Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit?A bridge hand void in one suitA bridge hand void in one suitProbability of Bridge hand having at most two suitsProbability of drawing at least one card from each suitProbability that a random 13-card hand contains at least 3 cards of every suit?Probability that hand contains Ace and King of at least one suit?How many bridge hands have exactly two 5-cards suits and a void so that the remaining suit has a run of 3 cards?Is there an alternative intuition for solving the probability of having one ace card in every bridge player's hand?The probability of a hand being void in zero suitsPropability of drawing at least 5 cards of the same suit?Probability that at least one suit is missing in a player's hand
Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?
How to take photos in burst mode, without vibration?
Infinite Abelian subgroup of infinite non Abelian group example
Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?
Will google still index a page if I use a $_SESSION variable?
Watching something be written to a file live with tail
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?
How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?
I Accidentally Deleted a Stock Terminal Theme
Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets
Assassin's bullet with mercury
Theorems that impeded progress
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?
What is the PIE reconstruction for word-initial alpha with rough breathing?
What's the difference between 'rename' and 'mv'?
Anagram holiday
Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?
Why can't we play rap on piano?
A reference to a well-known characterization of scattered compact spaces
What is the intuition behind short exact sequences of groups; in particular, what is the intuition behind group extensions?
When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?
Intersection of two sorted vectors in C++
Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit?
A bridge hand void in one suitA bridge hand void in one suitProbability of Bridge hand having at most two suitsProbability of drawing at least one card from each suitProbability that a random 13-card hand contains at least 3 cards of every suit?Probability that hand contains Ace and King of at least one suit?How many bridge hands have exactly two 5-cards suits and a void so that the remaining suit has a run of 3 cards?Is there an alternative intuition for solving the probability of having one ace card in every bridge player's hand?The probability of a hand being void in zero suitsPropability of drawing at least 5 cards of the same suit?Probability that at least one suit is missing in a player's hand
$begingroup$
Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit.
First I will select the suit I want to exclude from the $13$ cards, which is done in $4choose 1 $ $=4$ ways, then I will choose the $13$ cards from the remaining $39$ cards.
So the probability should be equal to
$4cdot$$frac39 choose 13 52choose 13 $
Is this correct?
probability combinatorics combinations
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit.
First I will select the suit I want to exclude from the $13$ cards, which is done in $4choose 1 $ $=4$ ways, then I will choose the $13$ cards from the remaining $39$ cards.
So the probability should be equal to
$4cdot$$frac39 choose 13 52choose 13 $
Is this correct?
probability combinatorics combinations
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:17
1
$begingroup$
Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
1
$begingroup$
@lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
$endgroup$
– So Lo
Mar 21 at 13:26
1
$begingroup$
Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:33
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit.
First I will select the suit I want to exclude from the $13$ cards, which is done in $4choose 1 $ $=4$ ways, then I will choose the $13$ cards from the remaining $39$ cards.
So the probability should be equal to
$4cdot$$frac39 choose 13 52choose 13 $
Is this correct?
probability combinatorics combinations
$endgroup$
Compute the probability that a bridge hand is void in at least one suit.
First I will select the suit I want to exclude from the $13$ cards, which is done in $4choose 1 $ $=4$ ways, then I will choose the $13$ cards from the remaining $39$ cards.
So the probability should be equal to
$4cdot$$frac39 choose 13 52choose 13 $
Is this correct?
probability combinatorics combinations
probability combinatorics combinations
edited Mar 21 at 18:07
N. F. Taussig
45k103358
45k103358
asked Mar 21 at 13:15
So LoSo Lo
64429
64429
1
$begingroup$
No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:17
1
$begingroup$
Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
1
$begingroup$
@lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
$endgroup$
– So Lo
Mar 21 at 13:26
1
$begingroup$
Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:33
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:17
1
$begingroup$
Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
1
$begingroup$
@lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
$endgroup$
– So Lo
Mar 21 at 13:26
1
$begingroup$
Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:33
1
1
$begingroup$
No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:17
$begingroup$
No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:17
1
1
$begingroup$
Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
$begingroup$
Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
1
1
$begingroup$
@lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
$endgroup$
– So Lo
Mar 21 at 13:26
$begingroup$
@lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
$endgroup$
– So Lo
Mar 21 at 13:26
1
1
$begingroup$
Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:33
$begingroup$
Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:33
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.
We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$
By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have
P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability
$$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.
The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156816%2fcompute-the-probability-that-a-bridge-hand-is-void-in-at-least-one-suit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.
We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$
By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have
P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability
$$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.
The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.
We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$
By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have
P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability
$$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.
The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.
We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$
By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have
P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability
$$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.
The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$
$endgroup$
Let $E_1, ;E_2,; E_3, ;E_4$ denote the events that your hand is void in $clubsuit$, $diamondsuit$, $spadesuit$, $heartsuit$ respectively.
We are looking for the probability P $= P(cup_i=1^4 E_i)$
By the inclusion-exclusion identity, we have
P = $p_1-p_2+p_3-p_4$ where $p_i$ denotes the probability that your hand is void in $i$ number of suits and contains $4choose i$ terms each with the probability
$$fracbinom52-13cdot i 13binom52 13$$ except for the case for $p_4$ since $p_4=0$ is evident as the hand cannot be void of all the $4$ suits.
The required probability P will then be $$4cdotfracbinom3913binom5213 - 6cdotfracbinom2613binom5213 + 4cdotfracbinom1313binom5213$$
edited Mar 21 at 15:07
zhoraster
16k21853
16k21853
answered Mar 21 at 13:47
Vishweshwar TyagiVishweshwar Tyagi
441311
441311
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156816%2fcompute-the-probability-that-a-bridge-hand-is-void-in-at-least-one-suit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
No, you are over counting. For instance, you count the hand with 13 spades three times (once as a void in hearts, again as a void in diamonds, and a third time as a void in clubs).
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:17
1
$begingroup$
Note; of course your answer ought to be a decent approximation...hands with multiple voids being quite rare.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of A bridge hand void in one suit
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:19
1
$begingroup$
@lulu I am trying to understand your reasoning, please tell me if I got it right. According to my method, you are saying that suppose at first if I take my excluded suit to be the Diamonds, then this will also contain hands that are void in Spades, which will result in over-count when I will take my excluded suit to be the Spades?
$endgroup$
– So Lo
Mar 21 at 13:26
1
$begingroup$
Exactly. Phrased (slightly) differently: look at the hand with $13$ spades. That hand is void in hearts, so you count it when you count the hands which are void in hearts. But then you also count it when you count the hands which are void in diamonds, or in clubs. If you want an exact answer you have to correct for that. As I say, your answer ought to be a very strong approximation though.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 21 at 13:33