Translating a sentence into a predicate formulaExpress statements using symbolic logicWhat does 'any' mean in predicate calculusWould including the outside quantifier make more sense/be logically correct?Translating English to QuantifiersTranslating English to symbolic logicOrder of statements in implicationTranslating this nested quantifier to english (negation of nested quantifiers)How do I translate sentences from English to predicate logic?Nested Quantifiers (And vs Implies)Need someone to check if I am reading nested quantifiers correctly

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?

What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?

Language involving irrational number is not a CFL

Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?

Visualizing the difference curve in a 2D plot?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting in 15 days (a colleague left this week)

How would a solely written language work mechanically

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

How do I Interface a PS/2 Keyboard without Modern Techniques?

How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?

How much do grades matter for a future academia position?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

How to reduce predictors the right way for a logistic regression model

Ways of geometrical multiplication

In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?

If the only attacker is removed from combat, is a creature still counted as having attacked this turn?

What does "tick" mean in this sentence?

Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

When is "ei" a diphthong?

Proving an identity involving cross products and coplanar vectors

Can you identify this lizard-like creature I observed in the UK?

Usage of an old photo with expired copyright



Translating a sentence into a predicate formula


Express statements using symbolic logicWhat does 'any' mean in predicate calculusWould including the outside quantifier make more sense/be logically correct?Translating English to QuantifiersTranslating English to symbolic logicOrder of statements in implicationTranslating this nested quantifier to english (negation of nested quantifiers)How do I translate sentences from English to predicate logic?Nested Quantifiers (And vs Implies)Need someone to check if I am reading nested quantifiers correctly













0












$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are



  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”

(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.



  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30











  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31















0












$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are



  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”

(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.



  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30











  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are



  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”

(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.



  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Problem 3.40. (a) Translate the following sentence into a predicate formula:



There is a student who has e-mailed at most n other people in the class,
besides possibly himself.



The domain of discourse should be the set of students in the class; in addition, the only predicates that you may use are



  • equality,

  • E.x; y/, meaning that “x has sent e-mail to y.”

(b) Explain how you would use your predicate formula (or some variant of it) to
express the following two sentences.



  1. There is a student who has emailed at least n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.

  2. There is a student who has emailed exactly n other people in the class, besides possibly himself.






discrete-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 23 at 16:25









N. F. Taussig

44.8k103358




44.8k103358










asked Jan 23 at 16:16









Jinlin LIJinlin LI

1




1







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30











  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:18










  • $begingroup$
    How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:30











  • $begingroup$
    How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Jan 23 at 16:31







1




1




$begingroup$
Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:18




$begingroup$
Do you know quantifiers ? Like e.g. $exists x$
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:18












$begingroup$
How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:30





$begingroup$
How are you asked to mange the "n" ? Do you know "numerical" quantifiers ? if not, Try with the simple cases : $n=1$ and $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:30













$begingroup$
How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:31




$begingroup$
How we have to read "besides possibly himself" ? That we have to exclude himself from counting, I think...
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 23 at 16:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people





share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084689%2ftranslating-a-sentence-into-a-predicate-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people





share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59















0












$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people





share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59













0












0








0





$begingroup$

Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people





share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Solution to part (a):
$
exists s Big((forall u ^neg E(s, u) ) land big( exists xexists y (xne y land y ne s land x ne s) land (E(s, x) lor E(s,y)) land forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))big) Big)
$




  • $(forall u ^neg E(s, u) )$ stands for the case that s does not send any one an email.


  • $ E(s, x) lor E(s,y)$ stands for 2 people


  • $forall z ((z ne x lor zne y lor z ne s) implies ^neg E(s,z))$ stands for at most 2 people






share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 at 7:48









王文军 or Wenjun Wang王文军 or Wenjun Wang

514




514











  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59
















  • $begingroup$
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
    Mar 14 at 7:59















$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
$endgroup$
– 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
Mar 14 at 7:59




$begingroup$
@MauroALLEGRANZA Sir, may you check whether this solution is correct?
$endgroup$
– 王文军 or Wenjun Wang
Mar 14 at 7:59

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084689%2ftranslating-a-sentence-into-a-predicate-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers