Easier way to solve a LES (only pen/paper, no calculator)An Easier way to solve simple equations of this typeCreative way to solve a linear systemIs there any easy way to solve two equations with three unknowns?Easier way to discover the area of a right triangleIs there an easier way to solve this system of equations?Best way to solve $2$ equations in an efficient manner?Without using pen and paper, determine which of the following homogeneous systems have nontrivial solutionsEasier way to find eigenvalues of Matrices?Is there an elegant or easier way to solve this system of equations?Soft question: solution strategies, how to attack the problem when using pen and paper?

How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?

Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?

Neighboring nodes in the network

Intersection of two sorted vectors in C++

Is it possible to create light that imparts a greater proportion of its energy as momentum rather than heat?

What is going on with Captain Marvel's blood colour?

Assassin's bullet with mercury

Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets

How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?

Facing a paradox: Earnshaw's theorem in one dimension

Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Twin primes whose sum is a cube

Can one be a co-translator of a book, if he does not know the language that the book is translated into?

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going on to Canada

Infinite Abelian subgroup of infinite non Abelian group example

AES: Why is it a good practice to use only the first 16bytes of a hash for encryption?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

SSH "lag" in LAN on some machines, mixed distros

Anagram holiday

How to model explosives?



Easier way to solve a LES (only pen/paper, no calculator)


An Easier way to solve simple equations of this typeCreative way to solve a linear systemIs there any easy way to solve two equations with three unknowns?Easier way to discover the area of a right triangleIs there an easier way to solve this system of equations?Best way to solve $2$ equations in an efficient manner?Without using pen and paper, determine which of the following homogeneous systems have nontrivial solutionsEasier way to find eigenvalues of Matrices?Is there an elegant or easier way to solve this system of equations?Soft question: solution strategies, how to attack the problem when using pen and paper?













0












$begingroup$


I want to solve the following Linear Equation System with only pen and paper;



$$
470 = x_A - frac310x_B tag1
$$

$$
940 = x_B - frac210x_A tag2
$$



I attempt to solve for $x_A$ by inserting equation (2) into (1) and rewriting it, etc. I got something like;



$$
x_A=470 +frac310(940+frac210x_A) Rightarrow dots Rightarrow x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940=470+frac282010
$$



Next I try to isolate $x_A$ and simplify the expression;



$$
dots Rightarrow x_A =frac10094(470+frac282010)=frac10094(470+282)=frac10094752
$$



This is where I get stuck. Have I dug myself into a difficult hole when there is a better/more efficient approach to solving this LES? Or am I just missing a good method to solve $x_A=frac10094cdot752$ to get it to 800?



Any insight into "how to think" here and how you solve it with just pen and paper is much appreciated.



(Solution: $x_A=800$, $x_B=1100$)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I want to solve the following Linear Equation System with only pen and paper;



    $$
    470 = x_A - frac310x_B tag1
    $$

    $$
    940 = x_B - frac210x_A tag2
    $$



    I attempt to solve for $x_A$ by inserting equation (2) into (1) and rewriting it, etc. I got something like;



    $$
    x_A=470 +frac310(940+frac210x_A) Rightarrow dots Rightarrow x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940=470+frac282010
    $$



    Next I try to isolate $x_A$ and simplify the expression;



    $$
    dots Rightarrow x_A =frac10094(470+frac282010)=frac10094(470+282)=frac10094752
    $$



    This is where I get stuck. Have I dug myself into a difficult hole when there is a better/more efficient approach to solving this LES? Or am I just missing a good method to solve $x_A=frac10094cdot752$ to get it to 800?



    Any insight into "how to think" here and how you solve it with just pen and paper is much appreciated.



    (Solution: $x_A=800$, $x_B=1100$)










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I want to solve the following Linear Equation System with only pen and paper;



      $$
      470 = x_A - frac310x_B tag1
      $$

      $$
      940 = x_B - frac210x_A tag2
      $$



      I attempt to solve for $x_A$ by inserting equation (2) into (1) and rewriting it, etc. I got something like;



      $$
      x_A=470 +frac310(940+frac210x_A) Rightarrow dots Rightarrow x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940=470+frac282010
      $$



      Next I try to isolate $x_A$ and simplify the expression;



      $$
      dots Rightarrow x_A =frac10094(470+frac282010)=frac10094(470+282)=frac10094752
      $$



      This is where I get stuck. Have I dug myself into a difficult hole when there is a better/more efficient approach to solving this LES? Or am I just missing a good method to solve $x_A=frac10094cdot752$ to get it to 800?



      Any insight into "how to think" here and how you solve it with just pen and paper is much appreciated.



      (Solution: $x_A=800$, $x_B=1100$)










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I want to solve the following Linear Equation System with only pen and paper;



      $$
      470 = x_A - frac310x_B tag1
      $$

      $$
      940 = x_B - frac210x_A tag2
      $$



      I attempt to solve for $x_A$ by inserting equation (2) into (1) and rewriting it, etc. I got something like;



      $$
      x_A=470 +frac310(940+frac210x_A) Rightarrow dots Rightarrow x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940=470+frac282010
      $$



      Next I try to isolate $x_A$ and simplify the expression;



      $$
      dots Rightarrow x_A =frac10094(470+frac282010)=frac10094(470+282)=frac10094752
      $$



      This is where I get stuck. Have I dug myself into a difficult hole when there is a better/more efficient approach to solving this LES? Or am I just missing a good method to solve $x_A=frac10094cdot752$ to get it to 800?



      Any insight into "how to think" here and how you solve it with just pen and paper is much appreciated.



      (Solution: $x_A=800$, $x_B=1100$)







      linear-algebra systems-of-equations problem-solving






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 21 at 11:06







      litmus

















      asked Mar 21 at 10:02









      litmuslitmus

      297318




      297318




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
          $$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
          2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
          x_A=800.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:34






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            yes, look for common factors
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:35










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:45







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:48







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:50


















          1












          $begingroup$

          May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$



          $$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
          Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:25











          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. By hand !!
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:27










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:29










          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:39










          • $begingroup$
            But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:41


















          0












          $begingroup$

          What are your problems ?



          $ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:10











          • $begingroup$
            $90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:18











          • $begingroup$
            Yes, we have 90+4=94
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:21










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:23











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156615%2feasier-way-to-solve-a-les-only-pen-paper-no-calculator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
          $$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
          2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
          x_A=800.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:34






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            yes, look for common factors
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:35










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:45







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:48







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:50















          1












          $begingroup$

          First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
          $$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
          2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
          x_A=800.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:34






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            yes, look for common factors
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:35










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:45







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:48







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:50













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
          $$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
          2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
          x_A=800.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          First notice $94=47cdot 2$. You can simplify before adding/multiplying:
          $$x_Afrac94100=470+frac310940colorred=470+frac282010 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac47cdot 2100=47cdot 10+frac310cdot 47cdot 20 Rightarrow \
          x_Afrac2100=10+frac6010 Rightarrow \
          2x_A=1000+600 Rightarrow \
          x_A=800.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 21 at 10:31









          farruhotafarruhota

          21.8k2842




          21.8k2842











          • $begingroup$
            Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:34






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            yes, look for common factors
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:35










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:45







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:48







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:50
















          • $begingroup$
            Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:34






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            yes, look for common factors
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:35










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:45







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:48







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
            $endgroup$
            – farruhota
            Mar 21 at 10:50















          $begingroup$
          Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:34




          $begingroup$
          Ok, but why do we focus on factorizing 94 into 47 and 2? Is it because we have 940 and 470 on the RHS?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:34




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          yes, look for common factors
          $endgroup$
          – farruhota
          Mar 21 at 10:35




          $begingroup$
          yes, look for common factors
          $endgroup$
          – farruhota
          Mar 21 at 10:35












          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:45





          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your help. Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the red text is $470+frac310cdot470cdot2$?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:45





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
          $endgroup$
          – farruhota
          Mar 21 at 10:48





          $begingroup$
          the first line is yours and the red text implies it must be deleted, only black text is the right solution. in other words, you should not write this red text (it is an error)
          $endgroup$
          – farruhota
          Mar 21 at 10:48





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
          $endgroup$
          – farruhota
          Mar 21 at 10:50




          $begingroup$
          you are welcome. the more problems one solves, the more trained the eyes get to notice the connections between parts.
          $endgroup$
          – farruhota
          Mar 21 at 10:50











          1












          $begingroup$

          May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$



          $$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
          Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:25











          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. By hand !!
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:27










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:29










          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:39










          • $begingroup$
            But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:41















          1












          $begingroup$

          May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$



          $$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
          Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:25











          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. By hand !!
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:27










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:29










          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:39










          • $begingroup$
            But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:41













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$



          $$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
          Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          May be, it could be simpler to do $$470 = x_A - frac310x_B implies4700=10x_A-3x_Btag1$$



          $$940 = x_B - frac210x_A implies9400=10x_B-2x_Atag2$$
          Multiply $(1)$ by $10$ and $(2)$ by $3$ and add them together; this gives immediately $$75200=94 x_Aimplies x_A=frac7520094=800$$ Plug this in $(2)$ to get $x_B$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 21 at 10:23









          Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

          125k1158135




          125k1158135











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:25











          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. By hand !!
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:27










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:29










          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:39










          • $begingroup$
            But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:41
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:25











          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. By hand !!
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:27










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:29










          • $begingroup$
            @litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 21 at 10:39










          • $begingroup$
            But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:41















          $begingroup$
          Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:25





          $begingroup$
          Thanks! But with pen and paper, how do you compute 75200/94 ?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:25













          $begingroup$
          @litmus. By hand !!
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Mar 21 at 10:27




          $begingroup$
          @litmus. By hand !!
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Mar 21 at 10:27












          $begingroup$
          Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:29




          $begingroup$
          Could you please tell me the name of the method used for this so I can google it.
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:29












          $begingroup$
          @litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Mar 21 at 10:39




          $begingroup$
          @litmus. Have a look at tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/SystemsTwoVrble.aspx
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Mar 21 at 10:39












          $begingroup$
          But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:41




          $begingroup$
          But this link explains how to solve Linear Systems, I would like to know how you solve 75200/94 by hand. Please show me, this would help me so much!
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:41











          0












          $begingroup$

          What are your problems ?



          $ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:10











          • $begingroup$
            $90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:18











          • $begingroup$
            Yes, we have 90+4=94
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:21










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:23















          0












          $begingroup$

          What are your problems ?



          $ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:10











          • $begingroup$
            $90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:18











          • $begingroup$
            Yes, we have 90+4=94
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:21










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:23













          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          What are your problems ?



          $ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          What are your problems ?



          $ x_A=frac10094cdot752$ is correct, since $752:94=8.$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 21 at 10:07









          FredFred

          48.6k11849




          48.6k11849











          • $begingroup$
            But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:10











          • $begingroup$
            $90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:18











          • $begingroup$
            Yes, we have 90+4=94
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:21










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:23
















          • $begingroup$
            But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:10











          • $begingroup$
            $90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:13










          • $begingroup$
            Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:18











          • $begingroup$
            Yes, we have 90+4=94
            $endgroup$
            – Fred
            Mar 21 at 10:21










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
            $endgroup$
            – litmus
            Mar 21 at 10:23















          $begingroup$
          But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:10





          $begingroup$
          But how do you see that 752 divided by 94 is 8? I.e. how do you get to 800?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:10













          $begingroup$
          $90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
          $endgroup$
          – Fred
          Mar 21 at 10:13




          $begingroup$
          $90 times 8=720$ and $4 times 8=32.$
          $endgroup$
          – Fred
          Mar 21 at 10:13












          $begingroup$
          Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:18





          $begingroup$
          Could you please elaborate, do you use 90 and 4 because they sum to 94?
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:18













          $begingroup$
          Yes, we have 90+4=94
          $endgroup$
          – Fred
          Mar 21 at 10:21




          $begingroup$
          Yes, we have 90+4=94
          $endgroup$
          – Fred
          Mar 21 at 10:21












          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:23




          $begingroup$
          Thanks for your help! But how do you know to decompose 752 into 720 and 32? (If you don't know that $x_A=800$)
          $endgroup$
          – litmus
          Mar 21 at 10:23

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156615%2feasier-way-to-solve-a-les-only-pen-paper-no-calculator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye