Second Fundamental Form, Principle Curvature and Tangent Plane Vectors OrthogonalityShape operator and principal curvatureprincipal curvature and its relationship to second fundamental formWhy use Gauss and mean curvature to characterize a surface's deviation from being “flat” at one point?How to express the second fundamental form in terms of deformation second gradientIs the principal curvature of a cylinder positive or negative according to the second fundamental form?Show that a developable surface has zero Gaussian curvature.The parameter curves are asymptotic curvesarea of arbitrary surface elementPrincipal Normal SectionWhy divide mean curvature by 2?
How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?
How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?
AES: Why is it a good practice to use only the first 16bytes of a hash for encryption?
If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?
What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
Is it canonical bit space?
Where does SFDX store details about scratch orgs?
Does a druid starting with a bow start with no arrows?
Why is Collection not simply treated as Collection<?>
I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months
How to take photos in burst mode, without vibration?
Anagram holiday
How can I fix/modify my tub/shower combo so the water comes out of the showerhead?
What killed these X2 caps?
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
Assassin's bullet with mercury
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
Stopping power of mountain vs road bike
When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?
Why doesn't using multiple commands with a || or && conditional work?
1960's book about a plague that kills all white people
Can a rocket refuel on Mars from water?
Twin primes whose sum is a cube
Second Fundamental Form, Principle Curvature and Tangent Plane Vectors Orthogonality
Shape operator and principal curvatureprincipal curvature and its relationship to second fundamental formWhy use Gauss and mean curvature to characterize a surface's deviation from being “flat” at one point?How to express the second fundamental form in terms of deformation second gradientIs the principal curvature of a cylinder positive or negative according to the second fundamental form?Show that a developable surface has zero Gaussian curvature.The parameter curves are asymptotic curvesarea of arbitrary surface elementPrincipal Normal SectionWhy divide mean curvature by 2?
$begingroup$
As I'm studying differential geometry of surfaces, I encountered the possibility of the first fundamental form $F_I$ being an identity matrix making the shape operator $S=F_I^-1F_II$ equal to the second fundamental form $F_II$ hence, the principle curvatures $kappa_1$ and $kappa_2$ would be the eigenvalues of $F_II$.
If $F_I$ is given as
$F_I = beginbmatrixf_xf_x&f_xf_y\f_xf_y&f_yf_yendbmatrix$
then for it to be an identity matrix, $f_x$ and $f_y$ should be orthogonal unit vectors.
While reading this article Spek et al. (2017) - A Fast Method for Computing Principal Curvatures From Range Images, at Section $(3.1)$ Theory, they started with $hatu$ and $hatv$ two orthogonal vectors in the tangent plane to the surface at point $p$.
My first question is, where does this orthogonality come into account and does it offer any advantages over using standard Cartesian coordinates system with the origin shifted to the point $p$ and rotating the surface unit normal vector to become parallel to the $Z-(0,0,1)$ axis?
Say I'm going with a (Monge patch parametrized) local surface around point $p$.
A surface of the form $F(x,y)=[x, y, z(x,y)]$ where the local surface normal is rotated to a position where it is parallel to Z-axis at $(0, 0, 1)$ and the origin is shifted to point $p$.
$z(x, y)$ is approximated by fitting a bi-quadratic surface of the form $z(x,y) = p_0x^2 + p_1y^2 + p_2xy$.
Now what should be changed to ensure that $F_I$ is an identity matrix thus, along with the rotation of the surface normal to $(0,0,1)$, $F_II$ becomes
$F_II = beginbmatrixz_xx&z_xy\z_xy&z_yyendbmatrix$
and its eigenvalues would be the principal curvatures.
Apologize if the post is not coherent (or theoretically correct), as I seem to not be able to connect the dots in this topic yet and some parts are still unclear to me.
differential-geometry curvature
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As I'm studying differential geometry of surfaces, I encountered the possibility of the first fundamental form $F_I$ being an identity matrix making the shape operator $S=F_I^-1F_II$ equal to the second fundamental form $F_II$ hence, the principle curvatures $kappa_1$ and $kappa_2$ would be the eigenvalues of $F_II$.
If $F_I$ is given as
$F_I = beginbmatrixf_xf_x&f_xf_y\f_xf_y&f_yf_yendbmatrix$
then for it to be an identity matrix, $f_x$ and $f_y$ should be orthogonal unit vectors.
While reading this article Spek et al. (2017) - A Fast Method for Computing Principal Curvatures From Range Images, at Section $(3.1)$ Theory, they started with $hatu$ and $hatv$ two orthogonal vectors in the tangent plane to the surface at point $p$.
My first question is, where does this orthogonality come into account and does it offer any advantages over using standard Cartesian coordinates system with the origin shifted to the point $p$ and rotating the surface unit normal vector to become parallel to the $Z-(0,0,1)$ axis?
Say I'm going with a (Monge patch parametrized) local surface around point $p$.
A surface of the form $F(x,y)=[x, y, z(x,y)]$ where the local surface normal is rotated to a position where it is parallel to Z-axis at $(0, 0, 1)$ and the origin is shifted to point $p$.
$z(x, y)$ is approximated by fitting a bi-quadratic surface of the form $z(x,y) = p_0x^2 + p_1y^2 + p_2xy$.
Now what should be changed to ensure that $F_I$ is an identity matrix thus, along with the rotation of the surface normal to $(0,0,1)$, $F_II$ becomes
$F_II = beginbmatrixz_xx&z_xy\z_xy&z_yyendbmatrix$
and its eigenvalues would be the principal curvatures.
Apologize if the post is not coherent (or theoretically correct), as I seem to not be able to connect the dots in this topic yet and some parts are still unclear to me.
differential-geometry curvature
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As I'm studying differential geometry of surfaces, I encountered the possibility of the first fundamental form $F_I$ being an identity matrix making the shape operator $S=F_I^-1F_II$ equal to the second fundamental form $F_II$ hence, the principle curvatures $kappa_1$ and $kappa_2$ would be the eigenvalues of $F_II$.
If $F_I$ is given as
$F_I = beginbmatrixf_xf_x&f_xf_y\f_xf_y&f_yf_yendbmatrix$
then for it to be an identity matrix, $f_x$ and $f_y$ should be orthogonal unit vectors.
While reading this article Spek et al. (2017) - A Fast Method for Computing Principal Curvatures From Range Images, at Section $(3.1)$ Theory, they started with $hatu$ and $hatv$ two orthogonal vectors in the tangent plane to the surface at point $p$.
My first question is, where does this orthogonality come into account and does it offer any advantages over using standard Cartesian coordinates system with the origin shifted to the point $p$ and rotating the surface unit normal vector to become parallel to the $Z-(0,0,1)$ axis?
Say I'm going with a (Monge patch parametrized) local surface around point $p$.
A surface of the form $F(x,y)=[x, y, z(x,y)]$ where the local surface normal is rotated to a position where it is parallel to Z-axis at $(0, 0, 1)$ and the origin is shifted to point $p$.
$z(x, y)$ is approximated by fitting a bi-quadratic surface of the form $z(x,y) = p_0x^2 + p_1y^2 + p_2xy$.
Now what should be changed to ensure that $F_I$ is an identity matrix thus, along with the rotation of the surface normal to $(0,0,1)$, $F_II$ becomes
$F_II = beginbmatrixz_xx&z_xy\z_xy&z_yyendbmatrix$
and its eigenvalues would be the principal curvatures.
Apologize if the post is not coherent (or theoretically correct), as I seem to not be able to connect the dots in this topic yet and some parts are still unclear to me.
differential-geometry curvature
$endgroup$
As I'm studying differential geometry of surfaces, I encountered the possibility of the first fundamental form $F_I$ being an identity matrix making the shape operator $S=F_I^-1F_II$ equal to the second fundamental form $F_II$ hence, the principle curvatures $kappa_1$ and $kappa_2$ would be the eigenvalues of $F_II$.
If $F_I$ is given as
$F_I = beginbmatrixf_xf_x&f_xf_y\f_xf_y&f_yf_yendbmatrix$
then for it to be an identity matrix, $f_x$ and $f_y$ should be orthogonal unit vectors.
While reading this article Spek et al. (2017) - A Fast Method for Computing Principal Curvatures From Range Images, at Section $(3.1)$ Theory, they started with $hatu$ and $hatv$ two orthogonal vectors in the tangent plane to the surface at point $p$.
My first question is, where does this orthogonality come into account and does it offer any advantages over using standard Cartesian coordinates system with the origin shifted to the point $p$ and rotating the surface unit normal vector to become parallel to the $Z-(0,0,1)$ axis?
Say I'm going with a (Monge patch parametrized) local surface around point $p$.
A surface of the form $F(x,y)=[x, y, z(x,y)]$ where the local surface normal is rotated to a position where it is parallel to Z-axis at $(0, 0, 1)$ and the origin is shifted to point $p$.
$z(x, y)$ is approximated by fitting a bi-quadratic surface of the form $z(x,y) = p_0x^2 + p_1y^2 + p_2xy$.
Now what should be changed to ensure that $F_I$ is an identity matrix thus, along with the rotation of the surface normal to $(0,0,1)$, $F_II$ becomes
$F_II = beginbmatrixz_xx&z_xy\z_xy&z_yyendbmatrix$
and its eigenvalues would be the principal curvatures.
Apologize if the post is not coherent (or theoretically correct), as I seem to not be able to connect the dots in this topic yet and some parts are still unclear to me.
differential-geometry curvature
differential-geometry curvature
edited Mar 21 at 23:03
Elia
asked Mar 21 at 15:14
EliaElia
1125
1125
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156944%2fsecond-fundamental-form-principle-curvature-and-tangent-plane-vectors-orthogona%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156944%2fsecond-fundamental-form-principle-curvature-and-tangent-plane-vectors-orthogona%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown