Collect SQL Server Query Execution time in secondsUnbelievably slow and unusable Query StoreSharing certificates encryped by password between DBs and instancesCollect CPU, reads and writes when replaying SQL Profiler TraceMonitoring sql serverSQL Server is caching query plans with the same query when using parameterized SQLHow to resolve RESOURCE_SEMAPHORE and RESOURCE_SEMAPHORE_QUERY_COMPILE wait typesExcessive CPU use in vendor SQL Server DBSQL Server Job is running slow after a few daysIntermittent “Login timeout expired” after migrating to VmWare SQL ServerElapsed time in SSMS is consistently higher than SQL Server Execution Time - connection issue?Columnstore index query performance based on number of columns in SELECT statement

How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?

What killed these X2 caps?

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

RG-213 Cable with electric strained wire as metallic shield of Coaxial cable

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Famous Pre Reformation Christian Pastors (Non Catholic and Non Orthodox)

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Is it possible to create light that imparts a greater proportion of its energy as momentum rather than heat?

Today is the Center

What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going on to Canada

What exploit are these user agents trying to use?

How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering

Infinite Abelian subgroup of infinite non Abelian group example

How to say in German "enjoying home comforts"

Arrow those variables!

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

If a Gelatinous Cube takes up the entire space of a Pit Trap, what happens when a creature falls into the trap but succeeds on the saving throw?

Is it possible to download Internet Explorer on my Mac running OS X El Capitan?

Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?

intersection of two sorted vectors in C++

How to model explosives?



Collect SQL Server Query Execution time in seconds


Unbelievably slow and unusable Query StoreSharing certificates encryped by password between DBs and instancesCollect CPU, reads and writes when replaying SQL Profiler TraceMonitoring sql serverSQL Server is caching query plans with the same query when using parameterized SQLHow to resolve RESOURCE_SEMAPHORE and RESOURCE_SEMAPHORE_QUERY_COMPILE wait typesExcessive CPU use in vendor SQL Server DBSQL Server Job is running slow after a few daysIntermittent “Login timeout expired” after migrating to VmWare SQL ServerElapsed time in SSMS is consistently higher than SQL Server Execution Time - connection issue?Columnstore index query performance based on number of columns in SELECT statement






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















I'm trying to find a way of collecting SQL server query response times over say for the last two days. Is there a way to achieve this? I know there are the query stats DMV's but I dont seem to be achieving what I required. I dont have access to query store therefore unable to use that at the moment either.



I'm looking for query response time from SQL server as I have people blaming the sql server but I can't see no memory pressure / cpu pressure or any bottlenecks. Therefore now trying to get the response times for queries ran against the server.



Thanks










share|improve this question




























    4















    I'm trying to find a way of collecting SQL server query response times over say for the last two days. Is there a way to achieve this? I know there are the query stats DMV's but I dont seem to be achieving what I required. I dont have access to query store therefore unable to use that at the moment either.



    I'm looking for query response time from SQL server as I have people blaming the sql server but I can't see no memory pressure / cpu pressure or any bottlenecks. Therefore now trying to get the response times for queries ran against the server.



    Thanks










    share|improve this question
























      4












      4








      4


      0






      I'm trying to find a way of collecting SQL server query response times over say for the last two days. Is there a way to achieve this? I know there are the query stats DMV's but I dont seem to be achieving what I required. I dont have access to query store therefore unable to use that at the moment either.



      I'm looking for query response time from SQL server as I have people blaming the sql server but I can't see no memory pressure / cpu pressure or any bottlenecks. Therefore now trying to get the response times for queries ran against the server.



      Thanks










      share|improve this question














      I'm trying to find a way of collecting SQL server query response times over say for the last two days. Is there a way to achieve this? I know there are the query stats DMV's but I dont seem to be achieving what I required. I dont have access to query store therefore unable to use that at the moment either.



      I'm looking for query response time from SQL server as I have people blaming the sql server but I can't see no memory pressure / cpu pressure or any bottlenecks. Therefore now trying to get the response times for queries ran against the server.



      Thanks







      sql-server sql-server-2016






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 21 at 11:39









      user153917user153917

      212




      212




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          There are indeed multiple methods.



          Query Store



          Since you have SQL Server 2016, may I recommend Query Store? You can enable it per database from the "properties" menu in SSMS, or by running something similar to the following script:



          USE [master]
          GO
          ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE = ON
          GO
          ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE (OPERATION_MODE = READ_WRITE, QUERY_CAPTURE_MODE = AUTO)
          GO


          Once it is turned on, you can look at query performance details.



          SSMS view:



          Gotchas: Fair warning - turning on Query Store will clear the plan cache! Query Store, as a newer feature, can have some quirks. I've run across several myself. As far as performance, I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead.



          DMVs



          Another option is to use the dmvs. The one you are looking for in this case is sys.dm_exec_query_stats, specifically the "elapsed_time" columns. Here's a query to look at recent long-duration queries.



          SELECT TOP 50
          st.text,
          SUBSTRING(st.text, (qs.statement_start_offset/2) + 1,
          ((CASE statement_end_offset
          WHEN -1 THEN DATALENGTH(st.text)
          ELSE qs.statement_end_offset
          END - qs.statement_start_offset)/2) + 1
          ) AS statement_text,
          qp.query_plan,
          qs.execution_count,
          qs.last_execution_time,
          qs.last_worker_time/1000000.0 AS last_worker_time_s, --this is CPU time
          qs.last_elapsed_time/1000000.0 AS last_elapsed_time_s --this is clock time
          FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats qs
          CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(qs.sql_handle) st
          CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_query_plan(qs.plan_handle) qp
          WHERE last_execution_time > DATEADD(minute,-5,GETDATE()) --last 5 minutes
          ORDER BY qs.last_elapsed_time DESC


          Gotchas to be mindful of with this dmv are that it doesn't capture RECOMPILE queries, and it doesn't capture canceled queries (which is what happens with a query timeout from the application).



          SSMS



          Finally, if you know the exact query, you can run it in SSMS and look at the actual execution plan. Highlight the select, and look at the properties window on the right. You'll see extremely helpful information about CPU and duration (in milliseconds). Similar information exists for the operators as well.



          Actual Plan



          Gotchas with this method include the fact that queries submitted through SSMS do not necessarily reflect what happens with application queries. Canonical link here.



          In short, I highly recommend Query Store.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Yes that is an option but is this likely to introduce other load problems? As its a heavy database with an average of 3k batches.

            – user153917
            Mar 21 at 12:11











          • @user153917 take a look at this blogpost that goes in depth on the possible performance side effects of enabling the query store.Also note Forrest's comment on batches: "I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead". Changing settings in the query store might also flush the plan cache. Look at this link for more on that. Flushing the plan cache will temporarily increase your cpu usage as well.

            – Randi Vertongen
            Mar 21 at 12:42












          • Many thanks guys for your swift responses. I shall check this out further based on feedback

            – user153917
            Mar 21 at 22:07


















          1














          In addition to great tips above I might suggest to check on light weight extended events.



          You can check some of the light events and actions as described here



          Depending upon the storage available and no of events being captured you can get the required data with some minimal performance impact.



          At the end you need to test and find what's best and within performance range for your server






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "182"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232707%2fcollect-sql-server-query-execution-time-in-seconds%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6














            There are indeed multiple methods.



            Query Store



            Since you have SQL Server 2016, may I recommend Query Store? You can enable it per database from the "properties" menu in SSMS, or by running something similar to the following script:



            USE [master]
            GO
            ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE = ON
            GO
            ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE (OPERATION_MODE = READ_WRITE, QUERY_CAPTURE_MODE = AUTO)
            GO


            Once it is turned on, you can look at query performance details.



            SSMS view:



            Gotchas: Fair warning - turning on Query Store will clear the plan cache! Query Store, as a newer feature, can have some quirks. I've run across several myself. As far as performance, I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead.



            DMVs



            Another option is to use the dmvs. The one you are looking for in this case is sys.dm_exec_query_stats, specifically the "elapsed_time" columns. Here's a query to look at recent long-duration queries.



            SELECT TOP 50
            st.text,
            SUBSTRING(st.text, (qs.statement_start_offset/2) + 1,
            ((CASE statement_end_offset
            WHEN -1 THEN DATALENGTH(st.text)
            ELSE qs.statement_end_offset
            END - qs.statement_start_offset)/2) + 1
            ) AS statement_text,
            qp.query_plan,
            qs.execution_count,
            qs.last_execution_time,
            qs.last_worker_time/1000000.0 AS last_worker_time_s, --this is CPU time
            qs.last_elapsed_time/1000000.0 AS last_elapsed_time_s --this is clock time
            FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats qs
            CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(qs.sql_handle) st
            CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_query_plan(qs.plan_handle) qp
            WHERE last_execution_time > DATEADD(minute,-5,GETDATE()) --last 5 minutes
            ORDER BY qs.last_elapsed_time DESC


            Gotchas to be mindful of with this dmv are that it doesn't capture RECOMPILE queries, and it doesn't capture canceled queries (which is what happens with a query timeout from the application).



            SSMS



            Finally, if you know the exact query, you can run it in SSMS and look at the actual execution plan. Highlight the select, and look at the properties window on the right. You'll see extremely helpful information about CPU and duration (in milliseconds). Similar information exists for the operators as well.



            Actual Plan



            Gotchas with this method include the fact that queries submitted through SSMS do not necessarily reflect what happens with application queries. Canonical link here.



            In short, I highly recommend Query Store.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Yes that is an option but is this likely to introduce other load problems? As its a heavy database with an average of 3k batches.

              – user153917
              Mar 21 at 12:11











            • @user153917 take a look at this blogpost that goes in depth on the possible performance side effects of enabling the query store.Also note Forrest's comment on batches: "I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead". Changing settings in the query store might also flush the plan cache. Look at this link for more on that. Flushing the plan cache will temporarily increase your cpu usage as well.

              – Randi Vertongen
              Mar 21 at 12:42












            • Many thanks guys for your swift responses. I shall check this out further based on feedback

              – user153917
              Mar 21 at 22:07















            6














            There are indeed multiple methods.



            Query Store



            Since you have SQL Server 2016, may I recommend Query Store? You can enable it per database from the "properties" menu in SSMS, or by running something similar to the following script:



            USE [master]
            GO
            ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE = ON
            GO
            ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE (OPERATION_MODE = READ_WRITE, QUERY_CAPTURE_MODE = AUTO)
            GO


            Once it is turned on, you can look at query performance details.



            SSMS view:



            Gotchas: Fair warning - turning on Query Store will clear the plan cache! Query Store, as a newer feature, can have some quirks. I've run across several myself. As far as performance, I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead.



            DMVs



            Another option is to use the dmvs. The one you are looking for in this case is sys.dm_exec_query_stats, specifically the "elapsed_time" columns. Here's a query to look at recent long-duration queries.



            SELECT TOP 50
            st.text,
            SUBSTRING(st.text, (qs.statement_start_offset/2) + 1,
            ((CASE statement_end_offset
            WHEN -1 THEN DATALENGTH(st.text)
            ELSE qs.statement_end_offset
            END - qs.statement_start_offset)/2) + 1
            ) AS statement_text,
            qp.query_plan,
            qs.execution_count,
            qs.last_execution_time,
            qs.last_worker_time/1000000.0 AS last_worker_time_s, --this is CPU time
            qs.last_elapsed_time/1000000.0 AS last_elapsed_time_s --this is clock time
            FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats qs
            CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(qs.sql_handle) st
            CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_query_plan(qs.plan_handle) qp
            WHERE last_execution_time > DATEADD(minute,-5,GETDATE()) --last 5 minutes
            ORDER BY qs.last_elapsed_time DESC


            Gotchas to be mindful of with this dmv are that it doesn't capture RECOMPILE queries, and it doesn't capture canceled queries (which is what happens with a query timeout from the application).



            SSMS



            Finally, if you know the exact query, you can run it in SSMS and look at the actual execution plan. Highlight the select, and look at the properties window on the right. You'll see extremely helpful information about CPU and duration (in milliseconds). Similar information exists for the operators as well.



            Actual Plan



            Gotchas with this method include the fact that queries submitted through SSMS do not necessarily reflect what happens with application queries. Canonical link here.



            In short, I highly recommend Query Store.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Yes that is an option but is this likely to introduce other load problems? As its a heavy database with an average of 3k batches.

              – user153917
              Mar 21 at 12:11











            • @user153917 take a look at this blogpost that goes in depth on the possible performance side effects of enabling the query store.Also note Forrest's comment on batches: "I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead". Changing settings in the query store might also flush the plan cache. Look at this link for more on that. Flushing the plan cache will temporarily increase your cpu usage as well.

              – Randi Vertongen
              Mar 21 at 12:42












            • Many thanks guys for your swift responses. I shall check this out further based on feedback

              – user153917
              Mar 21 at 22:07













            6












            6








            6







            There are indeed multiple methods.



            Query Store



            Since you have SQL Server 2016, may I recommend Query Store? You can enable it per database from the "properties" menu in SSMS, or by running something similar to the following script:



            USE [master]
            GO
            ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE = ON
            GO
            ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE (OPERATION_MODE = READ_WRITE, QUERY_CAPTURE_MODE = AUTO)
            GO


            Once it is turned on, you can look at query performance details.



            SSMS view:



            Gotchas: Fair warning - turning on Query Store will clear the plan cache! Query Store, as a newer feature, can have some quirks. I've run across several myself. As far as performance, I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead.



            DMVs



            Another option is to use the dmvs. The one you are looking for in this case is sys.dm_exec_query_stats, specifically the "elapsed_time" columns. Here's a query to look at recent long-duration queries.



            SELECT TOP 50
            st.text,
            SUBSTRING(st.text, (qs.statement_start_offset/2) + 1,
            ((CASE statement_end_offset
            WHEN -1 THEN DATALENGTH(st.text)
            ELSE qs.statement_end_offset
            END - qs.statement_start_offset)/2) + 1
            ) AS statement_text,
            qp.query_plan,
            qs.execution_count,
            qs.last_execution_time,
            qs.last_worker_time/1000000.0 AS last_worker_time_s, --this is CPU time
            qs.last_elapsed_time/1000000.0 AS last_elapsed_time_s --this is clock time
            FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats qs
            CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(qs.sql_handle) st
            CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_query_plan(qs.plan_handle) qp
            WHERE last_execution_time > DATEADD(minute,-5,GETDATE()) --last 5 minutes
            ORDER BY qs.last_elapsed_time DESC


            Gotchas to be mindful of with this dmv are that it doesn't capture RECOMPILE queries, and it doesn't capture canceled queries (which is what happens with a query timeout from the application).



            SSMS



            Finally, if you know the exact query, you can run it in SSMS and look at the actual execution plan. Highlight the select, and look at the properties window on the right. You'll see extremely helpful information about CPU and duration (in milliseconds). Similar information exists for the operators as well.



            Actual Plan



            Gotchas with this method include the fact that queries submitted through SSMS do not necessarily reflect what happens with application queries. Canonical link here.



            In short, I highly recommend Query Store.






            share|improve this answer















            There are indeed multiple methods.



            Query Store



            Since you have SQL Server 2016, may I recommend Query Store? You can enable it per database from the "properties" menu in SSMS, or by running something similar to the following script:



            USE [master]
            GO
            ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE = ON
            GO
            ALTER DATABASE [TestDB] SET QUERY_STORE (OPERATION_MODE = READ_WRITE, QUERY_CAPTURE_MODE = AUTO)
            GO


            Once it is turned on, you can look at query performance details.



            SSMS view:



            Gotchas: Fair warning - turning on Query Store will clear the plan cache! Query Store, as a newer feature, can have some quirks. I've run across several myself. As far as performance, I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead.



            DMVs



            Another option is to use the dmvs. The one you are looking for in this case is sys.dm_exec_query_stats, specifically the "elapsed_time" columns. Here's a query to look at recent long-duration queries.



            SELECT TOP 50
            st.text,
            SUBSTRING(st.text, (qs.statement_start_offset/2) + 1,
            ((CASE statement_end_offset
            WHEN -1 THEN DATALENGTH(st.text)
            ELSE qs.statement_end_offset
            END - qs.statement_start_offset)/2) + 1
            ) AS statement_text,
            qp.query_plan,
            qs.execution_count,
            qs.last_execution_time,
            qs.last_worker_time/1000000.0 AS last_worker_time_s, --this is CPU time
            qs.last_elapsed_time/1000000.0 AS last_elapsed_time_s --this is clock time
            FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats qs
            CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(qs.sql_handle) st
            CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_query_plan(qs.plan_handle) qp
            WHERE last_execution_time > DATEADD(minute,-5,GETDATE()) --last 5 minutes
            ORDER BY qs.last_elapsed_time DESC


            Gotchas to be mindful of with this dmv are that it doesn't capture RECOMPILE queries, and it doesn't capture canceled queries (which is what happens with a query timeout from the application).



            SSMS



            Finally, if you know the exact query, you can run it in SSMS and look at the actual execution plan. Highlight the select, and look at the properties window on the right. You'll see extremely helpful information about CPU and duration (in milliseconds). Similar information exists for the operators as well.



            Actual Plan



            Gotchas with this method include the fact that queries submitted through SSMS do not necessarily reflect what happens with application queries. Canonical link here.



            In short, I highly recommend Query Store.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 21 at 14:31

























            answered Mar 21 at 11:56









            ForrestForrest

            2,4861820




            2,4861820












            • Yes that is an option but is this likely to introduce other load problems? As its a heavy database with an average of 3k batches.

              – user153917
              Mar 21 at 12:11











            • @user153917 take a look at this blogpost that goes in depth on the possible performance side effects of enabling the query store.Also note Forrest's comment on batches: "I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead". Changing settings in the query store might also flush the plan cache. Look at this link for more on that. Flushing the plan cache will temporarily increase your cpu usage as well.

              – Randi Vertongen
              Mar 21 at 12:42












            • Many thanks guys for your swift responses. I shall check this out further based on feedback

              – user153917
              Mar 21 at 22:07

















            • Yes that is an option but is this likely to introduce other load problems? As its a heavy database with an average of 3k batches.

              – user153917
              Mar 21 at 12:11











            • @user153917 take a look at this blogpost that goes in depth on the possible performance side effects of enabling the query store.Also note Forrest's comment on batches: "I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead". Changing settings in the query store might also flush the plan cache. Look at this link for more on that. Flushing the plan cache will temporarily increase your cpu usage as well.

              – Randi Vertongen
              Mar 21 at 12:42












            • Many thanks guys for your swift responses. I shall check this out further based on feedback

              – user153917
              Mar 21 at 22:07
















            Yes that is an option but is this likely to introduce other load problems? As its a heavy database with an average of 3k batches.

            – user153917
            Mar 21 at 12:11





            Yes that is an option but is this likely to introduce other load problems? As its a heavy database with an average of 3k batches.

            – user153917
            Mar 21 at 12:11













            @user153917 take a look at this blogpost that goes in depth on the possible performance side effects of enabling the query store.Also note Forrest's comment on batches: "I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead". Changing settings in the query store might also flush the plan cache. Look at this link for more on that. Flushing the plan cache will temporarily increase your cpu usage as well.

            – Randi Vertongen
            Mar 21 at 12:42






            @user153917 take a look at this blogpost that goes in depth on the possible performance side effects of enabling the query store.Also note Forrest's comment on batches: "I see it used in environments with 20k batches/sec and only a couple of percent CPU overhead". Changing settings in the query store might also flush the plan cache. Look at this link for more on that. Flushing the plan cache will temporarily increase your cpu usage as well.

            – Randi Vertongen
            Mar 21 at 12:42














            Many thanks guys for your swift responses. I shall check this out further based on feedback

            – user153917
            Mar 21 at 22:07





            Many thanks guys for your swift responses. I shall check this out further based on feedback

            – user153917
            Mar 21 at 22:07













            1














            In addition to great tips above I might suggest to check on light weight extended events.



            You can check some of the light events and actions as described here



            Depending upon the storage available and no of events being captured you can get the required data with some minimal performance impact.



            At the end you need to test and find what's best and within performance range for your server






            share|improve this answer



























              1














              In addition to great tips above I might suggest to check on light weight extended events.



              You can check some of the light events and actions as described here



              Depending upon the storage available and no of events being captured you can get the required data with some minimal performance impact.



              At the end you need to test and find what's best and within performance range for your server






              share|improve this answer

























                1












                1








                1







                In addition to great tips above I might suggest to check on light weight extended events.



                You can check some of the light events and actions as described here



                Depending upon the storage available and no of events being captured you can get the required data with some minimal performance impact.



                At the end you need to test and find what's best and within performance range for your server






                share|improve this answer













                In addition to great tips above I might suggest to check on light weight extended events.



                You can check some of the light events and actions as described here



                Depending upon the storage available and no of events being captured you can get the required data with some minimal performance impact.



                At the end you need to test and find what's best and within performance range for your server







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 21 at 23:53









                KASQLDBAKASQLDBA

                5,61762045




                5,61762045



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232707%2fcollect-sql-server-query-execution-time-in-seconds%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer