Is there a cubic irreducible polynomial over $Bbb Q$ with all of its three roots are irrational?proving that this family of angles, cannot be trisectedProving that either $x $ or $2x$ is a generator of the cyclic group $(mathbb Z_3[x]/langle f(x) rangle)^*$Proving this polynomial is irreducible over any algebraically closed field.Radical extension with root of cubic polynomialForming $K(alpha) = K[x]/langle frangle = L$ and $L(beta) = L[x]/langle grangle$ how do elements appearIs it possible for an irreducible polynomial with rational coefficients to have three zeros in an arithmetic progression?Totally real Galois extension of given degreeHow to determine the Galois Group of a polynomial with “ugly” roots?Proof of $inotinmathbbQ(alpha)$ for $alpha$ root of irreducible polynomial with odd degreeIf one root is in then all roots are in
Why can't we play rap on piano?
How to say in German "enjoying home comforts"
Alternative to sending password over mail?
AES: Why is it a good practice to use only the first 16bytes of a hash for encryption?
Blender 2.8 I can't see vertices, edges or faces in edit mode
Why does Arabsat 6A need a Falcon Heavy to launch
Could gravitational lensing be used to protect a spaceship from a laser?
1960's book about a plague that kills all white people
Can a rocket refuel on Mars from water?
What killed these X2 caps?
Anagram holiday
Why is the 'in' operator throwing an error with a string literal instead of logging false?
Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
Combinations of multiple lists
Infinite Abelian subgroup of infinite non Abelian group example
Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?
How to take photos in burst mode, without vibration?
Emailing HOD to enhance faculty application
What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?
How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?
What exploit are these user agents trying to use?
Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?
Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?
Is there a cubic irreducible polynomial over $Bbb Q$ with all of its three roots are irrational?
proving that this family of angles, cannot be trisectedProving that either $x $ or $2x$ is a generator of the cyclic group $(mathbb Z_3[x]/langle f(x) rangle)^*$Proving this polynomial is irreducible over any algebraically closed field.Radical extension with root of cubic polynomialForming $K(alpha) = K[x]/langle frangle = L$ and $L(beta) = L[x]/langle grangle$ how do elements appearIs it possible for an irreducible polynomial with rational coefficients to have three zeros in an arithmetic progression?Totally real Galois extension of given degreeHow to determine the Galois Group of a polynomial with “ugly” roots?Proof of $inotinmathbbQ(alpha)$ for $alpha$ root of irreducible polynomial with odd degreeIf one root is in then all roots are in
$begingroup$
Prove or Disprove: For every irreducible cubic polynomial $f(x)in Bbb Q[x]$, there exist a subfield $F$ of $Bbb C$ such that $F nsubseteq Bbb R$ and $F simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle $
Here, $deg f$ is odd implies $f$ has a real root $alpha$ and by irreducibility, $alpha$ must be irrational. Thus $$F(alpha) simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle $$ and $F(alpha) subset Bbb R subset Bbb C$
If $beta, gamma $ are other roots of $f$ (in some extention) ,then $$F(beta) simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle simeq F(gamma) $$ If $beta , gamma in Bbb C$ then $F(gamma) nsubseteq Bbb R$. So every $f$ has the desired property, so the statement is true
But the answer given is "the statement is false". So my question is :
Is there any such $f$ with all three roots are irrational ? How to disprove the statement ?
abstract-algebra field-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove or Disprove: For every irreducible cubic polynomial $f(x)in Bbb Q[x]$, there exist a subfield $F$ of $Bbb C$ such that $F nsubseteq Bbb R$ and $F simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle $
Here, $deg f$ is odd implies $f$ has a real root $alpha$ and by irreducibility, $alpha$ must be irrational. Thus $$F(alpha) simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle $$ and $F(alpha) subset Bbb R subset Bbb C$
If $beta, gamma $ are other roots of $f$ (in some extention) ,then $$F(beta) simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle simeq F(gamma) $$ If $beta , gamma in Bbb C$ then $F(gamma) nsubseteq Bbb R$. So every $f$ has the desired property, so the statement is true
But the answer given is "the statement is false". So my question is :
Is there any such $f$ with all three roots are irrational ? How to disprove the statement ?
abstract-algebra field-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
See this piece of classical mathematics
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 21 at 12:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove or Disprove: For every irreducible cubic polynomial $f(x)in Bbb Q[x]$, there exist a subfield $F$ of $Bbb C$ such that $F nsubseteq Bbb R$ and $F simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle $
Here, $deg f$ is odd implies $f$ has a real root $alpha$ and by irreducibility, $alpha$ must be irrational. Thus $$F(alpha) simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle $$ and $F(alpha) subset Bbb R subset Bbb C$
If $beta, gamma $ are other roots of $f$ (in some extention) ,then $$F(beta) simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle simeq F(gamma) $$ If $beta , gamma in Bbb C$ then $F(gamma) nsubseteq Bbb R$. So every $f$ has the desired property, so the statement is true
But the answer given is "the statement is false". So my question is :
Is there any such $f$ with all three roots are irrational ? How to disprove the statement ?
abstract-algebra field-theory
$endgroup$
Prove or Disprove: For every irreducible cubic polynomial $f(x)in Bbb Q[x]$, there exist a subfield $F$ of $Bbb C$ such that $F nsubseteq Bbb R$ and $F simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle $
Here, $deg f$ is odd implies $f$ has a real root $alpha$ and by irreducibility, $alpha$ must be irrational. Thus $$F(alpha) simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle $$ and $F(alpha) subset Bbb R subset Bbb C$
If $beta, gamma $ are other roots of $f$ (in some extention) ,then $$F(beta) simeq Bbb Q[x]/langle f(x) rangle simeq F(gamma) $$ If $beta , gamma in Bbb C$ then $F(gamma) nsubseteq Bbb R$. So every $f$ has the desired property, so the statement is true
But the answer given is "the statement is false". So my question is :
Is there any such $f$ with all three roots are irrational ? How to disprove the statement ?
abstract-algebra field-theory
abstract-algebra field-theory
asked Mar 21 at 12:44
Chinnapparaj RChinnapparaj R
5,8682928
5,8682928
$begingroup$
See this piece of classical mathematics
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 21 at 12:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
See this piece of classical mathematics
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 21 at 12:49
$begingroup$
See this piece of classical mathematics
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 21 at 12:49
$begingroup$
See this piece of classical mathematics
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 21 at 12:49
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer to your title question is yes. For example,
$$
x^3-3x+1=0
$$
has three real solutions and none of them is rational by the rational root test.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe the submitter has misinterpreted the question. The expression '$F nsubseteq Bbb R$' has nothing to do with irrationality per se; it expresses the notion that $F$ is a field contained in $Bbb C$ but NOT in $Bbb R$ - i.e that $F$ necessarily contains complex-valued elements whose imaginary parts are non-zero. So the question is, whether EVERY cubic has at least one non-real complex root - which plainly is not true, as other answers show.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You might add a few words about "up to isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Mar 21 at 14:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's take a nice cubic polynomial with 3 real roots (like $x(x-2)(x+2) = x^3 - 4x$), then add a small constant (like $2$) to it. What we get is $x^3 - 4x + 2$, which is a polynomial with three real roots (calculating the value of the polynomial at $-3, 0, 1, 2$ shows that it still has three real roots) and by Eisenstein it is irreducible.
One might need some tweaking to make this work (my original attempt used $x^3 - x$ instead, which doesn't work quite as nicely), but it's a simple way to make examples relatively consistently.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156779%2fis-there-a-cubic-irreducible-polynomial-over-bbb-q-with-all-of-its-three-root%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer to your title question is yes. For example,
$$
x^3-3x+1=0
$$
has three real solutions and none of them is rational by the rational root test.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer to your title question is yes. For example,
$$
x^3-3x+1=0
$$
has three real solutions and none of them is rational by the rational root test.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer to your title question is yes. For example,
$$
x^3-3x+1=0
$$
has three real solutions and none of them is rational by the rational root test.
$endgroup$
The answer to your title question is yes. For example,
$$
x^3-3x+1=0
$$
has three real solutions and none of them is rational by the rational root test.
answered Mar 21 at 12:54
Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde
81.6k648106
81.6k648106
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe the submitter has misinterpreted the question. The expression '$F nsubseteq Bbb R$' has nothing to do with irrationality per se; it expresses the notion that $F$ is a field contained in $Bbb C$ but NOT in $Bbb R$ - i.e that $F$ necessarily contains complex-valued elements whose imaginary parts are non-zero. So the question is, whether EVERY cubic has at least one non-real complex root - which plainly is not true, as other answers show.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You might add a few words about "up to isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Mar 21 at 14:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe the submitter has misinterpreted the question. The expression '$F nsubseteq Bbb R$' has nothing to do with irrationality per se; it expresses the notion that $F$ is a field contained in $Bbb C$ but NOT in $Bbb R$ - i.e that $F$ necessarily contains complex-valued elements whose imaginary parts are non-zero. So the question is, whether EVERY cubic has at least one non-real complex root - which plainly is not true, as other answers show.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You might add a few words about "up to isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Mar 21 at 14:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe the submitter has misinterpreted the question. The expression '$F nsubseteq Bbb R$' has nothing to do with irrationality per se; it expresses the notion that $F$ is a field contained in $Bbb C$ but NOT in $Bbb R$ - i.e that $F$ necessarily contains complex-valued elements whose imaginary parts are non-zero. So the question is, whether EVERY cubic has at least one non-real complex root - which plainly is not true, as other answers show.
$endgroup$
I believe the submitter has misinterpreted the question. The expression '$F nsubseteq Bbb R$' has nothing to do with irrationality per se; it expresses the notion that $F$ is a field contained in $Bbb C$ but NOT in $Bbb R$ - i.e that $F$ necessarily contains complex-valued elements whose imaginary parts are non-zero. So the question is, whether EVERY cubic has at least one non-real complex root - which plainly is not true, as other answers show.
answered Mar 21 at 13:02
PMarPMar
211
211
$begingroup$
You might add a few words about "up to isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Mar 21 at 14:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You might add a few words about "up to isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Mar 21 at 14:33
$begingroup$
You might add a few words about "up to isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Mar 21 at 14:33
$begingroup$
You might add a few words about "up to isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Mar 21 at 14:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's take a nice cubic polynomial with 3 real roots (like $x(x-2)(x+2) = x^3 - 4x$), then add a small constant (like $2$) to it. What we get is $x^3 - 4x + 2$, which is a polynomial with three real roots (calculating the value of the polynomial at $-3, 0, 1, 2$ shows that it still has three real roots) and by Eisenstein it is irreducible.
One might need some tweaking to make this work (my original attempt used $x^3 - x$ instead, which doesn't work quite as nicely), but it's a simple way to make examples relatively consistently.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's take a nice cubic polynomial with 3 real roots (like $x(x-2)(x+2) = x^3 - 4x$), then add a small constant (like $2$) to it. What we get is $x^3 - 4x + 2$, which is a polynomial with three real roots (calculating the value of the polynomial at $-3, 0, 1, 2$ shows that it still has three real roots) and by Eisenstein it is irreducible.
One might need some tweaking to make this work (my original attempt used $x^3 - x$ instead, which doesn't work quite as nicely), but it's a simple way to make examples relatively consistently.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's take a nice cubic polynomial with 3 real roots (like $x(x-2)(x+2) = x^3 - 4x$), then add a small constant (like $2$) to it. What we get is $x^3 - 4x + 2$, which is a polynomial with three real roots (calculating the value of the polynomial at $-3, 0, 1, 2$ shows that it still has three real roots) and by Eisenstein it is irreducible.
One might need some tweaking to make this work (my original attempt used $x^3 - x$ instead, which doesn't work quite as nicely), but it's a simple way to make examples relatively consistently.
$endgroup$
Let's take a nice cubic polynomial with 3 real roots (like $x(x-2)(x+2) = x^3 - 4x$), then add a small constant (like $2$) to it. What we get is $x^3 - 4x + 2$, which is a polynomial with three real roots (calculating the value of the polynomial at $-3, 0, 1, 2$ shows that it still has three real roots) and by Eisenstein it is irreducible.
One might need some tweaking to make this work (my original attempt used $x^3 - x$ instead, which doesn't work quite as nicely), but it's a simple way to make examples relatively consistently.
answered Mar 21 at 12:54
ArthurArthur
122k7122210
122k7122210
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156779%2fis-there-a-cubic-irreducible-polynomial-over-bbb-q-with-all-of-its-three-root%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
See this piece of classical mathematics
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 21 at 12:49