Easier way to solve a LES (only pen/paper, no calculator)An Easier way to solve simple equations of this typeCreative way to solve a linear systemIs there any easy way to solve two equations with three unknowns?Easier way to discover the area of a right triangleIs there an easier way to solve this system of equations?Best way to solve $2$ equations in an efficient manner?Without using pen and paper, determine which of the following homogeneous systems have nontrivial solutionsEasier way to find eigenvalues of Matrices?Is there an elegant or easier way to solve this system of equations?Soft question: solution strategies, how to attack the problem when using pen and paper?
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?
Neighboring nodes in the network
Intersection of two sorted vectors in C++
Is it possible to create light that imparts a greater proportion of its energy as momentum rather than heat?
What is going on with Captain Marvel's blood colour?
Assassin's bullet with mercury
Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets
How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?
Facing a paradox: Earnshaw's theorem in one dimension
Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?
If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?
Twin primes whose sum is a cube
Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?
Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?
What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going on to Canada
Infinite Abelian subgroup of infinite non Abelian group example
AES: Why is it a good practice to use only the first 16bytes of a hash for encryption?
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope
Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?
SSH "lag" in LAN on some machines, mixed distros
Anagram holiday
How to model explosives?
Easier way to solve a LES (only pen/paper, no calculator)
An Easier way to solve simple equations of this typeCreative way to solve a linear systemIs there any easy way to solve two equations with three unknowns?Easier way to discover the area of a right triangleIs there an easier way to solve this system of equations?Best way to solve $2$ equations in an efficient manner?Without using pen and paper, determine which of the following homogeneous systems have nontrivial solutionsEasier way to find eigenvalues of Matrices?Is there an elegant or easier way to solve this system of equations?Soft question: solution strategies, how to attack the problem when using pen and paper?
$begingroup$
I want to solve the following Linear Equation System with only pen and paper;
$$
470 = x_A - frac310x_B tag1
$$
$$
940 = x_B - frac210x_A tag2
$$
I attempt to solve for $x_A$ by inserting equation (2) into (1) and rewriting it, etc. I got something like;
$$
x_A=470 +frac310(940+frac210x_A) Rightarrow dots Rightarrow x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940=470+frac282010
$$
Next I try to isolate $x_A$ and simplify the expression;
$$
dots Rightarrow x_A =frac10094(470+frac282010)=frac10094(470+282)=frac10094752
$$
This is where I get stuck. Have I dug myself into a difficult hole when there is a better/more efficient approach to solving this LES? Or am I just missing a good method to solve $x_A=frac10094cdot752$ to get it to 800?
Any insight into "how to think" here and how you solve it with just pen and paper is much appreciated.
(Solution: $x_A=800$, $x_B=1100$)
linear-algebra systems-of-equations problem-solving
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to solve the following Linear Equation System with only pen and paper;
$$
470 = x_A - frac310x_B tag1
$$
$$
940 = x_B - frac210x_A tag2
$$
I attempt to solve for $x_A$ by inserting equation (2) into (1) and rewriting it, etc. I got something like;
$$
x_A=470 +frac310(940+frac210x_A) Rightarrow dots Rightarrow x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940=470+frac282010
$$
Next I try to isolate $x_A$ and simplify the expression;
$$
dots Rightarrow x_A =frac10094(470+frac282010)=frac10094(470+282)=frac10094752
$$
This is where I get stuck. Have I dug myself into a difficult hole when there is a better/more efficient approach to solving this LES? Or am I just missing a good method to solve $x_A=frac10094cdot752$ to get it to 800?
Any insight into "how to think" here and how you solve it with just pen and paper is much appreciated.
(Solution: $x_A=800$, $x_B=1100$)
linear-algebra systems-of-equations problem-solving
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to solve the following Linear Equation System with only pen and paper;
$$
470 = x_A - frac310x_B tag1
$$
$$
940 = x_B - frac210x_A tag2
$$
I attempt to solve for $x_A$ by inserting equation (2) into (1) and rewriting it, etc. I got something like;
$$
x_A=470 +frac310(940+frac210x_A) Rightarrow dots Rightarrow x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940=470+frac282010
$$
Next I try to isolate $x_A$ and simplify the expression;
$$
dots Rightarrow x_A =frac10094(470+frac282010)=frac10094(470+282)=frac10094752
$$
This is where I get stuck. Have I dug myself into a difficult hole when there is a better/more efficient approach to solving this LES? Or am I just missing a good method to solve $x_A=frac10094cdot752$ to get it to 800?
Any insight into "how to think" here and how you solve it with just pen and paper is much appreciated.
(Solution: $x_A=800$, $x_B=1100$)
linear-algebra systems-of-equations problem-solving
$endgroup$
I want to solve the following Linear Equation System with only pen and paper;
$$
470 = x_A - frac310x_B tag1
$$
$$
940 = x_B - frac210x_A tag2
$$
I attempt to solve for $x_A$ by inserting equation (2) into (1) and rewriting it, etc. I got something like;
$$
x_A=470 +frac310(940+frac210x_A) Rightarrow dots Rightarrow x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940=470+frac282010
$$
Next I try to isolate $x_A$ and simplify the expression;
$$
dots Rightarrow x_A =frac10094(470+frac282010)=frac10094(470+282)=frac10094752
$$
This is where I get stuck. Have I dug myself into a difficult hole when there is a better/more efficient approach to solving this LES? Or am I just missing a good method to solve $x_A=frac10094cdot752$ to get it to 800?
Any insight into "how to think" here and how you solve it with just pen and paper is much appreciated.
(Solution: $x_A=800$, $x_B=1100$)
linear-algebra systems-of-equations problem-solving
linear-algebra systems-of-equations problem-solving
edited Mar 21 at 11:06
litmus
asked Mar 21 at 10:02
litmuslitmus
297318
297318
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
$$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
x_A=800.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:34
1
$begingroup$
yes, look for common factors
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:35
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:45
1
$begingroup$
the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:50
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$
$$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:25
$begingroup$
@litmus. By hand !!
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:27
$begingroup$
Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:29
$begingroup$
@litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:39
$begingroup$
But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:41
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
What are your problems ?
$ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:10
$begingroup$
$90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:13
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Yes, we have 90+4=94
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:21
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156615%2feasier-way-to-solve-a-les-only-pen-paper-no-calculator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
$$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
x_A=800.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:34
1
$begingroup$
yes, look for common factors
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:35
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:45
1
$begingroup$
the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:50
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
$$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
x_A=800.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:34
1
$begingroup$
yes, look for common factors
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:35
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:45
1
$begingroup$
the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:50
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
$$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
x_A=800.$$
$endgroup$
First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
$$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
x_A=800.$$
answered Mar 21 at 10:31
farruhotafarruhota
21.8k2842
21.8k2842
$begingroup$
Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:34
1
$begingroup$
yes, look for common factors
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:35
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:45
1
$begingroup$
the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:50
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:34
1
$begingroup$
yes, look for common factors
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:35
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:45
1
$begingroup$
the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:50
$begingroup$
Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:34
$begingroup$
Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:34
1
1
$begingroup$
yes, look for common factors
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:35
$begingroup$
yes, look for common factors
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:35
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:45
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:45
1
1
$begingroup$
the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:48
$begingroup$
the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:48
1
1
$begingroup$
you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:50
$begingroup$
you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Mar 21 at 10:50
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$
$$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:25
$begingroup$
@litmus. By hand !!
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:27
$begingroup$
Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:29
$begingroup$
@litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:39
$begingroup$
But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:41
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$
$$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:25
$begingroup$
@litmus. By hand !!
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:27
$begingroup$
Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:29
$begingroup$
@litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:39
$begingroup$
But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:41
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$
$$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$
$endgroup$
May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$
$$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$
answered Mar 21 at 10:23
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
125k1158135
$begingroup$
Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:25
$begingroup$
@litmus. By hand !!
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:27
$begingroup$
Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:29
$begingroup$
@litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:39
$begingroup$
But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:41
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:25
$begingroup$
@litmus. By hand !!
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:27
$begingroup$
Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:29
$begingroup$
@litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:39
$begingroup$
But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:41
$begingroup$
Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:25
$begingroup$
Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:25
$begingroup$
@litmus. By hand !!
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:27
$begingroup$
@litmus. By hand !!
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:27
$begingroup$
Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:29
$begingroup$
Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:29
$begingroup$
@litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:39
$begingroup$
@litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 21 at 10:39
$begingroup$
But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:41
$begingroup$
But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:41
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
What are your problems ?
$ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:10
$begingroup$
$90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:13
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Yes, we have 90+4=94
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:21
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What are your problems ?
$ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:10
$begingroup$
$90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:13
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Yes, we have 90+4=94
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:21
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What are your problems ?
$ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$
$endgroup$
What are your problems ?
$ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$
answered Mar 21 at 10:07
FredFred
48.6k11849
48.6k11849
$begingroup$
But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:10
$begingroup$
$90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:13
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Yes, we have 90+4=94
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:21
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:10
$begingroup$
$90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:13
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Yes, we have 90+4=94
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:21
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:23
$begingroup$
But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:10
$begingroup$
But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:10
$begingroup$
$90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:13
$begingroup$
$90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:13
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Yes, we have 90+4=94
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:21
$begingroup$
Yes, we have 90+4=94
$endgroup$
– Fred
Mar 21 at 10:21
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:23
$begingroup$
Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
$endgroup$
– litmus
Mar 21 at 10:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156615%2feasier-way-to-solve-a-les-only-pen-paper-no-calculator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown