Supremum of $a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$ with $a+b+c+d=4$ [closed]Show that $mathbbQ$ is dense in the real numbers. (Using Supremum)supremum, infimum - provingBoundary of the DifferenceFinding the supremum of the following setFinding supremum of $fracxx+1 cdot sin x$Finding and Proving the Supremum and Infimum of $X = bigcuplimits_n=1^infty [2n, 2n + 1]$Supremum norm in $mathbbR^2$Proving that a subsequence of a function converges to the same limit.Continuity of supremum of polynomialUniform convergence and the supremum theorem

Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?

Do I have to know the General Relativity theory to understand the concept of inertial frame?

How to preserve electronics (computers, iPads and phones) for hundreds of years

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?

When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

How to test the sharpness of a knife?

Review your own paper in Mathematics

"Oh no!" in Latin

What is the meaning of the following sentence?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?

What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"

Is it feasible to let a newcomer play the "Gandalf"-like figure I created for my campaign?

How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting in 15 days (a colleague left this week)

Check if object is null and return null

What (the heck) is a Super Worm Equinox Moon?

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?



Supremum of $a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$ with $a+b+c+d=4$ [closed]


Show that $mathbbQ$ is dense in the real numbers. (Using Supremum)supremum, infimum - provingBoundary of the DifferenceFinding the supremum of the following setFinding supremum of $fracxx+1 cdot sin x$Finding and Proving the Supremum and Infimum of $X = bigcuplimits_n=1^infty [2n, 2n + 1]$Supremum norm in $mathbbR^2$Proving that a subsequence of a function converges to the same limit.Continuity of supremum of polynomialUniform convergence and the supremum theorem













2












$begingroup$


Let $a,b,c,d>0$ I want to find the supremum of :




$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$$
With $a+b+c+d=4$




I claim that the supremum has the following form :
$$a^ab+3$$
With $a+b=4$



In fact it remains to prove the following theorem :




Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $a>b>c>d$ then we have :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da< a^ab+3$$




All of this is just an intuition and I'm really stuck to prove this...



If you have hints it will be nice .



Thanks in advance for your time .










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL Mar 14 at 16:09


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 14 at 8:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:06











  • $begingroup$
    Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
    $endgroup$
    – bonsoon
    Mar 14 at 12:44
















2












$begingroup$


Let $a,b,c,d>0$ I want to find the supremum of :




$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$$
With $a+b+c+d=4$




I claim that the supremum has the following form :
$$a^ab+3$$
With $a+b=4$



In fact it remains to prove the following theorem :




Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $a>b>c>d$ then we have :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da< a^ab+3$$




All of this is just an intuition and I'm really stuck to prove this...



If you have hints it will be nice .



Thanks in advance for your time .










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL Mar 14 at 16:09


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 14 at 8:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:06











  • $begingroup$
    Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
    $endgroup$
    – bonsoon
    Mar 14 at 12:44














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Let $a,b,c,d>0$ I want to find the supremum of :




$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$$
With $a+b+c+d=4$




I claim that the supremum has the following form :
$$a^ab+3$$
With $a+b=4$



In fact it remains to prove the following theorem :




Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $a>b>c>d$ then we have :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da< a^ab+3$$




All of this is just an intuition and I'm really stuck to prove this...



If you have hints it will be nice .



Thanks in advance for your time .










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $a,b,c,d>0$ I want to find the supremum of :




$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$$
With $a+b+c+d=4$




I claim that the supremum has the following form :
$$a^ab+3$$
With $a+b=4$



In fact it remains to prove the following theorem :




Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $a>b>c>d$ then we have :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da< a^ab+3$$




All of this is just an intuition and I'm really stuck to prove this...



If you have hints it will be nice .



Thanks in advance for your time .







real-analysis inequality






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 14 at 8:16









FatsWallersFatsWallers

1307




1307




closed as off-topic by Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL Mar 14 at 16:09


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL Mar 14 at 16:09


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • $begingroup$
    Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 14 at 8:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:06











  • $begingroup$
    Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
    $endgroup$
    – bonsoon
    Mar 14 at 12:44

















  • $begingroup$
    Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 14 at 8:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:06











  • $begingroup$
    Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
    $endgroup$
    – bonsoon
    Mar 14 at 12:44
















$begingroup$
Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 14 at 8:44




$begingroup$
Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 14 at 8:44




1




1




$begingroup$
$(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:06





$begingroup$
$(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:06













$begingroup$
Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
$endgroup$
– bonsoon
Mar 14 at 12:44





$begingroup$
Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
$endgroup$
– bonsoon
Mar 14 at 12:44











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:26










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Mar 14 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:36

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:26










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Mar 14 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:36















1












$begingroup$

Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:26










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Mar 14 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:36













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 at 8:53









PierreCarrePierreCarre

1,467211




1,467211











  • $begingroup$
    A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:26










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Mar 14 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:36
















  • $begingroup$
    A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 14 at 9:26










  • $begingroup$
    @PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Mar 14 at 11:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Mar 14 at 11:36















$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26




$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26












$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24




$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24












$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26




$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26




1




1




$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36




$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36



Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye