What is the minimal requirement for a Fourier transformation?Is this a correct way of thinking of Fourier transformsRepresenting a real sampled signal with N samples as a complex sampled signal with N/2 samplesA vector space with countable and uncountable basis at the same timeWhat's amiss in this Fourier convergence analysis?Magnitude and Angle of Discrete Fourier TransformWays to generate triangle wave function.Fourier series of piecewise-defined function and convergenceDirac delta distribution and sin(x) - what can be a test function?Decomposition of periodic spikes into frequenciesDetermine the fourier cosine series of $f(x)$

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?

Assassin's bullet with mercury

Etiquette around loan refinance - decision is going to cost first broker a lot of money

Brothers & sisters

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

AES: Why is it a good practice to use only the first 16bytes of a hash for encryption?

How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope

Facing a paradox: Earnshaw's theorem in one dimension

SSH "lag" in LAN on some machines, mixed distros

Blender 2.8 I can't see vertices, edges or faces in edit mode

Combinations of multiple lists

Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering

Emailing HOD to enhance faculty application

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Why is the 'in' operator throwing an error with a string literal instead of logging false?

Theorems that impeded progress

Python: return float 1.0 as int 1 but float 1.5 as float 1.5

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?



What is the minimal requirement for a Fourier transformation?


Is this a correct way of thinking of Fourier transformsRepresenting a real sampled signal with N samples as a complex sampled signal with N/2 samplesA vector space with countable and uncountable basis at the same timeWhat's amiss in this Fourier convergence analysis?Magnitude and Angle of Discrete Fourier TransformWays to generate triangle wave function.Fourier series of piecewise-defined function and convergenceDirac delta distribution and sin(x) - what can be a test function?Decomposition of periodic spikes into frequenciesDetermine the fourier cosine series of $f(x)$













1












$begingroup$


I have a lot of comprehension questions that I can't really figure out by googling:



  1. The difference between a Fourier transformation and a Fourier series. Am I correct in thinking that the difference: transforms are for continous cases and series are for discrete cases ?


  2. What functions can be Fourier transformed? Which not? I read/learned once that piecewise continuity is enough for a function to be transformed as long as it can be extended to 2 - pi periodic continuity (so the pieces can be "stringed together to a periodic wave")


Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:08










  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
    $endgroup$
    – shakshoka1234
    Mar 21 at 13:22










  • $begingroup$
    We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:31










  • $begingroup$
    So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
    $endgroup$
    – shakshoka1234
    Mar 21 at 13:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:55















1












$begingroup$


I have a lot of comprehension questions that I can't really figure out by googling:



  1. The difference between a Fourier transformation and a Fourier series. Am I correct in thinking that the difference: transforms are for continous cases and series are for discrete cases ?


  2. What functions can be Fourier transformed? Which not? I read/learned once that piecewise continuity is enough for a function to be transformed as long as it can be extended to 2 - pi periodic continuity (so the pieces can be "stringed together to a periodic wave")


Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:08










  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
    $endgroup$
    – shakshoka1234
    Mar 21 at 13:22










  • $begingroup$
    We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:31










  • $begingroup$
    So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
    $endgroup$
    – shakshoka1234
    Mar 21 at 13:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:55













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I have a lot of comprehension questions that I can't really figure out by googling:



  1. The difference between a Fourier transformation and a Fourier series. Am I correct in thinking that the difference: transforms are for continous cases and series are for discrete cases ?


  2. What functions can be Fourier transformed? Which not? I read/learned once that piecewise continuity is enough for a function to be transformed as long as it can be extended to 2 - pi periodic continuity (so the pieces can be "stringed together to a periodic wave")


Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a lot of comprehension questions that I can't really figure out by googling:



  1. The difference between a Fourier transformation and a Fourier series. Am I correct in thinking that the difference: transforms are for continous cases and series are for discrete cases ?


  2. What functions can be Fourier transformed? Which not? I read/learned once that piecewise continuity is enough for a function to be transformed as long as it can be extended to 2 - pi periodic continuity (so the pieces can be "stringed together to a periodic wave")


Is this correct?







functional-analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 21 at 13:06









shakshoka1234shakshoka1234

61




61











  • $begingroup$
    1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:08










  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
    $endgroup$
    – shakshoka1234
    Mar 21 at 13:22










  • $begingroup$
    We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:31










  • $begingroup$
    So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
    $endgroup$
    – shakshoka1234
    Mar 21 at 13:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:55
















  • $begingroup$
    1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:08










  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
    $endgroup$
    – shakshoka1234
    Mar 21 at 13:22










  • $begingroup$
    We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:31










  • $begingroup$
    So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
    $endgroup$
    – shakshoka1234
    Mar 21 at 13:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    Mar 21 at 13:55















$begingroup$
1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:08




$begingroup$
1. is more or less correct but 2. not so much. To be fourier transformed a function has to have some integrability properties because the fourier transform is defined as an integral over all of $mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:08












$begingroup$
thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:22




$begingroup$
thanks for your prompt response. i'm not looking for complicated counter examples and such, just the most generally applicable case , as in, what is the "weakest" function, that is still transformable
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:22












$begingroup$
We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:31




$begingroup$
We can readily talk about the fourier transform of $L^1$ functions because $|e^2pi i x xi|leq 1$ and we can use a density argument to extend to $L^2$. Beyond that we can go to distributions and say something about Schwartz functions but I don't really know what is the "weakest' function for this.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:31












$begingroup$
So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:39




$begingroup$
So all L1 and L2 functions are fourier transformable?
$endgroup$
– shakshoka1234
Mar 21 at 13:39












$begingroup$
Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:55




$begingroup$
Yes. The proof is not so bad, you first develop the theory in $L^1$, then look at functions in $L^1cap L^2$, and use a density argument to extend this to $L^2$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
Mar 21 at 13:55










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156806%2fwhat-is-the-minimal-requirement-for-a-fourier-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156806%2fwhat-is-the-minimal-requirement-for-a-fourier-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye