Supremum of $a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$ with $a+b+c+d=4$ [closed]Show that $mathbbQ$ is dense in the real numbers. (Using Supremum)supremum, infimum - provingBoundary of the DifferenceFinding the supremum of the following setFinding supremum of $fracxx+1 cdot sin x$Finding and Proving the Supremum and Infimum of $X = bigcuplimits_n=1^infty [2n, 2n + 1]$Supremum norm in $mathbbR^2$Proving that a subsequence of a function converges to the same limit.Continuity of supremum of polynomialUniform convergence and the supremum theorem
Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match
What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?
Do I have to know the General Relativity theory to understand the concept of inertial frame?
How to preserve electronics (computers, iPads and phones) for hundreds of years
Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?
Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?
How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?
How to test the sharpness of a knife?
Review your own paper in Mathematics
"Oh no!" in Latin
What is the meaning of the following sentence?
Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?
How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?
What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"
Is it feasible to let a newcomer play the "Gandalf"-like figure I created for my campaign?
How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting in 15 days (a colleague left this week)
Check if object is null and return null
What (the heck) is a Super Worm Equinox Moon?
Showing mass murder in a kid's book
How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?
Supremum of $a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$ with $a+b+c+d=4$ [closed]
Show that $mathbbQ$ is dense in the real numbers. (Using Supremum)supremum, infimum - provingBoundary of the DifferenceFinding the supremum of the following setFinding supremum of $fracxx+1 cdot sin x$Finding and Proving the Supremum and Infimum of $X = bigcuplimits_n=1^infty [2n, 2n + 1]$Supremum norm in $mathbbR^2$Proving that a subsequence of a function converges to the same limit.Continuity of supremum of polynomialUniform convergence and the supremum theorem
$begingroup$
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ I want to find the supremum of :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$$
With $a+b+c+d=4$
I claim that the supremum has the following form :
$$a^ab+3$$
With $a+b=4$
In fact it remains to prove the following theorem :
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $a>b>c>d$ then we have :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da< a^ab+3$$
All of this is just an intuition and I'm really stuck to prove this...
If you have hints it will be nice .
Thanks in advance for your time .
real-analysis inequality
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL Mar 14 at 16:09
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ I want to find the supremum of :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$$
With $a+b+c+d=4$
I claim that the supremum has the following form :
$$a^ab+3$$
With $a+b=4$
In fact it remains to prove the following theorem :
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $a>b>c>d$ then we have :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da< a^ab+3$$
All of this is just an intuition and I'm really stuck to prove this...
If you have hints it will be nice .
Thanks in advance for your time .
real-analysis inequality
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL Mar 14 at 16:09
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 14 at 8:44
1
$begingroup$
$(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:06
$begingroup$
Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
$endgroup$
– bonsoon
Mar 14 at 12:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ I want to find the supremum of :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$$
With $a+b+c+d=4$
I claim that the supremum has the following form :
$$a^ab+3$$
With $a+b=4$
In fact it remains to prove the following theorem :
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $a>b>c>d$ then we have :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da< a^ab+3$$
All of this is just an intuition and I'm really stuck to prove this...
If you have hints it will be nice .
Thanks in advance for your time .
real-analysis inequality
$endgroup$
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ I want to find the supremum of :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da$$
With $a+b+c+d=4$
I claim that the supremum has the following form :
$$a^ab+3$$
With $a+b=4$
In fact it remains to prove the following theorem :
Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $a>b>c>d$ then we have :
$$a^ab+b^bc+c^cd+d^da< a^ab+3$$
All of this is just an intuition and I'm really stuck to prove this...
If you have hints it will be nice .
Thanks in advance for your time .
real-analysis inequality
real-analysis inequality
asked Mar 14 at 8:16
FatsWallersFatsWallers
1307
1307
closed as off-topic by Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL Mar 14 at 16:09
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL
closed as off-topic by Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL Mar 14 at 16:09
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Martin R, mrtaurho, Saad, Xander Henderson, RRL
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 14 at 8:44
1
$begingroup$
$(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:06
$begingroup$
Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
$endgroup$
– bonsoon
Mar 14 at 12:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 14 at 8:44
1
$begingroup$
$(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:06
$begingroup$
Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
$endgroup$
– bonsoon
Mar 14 at 12:44
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 14 at 8:44
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 14 at 8:44
1
1
$begingroup$
$(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:06
$begingroup$
$(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:06
$begingroup$
Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
$endgroup$
– bonsoon
Mar 14 at 12:44
$begingroup$
Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
$endgroup$
– bonsoon
Mar 14 at 12:44
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26
$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24
$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26
$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24
$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26
$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24
$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.
$endgroup$
Your conjecture is not true. I just generated 4 random numbers satisfying the condition $a+b+c+d=4$ and immediately found counter-examples.
answered Mar 14 at 8:53
PierreCarrePierreCarre
1,467211
1,467211
$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26
$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24
$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26
$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24
$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26
1
$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36
$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26
$begingroup$
A concrete counter-example would be more helpful ...
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:26
$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24
$begingroup$
@PierreCarre Your counterexample does not satisfy the requirement $a>b>c>d$.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Mar 14 at 11:24
$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26
$begingroup$
You are correct @ArnaudD. I'll remove or edit the counter-example.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:26
1
1
$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36
$begingroup$
$a=2.52799, b= 1.25971, c = 0.208747, d = 0.0035519$ is one counter-example obtained by simple simulation.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Mar 14 at 11:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Lagrange multipliers?
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 14 at 8:44
1
$begingroup$
$(a, b, c, d) = (1.99, 1.1, 0.9, 0.01)$ is a counter-example for your “theorem.”
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 14 at 9:06
$begingroup$
Some numerics: $a^ab$ has a max value of about 32.7037, for $a+b=4$ (wolframalpha.com/input/?i=max+x%5E(4x-x%5E2),+x+from+0+to+4). So the desired supremum is at least 32.7037+3.
$endgroup$
– bonsoon
Mar 14 at 12:44