What is the minimal requirement for a Fourier transformation?Is this a correct way of thinking of Fourier transformsRepresenting a real sampled signal with N samples as a complex sampled signal with N/2 samplesA vector space with countable and uncountable basis at the same timeWhat's amiss in this Fourier convergence analysis?Magnitude and Angle of Discrete Fourier TransformWays to generate triangle wave function.Fourier series of piecewise-defined function and convergenceDirac delta distribution and sin(x) - what can be a test function?Decomposition of periodic spikes into frequenciesDetermine the fourier cosine series of $f(x)$
Watching something be written to a file live with tail
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?
What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?
Assassin's bullet with mercury
Etiquette around loan refinance - decision is going to cost first broker a lot of money
Brothers & sisters
Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?
What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?
AES: Why is it a good practice to use only the first 16bytes of a hash for encryption?
How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope
Facing a paradox: Earnshaw's theorem in one dimension
SSH "lag" in LAN on some machines, mixed distros
Blender 2.8 I can't see vertices, edges or faces in edit mode
Combinations of multiple lists
Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering
Emailing HOD to enhance faculty application
Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?
Why is the 'in' operator throwing an error with a string literal instead of logging false?
Theorems that impeded progress
Python: return float 1.0 as int 1 but float 1.5 as float 1.5
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?
Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?
What is the minimal requirement for a Fourier transformation?
Is this a correct way of thinking of Fourier transformsRepresenting a real sampled signal with N samples as a complex sampled signal with N/2 samplesA vector space with countable and uncountable basis at the same timeWhat's amiss in this Fourier convergence analysis?Magnitude and Angle of Discrete Fourier TransformWays to generate triangle wave function.Fourier series of piecewise-defined function and convergenceDirac delta distribution and sin(x) - what can be a test function?Decomposition of periodic spikes into frequenciesDetermine the fourier cosine series of $f(x)$
$begingroup$
I have a lot of comprehension questions that I can't really figure out by googling:
The difference between a Fourier transformation and a Fourier series. Am I correct in thinking that the difference: transforms are for continous cases and series are for discrete cases ?
What functions can be Fourier transformed? Which not? I read/learned once that piecewise continuity is enough for a function to be transformed as long as it can be extended to 2 - pi periodic continuity (so the pieces can be "stringed together to a periodic wave")
Is this correct?
functional-analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I have a lot of comprehension questions that I can't really figure out by googling:
The difference between a Fourier transformation and a Fourier series. Am I correct in thinking that the difference: transforms are for continous cases and series are for discrete cases ?
What functions can be Fourier transformed? Which not? I read/learned once that piecewise continuity is enough for a function to be transformed as long as it can be extended to 2 - pi periodic continuity (so the pieces can be "stringed together to a periodic wave")
Is this correct?
functional-analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:08
$begingroup$
thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:31
$begingroup$
So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:55
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I have a lot of comprehension questions that I can't really figure out by googling:
The difference between a Fourier transformation and a Fourier series. Am I correct in thinking that the difference: transforms are for continous cases and series are for discrete cases ?
What functions can be Fourier transformed? Which not? I read/learned once that piecewise continuity is enough for a function to be transformed as long as it can be extended to 2 - pi periodic continuity (so the pieces can be "stringed together to a periodic wave")
Is this correct?
functional-analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
$endgroup$
I have a lot of comprehension questions that I can't really figure out by googling:
The difference between a Fourier transformation and a Fourier series. Am I correct in thinking that the difference: transforms are for continous cases and series are for discrete cases ?
What functions can be Fourier transformed? Which not? I read/learned once that piecewise continuity is enough for a function to be transformed as long as it can be extended to 2 - pi periodic continuity (so the pieces can be "stringed together to a periodic wave")
Is this correct?
functional-analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
functional-analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
asked Mar 21 at 13:06
shakshoka1234shakshoka1234
61
61
$begingroup$
1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:08
$begingroup$
thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:31
$begingroup$
So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:55
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:08
$begingroup$
thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:31
$begingroup$
So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:55
$begingroup$
1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:08
$begingroup$
1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:08
$begingroup$
thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:31
$begingroup$
We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:31
$begingroup$
So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:39
$begingroup$
So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:55
$begingroup$
Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:55
|
show 3 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156806%2fwhat-is-the-minimal-requirement-for-a-fourier-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156806%2fwhat-is-the-minimal-requirement-for-a-fourier-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:08
$begingroup$
thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:31
$begingroup$
So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:55