Binomial Distribution of Random VariableBinomial Random Variable and Bernoulli trials problemNormal approximation of a binomial distributionBinomial Distribution ProbablityNormal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distributionBinomial Distribution Probability questionSingle-event vs multiple-event probability?Simple binomial distribution problem: why is my approach not working?Two Questions About the Binomial DistributionBinomial Distribution where n = X?“Finding the Number of Mutual Friends” (Binomial vs. Hypergeometric distributions)
Combinations of multiple lists
How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?
What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?
How to show the equivalence between the regularized regression and their constraint formulas using KKT
How to draw the figure with four pentagons?
Is "remove commented out code" correct English?
Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
What is going on with Captain Marvel's blood colour?
Where does SFDX store details about scratch orgs?
Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?
Assassin's bullet with mercury
Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets
What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?
Western buddy movie with a supernatural twist where a woman turns into an eagle at the end
intersection of two sorted vectors in C++
Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?
Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?
Does a druid starting with a bow start with no arrows?
Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?
Why does Arabsat 6A need a Falcon Heavy to launch
I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months
Etiquette around loan refinance - decision is going to cost first broker a lot of money
Binomial Distribution of Random Variable
Binomial Random Variable and Bernoulli trials problemNormal approximation of a binomial distributionBinomial Distribution ProbablityNormal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distributionBinomial Distribution Probability questionSingle-event vs multiple-event probability?Simple binomial distribution problem: why is my approach not working?Two Questions About the Binomial DistributionBinomial Distribution where n = X?“Finding the Number of Mutual Friends” (Binomial vs. Hypergeometric distributions)
$begingroup$
The mean of defective blades supplied in packets of $10$ is $1$. in how many packets of this make out of $1000$ packages would you expect to find at least $4$ non defective blades.
Answer given in my book is $13$ whereas me and my friends are getting $999$
binomial-distribution
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The mean of defective blades supplied in packets of $10$ is $1$. in how many packets of this make out of $1000$ packages would you expect to find at least $4$ non defective blades.
Answer given in my book is $13$ whereas me and my friends are getting $999$
binomial-distribution
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 13:10
$begingroup$
Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:11
$begingroup$
I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:56
$begingroup$
$13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be(1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 20:11
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The mean of defective blades supplied in packets of $10$ is $1$. in how many packets of this make out of $1000$ packages would you expect to find at least $4$ non defective blades.
Answer given in my book is $13$ whereas me and my friends are getting $999$
binomial-distribution
$endgroup$
The mean of defective blades supplied in packets of $10$ is $1$. in how many packets of this make out of $1000$ packages would you expect to find at least $4$ non defective blades.
Answer given in my book is $13$ whereas me and my friends are getting $999$
binomial-distribution
binomial-distribution
edited Mar 21 at 20:12
Henry
101k482170
101k482170
asked Mar 21 at 13:09
Tanay JoshiTanay Joshi
13
13
$begingroup$
Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 13:10
$begingroup$
Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:11
$begingroup$
I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:56
$begingroup$
$13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be(1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 20:11
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 13:10
$begingroup$
Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:11
$begingroup$
I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:56
$begingroup$
$13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be(1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 20:11
$begingroup$
Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 13:10
$begingroup$
Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 13:10
$begingroup$
Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:11
$begingroup$
Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:11
$begingroup$
I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:51
$begingroup$
I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:56
$begingroup$
Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:56
$begingroup$
$13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be
(1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 20:11
$begingroup$
$13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be
(1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 20:11
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To get you started:
The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.
What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?
Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.
Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:23
$begingroup$
I posted my approach
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
p = 0.1
q = 0.9
n = 10
N = 1000
(x is no. of defective items)
P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)
P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)
0 non defective = 10 defective
1 non defective = 9 defective and so on
1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
= 0.999
N*0.999 = 999
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156808%2fbinomial-distribution-of-random-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To get you started:
The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.
What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?
Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.
Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:23
$begingroup$
I posted my approach
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To get you started:
The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.
What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?
Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.
Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:23
$begingroup$
I posted my approach
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To get you started:
The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.
What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?
Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.
Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.
$endgroup$
To get you started:
The mean number of defective blades in a pack of $10$ is $1$, meaning the probability that a given blade in a pack is defective is $0.1$.
What is the probability that in $10$ blades, at least $4$ of them are defective?
Hint: Think Binomial Distribution and Complement Rule.
Then use this answer, which will be the probability that a given pack will have at least $4$ defective blades, and multiply by $1000$ to find the expected number of packs that have at least $4$ defective blades.
answered Mar 21 at 13:21
WaveXWaveX
2,8442822
2,8442822
$begingroup$
I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:23
$begingroup$
I posted my approach
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:23
$begingroup$
I posted my approach
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:39
$begingroup$
I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
I solved in the same way . I need final answer to compare
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:22
$begingroup$
May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:23
$begingroup$
May you share your work by editing your question body? Ultimately I am getting the answer of your book (after rounding)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:23
$begingroup$
I posted my approach
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:39
$begingroup$
I posted my approach
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
p = 0.1
q = 0.9
n = 10
N = 1000
(x is no. of defective items)
P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)
P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)
0 non defective = 10 defective
1 non defective = 9 defective and so on
1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
= 0.999
N*0.999 = 999
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
p = 0.1
q = 0.9
n = 10
N = 1000
(x is no. of defective items)
P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)
P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)
0 non defective = 10 defective
1 non defective = 9 defective and so on
1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
= 0.999
N*0.999 = 999
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
p = 0.1
q = 0.9
n = 10
N = 1000
(x is no. of defective items)
P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)
P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)
0 non defective = 10 defective
1 non defective = 9 defective and so on
1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
= 0.999
N*0.999 = 999
$endgroup$
p = 0.1
q = 0.9
n = 10
N = 1000
(x is no. of defective items)
P(X=x) + 10Cx * (0.1)^x * (0.9)^(10-x)
P(X>=4) = 1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items)
0 non defective = 10 defective
1 non defective = 9 defective and so on
1 - P(X=0,1,2,3 non defective items) = 1 - (10C10 * (0.1)^10 * (0.9)^0 + 10C9 * (0.1)^9 * (0.9)^1 + 10C8 * (0.1)^8 * (0.9)^2 + 10C7 * (0.1)^7 * (0.9)^3)
= 0.999
N*0.999 = 999
answered Mar 21 at 13:39
Tanay JoshiTanay Joshi
13
13
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156808%2fbinomial-distribution-of-random-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Have you tried using the binomial distribution mentioned in the title to your question?
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 13:10
$begingroup$
Yes. Answer given in my book is 13 whereas me and my friends are getting 999
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:11
$begingroup$
I would double check that you have the problem written down correctly. If the question asks for the number that have at least $4$ non defectives, then your answer would be right. But if it's asking for at least $4$ defectives, then the book's answer is right.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Mar 21 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Its asking for 4 non defectives. So is 999 correct in this case
$endgroup$
– Tanay Joshi
Mar 21 at 13:56
$begingroup$
$13$ or more precisely $12.7951984$ is the expected number of packages with at least $4$ defective blades - in R this would be
(1-pbinom(3,10,0.1))*1000
$endgroup$
– Henry
Mar 21 at 20:11