people






share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 at 7:48









王文军 or Wenjun Wang王文军 or Wenjun Wang

514




514











  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59
















  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59















$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
$endgroup$
– 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
Mar 14 at 7:59




$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
$endgroup$
– 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
Mar 14 at 7:59

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084689%2ftranslating-a-sentence-into-a-predicate-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".