Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit?A bridge hand void in one suitA bridge hand void in one suitProbability of Bridge hand having at most two suitsProbability of drawing at least one card from each suitProbability that a random 13-card hand contains at least 3 cards of every suit?Probability that hand contains Ace and King of at least one suit?How many bridge hands have exactly two 5-cards suits and a void so that the remaining suit has a run of 3 cards?Is there an alternative intuition for solving the probability of having one ace card in every bridge player's hand?The probability of a hand being void in zero suitsPropability of drawing at least 5 cards of the same suit?Probability that at least one suit is missing in a player's hand

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

How to take photos in burst mode, without vibration?

Infinite Abelian subgroup of infinite non Abelian group example

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Will google still index a page if I use a $_SESSION variable?

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?

How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?

I Accidentally Deleted a Stock Terminal Theme

Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets

Assassin's bullet with mercury

Theorems that impeded progress

How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?

Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?

What is the PIE reconstruction for word-initial alpha with rough breathing?

What's the difference between 'rename' and 'mv'?

Anagram holiday

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

A reference to a well-known characterization of scattered compact spaces

What is the intuition behind short exact sequences of groups; in particular, what is the intuition behind group extensions?

When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?

Intersection of two sorted vectors in C++



Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit?


A bridge hand void in one suitA bridge hand void in one suitProbability of Bridge hand having at most two suitsProbability of drawing at least one card from each suitProbability that a random 13-card hand contains at least 3 cards of every suit?Probability that hand contains Ace and King of at least one suit?How many bridge hands have exactly two 5-cards suits and a void so that the remaining suit has a run of 3 cards?Is there an alternative intuition for solving the probability of having one ace card in every bridge player's hand?The probability of a hand being void in zero suitsPropability of drawing at least 5 cards of the same suit?Probability that at least one suit is missing in a player's hand













0












$begingroup$


Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit.



First I will select the suit I want to exclude from the $13$ cards, which is done in $4choose 1 $ $=4$ ways, then I will choose the $13$ cards from the remaining $39$ cards.



So the probability should be equal to



$4cdot$$frac39 choose 13 52choose 13 $



Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
    $endgroup$
    – So Lo
    Mar 21 at 13:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:33















0












$begingroup$


Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit.



First I will select the suit I want to exclude from the $13$ cards, which is done in $4choose 1 $ $=4$ ways, then I will choose the $13$ cards from the remaining $39$ cards.



So the probability should be equal to



$4cdot$$frac39 choose 13 52choose 13 $



Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
    $endgroup$
    – So Lo
    Mar 21 at 13:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:33













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit.



First I will select the suit I want to exclude from the $13$ cards, which is done in $4choose 1 $ $=4$ ways, then I will choose the $13$ cards from the remaining $39$ cards.



So the probability should be equal to



$4cdot$$frac39 choose 13 52choose 13 $



Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit.



First I will select the suit I want to exclude from the $13$ cards, which is done in $4choose 1 $ $=4$ ways, then I will choose the $13$ cards from the remaining $39$ cards.



So the probability should be equal to



$4cdot$$frac39 choose 13 52choose 13 $



Is this correct?







probability combinatorics combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 18:07









N. F. Taussig

45k103358




45k103358










asked Mar 21 at 13:15









So LoSo Lo

64429




64429







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
    $endgroup$
    – So Lo
    Mar 21 at 13:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:33












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
    $endgroup$
    – So Lo
    Mar 21 at 13:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Mar 21 at 13:33







1




1




$begingroup$
No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:17




$begingroup$
No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:17




1




1




$begingroup$
Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19




$begingroup$
Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19












$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19




1




1




$begingroup$
@lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
$endgroup$
– So Lo
Mar 21 at 13:26




$begingroup$
@lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
$endgroup$
– So Lo
Mar 21 at 13:26




1




1




$begingroup$
Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:33




$begingroup$
Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.



We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$



By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have



P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability



$$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.



The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156816%2fcompute-the-probability-that-a-bridge-hand-is-void-in-at-least-one-suit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.



    We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$



    By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have



    P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability



    $$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.



    The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.



      We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$



      By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have



      P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability



      $$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.



      The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.



        We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$



        By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have



        P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability



        $$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.



        The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.



        We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$



        By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have



        P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability



        $$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.



        The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 21 at 15:07









        zhoraster

        16k21853




        16k21853










        answered Mar 21 at 13:47









        Vishweshwar TyagiVishweshwar Tyagi

        441311




        441311



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156816%2fcompute-the-probability-that-a-bridge-hand-is-void-in-at-least-one-suit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee