Prove improper integral exists and continuously differentiableShowing $intlimits_a^b h(x)sin(nx) dx rightarrow 0$Swapping integral and limit - exampleuniform limit of step functionProve that the improper integral convergesA question related to Limit on Improper integralSwapping an improper integral and seriesA continuously differentiable function is weakly differentiableEvaluate $lim_nrightarrowinfty int_0^1 f(x^n) dx$Limit of a continuously differentiable functionDetermine pointwise and uniform convergence of a given sequence of functions and calculate an integral

Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?

Should I assume I have passed probation?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Anime with legendary swords made from talismans and a man who could change them with a shattered body

How to leave product feedback on macOS?

PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Sound waves in different octaves

Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

Can you identify this lizard-like creature I observed in the UK?

Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?

Typing CO_2 easily

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

Do you waste sorcery points if you try to apply metamagic to a spell from a scroll but fail to cast it?

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Storage of electrolytic capacitors - how long?

ContourPlot — How do I color by contour curvature?

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

How to make a list of partial sums using forEach



Prove improper integral exists and continuously differentiable


Showing $intlimits_a^b h(x)sin(nx) dx rightarrow 0$Swapping integral and limit - exampleuniform limit of step functionProve that the improper integral convergesA question related to Limit on Improper integralSwapping an improper integral and seriesA continuously differentiable function is weakly differentiableEvaluate $lim_nrightarrowinfty int_0^1 f(x^n) dx$Limit of a continuously differentiable functionDetermine pointwise and uniform convergence of a given sequence of functions and calculate an integral













2












$begingroup$


For $xin(0,infty)$, let $F(x)=int_0^inftyfrac1-e^-txt^frac32 dt$. Show that $F:(0,infty)to(0,infty)$ is well-defined, bijective and has continuous non-zero derivative.



I don't know what argument to say about bijectivity. And for derivative exists I suppose we use uniform convergence on compact interval which enables us to interchange limit and integration, but does that mean we have to cut $(0,infty)$ into three parts? As for showing derivative is continuous, it just sounds like a lot of calculation...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    For $xin(0,infty)$, let $F(x)=int_0^inftyfrac1-e^-txt^frac32 dt$. Show that $F:(0,infty)to(0,infty)$ is well-defined, bijective and has continuous non-zero derivative.



    I don't know what argument to say about bijectivity. And for derivative exists I suppose we use uniform convergence on compact interval which enables us to interchange limit and integration, but does that mean we have to cut $(0,infty)$ into three parts? As for showing derivative is continuous, it just sounds like a lot of calculation...










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      For $xin(0,infty)$, let $F(x)=int_0^inftyfrac1-e^-txt^frac32 dt$. Show that $F:(0,infty)to(0,infty)$ is well-defined, bijective and has continuous non-zero derivative.



      I don't know what argument to say about bijectivity. And for derivative exists I suppose we use uniform convergence on compact interval which enables us to interchange limit and integration, but does that mean we have to cut $(0,infty)$ into three parts? As for showing derivative is continuous, it just sounds like a lot of calculation...










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      For $xin(0,infty)$, let $F(x)=int_0^inftyfrac1-e^-txt^frac32 dt$. Show that $F:(0,infty)to(0,infty)$ is well-defined, bijective and has continuous non-zero derivative.



      I don't know what argument to say about bijectivity. And for derivative exists I suppose we use uniform convergence on compact interval which enables us to interchange limit and integration, but does that mean we have to cut $(0,infty)$ into three parts? As for showing derivative is continuous, it just sounds like a lot of calculation...







      real-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 14 at 19:39







      Fluffy Skye

















      asked Mar 14 at 6:53









      Fluffy SkyeFluffy Skye

      31919




      31919




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          To see that $F$ is well defined, you have to study separately the two singularities of $$f(t) = frac1-e^-xtt^3/2$$
          For $t to 0^+$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim fracxtt^3/2 = fracxt^1/2$$
          since $int_0^1 fracxt^1/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_0^1 f(t) dt$.



          For $t to + infty$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim frac1t^3/2$$
          since $int_1^+infty frac1t^3/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_1^+infty f(t) dt$.



          This shows that $F$ is well defined for all $x$.



          Now, for $0<x_1 < x_2$ and for all $t > 0$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2<frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2$$
          thus integrating you have
          $$int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2 mathrm dt <int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2 mathrm dt$$



          This shows that $F$ is strictly increasing on $(0, + infty)$. In particular it is injective. To show that it is bijective it is enough to prove continuity. To show that $F$ is continuous, it is enough to prove that $F$ is differentiable.
          This seems quite complicated.



          HOWEVER:
          Note that, if you call $u=xt$, then your function becomes:
          $$F(x)=sqrtx int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-uu^3/2 mathrm du = F(1) sqrt x$$
          which is a well-known function: continuous, strictly increasing, differentiable and bijective.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Say we didn't notice that $F(x) = F(1)sqrtx$ and we wanted to differentiate $F$ by dominating $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$ by an integrable function on $(0,+infty)$ independent of $x$. I haven't been able to come up with the dominating function. Clearly $frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt$ for $t le 1$ but for $t ge 1$ what to dominate it with?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 9:58











          • $begingroup$
            For $t ge 1$, $frace^-txsqrtt le e^-tx$.
            $endgroup$
            – Crostul
            Mar 14 at 10:25










          • $begingroup$
            Unfortunately this is not independent of $x$. And you cannot say $e^-tx le e^-t$ for $x < 1$. My other attempt was $$frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt(1+tx)$$ but again I was unable to eliminate $x$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 10:27







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid If we had $e^-tx/sqrt t le g(t)$ everwhere, then letting $xto 0^+$ gives $1/sqrt tle g(t)$ for all $t>0,$ which implies $gnotin L^1(0,infty).$
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 16:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid However, if $a>0,$ then for $(x,t)in [a,infty)times (0,infty),$ we have $$e^-tx/sqrt t le e^-ta/sqrt t.$$ That is enough to use differentiation through the integral sign.
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 17:33


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The derivative of the integrand is
          $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$
          We claim that
          $$F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          for all $x > 0$.



          Fix $a > 0$ and notice that for $x ge a$ we have
          $$frace^-txsqrtt le frace^-tasqrtt le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          the latter being an integrable function on $(0,infty)$.
          For any such $x$ we have
          $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 fracF(x+h) - F(x)h = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right],dt$$
          The mean value theorem implies that $exists theta(h) in (x,x+h)$ such that $$frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right] = frace^-tthetasqrtt$$
          so $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty lim_hto 0frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          We were able to swap the integral and the limit according to the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem since
          $$left|frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt right| le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t), quadforall t > 0$$
          Notice that it is important that the dominating function does not depend on $h$ in any way.



          Since $a > 0$ is arbitrary, we conclude $F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$ for all $x > 0$.




          For surjectivity it suffices to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$. This together with continuity yields the desired result via the intermediate value theorem.



          For $x le 1$ we have
          $$frac1-e^-txt^3/2 le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + frac1t^3/2chi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          having used $e^-tx ge 1-tx$. The latter function is integrable on $(0,infty)$ so Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem implies
          $$lim_xto 0 F(x) = lim_xto 0 int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto 0frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty 0 ,dt = 0$$



          You already know that for $x_1,x_2 in (0,infty)$ with $x_1 < x_2$ we have $$frac1-e^-tx_1t^3/2 < frac1-e^-tx_2t^3/2$$



          Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem thus implies
          $$lim_xto infty F(x) = lim_xto infty int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto inftyfrac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty frac1t^3/2 ,dt = infty$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I just learnt improper integral and this is the first excercie I got, I just want to know every detail.
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 21:39










          • $begingroup$
            But regarding surjectivity, without having the explicit formula, only knowing injectivity and continuity is not enough, is it?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 23:40










          • $begingroup$
            @FluffySkye It isn't, we also need to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$ and then the result follows from the intermediate value theorem. Have a look, I added it in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 15 at 21:34










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147646%2fprove-improper-integral-exists-and-continuously-differentiable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          To see that $F$ is well defined, you have to study separately the two singularities of $$f(t) = frac1-e^-xtt^3/2$$
          For $t to 0^+$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim fracxtt^3/2 = fracxt^1/2$$
          since $int_0^1 fracxt^1/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_0^1 f(t) dt$.



          For $t to + infty$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim frac1t^3/2$$
          since $int_1^+infty frac1t^3/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_1^+infty f(t) dt$.



          This shows that $F$ is well defined for all $x$.



          Now, for $0<x_1 < x_2$ and for all $t > 0$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2<frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2$$
          thus integrating you have
          $$int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2 mathrm dt <int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2 mathrm dt$$



          This shows that $F$ is strictly increasing on $(0, + infty)$. In particular it is injective. To show that it is bijective it is enough to prove continuity. To show that $F$ is continuous, it is enough to prove that $F$ is differentiable.
          This seems quite complicated.



          HOWEVER:
          Note that, if you call $u=xt$, then your function becomes:
          $$F(x)=sqrtx int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-uu^3/2 mathrm du = F(1) sqrt x$$
          which is a well-known function: continuous, strictly increasing, differentiable and bijective.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Say we didn't notice that $F(x) = F(1)sqrtx$ and we wanted to differentiate $F$ by dominating $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$ by an integrable function on $(0,+infty)$ independent of $x$. I haven't been able to come up with the dominating function. Clearly $frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt$ for $t le 1$ but for $t ge 1$ what to dominate it with?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 9:58











          • $begingroup$
            For $t ge 1$, $frace^-txsqrtt le e^-tx$.
            $endgroup$
            – Crostul
            Mar 14 at 10:25










          • $begingroup$
            Unfortunately this is not independent of $x$. And you cannot say $e^-tx le e^-t$ for $x < 1$. My other attempt was $$frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt(1+tx)$$ but again I was unable to eliminate $x$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 10:27







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid If we had $e^-tx/sqrt t le g(t)$ everwhere, then letting $xto 0^+$ gives $1/sqrt tle g(t)$ for all $t>0,$ which implies $gnotin L^1(0,infty).$
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 16:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid However, if $a>0,$ then for $(x,t)in [a,infty)times (0,infty),$ we have $$e^-tx/sqrt t le e^-ta/sqrt t.$$ That is enough to use differentiation through the integral sign.
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 17:33















          2












          $begingroup$

          To see that $F$ is well defined, you have to study separately the two singularities of $$f(t) = frac1-e^-xtt^3/2$$
          For $t to 0^+$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim fracxtt^3/2 = fracxt^1/2$$
          since $int_0^1 fracxt^1/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_0^1 f(t) dt$.



          For $t to + infty$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim frac1t^3/2$$
          since $int_1^+infty frac1t^3/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_1^+infty f(t) dt$.



          This shows that $F$ is well defined for all $x$.



          Now, for $0<x_1 < x_2$ and for all $t > 0$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2<frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2$$
          thus integrating you have
          $$int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2 mathrm dt <int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2 mathrm dt$$



          This shows that $F$ is strictly increasing on $(0, + infty)$. In particular it is injective. To show that it is bijective it is enough to prove continuity. To show that $F$ is continuous, it is enough to prove that $F$ is differentiable.
          This seems quite complicated.



          HOWEVER:
          Note that, if you call $u=xt$, then your function becomes:
          $$F(x)=sqrtx int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-uu^3/2 mathrm du = F(1) sqrt x$$
          which is a well-known function: continuous, strictly increasing, differentiable and bijective.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Say we didn't notice that $F(x) = F(1)sqrtx$ and we wanted to differentiate $F$ by dominating $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$ by an integrable function on $(0,+infty)$ independent of $x$. I haven't been able to come up with the dominating function. Clearly $frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt$ for $t le 1$ but for $t ge 1$ what to dominate it with?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 9:58











          • $begingroup$
            For $t ge 1$, $frace^-txsqrtt le e^-tx$.
            $endgroup$
            – Crostul
            Mar 14 at 10:25










          • $begingroup$
            Unfortunately this is not independent of $x$. And you cannot say $e^-tx le e^-t$ for $x < 1$. My other attempt was $$frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt(1+tx)$$ but again I was unable to eliminate $x$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 10:27







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid If we had $e^-tx/sqrt t le g(t)$ everwhere, then letting $xto 0^+$ gives $1/sqrt tle g(t)$ for all $t>0,$ which implies $gnotin L^1(0,infty).$
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 16:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid However, if $a>0,$ then for $(x,t)in [a,infty)times (0,infty),$ we have $$e^-tx/sqrt t le e^-ta/sqrt t.$$ That is enough to use differentiation through the integral sign.
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 17:33













          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          To see that $F$ is well defined, you have to study separately the two singularities of $$f(t) = frac1-e^-xtt^3/2$$
          For $t to 0^+$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim fracxtt^3/2 = fracxt^1/2$$
          since $int_0^1 fracxt^1/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_0^1 f(t) dt$.



          For $t to + infty$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim frac1t^3/2$$
          since $int_1^+infty frac1t^3/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_1^+infty f(t) dt$.



          This shows that $F$ is well defined for all $x$.



          Now, for $0<x_1 < x_2$ and for all $t > 0$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2<frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2$$
          thus integrating you have
          $$int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2 mathrm dt <int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2 mathrm dt$$



          This shows that $F$ is strictly increasing on $(0, + infty)$. In particular it is injective. To show that it is bijective it is enough to prove continuity. To show that $F$ is continuous, it is enough to prove that $F$ is differentiable.
          This seems quite complicated.



          HOWEVER:
          Note that, if you call $u=xt$, then your function becomes:
          $$F(x)=sqrtx int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-uu^3/2 mathrm du = F(1) sqrt x$$
          which is a well-known function: continuous, strictly increasing, differentiable and bijective.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          To see that $F$ is well defined, you have to study separately the two singularities of $$f(t) = frac1-e^-xtt^3/2$$
          For $t to 0^+$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim fracxtt^3/2 = fracxt^1/2$$
          since $int_0^1 fracxt^1/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_0^1 f(t) dt$.



          For $t to + infty$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-xtt^3/2 sim frac1t^3/2$$
          since $int_1^+infty frac1t^3/2 dt$ converges, you have convergence of $int_1^+infty f(t) dt$.



          This shows that $F$ is well defined for all $x$.



          Now, for $0<x_1 < x_2$ and for all $t > 0$ you have
          $$frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2<frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2$$
          thus integrating you have
          $$int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_1tt^3/2 mathrm dt <int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-x_2tt^3/2 mathrm dt$$



          This shows that $F$ is strictly increasing on $(0, + infty)$. In particular it is injective. To show that it is bijective it is enough to prove continuity. To show that $F$ is continuous, it is enough to prove that $F$ is differentiable.
          This seems quite complicated.



          HOWEVER:
          Note that, if you call $u=xt$, then your function becomes:
          $$F(x)=sqrtx int_0^+ infty frac1-e^-uu^3/2 mathrm du = F(1) sqrt x$$
          which is a well-known function: continuous, strictly increasing, differentiable and bijective.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 14 at 8:59

























          answered Mar 14 at 8:32









          CrostulCrostul

          28.2k22352




          28.2k22352











          • $begingroup$
            Say we didn't notice that $F(x) = F(1)sqrtx$ and we wanted to differentiate $F$ by dominating $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$ by an integrable function on $(0,+infty)$ independent of $x$. I haven't been able to come up with the dominating function. Clearly $frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt$ for $t le 1$ but for $t ge 1$ what to dominate it with?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 9:58











          • $begingroup$
            For $t ge 1$, $frace^-txsqrtt le e^-tx$.
            $endgroup$
            – Crostul
            Mar 14 at 10:25










          • $begingroup$
            Unfortunately this is not independent of $x$. And you cannot say $e^-tx le e^-t$ for $x < 1$. My other attempt was $$frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt(1+tx)$$ but again I was unable to eliminate $x$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 10:27







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid If we had $e^-tx/sqrt t le g(t)$ everwhere, then letting $xto 0^+$ gives $1/sqrt tle g(t)$ for all $t>0,$ which implies $gnotin L^1(0,infty).$
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 16:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid However, if $a>0,$ then for $(x,t)in [a,infty)times (0,infty),$ we have $$e^-tx/sqrt t le e^-ta/sqrt t.$$ That is enough to use differentiation through the integral sign.
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 17:33
















          • $begingroup$
            Say we didn't notice that $F(x) = F(1)sqrtx$ and we wanted to differentiate $F$ by dominating $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$ by an integrable function on $(0,+infty)$ independent of $x$. I haven't been able to come up with the dominating function. Clearly $frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt$ for $t le 1$ but for $t ge 1$ what to dominate it with?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 9:58











          • $begingroup$
            For $t ge 1$, $frace^-txsqrtt le e^-tx$.
            $endgroup$
            – Crostul
            Mar 14 at 10:25










          • $begingroup$
            Unfortunately this is not independent of $x$. And you cannot say $e^-tx le e^-t$ for $x < 1$. My other attempt was $$frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt(1+tx)$$ but again I was unable to eliminate $x$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 14 at 10:27







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid If we had $e^-tx/sqrt t le g(t)$ everwhere, then letting $xto 0^+$ gives $1/sqrt tle g(t)$ for all $t>0,$ which implies $gnotin L^1(0,infty).$
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 16:58






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid However, if $a>0,$ then for $(x,t)in [a,infty)times (0,infty),$ we have $$e^-tx/sqrt t le e^-ta/sqrt t.$$ That is enough to use differentiation through the integral sign.
            $endgroup$
            – zhw.
            Mar 14 at 17:33















          $begingroup$
          Say we didn't notice that $F(x) = F(1)sqrtx$ and we wanted to differentiate $F$ by dominating $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$ by an integrable function on $(0,+infty)$ independent of $x$. I haven't been able to come up with the dominating function. Clearly $frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt$ for $t le 1$ but for $t ge 1$ what to dominate it with?
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 14 at 9:58





          $begingroup$
          Say we didn't notice that $F(x) = F(1)sqrtx$ and we wanted to differentiate $F$ by dominating $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$ by an integrable function on $(0,+infty)$ independent of $x$. I haven't been able to come up with the dominating function. Clearly $frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt$ for $t le 1$ but for $t ge 1$ what to dominate it with?
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 14 at 9:58













          $begingroup$
          For $t ge 1$, $frace^-txsqrtt le e^-tx$.
          $endgroup$
          – Crostul
          Mar 14 at 10:25




          $begingroup$
          For $t ge 1$, $frace^-txsqrtt le e^-tx$.
          $endgroup$
          – Crostul
          Mar 14 at 10:25












          $begingroup$
          Unfortunately this is not independent of $x$. And you cannot say $e^-tx le e^-t$ for $x < 1$. My other attempt was $$frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt(1+tx)$$ but again I was unable to eliminate $x$.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 14 at 10:27





          $begingroup$
          Unfortunately this is not independent of $x$. And you cannot say $e^-tx le e^-t$ for $x < 1$. My other attempt was $$frace^-txsqrtt le frac1sqrtt(1+tx)$$ but again I was unable to eliminate $x$.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 14 at 10:27





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @mechanodroid If we had $e^-tx/sqrt t le g(t)$ everwhere, then letting $xto 0^+$ gives $1/sqrt tle g(t)$ for all $t>0,$ which implies $gnotin L^1(0,infty).$
          $endgroup$
          – zhw.
          Mar 14 at 16:58




          $begingroup$
          @mechanodroid If we had $e^-tx/sqrt t le g(t)$ everwhere, then letting $xto 0^+$ gives $1/sqrt tle g(t)$ for all $t>0,$ which implies $gnotin L^1(0,infty).$
          $endgroup$
          – zhw.
          Mar 14 at 16:58




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @mechanodroid However, if $a>0,$ then for $(x,t)in [a,infty)times (0,infty),$ we have $$e^-tx/sqrt t le e^-ta/sqrt t.$$ That is enough to use differentiation through the integral sign.
          $endgroup$
          – zhw.
          Mar 14 at 17:33




          $begingroup$
          @mechanodroid However, if $a>0,$ then for $(x,t)in [a,infty)times (0,infty),$ we have $$e^-tx/sqrt t le e^-ta/sqrt t.$$ That is enough to use differentiation through the integral sign.
          $endgroup$
          – zhw.
          Mar 14 at 17:33











          1












          $begingroup$

          The derivative of the integrand is
          $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$
          We claim that
          $$F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          for all $x > 0$.



          Fix $a > 0$ and notice that for $x ge a$ we have
          $$frace^-txsqrtt le frace^-tasqrtt le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          the latter being an integrable function on $(0,infty)$.
          For any such $x$ we have
          $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 fracF(x+h) - F(x)h = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right],dt$$
          The mean value theorem implies that $exists theta(h) in (x,x+h)$ such that $$frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right] = frace^-tthetasqrtt$$
          so $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty lim_hto 0frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          We were able to swap the integral and the limit according to the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem since
          $$left|frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt right| le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t), quadforall t > 0$$
          Notice that it is important that the dominating function does not depend on $h$ in any way.



          Since $a > 0$ is arbitrary, we conclude $F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$ for all $x > 0$.




          For surjectivity it suffices to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$. This together with continuity yields the desired result via the intermediate value theorem.



          For $x le 1$ we have
          $$frac1-e^-txt^3/2 le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + frac1t^3/2chi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          having used $e^-tx ge 1-tx$. The latter function is integrable on $(0,infty)$ so Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem implies
          $$lim_xto 0 F(x) = lim_xto 0 int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto 0frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty 0 ,dt = 0$$



          You already know that for $x_1,x_2 in (0,infty)$ with $x_1 < x_2$ we have $$frac1-e^-tx_1t^3/2 < frac1-e^-tx_2t^3/2$$



          Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem thus implies
          $$lim_xto infty F(x) = lim_xto infty int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto inftyfrac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty frac1t^3/2 ,dt = infty$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I just learnt improper integral and this is the first excercie I got, I just want to know every detail.
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 21:39










          • $begingroup$
            But regarding surjectivity, without having the explicit formula, only knowing injectivity and continuity is not enough, is it?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 23:40










          • $begingroup$
            @FluffySkye It isn't, we also need to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$ and then the result follows from the intermediate value theorem. Have a look, I added it in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 15 at 21:34















          1












          $begingroup$

          The derivative of the integrand is
          $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$
          We claim that
          $$F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          for all $x > 0$.



          Fix $a > 0$ and notice that for $x ge a$ we have
          $$frace^-txsqrtt le frace^-tasqrtt le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          the latter being an integrable function on $(0,infty)$.
          For any such $x$ we have
          $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 fracF(x+h) - F(x)h = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right],dt$$
          The mean value theorem implies that $exists theta(h) in (x,x+h)$ such that $$frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right] = frace^-tthetasqrtt$$
          so $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty lim_hto 0frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          We were able to swap the integral and the limit according to the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem since
          $$left|frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt right| le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t), quadforall t > 0$$
          Notice that it is important that the dominating function does not depend on $h$ in any way.



          Since $a > 0$ is arbitrary, we conclude $F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$ for all $x > 0$.




          For surjectivity it suffices to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$. This together with continuity yields the desired result via the intermediate value theorem.



          For $x le 1$ we have
          $$frac1-e^-txt^3/2 le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + frac1t^3/2chi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          having used $e^-tx ge 1-tx$. The latter function is integrable on $(0,infty)$ so Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem implies
          $$lim_xto 0 F(x) = lim_xto 0 int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto 0frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty 0 ,dt = 0$$



          You already know that for $x_1,x_2 in (0,infty)$ with $x_1 < x_2$ we have $$frac1-e^-tx_1t^3/2 < frac1-e^-tx_2t^3/2$$



          Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem thus implies
          $$lim_xto infty F(x) = lim_xto infty int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto inftyfrac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty frac1t^3/2 ,dt = infty$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I just learnt improper integral and this is the first excercie I got, I just want to know every detail.
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 21:39










          • $begingroup$
            But regarding surjectivity, without having the explicit formula, only knowing injectivity and continuity is not enough, is it?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 23:40










          • $begingroup$
            @FluffySkye It isn't, we also need to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$ and then the result follows from the intermediate value theorem. Have a look, I added it in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 15 at 21:34













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The derivative of the integrand is
          $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$
          We claim that
          $$F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          for all $x > 0$.



          Fix $a > 0$ and notice that for $x ge a$ we have
          $$frace^-txsqrtt le frace^-tasqrtt le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          the latter being an integrable function on $(0,infty)$.
          For any such $x$ we have
          $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 fracF(x+h) - F(x)h = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right],dt$$
          The mean value theorem implies that $exists theta(h) in (x,x+h)$ such that $$frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right] = frace^-tthetasqrtt$$
          so $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty lim_hto 0frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          We were able to swap the integral and the limit according to the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem since
          $$left|frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt right| le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t), quadforall t > 0$$
          Notice that it is important that the dominating function does not depend on $h$ in any way.



          Since $a > 0$ is arbitrary, we conclude $F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$ for all $x > 0$.




          For surjectivity it suffices to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$. This together with continuity yields the desired result via the intermediate value theorem.



          For $x le 1$ we have
          $$frac1-e^-txt^3/2 le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + frac1t^3/2chi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          having used $e^-tx ge 1-tx$. The latter function is integrable on $(0,infty)$ so Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem implies
          $$lim_xto 0 F(x) = lim_xto 0 int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto 0frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty 0 ,dt = 0$$



          You already know that for $x_1,x_2 in (0,infty)$ with $x_1 < x_2$ we have $$frac1-e^-tx_1t^3/2 < frac1-e^-tx_2t^3/2$$



          Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem thus implies
          $$lim_xto infty F(x) = lim_xto infty int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto inftyfrac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty frac1t^3/2 ,dt = infty$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The derivative of the integrand is
          $$fracddxleft(frac1-e^-txt^3/2right) = frace^-txsqrtt$$
          We claim that
          $$F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          for all $x > 0$.



          Fix $a > 0$ and notice that for $x ge a$ we have
          $$frace^-txsqrtt le frace^-tasqrtt le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          the latter being an integrable function on $(0,infty)$.
          For any such $x$ we have
          $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 fracF(x+h) - F(x)h = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right],dt$$
          The mean value theorem implies that $exists theta(h) in (x,x+h)$ such that $$frac1hleft[frac1-e^-t(x+h)t^3/2 - frac1-e^-txt^3/2right] = frace^-tthetasqrtt$$
          so $$F'(x) = lim_hto 0 int_0^infty frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty lim_hto 0frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt ,dt = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$$
          We were able to swap the integral and the limit according to the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem since
          $$left|frace^-ttheta(h)sqrtt right| le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + e^-tachi_[1,infty)(t), quadforall t > 0$$
          Notice that it is important that the dominating function does not depend on $h$ in any way.



          Since $a > 0$ is arbitrary, we conclude $F'(x) = int_0^infty frace^-txsqrtt,dt$ for all $x > 0$.




          For surjectivity it suffices to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$. This together with continuity yields the desired result via the intermediate value theorem.



          For $x le 1$ we have
          $$frac1-e^-txt^3/2 le frac1sqrttchi_(0,1](t) + frac1t^3/2chi_[1,infty)(t)$$
          having used $e^-tx ge 1-tx$. The latter function is integrable on $(0,infty)$ so Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem implies
          $$lim_xto 0 F(x) = lim_xto 0 int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto 0frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty 0 ,dt = 0$$



          You already know that for $x_1,x_2 in (0,infty)$ with $x_1 < x_2$ we have $$frac1-e^-tx_1t^3/2 < frac1-e^-tx_2t^3/2$$



          Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem thus implies
          $$lim_xto infty F(x) = lim_xto infty int_0^infty frac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty lim_xto inftyfrac1-e^-txt^3/2,dt = int_0^infty frac1t^3/2 ,dt = infty$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 15 at 21:33

























          answered Mar 14 at 21:10









          mechanodroidmechanodroid

          28.9k62548




          28.9k62548











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I just learnt improper integral and this is the first excercie I got, I just want to know every detail.
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 21:39










          • $begingroup$
            But regarding surjectivity, without having the explicit formula, only knowing injectivity and continuity is not enough, is it?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 23:40










          • $begingroup$
            @FluffySkye It isn't, we also need to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$ and then the result follows from the intermediate value theorem. Have a look, I added it in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 15 at 21:34
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! I just learnt improper integral and this is the first excercie I got, I just want to know every detail.
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 21:39










          • $begingroup$
            But regarding surjectivity, without having the explicit formula, only knowing injectivity and continuity is not enough, is it?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Mar 14 at 23:40










          • $begingroup$
            @FluffySkye It isn't, we also need to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$ and then the result follows from the intermediate value theorem. Have a look, I added it in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 15 at 21:34















          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much! I just learnt improper integral and this is the first excercie I got, I just want to know every detail.
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Mar 14 at 21:39




          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much! I just learnt improper integral and this is the first excercie I got, I just want to know every detail.
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Mar 14 at 21:39












          $begingroup$
          But regarding surjectivity, without having the explicit formula, only knowing injectivity and continuity is not enough, is it?
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Mar 14 at 23:40




          $begingroup$
          But regarding surjectivity, without having the explicit formula, only knowing injectivity and continuity is not enough, is it?
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Mar 14 at 23:40












          $begingroup$
          @FluffySkye It isn't, we also need to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$ and then the result follows from the intermediate value theorem. Have a look, I added it in the answer.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 15 at 21:34




          $begingroup$
          @FluffySkye It isn't, we also need to show that $lim_xto 0 F(x) = 0$ and $lim_xtoinfty F(x) = infty$ and then the result follows from the intermediate value theorem. Have a look, I added it in the answer.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 15 at 21:34

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147646%2fprove-improper-integral-exists-and-continuously-differentiable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer