Second Fundamental Form, Principle Curvature and Tangent Plane Vectors OrthogonalityShape operator and principal curvatureprincipal curvature and its relationship to second fundamental formWhy use Gauss and mean curvature to characterize a surface's deviation from being “flat” at one point?How to express the second fundamental form in terms of deformation second gradientIs the principal curvature of a cylinder positive or negative according to the second fundamental form?Show that a developable surface has zero Gaussian curvature.The parameter curves are asymptotic curvesarea of arbitrary surface elementPrincipal Normal SectionWhy divide mean curvature by 2?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?

AES: Why is it a good practice to use only the first 16bytes of a hash for encryption?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Is it canonical bit space?

Where does SFDX store details about scratch orgs?

Does a druid starting with a bow start with no arrows?

Why is Collection not simply treated as Collection<?>

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

How to take photos in burst mode, without vibration?

Anagram holiday

How can I fix/modify my tub/shower combo so the water comes out of the showerhead?

What killed these X2 caps?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

Assassin's bullet with mercury

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Stopping power of mountain vs road bike

When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?

Why doesn't using multiple commands with a || or && conditional work?

1960's book about a plague that kills all white people

Can a rocket refuel on Mars from water?

Twin primes whose sum is a cube



Second Fundamental Form, Principle Curvature and Tangent Plane Vectors Orthogonality


Shape operator and principal curvatureprincipal curvature and its relationship to second fundamental formWhy use Gauss and mean curvature to characterize a surface's deviation from being “flat” at one point?How to express the second fundamental form in terms of deformation second gradientIs the principal curvature of a cylinder positive or negative according to the second fundamental form?Show that a developable surface has zero Gaussian curvature.The parameter curves are asymptotic curvesarea of arbitrary surface elementPrincipal Normal SectionWhy divide mean curvature by 2?













0












$begingroup$


As I'm studying differential geometry of surfaces, I encountered the possibility of the first fundamental form $F_I$ being an identity matrix making the shape operator $S=F_I^-1F_II$ equal to the second fundamental form $F_II$ hence, the principle curvatures $kappa_1$ and $kappa_2$ would be the eigenvalues of $F_II$.



If $F_I$ is given as
$F_I = beginbmatrixf_xf_x&f_xf_y\f_xf_y&f_yf_yendbmatrix$

then for it to be an identity matrix, $f_x$ and $f_y$ should be orthogonal unit vectors.



While reading this article Spek et al. (2017) - A Fast Method for Computing Principal Curvatures From Range Images, at Section $(3.1)$ Theory, they started with $hatu$ and $hatv$ two orthogonal vectors in the tangent plane to the surface at point $p$.

My first question is, where does this orthogonality come into account and does it offer any advantages over using standard Cartesian coordinates system with the origin shifted to the point $p$ and rotating the surface unit normal vector to become parallel to the $Z-(0,0,1)$ axis?



Say I'm going with a (Monge patch parametrized) local surface around point $p$.

A surface of the form $F(x,y)=[x, y, z(x,y)]$ where the local surface normal is rotated to a position where it is parallel to Z-axis at $(0, 0, 1)$ and the origin is shifted to point $p$.
$z(x, y)$ is approximated by fitting a bi-quadratic surface of the form $z(x,y) = p_0x^2 + p_1y^2 + p_2xy$.



Now what should be changed to ensure that $F_I$ is an identity matrix thus, along with the rotation of the surface normal to $(0,0,1)$, $F_II$ becomes
$F_II = beginbmatrixz_xx&z_xy\z_xy&z_yyendbmatrix$

and its eigenvalues would be the principal curvatures.



Apologize if the post is not coherent (or theoretically correct), as I seem to not be able to connect the dots in this topic yet and some parts are still unclear to me.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    As I'm studying differential geometry of surfaces, I encountered the possibility of the first fundamental form $F_I$ being an identity matrix making the shape operator $S=F_I^-1F_II$ equal to the second fundamental form $F_II$ hence, the principle curvatures $kappa_1$ and $kappa_2$ would be the eigenvalues of $F_II$.



    If $F_I$ is given as
    $F_I = beginbmatrixf_xf_x&f_xf_y\f_xf_y&f_yf_yendbmatrix$

    then for it to be an identity matrix, $f_x$ and $f_y$ should be orthogonal unit vectors.



    While reading this article Spek et al. (2017) - A Fast Method for Computing Principal Curvatures From Range Images, at Section $(3.1)$ Theory, they started with $hatu$ and $hatv$ two orthogonal vectors in the tangent plane to the surface at point $p$.

    My first question is, where does this orthogonality come into account and does it offer any advantages over using standard Cartesian coordinates system with the origin shifted to the point $p$ and rotating the surface unit normal vector to become parallel to the $Z-(0,0,1)$ axis?



    Say I'm going with a (Monge patch parametrized) local surface around point $p$.

    A surface of the form $F(x,y)=[x, y, z(x,y)]$ where the local surface normal is rotated to a position where it is parallel to Z-axis at $(0, 0, 1)$ and the origin is shifted to point $p$.
    $z(x, y)$ is approximated by fitting a bi-quadratic surface of the form $z(x,y) = p_0x^2 + p_1y^2 + p_2xy$.



    Now what should be changed to ensure that $F_I$ is an identity matrix thus, along with the rotation of the surface normal to $(0,0,1)$, $F_II$ becomes
    $F_II = beginbmatrixz_xx&z_xy\z_xy&z_yyendbmatrix$

    and its eigenvalues would be the principal curvatures.



    Apologize if the post is not coherent (or theoretically correct), as I seem to not be able to connect the dots in this topic yet and some parts are still unclear to me.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      As I'm studying differential geometry of surfaces, I encountered the possibility of the first fundamental form $F_I$ being an identity matrix making the shape operator $S=F_I^-1F_II$ equal to the second fundamental form $F_II$ hence, the principle curvatures $kappa_1$ and $kappa_2$ would be the eigenvalues of $F_II$.



      If $F_I$ is given as
      $F_I = beginbmatrixf_xf_x&f_xf_y\f_xf_y&f_yf_yendbmatrix$

      then for it to be an identity matrix, $f_x$ and $f_y$ should be orthogonal unit vectors.



      While reading this article Spek et al. (2017) - A Fast Method for Computing Principal Curvatures From Range Images, at Section $(3.1)$ Theory, they started with $hatu$ and $hatv$ two orthogonal vectors in the tangent plane to the surface at point $p$.

      My first question is, where does this orthogonality come into account and does it offer any advantages over using standard Cartesian coordinates system with the origin shifted to the point $p$ and rotating the surface unit normal vector to become parallel to the $Z-(0,0,1)$ axis?



      Say I'm going with a (Monge patch parametrized) local surface around point $p$.

      A surface of the form $F(x,y)=[x, y, z(x,y)]$ where the local surface normal is rotated to a position where it is parallel to Z-axis at $(0, 0, 1)$ and the origin is shifted to point $p$.
      $z(x, y)$ is approximated by fitting a bi-quadratic surface of the form $z(x,y) = p_0x^2 + p_1y^2 + p_2xy$.



      Now what should be changed to ensure that $F_I$ is an identity matrix thus, along with the rotation of the surface normal to $(0,0,1)$, $F_II$ becomes
      $F_II = beginbmatrixz_xx&z_xy\z_xy&z_yyendbmatrix$

      and its eigenvalues would be the principal curvatures.



      Apologize if the post is not coherent (or theoretically correct), as I seem to not be able to connect the dots in this topic yet and some parts are still unclear to me.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      As I'm studying differential geometry of surfaces, I encountered the possibility of the first fundamental form $F_I$ being an identity matrix making the shape operator $S=F_I^-1F_II$ equal to the second fundamental form $F_II$ hence, the principle curvatures $kappa_1$ and $kappa_2$ would be the eigenvalues of $F_II$.



      If $F_I$ is given as
      $F_I = beginbmatrixf_xf_x&f_xf_y\f_xf_y&f_yf_yendbmatrix$

      then for it to be an identity matrix, $f_x$ and $f_y$ should be orthogonal unit vectors.



      While reading this article Spek et al. (2017) - A Fast Method for Computing Principal Curvatures From Range Images, at Section $(3.1)$ Theory, they started with $hatu$ and $hatv$ two orthogonal vectors in the tangent plane to the surface at point $p$.

      My first question is, where does this orthogonality come into account and does it offer any advantages over using standard Cartesian coordinates system with the origin shifted to the point $p$ and rotating the surface unit normal vector to become parallel to the $Z-(0,0,1)$ axis?



      Say I'm going with a (Monge patch parametrized) local surface around point $p$.

      A surface of the form $F(x,y)=[x, y, z(x,y)]$ where the local surface normal is rotated to a position where it is parallel to Z-axis at $(0, 0, 1)$ and the origin is shifted to point $p$.
      $z(x, y)$ is approximated by fitting a bi-quadratic surface of the form $z(x,y) = p_0x^2 + p_1y^2 + p_2xy$.



      Now what should be changed to ensure that $F_I$ is an identity matrix thus, along with the rotation of the surface normal to $(0,0,1)$, $F_II$ becomes
      $F_II = beginbmatrixz_xx&z_xy\z_xy&z_yyendbmatrix$

      and its eigenvalues would be the principal curvatures.



      Apologize if the post is not coherent (or theoretically correct), as I seem to not be able to connect the dots in this topic yet and some parts are still unclear to me.







      differential-geometry curvature






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 21 at 23:03







      Elia

















      asked Mar 21 at 15:14









      EliaElia

      1125




      1125




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156944%2fsecond-fundamental-form-principle-curvature-and-tangent-plane-vectors-orthogona%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156944%2fsecond-fundamental-form-principle-curvature-and-tangent-plane-vectors-orthogona%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye