Binomial Distribution of Random VariableBinomial Random Variable and Bernoulli trials problemNormal approximation of a binomial distributionBinomial Distribution ProbablityNormal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distributionBinomial Distribution Probability questionSingle-event vs multiple-event probability?Simple binomial distribution problem: why is my approach not working?Two Questions About the Binomial DistributionBinomial Distribution where n = X?“Finding the Number of Mutual Friends” (Binomial vs. Hypergeometric distributions)

Combinations of multiple lists

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

How to show the equivalence between the regularized regression and their constraint formulas using KKT

How to draw the figure with four pentagons?

Is "remove commented out code" correct English?

Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

What is going on with Captain Marvel's blood colour?

Where does SFDX store details about scratch orgs?

Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?

Assassin's bullet with mercury

Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Western buddy movie with a supernatural twist where a woman turns into an eagle at the end

intersection of two sorted vectors in C++

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?

Does a druid starting with a bow start with no arrows?

Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?

Why does Arabsat 6A need a Falcon Heavy to launch

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

Etiquette around loan refinance - decision is going to cost first broker a lot of money



Binomial Distribution of Random Variable


Binomial Random Variable and Bernoulli trials problemNormal approximation of a binomial distributionBinomial Distribution ProbablityNormal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distributionBinomial Distribution Probability questionSingle-event vs multiple-event probability?Simple binomial distribution problem: why is my approach not working?Two Questions About the Binomial DistributionBinomial Distribution where n = X?“Finding the Number of Mutual Friends” (Binomial vs. Hypergeometric distributions)













0












$begingroup$


The mean of defective blades supplied in packets of $10$ is $1$. in how many packets of this make out of $1000$ packages would you expect to find at least $4$ non defective blades.



Answer given in my book is $13$ whereas me and my friends are getting $999$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    Mar 21 at 13:10










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:11











  • $begingroup$
    I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
    $endgroup$
    – WaveX
    Mar 21 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:56










  • $begingroup$
    $13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be (1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    Mar 21 at 20:11
















0












$begingroup$


The mean of defective blades supplied in packets of $10$ is $1$. in how many packets of this make out of $1000$ packages would you expect to find at least $4$ non defective blades.



Answer given in my book is $13$ whereas me and my friends are getting $999$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    Mar 21 at 13:10










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:11











  • $begingroup$
    I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
    $endgroup$
    – WaveX
    Mar 21 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:56










  • $begingroup$
    $13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be (1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    Mar 21 at 20:11














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The mean of defective blades supplied in packets of $10$ is $1$. in how many packets of this make out of $1000$ packages would you expect to find at least $4$ non defective blades.



Answer given in my book is $13$ whereas me and my friends are getting $999$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The mean of defective blades supplied in packets of $10$ is $1$. in how many packets of this make out of $1000$ packages would you expect to find at least $4$ non defective blades.



Answer given in my book is $13$ whereas me and my friends are getting $999$







binomial-distribution






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 20:12









Henry

101k482170




101k482170










asked Mar 21 at 13:09









Tanay JoshiTanay Joshi

13




13











  • $begingroup$
    Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    Mar 21 at 13:10










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:11











  • $begingroup$
    I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
    $endgroup$
    – WaveX
    Mar 21 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:56










  • $begingroup$
    $13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be (1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    Mar 21 at 20:11

















  • $begingroup$
    Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    Mar 21 at 13:10










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:11











  • $begingroup$
    I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
    $endgroup$
    – WaveX
    Mar 21 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:56










  • $begingroup$
    $13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be (1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
    $endgroup$
    – Henry
    Mar 21 at 20:11
















$begingroup$
Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 13:10




$begingroup$
Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 13:10












$begingroup$
Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:11





$begingroup$
Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:11













$begingroup$
I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:51




$begingroup$
I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:51












$begingroup$
Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:56




$begingroup$
Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:56












$begingroup$
$13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be (1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 20:11





$begingroup$
$13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be (1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 20:11











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

To get you started:



The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.



What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?



Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.



Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:22











  • $begingroup$
    May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
    $endgroup$
    – WaveX
    Mar 21 at 13:23










  • $begingroup$
    I posted my approach
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:39


















0












$begingroup$

p = 0.1
q = 0.9
n = 10
N = 1000
(x is no. of defective items)



P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)



P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)



0 non defective = 10 defective
1 non defective = 9 defective and so on



1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
= 0.999



N*0.999 = 999






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156808%2fbinomial-distribution-of-random-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    To get you started:



    The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.



    What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?



    Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.



    Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
      $endgroup$
      – Tanay Joshi
      Mar 21 at 13:22











    • $begingroup$
      May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
      $endgroup$
      – WaveX
      Mar 21 at 13:23










    • $begingroup$
      I posted my approach
      $endgroup$
      – Tanay Joshi
      Mar 21 at 13:39















    0












    $begingroup$

    To get you started:



    The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.



    What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?



    Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.



    Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
      $endgroup$
      – Tanay Joshi
      Mar 21 at 13:22











    • $begingroup$
      May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
      $endgroup$
      – WaveX
      Mar 21 at 13:23










    • $begingroup$
      I posted my approach
      $endgroup$
      – Tanay Joshi
      Mar 21 at 13:39













    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    To get you started:



    The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.



    What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?



    Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.



    Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    To get you started:



    The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.



    What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?



    Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.



    Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Mar 21 at 13:21









    WaveXWaveX

    2,8442822




    2,8442822











    • $begingroup$
      I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
      $endgroup$
      – Tanay Joshi
      Mar 21 at 13:22











    • $begingroup$
      May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
      $endgroup$
      – WaveX
      Mar 21 at 13:23










    • $begingroup$
      I posted my approach
      $endgroup$
      – Tanay Joshi
      Mar 21 at 13:39
















    • $begingroup$
      I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
      $endgroup$
      – Tanay Joshi
      Mar 21 at 13:22











    • $begingroup$
      May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
      $endgroup$
      – WaveX
      Mar 21 at 13:23










    • $begingroup$
      I posted my approach
      $endgroup$
      – Tanay Joshi
      Mar 21 at 13:39















    $begingroup$
    I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:22





    $begingroup$
    I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:22













    $begingroup$
    May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
    $endgroup$
    – WaveX
    Mar 21 at 13:23




    $begingroup$
    May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
    $endgroup$
    – WaveX
    Mar 21 at 13:23












    $begingroup$
    I posted my approach
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:39




    $begingroup$
    I posted my approach
    $endgroup$
    – Tanay Joshi
    Mar 21 at 13:39











    0












    $begingroup$

    p = 0.1
    q = 0.9
    n = 10
    N = 1000
    (x is no. of defective items)



    P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)



    P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)



    0 non defective = 10 defective
    1 non defective = 9 defective and so on



    1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
    = 0.999



    N*0.999 = 999






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      p = 0.1
      q = 0.9
      n = 10
      N = 1000
      (x is no. of defective items)



      P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)



      P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)



      0 non defective = 10 defective
      1 non defective = 9 defective and so on



      1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
      = 0.999



      N*0.999 = 999






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        p = 0.1
        q = 0.9
        n = 10
        N = 1000
        (x is no. of defective items)



        P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)



        P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)



        0 non defective = 10 defective
        1 non defective = 9 defective and so on



        1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
        = 0.999



        N*0.999 = 999






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        p = 0.1
        q = 0.9
        n = 10
        N = 1000
        (x is no. of defective items)



        P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)



        P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)



        0 non defective = 10 defective
        1 non defective = 9 defective and so on



        1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
        = 0.999



        N*0.999 = 999







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 21 at 13:39









        Tanay JoshiTanay Joshi

        13




        13



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156808%2fbinomial-distribution-of-random-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer